SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Arc A570M form a mobile combination with a combined benchmark percentile of 89, placing it in the upper tier of laptop builds. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 88th percentile among all GPUs, so this pairing is unusually balanced on paper. That said, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than directly observed frames.

Balance and Bottleneck

Both components land within one percentage point of their nearest rivals, and the combined percentile of 89 indicates a laptop where neither side is drastically underpowered. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost of 5.20 GHz, provide a strong foundation for both gaming and productivity. The GPU, with 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128‑bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s, is clearly the more limited half of the pairing for memory capacity and bandwidth.

In gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the more relevant factor; the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852 and the 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 suggest the CPU can feed frames quickly. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute become the limiting factor, especially for titles that demand large texture pools. For productivity, the CPU is the clear star: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 indicate that heavy rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks will saturate the CPU long before the GPU.

The data shows that the CPU’s multi-thread scaling is strong. From the 2‑thread 3DMark score of 1988 to the max-thread score of 11108, the CPU scales nearly linearly up to its full 24 threads. This means the bottleneck in a mixed workload is rarely the CPU, but the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 224 GB/s bandwidth may force settings down at 1440p or higher. The GPU’s pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are moderate for a laptop part, reinforcing that it is best suited to 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, placing it at the 89th percentile. The nearest rivals, as given, are the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487, +0.4% delta), Intel Core i7-13700K (46881, -0.5% delta), and AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, -0.7% delta). This shows the 7845HX is statistically tied with a desktop i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 5900, despite being a mobile chip with a 55 W TDP.

In specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 is the headline number, nearly matching a desktop i7-13700K. The single-core R23 score of 1852 is also respectable, though the 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 is lower than the multi-thread scores suggest. The Geekbench scores (multi 16633, single 2389) and PassMark scores (multi 45010, single 3935) all point to a CPU that excels in both threaded and lightly-threaded workloads.

The GPU’s only benchmark in the pack is a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which places it at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, -0.3% delta), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, +0.3% delta), NVIDIA P102-102 (58528, -0.5% delta), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, -0.7% delta). In OpenCL compute, the Arc A570M is within 1% of a desktop RX 6950 XT, which is remarkable for a 75 W laptop part. However, that is a compute test; the actual gaming performance depends on drivers and optimizations, which are not captured here.

The combined picture is a laptop that should handle both CPU-heavy and GPU-heavy tasks without a glaring imbalance. The CPU’s percentile (89) and the GPU’s percentile (88) are nearly identical, so neither will be an obvious drag on the other in most mixed workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a Zen 4 chip built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 2x71 mm² and 13,140 million transistors. It uses the AMD Socket FL1 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU has 64 MB of L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. It also includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU, which is useful for light tasks or troubleshooting.

The benchmark scores tell a clear story. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 is the headline, and it is within 0.5% of a desktop i7-13700K. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 and the integer math score of 155118 indicate strong performance in integer-heavy workloads, such as code compilation and database operations. The floating-point math score of 94287 and the extended instruction score of 41020 suggest that scientific and engineering software will run well.

Single-thread performance is also competitive: the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852 and Geekbench single-core of 2389 are typical of a modern high-end mobile CPU. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 is the lowest among the provided scores, but that is a synthetic test with its own quirks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3935 is more representative, and it places the chip among the best mobile CPUs.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is adequate for a mobile part, but it is not a standout figure. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes (CPU only) is generous for a laptop, though the actual usable bandwidth depends on the OEM’s implementation. The TDP of 55 W is modest for a 12-core CPU, indicating that the chip is designed to sustain high clocks within a laptop thermal envelope.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits a laptop that needs to handle both heavy compute and modern gaming. Gamers at 1080p will find the CPU strong enough to drive high frame rates in CPU-limited titles, and the GPU should handle most games at that resolution with high settings. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth will become a limitation, but many esports and moderate settings will still be playable.

Content creators who rely on multi-threaded rendering will appreciate the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 26876 and PassMark multi-thread of 45010. Video editors, 3D modelers, and software developers compiling large projects will see the CPU’s integer and floating-point performance. The CPU’s ECC support and DDR5 memory also make it suitable for data integrity in a small business workstation.

Students in engineering, computer science, or design will benefit from the combination of CPU power and a discrete GPU. The integrated Radeon 610M can handle basic display output, while the Arc A570M accelerates CUDA-like workloads (though CUDA is not supported, but OpenCL and Vulkan are). For small business workstations that run simulations or database queries, the CPU’s integer math score of 155118 and encryption score of 32789 are relevant.

The GPU’s compute performance (OpenCL 58239) is near that of an RX 6950 XT in that specific test, but that does not translate directly to gaming. Users who want to do GPGPU work (e.g., machine learning inference, video encoding) will find the Arc A570M capable, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for large models or textures.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 11.5 billion transistors on a 269 mm² die. It has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 900 MHz and the boost clock is 1300 MHz, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 is wired on a 128-bit bus, giving a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is modern in API support.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places the GPU at the 88th percentile, within 0.3% of an AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in this specific compute test. That is an impressive compute result for a laptop part, but it does not directly translate to gaming performance, which depends on driver optimizations and memory bandwidth. The 224 GB/s bandwidth is modest for a GPU with 2048 shaders, and the 8 GB VRAM is a common limitation at high resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

The RT cores (16) provide ray tracing capability, but the compute performance for RT is not separately benchmarked here. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are decent for a laptop, and the FP32 5.325 TFLOPS is adequate for many compute tasks. The lack of any tensor core information means that AI acceleration features are not described in the pack.

For rendering workloads, the OpenCL score is the only hard data. The GPU is clearly capable of OpenCL compute, but its 8 GB memory limit will cap the size of scenes or models that can be processed on the GPU. For gaming, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor at 1440p and above, especially in modern titles with large textures.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7845HX compare to an Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: The average benchmark score of the 7845HX is 46654, which is within 0.5% of the i7-13700K (46881), meaning they are statistically equivalent in average performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 16 dedicated RT cores, but the FACT PACK does not include any ray tracing benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 89, meaning the system is in the top 11% of all laptop builds.

Q: Is the GPU better than a desktop Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL compute test, the GPU scored 58239, which is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT (58392). That is a compute result, not a gaming result.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 75 W, making a combined thermal envelope of 130 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK does not contain any measured FPS values for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance here is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1852, PassMark single-thread 3935) suggests that the CPU will not be a limiting factor in most games, even at 1080p. The GPU’s compute score is high, but gaming performance is often less tied to OpenCL and more to the graphics drivers and the 8 GB VRAM.

At 1080p, with ultra settings, the GPU should be able to run most titles at 60 FPS or above, based on the GPU’s 2048 shading units and 224 GB/s bandwidth. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM may become a bottleneck for games that use high-resolution textures, and the 5.3 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggests that heavier scenes will require reduced settings. At 4K, the GPU is likely to be insufficient for high settings.

The CPU’s 12 cores/24 threads are more than enough for gaming, and the 64 MB L3 cache helps with game logic and physics. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is a strong 1080p machine, a capable 1440p machine with lowered settings, and not a 4K gaming laptop.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile socket, so the CPU itself is not upgradeable in the typical sense. The memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the memory bus is dual-channel. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for storage and GPU expansion, though the GPU is integrated into the laptop and uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU has a TDP of 75 W and no separate power connectors, meaning it is a soldered part. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the combined 130 W is typical for a laptop. There is no suggested PSU because this is a laptop, so the power delivery is fixed by the laptop’s power brick.

For an upgrade path, the only realistic options are adding more DDR5 memory (if the laptop has empty slots) or using an external GPU (eGPU) via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the integrated Radeon 610M can be used for basic tasks. The CPU is already near the top of the mobile range, so the next meaningful upgrade would be a new laptop with a newer generation CPU or a GPU with more VRAM.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (build class: laptop) that pairs an AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with an Intel Arc A570M. The combined percentile is 89, placing it in the top 11% of all systems. The CPU is a 12-core/24-thread Zen 4 chip, and the GPU is an 8 GB Arc mobile GPU. The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile (89 and 88), making this a well-balanced laptop for both CPU-bound productivity and GPU-bound gaming at 1080p/1440p. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks, but the CPU’s single-thread strength and the GPU’s compute capability suggest a capable gaming machine, provided the 8 GB VRAM is respected.

The build is a high-end laptop, with a combined percentile of 89. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor with a 5.2 GHz boost, and the GPU is an 8 GB Arc part with 2048 shading units. This is a machine for gamers who want a strong CPU for other tasks, and for professionals who need a powerful CPU and a GPU that can accelerate compute workloads. The CPU’s TDP of 55 W and the GPU’s 75 W TDP mean the laptop is likely to be a mid-to-large form factor with adequate cooling.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds