SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

75%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

4,121 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A370M

This pairing combines an 8-core Zen 3 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop class build. The CPU sits at the 57th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 4121, while the GPU ranks higher at the 74th percentile with an average score of 29175, placing the combined system at the 66th percentile overall. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Intel Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU standing suggests it can handle esports and older titles at elevated framerates, though the 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 64-bit bus will constrain texture-heavy modern games. The CPU's single-core score of 1529 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance that keeps frame pacing stable in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's modest 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely be the limiting factor for pushing beyond 1080p high-refresh territory.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which allow simultaneous encoding and gameplay without excessive frame drops. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12629 demonstrates enough headroom for software encoding at reasonable quality settings, while the GPU's dedicated media engines (implied by its Arc architecture) could offload encode tasks, though the data does not specify encoder performance directly.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve leverages both components: the CPU's 12629 multicore score handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676 accelerate effects and color grading. The 4 GB VRAM may limit working with high-resolution timelines or multiple layers, but 1080p projects should proceed smoothly based on the combined compute throughput.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will be split between CPU and GPU paths. The CPU's 12629 Cinebench R23 multicore score places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (deltaPct 0.2) and Intel Core i9-9900 (deltaPct -1), meaning CPU rendering performance is comparable to those desktop parts. GPU rendering via the Arc A370M's 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores offers acceleration for ray-traced scenes, though the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 rate indicates modest throughput compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 16 threads for parallel compilation and the 57th percentile ranking, which places it above Intel Core i5-12500TE (0.9% faster) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (1.2% faster). The 16 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory at 68.3 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate data movement for code builds, while the GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support enables graphics debugging and compute shader development.

Student and office work sees strong performance from the 8-core CPU with a 243 single-core score in Cinebench R15, which ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet responsiveness. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks, though the discrete Arc A370M handles accelerated workloads when needed, making this pair suitable for demanding multitasking in academic settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12629 and single-core score of 1529, with older Cinebench R15 results of 2083 multicore and 243 single-core. These scores yield an average benchmark score of 4121, placing the processor at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores 4114 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i5-12500TE scores 4083 (0.9% lower), the Intel Core i9-9900 scores 4163 (1.0% higher), and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X scores 4073 (1.2% lower). This clustering indicates the 5980HS performs essentially at par with these desktop-class parts from previous generations.

The GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, averaging 29175 and ranking at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its rivals show remarkable similarity: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29197 (0.1% higher), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874 (1.0% lower). The near-identical scores across these disparate GPUs suggest the Arc A370M delivers performance comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU from the RX 470 era, despite its mobile form factor.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in relative percentile terms (74 vs 57), resulting in a combined percentile of 66. This suggests the pairing is balanced toward graphics workloads, with the CPU providing adequate but not exceptional compute relative to its GPU counterpart. The average benchmark scores — 4121 for CPU and 29175 for GPU — indicate that the GPU's raw compute output is roughly seven times the CPU's average score, though these metrics are not directly comparable across different benchmark suites.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, ranking 17 percentile points higher than the CPU. This imbalance suggests that in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings, the Arc A370M will be the primary performance driver, while the CPU has headroom to handle physics, AI, and game logic without becoming a constraint. The CPU's 57th percentile ranking means it sits near the median of all processors, so it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

However, the CPU's single-core performance, reflected in the 1529 Cinebench R23 score, may limit frame rates in titles that rely heavily on single-threaded game logic. The GPU's FPS scaling, while not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from its percentile position: at 74th percentile, it outperforms the median GPU, suggesting it can maintain playable framerates at 1080p in many titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in texture-heavy scenes.

Conversely, CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or software compilation will see the processor as the limiting factor. The 12629 multicore score places it just 1% below the Intel Core i9-9900, so multi-threaded tasks will perform similarly to that older desktop flagship, but not exceed it. The GPU's 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units offer parallel compute that can offload some rendering tasks, but the CPU remains the bottleneck for tasks that cannot be parallelized onto the GPU.

The memory subsystem further influences balance: the CPU's dual-channel DDR4 with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth pairs with the GPU's 112.0 GB/s GDDR6, meaning the GPU has faster access to its dedicated memory than the CPU has to system memory. This disparity can cause bottlenecks when data must transfer between CPU and GPU, particularly in gaming scenarios with large asset streaming.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with medium-to-high settings will find this pairing suitable, given the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and the CPU's ability to feed frames without bottlenecking. Esports titles and older AAA games should run smoothly, though the 4 GB VRAM will require texture quality reductions in newer releases. The absence of measured FPS data means these expectations are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores relative to rivals like the RX 470 and RX Vega M GH.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing and photo manipulation will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute acceleration. The OpenCL score of 29676 supports GPU-accelerated effects, while the CPU's 12629 multicore score handles export encoding. For 3D artists, the 8 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported applications, though the modest FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS limits complex scene rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache, which reduce build times compared to lower-core-count mobile processors. The CPU's proximity to desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (0.2% difference) and Core i9-9900 (1% difference) means compilation performance approaches that of last-generation desktop workstations.

Students in engineering or data science programs require multi-threaded compute for simulations and analysis. The CPU's 12629 Cinebench R23 score provides sufficient throughput for MATLAB, Python, and R workloads, while the GPU supports CUDA-like compute through OpenCL and Vulkan, though not as efficiently as dedicated NVIDIA solutions. Office workers running spreadsheets, documents, and web applications will find the 243 single-core Cinebench R15 score more than adequate for responsive daily use.

Small business workstations handling inventory management, accounting software, or light CAD will see strong performance from the CPU's 8 cores, with the GPU providing acceleration for visualization tasks. The combined 66th percentile ranking indicates this system sits above average for general productivity, making it a versatile choice for mixed workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is a mobile processor from the 5000 series, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne), with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 35 W TDP classifies it as a high-performance mobile chip for thin-and-light laptops.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, totaling a substantial pool for multi-threaded workloads. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles most graphics tasks.

Benchmark results show the CPU's multicore performance at 12629 in Cinebench R23, which is 0.2% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and 1% below the Core i9-9900. This places it firmly in the performance tier of desktop processors from the 2018-2019 era, despite being a mobile part. The single-core score of 1529 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

The 57th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms roughly 57% of processors, which is respectable for a mobile chip but not exceptional by desktop standards. The average benchmark score of 4121, derived from the Cinebench results, provides a composite metric that aligns with the nearest rivals within a narrow 1.2% band. This tight clustering suggests the 5980HS delivers consistent, predictable performance relative to its contemporaries.

For real-world workloads, the 16 threads handle parallel tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering efficiently, while the 4.8 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance. The 35 W TDP allows sustained performance in thin chassis, though sustained loads may experience thermal throttling depending on the laptop's cooling solution.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (codename Alchemist, Arc 3 Mobile generation), built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 8 dedicated RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz.

Memory consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a notable limitation: the narrow bus and modest VRAM capacity constrain performance in high-resolution textures and large scenes. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), which is standard for GDDR6 but the bandwidth is roughly one-third that of higher-tier GPUs.

Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern game APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory size, and the 35 W TDP matches the CPU's power envelope.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, averaging 29175 and ranking at the 74th percentile. The nearest rivals — RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and RX 6800M (28874, 1.0% lower) — all cluster within 1% of the Arc A370M's score. This suggests the GPU delivers performance equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU from the RX 470 era, despite its mobile form factor.

For rendering workloads, the 8 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest ALU count limits ray-tracing performance compared to higher-tier Arc or NVIDIA parts. The 1024 shading units provide adequate rasterization throughput for 1080p gaming, and the 2:1 FP16 ratio supports accelerated compute in applications that leverage half-precision math.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RX 470 (0.6% difference in average score) suggest that gaming performance will closely match that older desktop GPU, which was a popular 1080p gaming solution.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-core score of 1529 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS should deliver high framerates at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, likely exceeding 100 FPS in most scenarios. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for these lightweight titles, and the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth does not become a constraint.

For AAA games at 1080p, the estimates suggest medium settings will achieve playable framerates in the 40-60 FPS range, based on the GPU's compute throughput and the CPU's ability to maintain frame pacing. Games with heavy ray tracing will see significant performance drops due to the 8 RT cores' limited throughput, so DLSS or FSR upscaling would be necessary for playable ray-traced performance, though the data does not confirm upscaler support.

At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM becomes a critical limitation, as many modern games exceed this capacity at high textures. The estimated framerates would drop to 25-40 FPS at medium settings, making 1440p gaming marginal. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking suggests it performs above median, but the memory constraint caps its effective resolution ceiling.

The CPU's 57th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as the GPU is the weaker component relative to its peers. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle game logic and physics without strain, and the 4.8 GHz boost clock ensures responsive input. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 provides a fallback for light gaming when the discrete GPU is disabled for power saving.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket with no desktop equivalent, limiting upgrade options to other FP6-compatible processors within the same generation. The memory support is dual-channel DDR4, so upgrading to higher-capacity or faster DDR4 modules is possible, though the 68.3 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the memory controller. The PCIe Gen 3 x16 interface (CPU only) provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 connection, but future GPUs requiring PCIe 4.0 x16 may be limited.

The GPU, being end-of-life, has no direct successor within the same architecture, but the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface allows for potential upgrades to other mobile GPUs if the laptop chassis supports it, though this is typically not feasible in integrated laptop designs. The 35 W TDP for both CPU and GPU suggests the power delivery system is designed for a combined 70 W load, leaving little headroom for higher-TDP components.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory from the baseline dual-channel DDR4 configuration, as the CPU benefits from higher memory bandwidth in multi-threaded workloads. Additionally, ensuring the laptop's storage uses NVMe SSDs over PCIe Gen 3 would maximize data throughput, though the data does not specify storage interface support. The 16 MB L3 cache provides adequate on-chip storage, but workloads exceeding this capacity will rely on system memory performance.

The platform's mobile nature means upgrades are largely limited to memory and storage, as the CPU and GPU are soldered. Users seeking higher performance would need to consider a new laptop, as the FP6 socket and 35 W TDP envelope constrain component choices. The PCIe Gen 3 x16 CPU interface remains sufficient for the current GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 link, but future GPUs with higher bandwidth requirements may be bottlenecked.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, indicating the system outperforms 66% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations, with the CPU at the 57th percentile and GPU at the 74th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-9900 in multicore performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 5980HS scores 12629 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 1% lower than the Core i9-9900's average score of 4163, placing them at near-parity despite the mobile form factor.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A370M includes 8 dedicated RT cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though performance is limited by the modest ALU count.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29175 on average versus the RX 470's 28996, making it 0.6% faster, indicating near-identical performance despite the mobile form factor.

Q: Are the gaming FPS figures measured or estimated?

A: The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, an 8-core Zen 3 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 4121, while the GPU ranks at the 74th percentile with an average score of 29175, resulting in a combined percentile of 66.

The system targets portable performance with both components rated at 35 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that require moderate gaming and content creation capabilities. The CPU's multicore performance rivals desktop parts like the Core i9-9900 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, while the GPU's compute throughput matches the RX 470, a popular 1080p gaming GPU from its era.

The pairing represents a balanced mobile solution for users who need multi-threaded CPU performance and discrete GPU acceleration without the bulk of a full-size gaming laptop. The 66th combined percentile indicates it sits above the median for all systems, though the 4 GB GPU memory and 68.3 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth cap its ceiling for demanding workloads at higher resolutions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds