SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process node. It belongs to the AMD 7000 series and is designed for high-performance laptops, as indicated by its market segment classification. The CPU has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W, making it a power-efficient yet powerful option for mobile workstations and gaming laptops. The processor is built on a dual-chiplet design, with a die size of 2x 71 mm² and a total of 13,140 million transistors, reflecting the complexity of the Zen 4 architecture.

Cache configuration is substantial: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that benefit from fast access to frequently used data, such as database operations and scientific simulations. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is an important feature for professionals who require data integrity in compute-heavy tasks. The integrated graphics are Radeon 610M, which provides basic display output but is not intended for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark data shows a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1852 in single-core and 26876 in multi-core. The single-core score places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors, while the multi-core score demonstrates strong scaling across its 12 cores and 24 threads. The Geekbench scores are equally impressive: 2389 for single-core and 16633 for multi-core. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling pattern: 1988 for 2 threads, 3807 for 4 threads, 7140 for 8 threads, 10068 for 16 threads, and 11108 for max threads. This progression indicates efficient thread utilization, with the jump from 8 to 16 threads nearly doubling the score, which is a sign of robust multi-threading capabilities.

The PassMark suite provides additional context. The multithread score is 45010, while the single-thread score is 3935. Data compression scores 543539, and data encryption scores 32789, indicating strong performance in security-related tasks. Extended instructions score 41020, floating point math scores 94287, and integer math scores 155118. These numbers suggest the CPU is well-suited for a variety of compute-intensive workloads, from financial modeling to engineering simulations. The 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it ahead of most desktop and mobile processors, with an average benchmark score of 46654.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7845HX is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon w3-2535, which has an average score of 46653, a delta of 0%. It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487), 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881), and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971). This positions the 7845HX as a high-end mobile chip that competes with desktop processors from the previous generation, which is remarkable for a laptop part.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 1852 in Cinebench R23 and 2389 in Geekbench ensures that game logic and physics calculations are handled with minimal latency. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1988 indicates strong responsiveness in lightly threaded workloads, which are common in game engines. However, the GPU pairing with the Intel Arc A350M will be the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming, as the CPU has more than enough headroom to drive high frame rates in most titles.

Streaming: The 24 threads and strong multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and a PassMark multithread score of 45010, allow for simultaneous encoding and gaming without significant frame drops. The CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining playable frame rates, though the GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware may push more load onto the CPU.

Video editing: The 64 MB L3 cache and 12 cores provide excellent performance in timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 indicate that 4K video exports and color grading tasks will complete quickly. The PassMark floating point score of 94287 further supports smooth handling of video filters and transitions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 threads shine in ray tracing and complex scene rendering. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4320 and the 3DMark max threads score of 11108 show strong sustained performance under heavy loads. The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, making it suitable for professional rendering workstations.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the high single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark and the multi-thread capabilities. The PassMark integer math score of 155118 indicates fast arithmetic operations, which are critical for code compilation and unit testing. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with caching build artifacts and frequently accessed code modules, reducing compile times.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for basic productivity, but its efficiency at lower thread counts, shown by the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1988, means it will handle spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The low 55 W TDP ensures that the laptop remains cool and quiet during everyday tasks, making it a comfortable device for library sessions and long study hours.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is one of strong CPU performance held back by a modest GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 80, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 80% of all tested configurations.

The GPU's benchmarks are limited to two tests: Geekbench OpenCL scores 24546, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 24747. These scores place the Arc A350M close to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, delta -0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, delta -0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, delta 0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, delta 1.5%). This indicates that the GPU performs at the level of a mid-range desktop graphics card from several years ago, which is respectable for a low-power mobile part with a 25 W TDP.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance suggests that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU's raw compute power of 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 will limit frame rates to what a 70th percentile GPU can deliver. In practical terms, this means 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable, but 1440p or 4K gaming will require significant settings reductions.

The CPU's 3DMark scores provide a clear picture of its scaling efficiency. The 2-thread score of 1988 and the max threads score of 11108 show a 5.6x increase when moving from 2 to 24 threads, which is a solid scaling result for a mobile processor. The Geekbench scores follow a similar pattern, with the multi-core score of 16633 being 7x the single-core score of 2389. This level of scaling indicates that the CPU is well-balanced for both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The fundamental balance issue in this build is the mismatch between the CPU's 89th percentile performance and the GPU's 70th percentile performance. The CPU is capable of far more work than the GPU can keep up with in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, as the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit frame rates before the CPU's processing power is fully utilized.

The CPU's percentile ranking suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations, AI inference, and data processing, the system will perform exceptionally well. The PassMark multithread score of 45010 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 indicate that these tasks will run at speeds comparable to high-end desktop CPUs from a few years ago. However, in GPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at the level of the GPU's 70th percentile, which is adequate for mainstream gaming but not for high-end graphics work.

The FPS scaling in games would follow the GPU's capabilities, meaning that frame rates will be consistent with what a 70th percentile GPU can deliver. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be smooth, as the CPU can feed the GPU with data without delays. However, the GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB GDDR6 memory will cause performance drops in games that require more than 4 GB of VRAM at high settings, which is a growing concern in modern titles.

In CPU-intensive scenarios, such as strategy games with many units or open-world games with complex physics, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for game logic, while the GPU works to render frames. In GPU-intensive scenarios, such as ray-tracing-enabled games or high-resolution textures, the GPU will struggle, and users will need to lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46654.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 26876 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it in the 89th percentile and makes it competitive with desktop CPUs like the Intel Core i7-13700K, which has an average score of 46881.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks that require high data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is relatively low and may limit performance in memory-intensive workloads.

Q: Is this build suitable for gaming?

A: The CPU is highly capable for gaming, but the GPU will limit frame rates to what a 70th percentile GPU can deliver. Estimated 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable, but high-refresh or 1440p gaming will require settings reductions.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is designed for mobile platforms. This means that the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense, as it is soldered to the motherboard. Users looking to upgrade will need to purchase a new laptop with a more powerful CPU. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is a modern memory standard that provides ample bandwidth for most workloads.

The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), which is a significant advantage for connecting high-speed storage devices and external GPUs. This allows for NVMe SSDs with extremely fast read and write speeds, as well as future-proofing for next-generation peripherals. The integrated graphics, Radeon 610M, provide basic display output, but the system relies on the discrete GPU for graphics acceleration.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, has a TDP of 25 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the low TDP of both the CPU and GPU means that a standard laptop power adapter will suffice. The GPU has a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its performance level. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning that it is no longer in production, and users should consider this when planning for future upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the entire laptop with a model that has a more powerful GPU, as the CPU is already in the 89th percentile and will remain relevant for several years. The CPU's 55 W TDP is low enough for thin-and-light chassis, but the GPU's 25 W TDP is the limiting factor for graphics performance. Upgrading to a laptop with a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher would provide a more balanced system for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It has a die size of 157 mm² and contains 7,200 million transistors, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, which are modest numbers for a low-power mobile part.

The GPU's memory configuration is a notable limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming at lower settings, but it will struggle with high-resolution textures or memory-intensive applications. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is also a concern for modern games that require more than 4 GB at high settings.

The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, which is a small number compared to higher-end Arc parts, but it does support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These numbers indicate that the GPU is capable of basic ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, but performance will be modest.

The GPU's benchmark scores are limited to Geekbench OpenCL (24546) and Geekbench Vulkan (24747). The average benchmark score is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This performance level is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a desktop GPU from 2018, and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which is a professional mobile GPU. The GPU is not suitable for high-end rendering or compute tasks, but it can handle casual gaming and light creative work.

The GPU's TDP is 25 W, which is very low for a discrete GPU, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops. The slot width is classified as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the system board. The display outputs are portable device dependent, which means they vary by laptop model. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so users should not expect driver updates or long-term support.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, a high-end mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A350M, a low-power entry-level mobile GPU. The build class is laptop, indicating that this is a mobile system designed for portability. The combined percentile for this build is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all tested configurations, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU's strong performance.

The CPU is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46654, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This discrepancy means that the system is CPU-heavy, with the processor being the dominant component. The overall tier of the build is therefore defined by the CPU's performance, with the GPU acting as a limiting factor for graphics-intensive tasks.

The build is best described as a workstation-class laptop with a modest GPU. It is suitable for CPU-intensive tasks such as software development, data analysis, and 3D rendering, where the GPU's role is less critical. However, for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the system will perform at the level of the GPU, which is adequate for casual gaming but not for high-end graphics work.

The CPU's 12 cores, 24 threads, and 64 MB L3 cache make it a powerful processor for multitasking and heavy workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for light gaming and basic video editing, but they will not satisfy users who require high-fidelity graphics or fast render times. The system is balanced in the sense that it offers strong CPU performance for a mobile form factor, but it is unbalanced in terms of graphics capabilities.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance in a laptop form factor. Software developers will benefit from the 24 threads and high integer math score of 155118 in PassMark, which accelerates compilation and testing. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures that development environments remain responsive even with multiple virtual machines or containers running.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU's capabilities useful for simulation and modeling tasks, while the GPU provides enough power for casual gaming during downtime. The 55 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP combined mean that the laptop will have reasonable battery life for a performance system, making it suitable for all-day campus use.

Small business workstations that handle data processing, financial analysis, or database management will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and ECC memory support. The PassMark data compression score of 543539 indicates fast file operations, which is useful for backup and archiving tasks. The GPU is sufficient for office productivity and light graphics work, but it is not intended for heavy 3D modeling or video production.

Content creators who work primarily with code, documents, and data will find this build sufficient, but those who edit video or create 3D content will be limited by the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. Gamers who play esports titles or older games at 1080p will be satisfied with the performance, but those who play modern AAA games at high settings will need to lower graphical options. Overall, this build is best suited for users who need a powerful CPU for compute-heavy tasks and are willing to accept modest GPU performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds