SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX paired with the Intel Arc A550M is a mobile combination that targets high-end laptop performance. The processor is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part, while the GPU is Intel’s Alchemist-based discrete mobile graphics. This pairing sits at the 88th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average but not at the absolute top tier. The data shows a platform with significant CPU headroom and a GPU that is surprisingly competitive in compute benchmarks, but the specific balance between them requires careful interpretation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear asymmetry between the two components. The CPU is a powerhouse, achieving an average benchmark score of 46654 and ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-thread score of 1025 in 3dmark and 1852 in Cinebench R23 indicate excellent responsiveness, while its multi-threaded scores—like the 26876 in Cinebench R23 and 11108 in 3dmark max threads—demonstrate immense parallel processing capability. The GPU, while strong, is not in the same class. Its average benchmark score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile of GPUs, but this is a different metric scale than the CPU. The combined percentile of 88 suggests that, in typical gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The data indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. With a 3dmark 16-thread score of 10068 and a single-thread score of 1025, the 7845HX has more than enough power to feed the A550M. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary constraint in gaming. For example, while the CPU can handle complex physics and AI calculations, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth will likely cap frame rates at higher resolutions. The deltaPct values for the GPU’s rivals show it is within 2.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and 2.4% of the RX 6900 XT, which are desktop-class cards. This means the A550M is not a weak link, but it is still the component that will determine maximum graphical settings and frame rates in most titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the GPU’s performance relative to known rivals. The data should be treated as a projection of capability, not a record of observed results. The Intel Arc A550M’s compute scores are impressive, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580. These numbers place it in the same performance bracket as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which has a deltaPct of -0.4, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, with a deltaPct of -0.5.

Based on these figures, the system is estimated to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings well. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for current titles, but may be a constraint for future releases or texture-heavy mods. The 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth are adequate for this class, but not exceptional. Expect playable frame rates at ultra settings for most esports and slightly older AAA titles. For the newest AAA games, you may need to adjust settings to high or medium to maintain smooth performance. The CPU will not be the cause of any frame drops; its 3dmark 8-thread score of 7140 ensures it can handle the background tasks and game logic without stuttering.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design. The CPU has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is a high ceiling for a mobile part. This is a flagship mobile processor designed for performance laptops, as evidenced by its market segment designation.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end status. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 is exceptional for a laptop CPU, rivaling desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-13700K, which has a deltaPct of -0.5 in the nearestRivals list. The single-core score of 1852 is also strong, meaning day-to-day tasks and lightly-threaded applications will feel responsive. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core provide a substantial buffer for data-intensive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically found in workstation chips. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a basic display output, but the system will rely on the discrete Intel Arc GPU for any demanding graphics work.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is suited for users who need a laptop that can do it all, but with a tilt toward productivity and CPU-heavy tasks. The 12-core, 24-thread processor makes it a strong choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 indicates that rendering tasks will complete quickly. The 89th percentile CPU ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of other processors available.

For gamers, this is a 1440p-oriented machine. The GPU’s performance, which is within 2.6% of the RX 6800 XT, suggests it can handle high refresh rates at 1080p and solid frame rates at 1440p. It is less suited for 4K gaming, where the 8 GB VRAM and memory bandwidth will become a limiting factor. Developers and engineers will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities, as well as the PCIe Gen 5 support for fast NVMe storage. Students and small business users will find the performance more than adequate for any office productivity, but this is overkill for basic tasks. This is a build for users who demand high performance in a mobile form factor and are willing to accept that the GPU is the secondary component in the system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system is estimated to drive high refresh rate monitors. The GPU’s compute scores are close to the RTX 5070 Ti, which is a strong 1440p card. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 1025 in 3dmark ensures that frame times will be consistent, avoiding hitches that can ruin the experience. Expect competitive frame rates in most esports and action titles.

Streaming: The 24 threads of the 7845HX are a significant asset here. Encoding video for a stream requires CPU resources, and this processor has them in spades. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 suggests that the CPU can handle the encode load while leaving enough headroom for the game itself. The GPU also supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features for streaming and capture.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of 94287 and integer math score of 155118 are strong indicators of processing power. The GPU’s 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs will accelerate effects and exports. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines, but may be tight for complex 4K projects with many layers.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 puts it in the same league as desktop CPUs like the i7-13700K. This means rendering a frame in Blender or Cinebench will be fast. The GPU can also contribute via OpenCL or Vulkan, with scores of 49894 and 49580, respectively. This is a capable mobile rendering station.

Software development: Compilation is a highly parallel task. The 12 cores and 24 threads are ideal for building large codebases. The Passmark data compression score of 543539 and encryption score of 32789 indicate strong performance in archive and security-related tasks. The support for ECC memory is a bonus for long-running, error-sensitive computations.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill. The single-thread performance is excellent, so spreadsheets and web browsers will be snappy. The 24 threads are unnecessary for this class of work, but they ensure the laptop will not feel slow for years to come. The battery life is likely to be poor due to the high TDP components, but performance is never in question.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the mobile Dragon Range platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; it is soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is a feature for professional use.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A550M, which is a mobile part that is also soldered to the motherboard. The system’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is the connection for the GPU. The CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for fast NVMe SSDs. The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W. This is a combined power draw of 115 W, which is low for the performance level. There is no suggested PSU data available, but the total system power draw is modest for a laptop of this class.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the amount of system memory to 32 GB or 64 GB, as DDR5 is supported and the CPU can handle it. Storage is also a viable upgrade path, as PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives can be added to take advantage of the CPU’s lanes. The CPU is the strongest part of this platform, so any future upgrade should focus on the GPU or memory, but those are also likely soldered in this mobile form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the closest rivals being the Intel Xeon w3-2535 at a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X at 0.4%, and the Intel Core i7-13700K at -0.5%. The CPU’s single-thread performance is also notable, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2389 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3935. The multi-threaded scores are even more impressive: Geekbench multicore 16633, Passmark multithread 45010, and Cinebench R23 multicore 26876.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737, which places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is a high ranking, and its rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at -0.4%, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at -0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 2.6%. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are very close, indicating consistent compute performance across different APIs. The combined picture is one of a CPU that is a top-tier performer and a GPU that is solidly in the upper mid-range to high-end tier. The combined percentile of 88 reflects this balance, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the GPU is a 60 W part with 2048 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 88 indicates that this system is in the top 12% of all paired components.

The CPU is clearly the star of the show, with an 89th percentile ranking and benchmark scores that rival desktop parts. The GPU is also strong, sitting in the 86th percentile, but it is the more limiting factor in the pairing. This is not a balanced system in the sense of two equal halves; it is a system with a massive CPU and a very capable GPU. It is a desktop-class CPU in a laptop, and the GPU is along for the ride to provide good, but not class-leading, graphics performance. This is a build for users who prioritize CPU compute power and want a GPU that can keep up with modern games at 1080p and 1440p.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Arc A550M is 88, meaning it outperforms 88% of all other CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark relative to the Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: The Ryzen 9 7845HX has an average benchmark score of 46654, while the Intel Core i7-13700K has an average score of 46881, a delta of -0.5%. This means the AMD part is roughly equal in performance, being only 0.5% slower.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has a score of 48477. The deltaPct is 2.6%, indicating that the Intel GPU is 2.6% faster in these benchmarks.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the main bottleneck for gaming?

A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming performance. The CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores are more than sufficient to feed the GPU, so frame rates will be constrained by the Arc A550M’s processing power and 8 GB of VRAM.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and comparisons to the GPU’s nearest rivals.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W. This is a combined power draw of 115 W for the two primary processing components.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds