SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

26,274 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a specific configuration in the laptop market, combining a high-end 8-core processor with an entry-level discrete graphics solution. The data for this pairing is derived from component-level benchmarks rather than direct system tests, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All performance discussions regarding gaming must therefore be treated as estimates based on the component scores, not empirical results from this specific build.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a 45 W TDP part, indicating a high-performance mobile segment position.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 912 in single-thread to 1767 in 2-threads, 3353 in 4-threads, 5607 in 8-threads, and peak at 6717 in max-threads, with the 16-thread score at 6745. This scaling pattern shows near-linear multi-thread performance, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is efficiently utilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13497 and single-core score of 1558 further substantiate this, showing a strong ratio of roughly 8.7:1 between multi and single-thread performance.

In real workloads, the data suggests this CPU excels at heavily threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 24346, combined with integer math at 89388 and floating-point math at 49981, indicates strong computational throughput for rendering, compilation, and scientific calculations. The data compression score of 306184 and encryption score of 19118 show that the processor handles content-heavy workloads well, though the extended instructions score of 20849 suggests moderate SIMD performance. The single-thread score of 3409 in PassMark indicates that lighter, single-threaded tasks are also handled competently, though this is not where the chip's primary strength lies.

The avgBenchmarkScore for the CPU is 26274, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the performance deltas are minimal. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 has an average score of 26324, which is 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, 0.3% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, 0.5% higher. These sub-1% differences indicate that this mobile 8-core part is performing essentially on par with desktop-class 6-core and 8-core alternatives from both AMD and Intel, which confirms the efficiency of the Zen 3+ architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and the Intel Arc A370M is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor, sitting at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, is a high-end part capable of driving demanding compute workloads. The GPU, with its 74th percentile position, is a mid-range entry-level discrete part. This creates a scenario where the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks; the GPU will saturate well before the CPU reaches its performance ceiling.

The PassMark physics score of 1153 and the single-thread score of 3409 indicate that the CPU has ample headroom for game logic and physics calculations. In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck will be the GPU's rendering capabilities. The Arc A370M, with its 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB of VRAM, will constrain frame rates in modern titles, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are so far ahead of the GPU's rasterization power that the system will be GPU-bound in virtually all gaming scenarios.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance is reversed. In CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, data compression, or code compilation, the processor's 16 threads will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will play a lesser role. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13497 indicates that the CPU alone can handle substantial rendering workloads, while the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist in GPU-accelerated workflows but will not dominate. The data indicates a system where the CPU is a workstation-class component and the GPU is a casual gaming or entry-level creative component, making the system's overall balance dependent on the specific workload.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores position it as a top-tier mobile processor. The Geekbench multicore score of 9850 and single-core score of 1881 demonstrate strong general-purpose performance. The Cinebench R15 scores of 2231 for multicore and 249 for single-core are consistent with the R23 results, showing a stable scaling across versions. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6745 confirms that the processor maintains high performance under sustained multi-threaded loads.

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A370M posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673. The avgBenchmarkScore for the GPU is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29197, just 0.1% higher, and the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211, also 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996, 0.6% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874, 1% lower. This indicates that the Arc A370M sits in a performance band where even a high-end mobile GPU like the RX 6800M is statistically indistinguishable in these aggregate benchmarks, though this may reflect the specific benchmark mix rather than raw gaming rasterization.

The combined system percentile is 76, reflecting a configuration that is above average but not exceptional. The CPU's 78th percentile is the primary driver of this ranking, while the GPU's 74th percentile is slightly lower but still above the median. The combined picture is that of a laptop with a strong processor that can handle demanding productivity tasks, paired with a discrete GPU that provides moderate graphics acceleration for gaming and creative applications.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX is well-suited for developers who compile large codebases, given the PassMark multithread score of 24346 and integer math score of 89388. Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the processing power for simulations and analysis, though the GPU is sufficient for visualization tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or batch processing will find the processor's 16 threads advantageous. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13497 indicates that the CPU can handle 4K video editing timelines in software without a dedicated GPU accelerator, though the Arc A370M can provide some hardware acceleration for effects and renders. Small business workstations running database applications or financial modeling will see strong performance from the CPU's data compression score of 306184.

Gamers at 1080p with esports titles or older games will find the GPU adequate, but those seeking high-refresh-rate gaming in modern AAA titles will be limited by the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus. The system is better suited as a portable workstation with occasional gaming capability rather than a dedicated gaming laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the benchmark percentile ranking for the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX?

A: The CPU is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26274.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to its closest rival?

A: The GPU's average score of 29175 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH's 29197, and 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 470's 28996.

Q: What is the combined system percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combinedPercentile is 76, indicating the system is above average compared to all tested configurations.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX does not support ECC memory, according to the specifications.

Q: What is the process node for both components?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and the Intel Arc A370M are fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the CPU in Cinebench R23?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1558, while the multicore score is 13497.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX uses the AMD Socket FP7 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is disabled or fails.

The Intel Arc A370M is an end-of-life product, meaning it cannot be upgraded in place. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 35 W. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined TDP of the CPU (45 W) and GPU (35 W) totals 80 W, which is modest for a laptop platform. This suggests that the power delivery system does not need excessive headroom, and the laptop's cooling solution is the primary constraint for performance.

A sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the DDR5 support and dual-channel bus are current-generation. The CPU is production-active, so it will remain serviceable, but the GPU's end-of-life status means that any future graphics upgrade would require a new motherboard and chassis, effectively meaning a new laptop. The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support is adequate for current storage devices, but the 20-lane allocation may limit expansion options.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and is part of the Alchemist generation targeting the mobile Arc 3 segment. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations units, along with 8 ray tracing cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The raw FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores show a Geekbench OpenCL result of 29676 and a Vulkan result of 28673. These scores, combined with the 74th percentile ranking, indicate that the GPU is competitive with older desktop mid-range parts like the AMD Radeon RX 470, which scores 28996. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for large scenes or high-resolution textures, but the 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a notable feature at this performance tier. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Build Overview

This build consists of an AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX processor and an Intel Arc A370M GPU, configured as a laptop system. The CPU is a high-end mobile part from the 6000 series, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete solution from Intel's Arc 3 mobile lineup. The combinedPercentile of 76 places this system in the upper quartile of all tested configurations, primarily driven by the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance.

The class is explicitly "laptop," meaning this is a mobile platform with integrated power management. The pairing is somewhat unusual: a processor that ranks in the 78th percentile of all CPUs is matched with a GPU in the 74th percentile, but these percentiles are relative to their respective component pools. The CPU is overkill for the GPU's capabilities in gaming, but the system overall is well-above average for productivity tasks. The overall tier is solidly mid-to-upper range, with the processor providing workstation-class compute and the GPU providing acceptable graphics acceleration for a portable system.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3409 in PassMark and 912 in 3DMark ensures it will not bottleneck game logic, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates. Esports titles at 1080p should run smoothly, but high-refresh 144 Hz+ gaming in modern titles is unlikely to be consistently achievable.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6745, can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously. The PassMark data encryption score of 19118 indicates that the CPU can manage the encryption overhead of streaming protocols without significant impact on other tasks.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13497 suggests that the CPU can handle 1080p and some 4K video editing timelines in software. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 performance can accelerate effects and color grading, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit the size of preview buffers.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multithread score of 24346 in PassMark and 16-thread 3DMark score of 6745 make it a capable CPU-based renderer. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate viewport rendering and GPU-based render engines, but the 64-bit memory bus will limit complex scenes.

Software Development: The integer math score of 89388 and data compression score of 306184 indicate fast compilation and packaging of large codebases. The Geekbench multicore score of 9850 supports heavy parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 1881 ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3409 and the system's overall 76th percentile ensure smooth performance for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 680M provides a backup for the discrete GPU, enhancing reliability for everyday tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not empirical results. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, indicating that these figures are projections.

Based on the GPU's performance percentile of 74 and its similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% higher average score), the Intel Arc A370M is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most games. The 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor for texture-heavy titles, and the 64-bit memory bus will constrain performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The CPU's 78th percentile ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario, so the GPU will define the gaming experience.

At 1080p, esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should achieve frame rates well above 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in modern AAA titles, and the 4 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced quality settings. At 4K, the GPU is not viable for modern gaming, as the memory bandwidth and capacity are insufficient. Users should expect a 1080p-focused gaming experience, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame pacing and the GPU providing entry-level discrete performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds