SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A310: A Desktop Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 paired with the Intel Arc A310 represents an unusual desktop combination — a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 flagship-class CPU coupled with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data reveals a stark performance asymmetry: the CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 40th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing raises immediate questions about workload suitability, bottleneck dynamics, and the intended use case for such a configuration. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 builds on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. This desktop processor features 12 physical cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz that boosts to 5.40 GHz. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 12-core part, suggesting efficient power delivery while maintaining high boost frequencies.

The cache hierarchy provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool. This substantial L3 cache benefits workloads with large working sets, such as database operations or complex simulations. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, which positions this CPU for professional and reliability-sensitive environments. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes from the CPU offers high bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark results paint a picture of strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 demonstrates excellent scaling across the 12 cores, while the single-core score of 1966 indicates competitive per-thread performance. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern: 17726 multicore and 2495 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling test shows progressive improvement from 2067 with 2 threads to 10953 with max threads, suggesting efficient thread utilization without significant scaling drop-offs.

The PassMark multithread score of 48347 and floating-point math score of 97943 highlight computational strength for scientific and engineering workloads. Data encryption at 34708 and compression at 577847 further indicate robust integer-heavy performance. The average benchmark score of 49228 places this CPU at the 90th percentile overall, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 0.1% slower), Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, 0.3% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, 0.5% slower), and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, 1.1% slower). This grouping shows the Ryzen 9 7900 competing effectively with both newer and server-class parts.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark profile demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability. Cinebench R23 multicore at 24776 represents a strong result for productivity applications that scale across cores, such as video rendering or code compilation. The single-core score of 1966 ensures responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. PassMark single-thread at 4130 confirms this pattern of balanced performance.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Intel Arc A310 scores 5433 in PassMark G3D, placing it at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7557, 0.1% faster), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7580, 0.4% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472, 1% slower), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 1.4% slower). The GTX 1650 comparison is particularly telling — the Arc A310 sits within 1% of a budget gaming card from a previous generation. In compute tasks, the Arc A310 achieves 2157 in PassMark GPU Compute and 30607 in Geekbench OpenCL, while Vulkan performance reaches 28964.

The combined percentile of 65 reflects the dominant contribution of the CPU's high score pulling the overall position upward, despite the GPU's below-average placement. The average benchmark score of 7550 for the GPU versus 49228 for the CPU creates a 6.5x disparity in raw benchmark output. This asymmetry defines the system's character: exceptional processing power paired with limited graphics throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU constrains graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU excels in compute-heavy tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 40th percentile demonstrates that any 3D application will be limited by the Arc A310's throughput. In gaming scenarios, the CPU would remain underutilized while the GPU operates at full capacity, yet frame rates would still be governed by the graphics card's capabilities.

For non-graphics workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide substantial compute resources, while the GPU's 768 shading units and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the limiting factor only in GPU-accelerated tasks. The PassMark physics score of 3059 for the CPU suggests strong simulation performance, while the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 indicates minimal gaming headroom.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that resolution increases would further shift the bottleneck toward the GPU. At higher resolutions, the graphics card's 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would become increasingly saturated, while the CPU's processing headroom would remain largely untapped. Conversely, at lower resolutions, the GPU still limits performance, though the CPU's strong single-thread scores would ensure minimal frame pacing issues.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU ranking and 5433 PassMark G3D score preclude high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The CPU's 1966 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures no CPU-side limitations, but the GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM would restrict playable frame rates to modest levels at 1080p with reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The 24776 Cinebench R23 multicore score suggests simultaneous gaming and encoding is feasible from a CPU perspective, though the GPU's limited gaming performance would constrain the gaming side of the equation. The Arc A310's lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware acceleration for AI-based encoding enhancements.

Video editing: The Ryzen 9 7900's 10953 3DMark max-thread score and 97943 PassMark floating-point math indicate strong performance for video encoding and rendering. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timeline performance. The CPU could handle software encoding well, but GPU-assisted workflows would encounter bottlenecks.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would excel with the 12-core processor producing strong results in Cinebench R23 multicore at 24776. GPU rendering would be severely limited by the Arc A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB memory capacity, which constrains scene complexity and texture resolution.

Software development: The 577847 PassMark data compression score and 34708 encryption score indicate strong performance for build tools and code compilation. The 24 threads provide excellent parallel compilation capabilities, and the 64 MB L3 cache benefits incremental builds with frequent file access patterns.

Student and office work: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, while the GPU provides adequate display output through its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest for everyday workloads, though the GPU's 30 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU create a low total system power requirement.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and 40th percentile ranking suggest entry-level gaming capability. The nearest rival comparison to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% faster in average score) provides a reference point for expected performance — the GTX 1650 typically delivers 1080p gaming at medium settings in modern titles.

The Arc A310's 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would limit texture quality and resolution. The 64-bit memory bus constrains bandwidth, and the 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests modest fill-rate capabilities. The 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs provide fundamental rasterization throughput, while the 6 RT cores offer ray tracing support but with limited processing power.

At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, estimated frame rates in esports titles could range from playable to smooth, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance would prevent CPU-side frame drops. Modern AAA titles would likely see reduced frame rates, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute throughput would severely limit playability, making these resolutions impractical for gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard ecosystem. The Ryzen 9 7900 supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel interface with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory support adds professional workstation flexibility. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 CPU lanes offers future-proofing for high-bandwidth storage and expansion cards.

The most sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Intel Arc A310 with a higher-performance GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and 12-core configuration would support substantially more powerful graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck in most scenarios. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for modern GPUs, while the 65 W TDP leaves significant power headroom in the system's overall budget.

The GPU's 200 W suggested PSU requirement indicates minimal power supply demands for the current configuration. An upgraded GPU would likely require a higher-wattage PSU, but the CPU's modest TDP allows flexibility in power supply selection. The Arc A310's end-of-life production status and successor Battlemage architecture suggest that a GPU upgrade would also bring architectural improvements.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users requiring exceptional CPU compute performance with minimal graphics demands. The combined 65th percentile ranking reflects a configuration optimized for processing rather than gaming. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering tools would benefit from the 24776 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the 24 threads and 577847 compression score.

Students and professionals in engineering, scientific computing, or data analysis fields would find the CPU's floating-point math (97943) and integer math (164075) scores valuable for simulation and analysis workloads. The ECC memory support and 64 MB L3 cache suit reliability-sensitive applications. Small business workstations handling database operations or virtualization would leverage the 24 threads effectively.

Gamers targeting high-refresh experiences should look elsewhere, as the Arc A310's 40th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM would limit gaming performance. However, users seeking a low-power desktop with excellent CPU performance — such as software developers running multiple VMs or researchers processing large datasets — would find this configuration well-suited to their needs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49228.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has an average score of 7550, placing it 1% slower than the GTX 1650's average score of 7472, making them closely matched in overall GPU benchmarks.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this system support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU pairing, so gaming frame rates are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310 features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a suggested PSU rating of 200 W and a TDP of 30 W, requiring no power connectors.

Q: What is the CPU's release date and launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 was released on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $429.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 represents Intel's entry point into the discrete GPU market, built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip. Fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die, this GPU implements the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory operates across a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s bandwidth — a figure that constrains high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

The compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS and FP16 of 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU firmly in the entry-level performance tier. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, though with limited processing power compared to higher-tier Arc parts. No tensor cores are present, which affects AI-accelerated workloads.

The GPU's benchmark results confirm its positioning. PassMark G3D at 5433 and the 40th percentile ranking among all GPUs demonstrate modest 3D performance. The DirectX 12 score of 29, DirectX 11 score of 33, and DirectX 10 score of 31 indicate relatively consistent performance across API generations. DirectX 9 at 69 shows better legacy performance. The G2D score of 625 supports basic 2D workloads effectively.

The 1750 MHz base and boost clocks maintain consistent performance, while the 30 W TDP makes this an exceptionally power-efficient GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's compute capabilities. Display output includes 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern monitor configurations. The end-of-life production status and predecessor Xe Graphics relationship place this GPU within Intel's first discrete GPU generation, with Battlemage as its successor.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, a 12-core Zen 4 processor at the 90th CPU percentile, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level Alchemist GPU at the 40th GPU percentile. The combined percentile of 65 reflects the system's overall position, weighted heavily by the CPU's exceptional performance. The 6.5x difference in average benchmark scores between CPU and GPU creates a fundamentally unbalanced configuration.

As a desktop class system, this build offers substantial processing power for productivity and compute workloads while providing minimal gaming capability. The CPU's 24776 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 24 threads enable demanding professional applications, while the GPU's 5433 PassMark G3D score limits graphics-intensive tasks to entry-level expectations. The 65 W CPU TDP and 30 W GPU TDP combine for a modest total power draw, with the GPU's 200 W suggested PSU requirement indicating a low overall system power envelope.

This pairing suits users whose primary needs center on CPU-bound workloads — software development, scientific computing, office productivity — with occasional light graphics use. The upgrade path is clear: retaining the powerful CPU while replacing the GPU would transform this system into a balanced gaming or workstation configuration. As configured, it represents a compute-first desktop where the processor dominates the system's character.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds