SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop configuration that pairs a flagship-class, high-core-count CPU with a modest, entry-level discrete GPU. This combination creates a specific performance profile: the processor is capable of heavy, multi-threaded workstation tasks, while the graphics card is suited for lighter gaming and media work. The data indicates a significant imbalance in raw compute capability between the two components, making this a build for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range for the mobile market. It operates on a 5 nm TSMC process node and features a base clock of 3.00 GHz, capable of boosting up to 5.20 GHz. This is a high-end mobile CPU, evidenced by its 89th percentile ranking against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently available.

Benchmark data shows strong scaling across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,025 in single-thread, 1,988 in 2-thread, 3,807 in 4-thread, 7,140 in 8-thread, and 11,108 in max-thread tests. This progression suggests that the CPU efficiently utilizes additional cores, with the max-thread score being over ten times the single-thread score. The multi-threaded performance is particularly impressive; the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,876 and Geekbench multicore score of 16,633 indicate that this processor can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and complex simulations with ease.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46,654 places it in a tight competitive group. It is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon w3-2535, which has a deltaPct of 0, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, which is only 0.4% behind. It also trades blows with the Intel Core i7-13700K, which is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which is 0.7% ahead. These negligible percentage differences mean that in real-world use, the 7845HX will be essentially indistinguishable in performance from these desktop-class rivals, making it a top-tier choice for CPU-intensive applications.

Specific workload tests from Passmark reveal further strengths. The CPU scores 155,118 in integer math, 94,287 in floating-point math, and 543,539 in data compression. These scores suggest excellent performance in tasks that rely on heavy arithmetic and data processing. The L3 cache is a substantial 64 MB (shared), which helps feed those high core counts. The platform supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, a feature often desired for workstation stability. For connectivity, the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring fast access to the latest NVMe SSDs and other peripherals. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback display output and basic 2D acceleration, though the discrete GPU handles all heavy graphics work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation. It is built on a 6 nm TSMC process. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. While this bandwidth is sufficient for its target market, it is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy compute workloads. The card has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Clock speeds are a base of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS. In terms of API support, it is modern, featuring DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, meaning it supports current gaming features like hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders, albeit at a lower performance tier than larger Arc GPUs. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, making it a low-power part suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

Its benchmark performance, with an average score of 29,175, places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This is a solid mid-range position, but the nearest rivals reveal a mixed bag. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% slower) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% slower). It is 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 470, but 1% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. The fact that it is so close to the RX 6800M, which is a much more powerful discrete GPU in most respects, is likely an anomaly of the specific benchmark set used (Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan), but the data shows that in these synthetic tests, the Arc A370M performs at a level comparable to those established cards. In the Geekbench tests, it scores 29,676 in OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU paired with a moderate GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46,654 is in the 89th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 29,175 is in the 74th percentile. This pairing gives the system an overall combined percentile of 82.

Looking at the CPU's specific scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 26,876 puts it in the upper echelon for mobile processors. Its single-core score of 1,852 is also strong, ensuring good responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The Geekbench multicore score of 16,633 complements these findings.

For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673 show that the Arc A370M is a capable performer for its class. These scores suggest that it can handle modern game engines, but its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be bottlenecks for higher resolutions and texture quality settings.

The performance disparity is clear: the CPU is in the top 11% of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 26% of all graphics cards. This means that in any workload, the GPU will be the limiting factor long before the CPU is stressed. The system is overqualified for GPU-bound tasks and underqualified for CPU-bound tasks, which is a classic workstation profile.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX a 3D V-Cache CPU?

A: No. The CPU's cache specifications list an L3 cache of 64 MB (shared), and the "vCache3d" field is null, indicating that this model does not include the extra 3D V-Cache stack found on some other Ryzen parts.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the system's performance rely on measured FPS data?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 470 in average benchmark score, making them very close in overall synthetic performance.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is low for a 12-core processor, highlighting the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, offering high bandwidth for compatible storage and expansion devices.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No. The Intel Arc A370M is listed as "End-of-life," meaning it is no longer in active production, though it may still be found in existing laptop models.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The Intel Arc A370M is a 1080p-oriented GPU. With its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, it is best suited for 1080p gaming. In less demanding esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate could likely deliver high frame rates, potentially exceeding 100 FPS at medium or high settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,025 in 3DMark would not bottleneck these games, ensuring smooth frame pacing.

For more graphically demanding AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM will be a significant limitation. Games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield often require more than 4 GB of VRAM at high texture settings, which could lead to texture pop-in or stuttering. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the GPU might deliver playable frame rates, potentially in the 30-50 FPS range, depending on the game's optimization. The presence of 8 ray tracing cores means the GPU supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but given its overall performance tier, enabling ray tracing would likely have a severe impact on frame rates, making it only viable at low resolutions and settings.

The CPU will have no issues in gaming. Its high core count and clock speeds ensure it can handle the most demanding game engines and background tasks. The performance bottleneck will always be the GPU. Users should expect consistent 1080p gaming performance typical of an entry-level discrete GPU, with the understanding that high-refresh-rate gaming will be limited to less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive computing. The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a mobile workstation powerhouse, and this build is ideal for:

  • Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,876 and Geekbench multicore score of 16,633. Tasks like rendering 4K video or exporting complex 3D scenes will be significantly faster on this CPU. The GPU can handle preview rendering and some effects, but the CPU is the main engine.
  • Developers: Software engineers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will find the 12 cores and 24 threads invaluable. The Passmark integer math score of 155,118 and data encryption score of 32,789 indicate strong performance in these logic-heavy tasks.
  • Data Analysts and Scientists: For workloads involving large datasets, the CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and high memory bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) will help with data processing and manipulation. The ECC memory support adds a layer of data integrity crucial for long-running calculations.
  • Students and Professionals in STEM: Those running simulations, statistical analysis (like MATLAB or R), or CAD software will see substantial benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded power.
  • Small Business Workstations: For a desktop-replacement laptop used for accounting, heavy spreadsheet work, or database management, the CPU ensures responsive performance.

This is not a build for gamers looking for high-end graphics performance. While it can play games, the GPU is the limiting factor, and a system with a less powerful CPU and a stronger GPU would offer a better gaming experience. This is a workstation first, with casual gaming as a secondary feature.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile processors. This means that the CPU is soldered onto the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The upgrade path is therefore limited to the laptop itself, not the components within it.

The memory support is for DDR5, which is the current standard and offers a solid foundation. The CPU supports a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which is a plus for professional use. The system also benefits from PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes on the CPU side. This ensures that the installed NVMe SSD is running at full speed and allows for future high-bandwidth expansion, though in a laptop, expansion is typically limited to the storage drive.

The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, giving a combined base power draw of 90 W for the core components. There is no suggested PSU listed, but as a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the AC adapter. The low power draw of the GPU means that the system's power headroom is primarily allocated to the CPU. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to ensure the system has the maximum amount of RAM supported and a fast PCIe Gen 5 SSD to match the CPU's capabilities. Since neither the CPU nor the GPU can be upgraded in a laptop, the user's only path is to buy a new system, and this build's strengths should be considered carefully against that reality.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the "buildClass" field. The pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, a 12-core/24-thread mobile processor, and the Intel Arc A370M, a 4 GB entry-level discrete GPU. The system's overall performance places it in the 82nd percentile against all other builds, which is a strong showing driven almost entirely by the CPU.

The CPU is a top-tier part, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and its performance rivals desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. The GPU is a competent mid-range mobile part, ranking in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with performance close to the AMD Radeon RX 470. This is a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a graphics chip designed for mainstream use, resulting in a system that excels at processor-intensive tasks but is average for gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The Ryzen 9 7845HX's average benchmark score of 46,654 is significantly higher than the Arc A370M's average score of 29,175. The CPU is in the 89th percentile, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile. This indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in almost any workload that involves graphics processing.

In gaming, the GPU will be the primary limiter. A game's frame rate will be determined by the Arc A370M's ability to render frames, and the CPU will likely be waiting idle for the GPU to catch up. The 4 GB VRAM is a particular constraint at higher resolutions and detail settings. The CPU's powerful single-thread performance ensures that it will not be a bottleneck for game logic or physics, but the GPU will prevent the system from achieving high frame rates in demanding titles.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, or code compilation, the GPU's role is minimal. The CPU will be the workhorse, and the system's performance will be excellent. The GPU will handle the display output and any basic GPU-accelerated effects, but the overall time for these tasks will be dictated by the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads. In this scenario, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU, but given its high performance, this is a good problem to have. The system is effectively a high-performance desktop CPU in a laptop chassis with a modest GPU for light graphics duties.