SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a high-end desktop pairing that sits at the 89th percentile overall among all builds. The CPU holds the 90th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 88th percentile against all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component rather than from direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 21 chip fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 26,800 million transistors across a 520 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. These memory specifications place the card in a strong position for high-resolution textures and large datasets, as the 16 GB frame buffer is substantial for modern workloads.

Clock speeds are a defining characteristic of this card. The base clock is 1860 MHz, the game clock is 2100 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2310 MHz. The shading units number 5120, with 320 texture mapping units and 128 raster output units. Pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 23.65 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 47.31 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. This raw compute throughput is what drives the PassMark G3D score of 28070 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235.

The card includes 80 ray tracing cores, which is the dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects. There are no tensor cores listed in the specifications, meaning the card relies on standard compute units for any AI or machine learning acceleration rather than dedicated tensor hardware. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support and Vulkan 1.4 support indicate modern rendering pipeline compatibility. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 114, DirectX 11 score of 300, and DirectX 9 score of 303 show varying performance across API generations — the card handles legacy APIs reasonably well, but the modern DX12 workload is where the architecture is designed to excel.

The GPU's power delivery is substantial, with a TDP of 335 W and a suggested power supply of 700 W. The card uses two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient bandwidth for the card's data transfer needs.

For rendering workloads, the benchmark scores suggest strong performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998 and Vulkan score of 165212 indicate that compute-heavy rendering tasks will run efficiently. The FP32 throughput of 23.65 TFLOPS is the key figure for traditional rasterization rendering, while the FP16 throughput of 47.31 TFLOPS could accelerate certain mixed-precision workloads. The ray tracing hardware, while present with 80 cores, is not the primary strength of this architecture compared to the raw rasterization power.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct gameplay testing. The reader should treat any FPS value in this section as an approximation based on synthetic benchmarks.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. For gaming, this suggests the card is capable of handling modern titles at high settings. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for 1440p and 4K textures, as the memory capacity reduces the likelihood of texture swapping or stuttering in memory-constrained scenarios. The 128 ROPs and 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate support high fill-rate demands at higher resolutions.

The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1966, suggests that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample processing power for game logic and physics calculations. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10056 indicates strong multi-threaded scaling, which modern games increasingly utilize.

Estimated frame rates would be highest in esports titles at 1080p, where the GPU's 2310 MHz boost clock and the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock combine for low latency and high throughput. For AAA titles at 1440p, the 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth would support high settings with smooth frame delivery. At 4K, the 16 GB memory buffer becomes an advantage, though the 256-bit bus width may limit performance compared to wider-memory cards in the same class.

The ray tracing cores, numbering 80, would provide playable but not class-leading ray-traced frame rates. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 114, while not directly comparable to FPS, indicates the card's DX12 path is functional but may not be the strongest aspect of the architecture. Games that rely heavily on DX12 feature sets may see less scaling than those using Vulkan, where the 165212 Geekbench Vulkan score suggests strong API efficiency.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Raphael. The manufacturing process is 5 nm at TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 3.70 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is notably modest for a 12-core part, indicating strong power efficiency from the Zen 4 design.

Cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as database operations and certain scientific computing tasks. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is relevant for workstation and server-adjacent workloads where data integrity is critical.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 is strong for a 65 W part, showing that the 12 cores scale effectively under sustained load. The single-core score of 1966 in the same test indicates excellent per-thread performance, driven by the 5.40 GHz boost clock. The Geekbench multicore score of 17726 and single-core score of 2495 corroborate this dual strength.

PassMark results reveal specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 164075 and floating point math score of 97943 show balanced arithmetic performance. Data compression scores 577847, while data encryption scores 34708 — the latter benefiting from the AES instructions. Extended instructions score 42253, and random string sorting scores 68474. The find prime numbers score of 380 is lower, reflecting that this workload is more sensitive to memory latency than raw throughput. The overall PassMark multithread score of 48347 and single-thread score of 4130 place the CPU at the 90th percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (0.1% difference), the Intel Core i5-14600KF at 49394 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H at 48698 (1.1% lower). These deltas are small, indicating the Ryzen 9 7900 sits in a competitive performance band. The average benchmark score is 49228, which is the metric used for these comparisons.

For real workloads, the 12 cores and 24 threads handle multi-threaded compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering efficiently. The high single-thread score ensures responsive application behavior and strong performance in lightly-threaded tasks like office productivity and web browsing. The 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, allowing for smaller coolers and quieter operation in desktop builds.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 89 places this build in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU at the 90th percentile and GPU at the 88th percentile are closely matched, with the CPU having a slight edge over the GPU in relative standing. This proximity suggests that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other across a wide range of workloads.

For gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's 88th percentile rank versus the CPU's 90th percentile means that at 4K, where the GPU's pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are taxed, the graphics card will reach its limits before the CPU does. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10056 provides ample headroom for game logic and draw call processing, so the GPU becomes the primary constraint on frame rates.

At lower resolutions like 1080p, the balance shifts. The CPU's single-thread performance, measured by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1966, becomes more relevant as the GPU can produce frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. In this scenario, the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles, though the high boost clock of 5.40 GHz mitigates this to some degree.

For compute workloads, the balance depends on the specific task. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 23.65 TFLOPS far exceeds the CPU's floating point math score of 97943 in raw parallel throughput, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be GPU-bound. Conversely, tasks that are memory-latency sensitive or require complex branching logic, such as the PassMark find prime numbers test where the CPU scores 380, will be CPU-bound. The CPU's 64 MB L3 cache helps with data reuse, but the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is superior for streaming large datasets.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. The GPU's 16 GB memory and high bandwidth would allow for consistent scaling from 1080p to 1440p, with a smaller step to 4K due to the 256-bit bus width. The CPU's 12 cores ensure that multi-threaded game engines can feed the GPU adequately, but the single-thread ceiling at 1069 in 3DMark could cap frame rates in esports titles where the GPU is otherwise underutilized.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49228, placing it at the 90th percentile against all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 24776, Cinebench R23 single-core at 1966, Geekbench multicore at 17726, Geekbench single-core at 2495, and PassMark multithread at 48347. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 2067 in the 2-thread test to 10953 in the max-thread test, demonstrating linear scaling with core count.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58392, placing it at the 88th percentile against all GPUs. Key scores include the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 4235, Geekbench OpenCL at 205998, Geekbench Vulkan at 165212, Geekbench Metal at 222653, and PassMark G3D at 28070. The PassMark GPU compute score is 14199, which measures general-purpose compute performance.

The combined percentile of 89 is the aggregate metric for this pairing. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600KF, scores 49394, which is 0.3% higher — a negligible difference. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO V710, scores 58657, which is 0.5% higher — also negligible. This means the build performs essentially at parity with the surrounding competition in each component's respective benchmark space.

What the combined picture shows is a system where both components are in the upper echelon of their categories, but neither is at the very top. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, meaning 10% of CPUs outperform it. The GPU is in the 88th percentile, meaning 12% of GPUs outperform it. The build as a whole sits at the 89th percentile, reflecting the slight pull-down from the GPU's lower relative position. This is a high-tier build that would handle most mainstream workloads with ease, but would not be the absolute fastest configuration available.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 2310 MHz boost clock and 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance, combined with the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 1069 in 3DMark, support high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The 16 GB memory buffer prevents texture-related frame drops, though the 256-bit bus width may limit extreme refresh rates at 4K.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark max-thread score of 10953, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 34708 indicates the CPU can handle encryption overhead for secure streaming protocols without significant performance loss.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 supports fast export times, while the GPU's 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 64 MB L3 cache on the CPU aids in timeline scrubbing, and the 16 GB GPU memory allows for large preview buffers.

3D rendering: The GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for both rasterization and ray-traced rendering. The CPU's multicore score of 24776 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-based rendering fallbacks are also fast, making this a dual-path rendering system.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, with a Geekbench multicore score of 17726, accelerate compilation times. The PassMark integer math score of 164075 indicates strong performance for code parsing and static analysis. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large build caches.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4130 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for prolonged use. The GPU's 1063 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop acceleration efficiently, and the integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is idle.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, with the CPU at the 90th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU at the 88th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: How much memory does the RX 6950 XT have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 9 7900, and what memory type does it support?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the RX 6950 XT have dedicated tensor cores?

A: No tensor cores are listed in the specifications. The card relies on its 5120 shading units for compute tasks, with 80 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the RX 6950 XT?

A: The suggested power supply is 700 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 335 W with two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for the RX 6950 XT?

A: The GPU is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, a 12-core 24-thread Zen 4 processor, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a 16 GB RDNA 2.0 graphics card. The overall tier is high, with the build sitting at the 89th combined percentile. The CPU is in the 90th percentile, and the GPU is in the 88th percentile, placing both components in the upper decile of their respective categories.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 49228 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 58392 are close to their nearest rivals, with deltas under 1.1% in all cases. This indicates the build is competitive with other high-end configurations but not leading its class. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is active in production. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $429, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,099 USD.

This pairing is a balanced high-refresh gaming and productivity workstation. The CPU's 65 W TDP allows for efficient cooling solutions, while the GPU's 335 W TDP requires adequate power delivery and case airflow. The triple-slot GPU and 267 mm length dictate case compatibility. The overall tier is upper-midrange to high-end, suitable for demanding applications but not the absolute top tier of available hardware.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh displays are the primary audience. The GPU's 16 GB memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle high-resolution textures, while the CPU's single-thread score of 1069 in 3DMark ensures smooth frame pacing. The 4K experience is possible but the 256-bit bus may cap performance in the most demanding titles.

Content creators working in video editing will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 for export tasks and the GPU's 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 for effects processing. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle multi-track timelines, and the 64 MB L3 cache accelerates preview rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's 12 cores and PassMark integer math score of 164075 valuable. The 24 threads reduce build times, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports parallel compilation tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers.

3D artists and architects using GPU-based renderers will leverage the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 ray tracing cores. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes, and the CPU's multicore score of 24776 in Cinebench R23 provides a fast CPU fallback for hybrid rendering pipelines.

Students in STEM fields will benefit from the CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 17726 for simulation workloads and the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 for CUDA-like tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup display output.

Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads will use the CPU's 12 cores and PassMark data compression score of 577847. The ECC memory support protects data integrity, and the 700 W suggested PSU allows for expansion. The GPU's compute capability supports occasional rendering or machine learning inference tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which is the current desktop platform from AMD. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is forward-compatible with the latest storage and graphics cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking within the 65 W TDP envelope.

The GPU uses the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU's power requirements are a 335 W TDP with a 700 W suggested PSU. The CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system power draw is well within the 700 W PSU's capacity, leaving headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripheral cards.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU with higher memory bandwidth, as the 256-bit bus of the RX 6950 XT is the most likely performance limiter in GPU-bound workloads. The 16 GB memory capacity is adequate, so the upgrade would target bandwidth and newer architecture features. The CPU's 90th percentile position suggests it has longevity, and the AM5 socket supports future processor generations, so the CPU can remain in place for several years.

Another upgrade path is adding more memory, as the dual-channel DDR5 setup at 83.2 GB/s could be expanded to higher-capacity modules for memory-intensive workloads. The CPU's 64 MB L3 cache mitigates memory latency, but capacity is finite. The PCIe Gen 5 support means future NVMe storage drives can achieve higher throughput than the current Gen 4 standard, though the practical benefit depends on workload.

The PSU headroom is significant: the 700 W suggested PSU covers the GPU's 335 W TDP and CPU's 65 W TDP with a wide margin. This allows for overclocking both components without exceeding the PSU's capacity. The triple-slot GPU and 267 mm length should be verified against case dimensions before purchase, but the platform itself has clear upgrade paths for storage, memory, and graphics.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds