SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

75%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

4,121 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A350M: A Laptop Pairing with Divergent Strengths

This analysis examines a laptop build combining AMD's Ryzen 9 5980HS processor with Intel's Arc A350M discrete GPU. The CPU, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, posts a 57th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at a 70th percentile among all GPUs. Together, they form a system with a combined percentile of 64 — a pairing where the graphics card outperforms the processor in relative standing. The data in this FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Cezanne), manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5980HS compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 4121, placing it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (score 4114), 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i5-12500TE (score 4083), 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (score 4073), and 1% behind the Intel Core i9-9900 (score 4163).

Q: What is the Intel Arc A350M's memory configuration?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the Arc A350M's average benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24647 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the Radeon RX 590's score of 24744. The delta is minimal, indicating near-identical overall compute performance in these benchmarks.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 5980HS support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a total bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU is marked as End-of-life, with a release date of 2022-03-29. The CPU, by contrast, remains in Active production status with a release date of 2021-01-11.

Q: What API features does the Arc A350M support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores, though it does not list tensor cores in the specifications.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and its near-parity with the Radeon RX 590 (0.4% gap) suggest it can handle esports titles at moderate settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus may constrain texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's single-core score of 1529 in Cinebench R23 indicates adequate responsiveness for frame pacing, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12629 placing it in the 57th percentile. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics could serve as a secondary encoder, but the discrete Arc GPU's 25 W TDP suggests thermal headroom is limited for simultaneous encoding and rendering.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve relies heavily on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-core performance is 0.2% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (avg score 4121), while the GPU's fp32 compute of 3.379 TFLOPS and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. The 4 GB VRAM may become a bottleneck for 4K timelines.

3D rendering tasks, such as Blender or Cinema 4D, will see the CPU pulling more weight relative to the GPU. The Ryzen 9 5980HS's 16 MB shared L3 cache and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth support complex scenes, but the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS fp32 performance trails what a desktop-class GPU would offer, making GPU-accelerated renders slower than CPU-only paths in some scenarios.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and single-core strength — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1529 — for compilation tasks. The 57th CPU percentile means it is not a top-tier developer chip, but the 0.9% edge over the Core i5-12500TE (avg 4083) shows it remains competitive for code builds and virtual machines.

Student and office work is where this pairing excels. The CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP together create a power-efficient laptop for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet analysis. The 70th GPU percentile ensures smooth UI rendering, while the CPU's 8 cores handle multitasking without stutter, making this a capable all-rounder for academic workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, using TSMC's 7 nm process node. It integrates 10,700 million transistors across a 180 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 8 cores and 16 threads share 16 MB of L3 cache, with each core having 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 12629 in multi-core and 1529 in single-core tests. The multi-core score places it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs, a respectable mid-range position. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900, scores 4163 on average — just 1% higher — indicating that the 5980HS delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 35 W TDP envelope. The single-core score of 1529 is competitive for daily tasks and lightly-threaded applications, though it does not lead its class.

The 0.2% gap over the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (avg 4114) and 0.9% over the Core i5-12500TE (avg 4083) suggests that the 5980HS sits in a dense performance cluster where small architectural differences matter more than raw clock speeds. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock is notably high for a 35 W part, and the 16 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency in multi-core workloads. For real-world tasks, the data implies this CPU can handle sustained multi-threaded loads — such as video encoding or software compilation — while maintaining reasonable power draw, given its TDP rating.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 64, with a CPU at 57 and GPU at 70, reveals an imbalance where the graphics card has more relative headroom than the processor. In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulations, AI inference, or database queries — the Ryzen 9 5980HS will be the limiting factor, as its 57th percentile ranking is below the GPU's 70th percentile. The 16 MB L3 cache and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth may struggle to feed the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth in data-heavy scenes, creating a potential memory subsystem bottleneck.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming or ray-traced rendering, the Arc A350M becomes the constraint. Its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus width (112.0 GB/s) are modest by modern standards, and the 0.4% performance gap with the Radeon RX 590 — a desktop card from 2018 — shows this is not a high-end mobile GPU. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads would be underutilized in such workloads, leaving compute capacity on the table.

The FPS scaling between the two components is not directly measurable here, as no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU's single-core advantage (1529 in Cinebench R23) should prevent severe frame pacing issues in esports titles, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS fp32 performance will cap maximum frame rates in graphically intense games. The 25 W GPU TDP combined with the 35 W CPU TDP suggests a total system power budget that favors balanced workloads over sustained peak performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 4121, derived from Cinebench R15 (2083 multi-core, 243 single-core) and Cinebench R23 (12629 multi-core, 1529 single-core) results. This score places it at the 57th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X at 4114 (0.2% behind), the Core i5-12500TE at 4083 (0.9% behind), the Core i9-9900 at 4163 (1% ahead), and the Threadripper 1900X at 4073 (1.2% behind). This indicates the 5980HS is a solid mid-range mobile CPU, competitive with older desktop parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, from Geekbench OpenCL (24546) and Vulkan (24747) tests. This puts it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, which is notably higher than the CPU's standing. The nearest rivals include the Radeon RX 590 at 24744 (0.4% ahead), the RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (0.5% ahead), the Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 (0.8% behind), and the GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (1.5% behind). The GPU's performance is thus comparable to a desktop RX 590, which is impressive for a 25 W mobile part.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in relative terms — 70 vs 57 percentile. This means the pairing is better suited for graphics-intensive tasks than for pure compute or multi-threaded workloads. The CPU's 1% deficit to the Core i9-9900 (avg 4163) is minor, but the GPU's 1.5% lead over the GTX 1630 (avg 24277) is more substantial, suggesting the A350M provides proportionally more graphics performance than the CPU provides processing power.

Who Should Build It

Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and 4 GB VRAM adequate for most titles, though the 64-bit memory bus may limit texture streaming. The CPU's single-core score of 1529 in Cinebench R23 ensures stable frame delivery in CPU-light games. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS fp32 performance will be insufficient, making this a 1080p-focused gaming laptop.

Content creators working with 1080p video or still images will benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, as evidenced by the 12629 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU's 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate accelerate effects and compositing, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for large textures or multi-layer compositions. Developers compiling code or running VMs will appreciate the 16 threads and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, with the CPU's 57th percentile ranking proving adequate for most build processes.

Students and small business users will find this pairing efficient for office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The combined 60 W TDP (35 W CPU + 25 W GPU) extends battery life in laptops, while the 70th GPU percentile ensures smooth UI animations and video playback. The CPU's 0.9% lead over the Core i5-12500TE (avg 4083) means it can handle occasional multi-threaded tasks like data analysis or presentation rendering without significant slowdown.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Arc A350M's average Geekbench score of 24647, which places it 0.8% ahead of the Radeon RX 6600 XT (avg 24442) and 1.5% ahead of the GTX 1630 (avg 24277), suggests it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in most modern titles. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraints, potentially causing stutter in games with large texture packs.

For esports titles like CS:GO, Valorant, or Rocket League, the CPU's single-core performance (1529 in Cinebench R23) combined with the GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate should push frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p, even on high settings. The 0.4% gap to the Radeon RX 590 (avg 24744) indicates the A350M can handle competitive gaming demands, though the 64-bit bus may cause frame dips in crowded scenes.

For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Valhalla, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS fp32 performance will likely deliver 30-50 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, with ray tracing (6 RT cores) available but at a significant performance cost. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for these workloads, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will force texture quality reductions. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming system for esports and older titles, not a high-refresh or high-resolution machine.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) pairing AMD's Ryzen 9 5980HS mobile processor with Intel's Arc A350M discrete GPU. The CPU, from the 5000 series based on Zen 3 (Cezanne), is a 35 W part with 8 cores and 16 threads. The GPU, based on Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist, Arc 3 Mobile), is a 25 W part with 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 64 places this system in the upper-mid range of all laptop configurations.

The CPU's 57th percentile and GPU's 70th percentile create a system that is more graphics-capable than compute-capable. The GPU's near-parity with the Radeon RX 590 (0.4% gap) is notable for a mobile 25 W part, while the CPU's 1% deficit to the Core i9-9900 (avg 4163) shows it is a competent processor despite being older. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize graphics performance over multi-threaded compute, such as gamers or light content creators, rather than heavy renderers or data scientists.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's fp32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with fp16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s.

The Geekbench scores — 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan — average to 24647, placing the GPU at the 70th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Radeon RX 590, scores 24744 (0.4% ahead), indicating the A350M delivers desktop-class compute in a 25 W package. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are severe limitations for modern rendering workloads, as they cap texture memory and bandwidth far below what the compute units can sustain. The 6 RT cores enable ray tracing, but with only 3.379 TFLOPS fp32, ray-traced scenes will run at low resolutions or settings.

For rendering in Blender or Maya, the GPU's 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate helps with texture-heavy scenes, but the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will bottleneck large geometry or high-res textures. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern game engines, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 cover most professional applications. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, though fp16 at 6.758 TFLOPS can be used for some neural network inference.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the processor is likely soldered and not upgradeable. The GPU is also integrated (slotWidth: IGP), so this is a closed platform where neither component can be swapped. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and the system uses PCIe Gen 3 (16 lanes from the CPU) and PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU. This means memory upgrades are possible, but the CPU and GPU are fixed.

The CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP together suggest a total system power draw around 60 W for these components, plus the rest of the laptop. The FACT PACK provides no suggested PSU rating for the GPU, so power headroom must be inferred from the TDP figures. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system RAM to the maximum supported by the dual-channel DDR4 controller, as the 68.3 GB/s bandwidth is a shared resource for both CPU and GPU.

For storage, the PCIe Gen 3 x16 lanes from the CPU could support a fast NVMe SSD, while the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface leaves bandwidth headroom for future external GPU enclosures, though the laptop's IGP design makes this unlikely. Given the GPU's End-of-life status and the CPU's Active production, the platform is nearing the end of its upgrade viability. The most practical enhancement would be adding more memory or faster DDR4 modules, as the CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and 8 cores remain competitive, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is the primary bottleneck for future software demands.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds