SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop pairing with a combined percentile rank of 54, indicating a mid-tier position relative to all possible configurations. The CPU is a high-end 12-core Zen 4 processor, while the GPU’s benchmark scores place it in an entry-level segment, creating a significant imbalance. This analysis examines the data from the FACT PACK to determine how this asymmetry affects workload distribution, gaming expectations, and upgrade viability. No measured frame rate data exists for this specific combination, so all FPS discussions are estimated from synthetic benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a stark bottleneck scenario favoring the CPU as the dominant component. The processor’s average benchmark score is 49228, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card’s average score is only 2690, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This 72-percentile gap indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly all graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU will sit underutilized.

In CPU-bound workloads, the Ryzen 9 7900’s 12 cores and 24 threads deliver a 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953, which is 9.6% higher than its 8-thread score of 7454. This scaling demonstrates that the processor can effectively use additional threads, but the GPU’s low 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 2690 means that even modest graphical loads will saturate the GPU first. For example, a game running at ultra settings will be constrained by the GPU’s 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 1069 in 3dmark suggests it can easily feed frames at lower resolutions.

The bottleneck flips only in non-graphical workloads such as data compression, encryption, and physics calculations. The Passmark data compression score of 577847 and data encryption score of 34708 highlight the CPU’s strength in these areas, where the GPU is not involved. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 24 threads can handle encoding tasks, but the GPU will still cap the final rendered output. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056 versus the max_threads score of 10953 shows only an 8.9% gain from all threads, meaning the CPU has headroom for background tasks without impacting primary performance.

The practical implication is that any upgrade path should prioritize the GPU. A more powerful graphics card would immediately improve gaming and rendering performance, while the current CPU would not bottleneck such an upgrade due to its high percentile standing. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains in GPU-bound scenarios, as the data shows the graphics card is the clear performance ceiling.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7900 achieves an average benchmark score of 49228 across all tests, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G with an average score of 49196, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the 7900. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394, putting the 7900 0.3% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, placing the 7900 0.5% ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698, giving the 7900 a 1.1% advantage. In multi-core tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 demonstrates strong rendering capability, while the Geekbench multicore score of 17726 confirms its position in the top decile of processors.

The RTX 5070 SUPER, in contrast, achieves an average benchmark score of 2690, ranking only in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with a score of 2664 (1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 with 2662 (1.1% behind), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 with 2660 (1.1% behind). The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 scores 2645, putting it 1.7% behind the 5070 SUPER. This places the GPU in the company of entry-level and legacy cards, despite its modern architecture and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking suggests a high-end workstation or enthusiast processor, while the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking is more typical of a basic office or HTPC graphics solution. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this split, indicating that the overall system performance is mediocre relative to what the CPU alone could support. In CPU-heavy tasks like Passmark integer math (164075) or floating-point math (97943), the system performs admirably, but in any GPU-accelerated scenario, the scores will be dragged down to the GPU’s level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU supports ECC memory, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck from the slot itself.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is notably low for a 12-core processor, indicating efficient power draw. The GPU has a 275 W TDP and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a dual-slot cooler design measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage, so power supply requirements must be evaluated qualitatively. The combined thermal load of 340 W across both components suggests a capable power supply is necessary, but the exact wattage remains unspecified.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a model that scores closer to the CPU’s percentile. The current GPU’s 18th percentile ranking leaves substantial room for improvement, and the CPU’s 90th percentile means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot is future-proof, and the AM5 socket supports active production processors, so a CPU upgrade is also possible, though less urgent given its high performance. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 modules would benefit data-heavy tasks, given the dual-channel bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Who Should Build It

The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU-centric workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate settings may find the GPU sufficient for esports titles, but the 18th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle at 4K or with ultra settings. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 24776 Cinebench R23 multicore score, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the 2690 Steel Nomad score.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which speeds up parallel builds. The Passmark data compression score of 577847 indicates strong performance in database and file-compression tasks. Students in engineering or data science fields can use the CPU’s floating-point math score of 97943 for numerical analysis, while the GPU handles basic visualization needs.

Small business workstations running office applications, spreadsheets, and databases will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 4130 in Passmark sufficient for responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds reliability for financial or scientific data. However, users in 3D animation, video production, or AI inference should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 200 tensor cores and 50 RT cores are present but underpowered relative to the CPU’s capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 2690 Steel Nomad score indicates it can handle 1080p competitive gaming at medium-to-high settings, but the 18th percentile ranking means it will not sustain high frame rates at 1440p or above. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1069 in 3dmark ensures no CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056 provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. However, the GPU’s low score means the game itself will run at reduced quality to maintain a playable stream. Hardware encoding via the GPU’s tensor cores is possible but unproven given the low benchmark results.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 makes timeline scrubbing and export rendering smooth for 1080p and 4K footage. The GPU’s 18 GB of VRAM can hold large preview buffers, but its 672.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, and effects-heavy timelines will see slowdowns.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will excel, with the Passmark integer math score of 164075 and floating-point score of 97943 providing strong compute. GPU-accelerated renderers will be disappointing, as the 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is far below what a 90th-percentile CPU would typically pair with.

Software development: The 12 cores and 24 threads compile code quickly, and the 64 MB L3 cache speeds up repetitive build tasks. The GPU is irrelevant for most development, making this a strong scenario for the pairing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4130 ensures responsive applications, while the GPU’s 18 GB of VRAM supports multiple 4K monitors. The low CPU TDP of 65 W keeps power costs down, though the GPU’s 275 W TDP offsets this.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 54, placing it in the middle of all configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 0.1% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.3% below the Core i5-14600KF, 0.5% above the Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% above the Xeon Gold 5318H.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3dmark Steel Nomad, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this platform?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 configuration provides 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured gaming performance data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU pairing.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each component?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 275 W TDP, for a combined 340 W.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 2690, ranking at the 18th percentile, suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern games will run at low-to-medium frame rates, typically below 60 FPS for demanding titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will push frame rates down further, likely requiring medium settings for playable performance. At 4K, the card is not viable for modern gaming at any quality setting above low.

The CPU’s high benchmark scores, including a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1069 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4130, ensure that it will not be the limiting factor at any resolution. In CPU-bound scenarios such as 1080p esports titles, the GPU may still cap performance, but the CPU will deliver consistent frame pacing. The 18 GB of GDDR7 VRAM is ample for texture-heavy games, but the 192-bit bus width and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest compared to higher-tier cards, limiting high-resolution texture streaming.

For games that rely heavily on ray tracing, the 50 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the GPU’s low overall score suggests that ray-traced effects will cause significant frame rate drops. DLSS or similar upscaling techniques could mitigate this, but the data does not include specific FPS measurements. Users should expect the GPU to perform at a level consistent with its 18th percentile ranking, meaning it is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings or less demanding esports titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, a 12-core Zen 4 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 GPU. The CPU is in the 90th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile, creating a lopsided configuration. The combined percentile of 54 places the overall system in the middle tier, but this is misleading because the CPU is top-tier while the GPU is entry-level. The build is best described as a high-end workstation CPU paired with a low-end graphics card, suitable for compute-heavy tasks but not for modern gaming at high settings.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 and a single-core score of 1966. The Geekbench multicore score is 17726, with a single-core score of 2495. In Passmark, the processor scores 48347 in multithread tests and 4130 in single-thread tests. The 3dmark scores scale from 1069 in single-thread to 10953 in max-threads, indicating good multi-thread scaling. The processor is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with rivals including the Core i5-14600KF and Core Ultra 5 245. For real workloads, this translates to strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, where multi-threaded performance is paramount.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. It has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput is 32.15 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s.

The only benchmark score available is the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, placing the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals include the Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, and Arc Pro B50, all of which are entry-level or legacy cards. Despite having 18 GB of VRAM, the low score indicates that memory capacity is not the limiting factor; rather, the compute throughput and memory bandwidth are insufficient for modern gaming. For rendering tasks, the 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, and the 200 tensor cores provide limited AI acceleration. The GPU is physically a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm in length, requiring a 16-pin power connector and 275 W TDP.