SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

75%

GPU

97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

4,121 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS and Intel Arc A570M form an unusual laptop pairing: an 8-core Zen 3 CPU from early 2021 combined with a 2023 Alchemist-generation discrete GPU. The data shows this combination sits at the 73rd percentile overall among all tested builds, with the CPU at the 57th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5980HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It belongs to the 5000 series and uses the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom is absent, but for a 35 W TDP part, the boost behavior matters more than manual tuning.

Benchmark results place this chip in a specific performance tier. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12629 in multi-core and 1529 in single-core. The multi-core result is the more telling figure: it suggests sustained all-core workloads like video encoding or compilation will see strong throughput from 8 physical cores. The single-core score of 1529 is competitive for its generation, indicating good responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. Cinebench R15 shows 2083 multi-core and 243 single-core, which follows the same pattern. The average benchmark score is 4121, placing the CPU at the 57th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 5980HS is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (avg score 4114), 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i5-12500TE (avg score 4083), and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (avg score 4073). It is 1% behind the Intel Core i9-9900 (avg score 4163). These deltas are small — within 1.2% either way — meaning the 5980HS trades blows with desktop parts from previous generations. For a laptop CPU, matching a desktop Core i9-9900 within 1% in average score is notable. The 12629 multi-core R23 score implies that heavy rendering tasks will be handled competently, though not at the level of higher-core desktop parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 5980HS uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered and not user-upgradable; a platform upgrade requires a new laptop. Memory support is DDR4 with a dual-channel bus, providing 68.3 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, a limitation compared to newer Gen 4 or Gen 5 platforms, but adequate for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface (which will run at Gen 3 speeds, effectively halving bandwidth to x8 Gen 3 equivalent).

The integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8, which can serve as a fallback for basic display output or light tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. The production status is Active, and the release date is 2021-01-11. The TDP is 35 W, which is low for a high-core-count part, suggesting the laptop’s cooling solution must be efficient to sustain boost clocks. With the GPU at 75 W TDP, the combined thermal load is manageable for a larger laptop chassis, but the absence of a suggested PSU value in the data means no specific power supply recommendation is available. A sensible next upgrade path for a user in this platform would be to move to a newer AMD mobile platform with DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5, but that involves a full system replacement.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12629 and single-core score of 1529 provide a baseline for compute tasks. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This is a significant gap: the GPU is far stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is. The combined percentile is 73, reflecting that the GPU pulls the overall build upward.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in average score are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, delta 0.3%), NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, delta -0.5%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, delta -0.7%). The Arc A570M is within 0.7% of all these parts, meaning it performs at a desktop-class level despite being a mobile GPU. The CPU, by contrast, is within 1.2% of its rivals, which are older desktop parts. Together, this pairing offers a GPU that is near the top of its class and a CPU that is mid-pack, creating a system where the CPU will often be the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the GPU sits at the 88th percentile while the CPU is at the 57th. In gaming, this means the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU at high frame rates, especially in CPU-intensive titles. The CPU’s single-core score of 1529 in R23 is decent but not elite; modern games that rely on a few fast cores could see the CPU as a bottleneck before the GPU maxes out. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions, the Arc A570M’s 88th percentile standing means it will carry most of the load, and the CPU’s 8 cores will be sufficient for background tasks.

The R23 multi-core score of 12629 suggests that productivity workloads like video editing will be balanced: the CPU handles encoding while the GPU accelerates effects and rendering. However, in pure 3D rendering, the GPU’s 58239 OpenCL score will dominate, and the CPU will wait. The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists, but based on the percentile gap, the bottleneck is likely the CPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are high. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and the CPU’s relative weakness is less exposed.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is aimed at users who need strong GPU compute in a laptop without requiring top-tier CPU throughput. Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with high settings will benefit from the GPU’s 88th percentile performance, though CPU-heavy games may see stutter or lower 1% lows. Content creators working in video editing will find the combination of 8 CPU cores and a powerful GPU suitable for 4K timeline editing and GPU-accelerated effects. 3D artists using OpenCL-accelerated renderers will see strong performance from the 58239 Geekbench score. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 12629 multi-core score, which shortens build times. Students and small business users handling office productivity will find the CPU’s single-core score of 1529 more than adequate for spreadsheets and web browsing, and the GPU provides headroom for occasional creative tasks. The laptop class means portability is a factor, but the 35 W CPU and 75 W GPU suggest a moderately sized chassis.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 88th percentile suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU’s 57th percentile may cap FPS in esports titles. Expect playable but not maximum refresh rates in demanding games, with better scaling at higher resolutions where the GPU is the limit.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU can handle encoding at moderate bitrates while gaming, but the lack of a dedicated encoder on the GPU (tensor cores are null in the data) means CPU-based x264 encoding will compete with game threads. The R23 multi-core score of 12629 provides enough headroom for 1080p60 streaming, but 1440p streaming may cause frame drops.

Video editing: The combination of CPU and GPU is strong here. The CPU’s 12629 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU’s 58239 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 4K timelines with moderate effects.

3D rendering: The GPU is the star. With 2048 shading units and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32, OpenCL-based renderers like Blender Cycles (GPU mode) will see near-desktop performance. The CPU’s 12629 multi-core score also allows hybrid rendering, but expect GPU-first workflows to dominate.

Software development: Compilation is CPU-bound, and the 8 cores at 4.80 GHz boost will compile code quickly. The R23 single-core score of 1529 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The GPU is irrelevant for most dev tasks, but its compute power helps with machine learning inference or local testing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance is more than enough for document editing and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but it provides future-proofing for video calls with background blur or light photo editing. The 35 W CPU TDP also implies decent battery life for a performance laptop.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 88th percentile and 58239 OpenCL score suggest it performs near the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (within 0.3%), which is a high-end desktop card. In practice, games at 1080p ultra settings should achieve high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU likely limiting in CPU-intensive games like strategy or simulation genres. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the 8 GB VRAM with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle most textures at high settings. The CPU’s 1529 single-core score is roughly on par with older desktop parts, so games that are poorly threaded may show lower frame rates than the GPU would otherwise allow. Ray tracing performance is supported via 16 dedicated RT cores, but the FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS suggests RT will be heavy; expect to use upscaling or lower RT settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS uses the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename) on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 4121, which is 1% behind the Intel Core i9-9900 (4163) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (4114).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s bandwidth at a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 16 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 73, with the CPU at 57 and the GPU at 88.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and it does not support ECC memory.

Q: Is the GPU faster or slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL?

A: The GPU scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT’s 58392.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC’s 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, delivering a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost of 1300 MHz. Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 16 RT cores, but tensor cores are not listed, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the lanes of a typical desktop card, but sufficient for mobile use. The TDP is 75 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, indicating it may be integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places this GPU at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, which is remarkable for a mobile part. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58239 vs 58392, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, delta 0.3%), NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, delta -0.5%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, delta -0.7%). The fact that a mobile GPU is within 0.7% of a flagship desktop card like the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL compute suggests the Arc A570M is a compute powerhouse, likely due to its high shading unit count and decent memory bandwidth. For rendering workloads that utilize OpenCL, this GPU will perform at a level that was previously impossible in a laptop. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be limiting for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, which could bottleneck high-resolution texture streaming in some games. The lack of tensor cores means no DLSS-like feature; the GPU relies on traditional rendering, though DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern features like mesh shaders.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 3) with the Intel Arc A570M (8 GB GDDR6, Xe-HPG). The CPU is from the 5000 series with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU has a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile is 73, indicating this is a high-midrange to upper-tier laptop configuration. The CPU’s 57th percentile is the weaker link, while the GPU’s 88th percentile is the standout component. The system is best suited for users who prioritize GPU compute and gaming over raw CPU throughput. The 8-core CPU provides adequate multi-threaded performance for productivity, and the GPU delivers near-desktop-class OpenCL performance. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but based on the GPU’s percentile, expect high settings at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU potentially capping frame rates in less threaded titles. For a laptop, this pairing offers a rare combination of strong GPU compute and reasonable CPU power, making it a versatile machine for both gaming and creative work.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A570M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds