SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc A750: High-Core Desktop Pairing with Balanced 1440p Potential

This build pairs AMD's 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card in a desktop configuration. The combined system ranks at the 79th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings, indicating a strong overall performer. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component rather than direct game testing. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 66th percentile among all graphics cards, revealing a system where the processor substantially outclasses the graphics adapter in relative standing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows are available for this CPU+GPU pairing, frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests capable 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory throughput for modern titles at high settings. The 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate and 28 ray tracing cores indicate solid rasterization and entry-level ray tracing capability.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A750 should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles, given its 66th percentile standing. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest graphics APIs, while Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support broaden software compatibility. The 112 ROPs and 224 TMUs provide solid pixel and texture throughput, with a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. For 1440p gaming, the A750's 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy titles, but the high memory bandwidth helps mitigate this constraint.

The Ryzen 9 5950X's strong single-threaded performance — evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,083 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,614 — ensures the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,856 and 4-thread score of 3,595 indicate robust performance in lightly-threaded game engines. In CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p, the 5950X's 4.90 GHz boost clock and Zen 3 architecture provide the responsiveness needed for high-refresh-rate gaming. However, at higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary performance limiter, and the A750's 66th percentile standing suggests frame rates will be more modest.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 5950X delivers an average benchmark score of 51,947, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkable parity: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073 (0.2% ahead), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52,301 (0.7% ahead). This clustering indicates the 5950X remains competitive with much newer processors despite its 2020 release. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 45,424, demonstrating exceptional parallel processing capability. The 3DMark max-threads score of 11,597 further confirms strong scaling across all 32 threads.

The Intel Arc A750 produces an average benchmark score of 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are similarly tightly grouped: the Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556 (0.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.2% behind), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (0.5% behind). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 indicate solid compute capability, while the Vulkan score of 85,631 shows strong cross-API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 12,534 places the card firmly in mid-range territory.

The combined picture shows a significant imbalance: the CPU outperforms its peer group by a wide margin while the GPU sits closer to the median. The combined 79th percentile ranking reflects this disparity, with the CPU's 91st percentile strength pulling the overall score up against the GPU's 66th percentile contribution. This configuration prioritizes processor-heavy workloads while maintaining respectable gaming capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X features 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The processor operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing 105 W TDP. Built on the Vermeer codename, this chip integrates 8,300 million transistors across a dual-die design with two 74 mm² dies. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, which is critical for gaming and productivity workloads that benefit from large shared caches.

In single-threaded performance, the 5950X achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 3,470 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,083, placing it competitively against newer processors. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 266.5 further validates strong per-core efficiency. Multi-threaded results are exceptional: the PassMark integer math score of 185,520 and floating-point math score of 100,280 demonstrate the processor's arithmetic prowess. The PassMark data compression score of 624,347 and data encryption score of 39,593 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while the extended instructions score of 40,268 shows robust SIMD capability.

Real-world workload implications are substantial. The 32 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,810 versus the 8-thread score of 6,598 demonstrates near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads, indicating excellent thread utilization. The PassMark physics score of 1,878 and find prime numbers score of 228 show solid performance in physics simulations and mathematical computations. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR4 supports these workloads adequately, though not exceptional by modern standards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the 5950X's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,856 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,083 — ensures the CPU can feed frames rapidly. The Arc A750's 66th percentile GPU standing supports high frame rates in less demanding titles, though the GPU becomes the limiting factor in graphically intensive games. The 8 GB VRAM may restrict texture quality at higher settings.

Streaming: The 5950X's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017 indicates the CPU can handle x264 encoding alongside gameplay without significant frame drops. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45,424 further confirms this capability, making software encoding a viable option without requiring a dedicated streaming GPU.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks benefit from the 5950X's multi-threaded performance. The PassMark data compression score of 624,347 and integer math score of 185,520 support efficient video processing pipelines. The Arc A750's OpenCL score of 98,554 provides GPU acceleration for effects and transitions, though the GPU's 66th percentile standing means GPU-accelerated rendering will be moderate rather than exceptional.

3D Rendering: The 5950X excels in CPU-based rendering workloads, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017 and 3DMark max-threads score of 11,597 indicating strong performance in Blender, Maya, and similar applications. The Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate provides additional GPU rendering acceleration, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software Development: Compilation times benefit from the 32 threads and high integer performance (PassMark integer math score of 185,520). The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in iterative builds. The dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s supports large codebases and virtual machines, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and Office Work: For document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the 5950X's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,470) provides snappy responsiveness. The Arc A750's G2D score of 732 supports smooth 2D rendering for office applications. This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the headroom ensures no slowdowns even with many concurrent applications.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X still competitive against newer processors?

A: Yes. The 5950X's average benchmark score of 51,947 places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals — including the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX and Intel Core i7-14700 — are within 0.7% in average score, despite being newer releases.

Q: What resolution is the Arc A750 best suited for?

A: Based on its 66th percentile GPU standing and 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, the A750 is best suited for 1080p gaming. It can handle 1440p in many titles, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer games.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 5950X supports ECC memory, which provides error correction for memory-intensive workloads like scientific computing, database servers, and long-running rendering jobs.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The A750's average benchmark score of 20,582 is within 0.5% of the Intel Arc B570, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, AMD Radeon R9 M390X, and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, indicating near-identical performance among these GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X provides 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth over a dual-channel DDR4 interface, which is adequate for most workloads but lower than newer platforms with DDR5 support.

Q: Is the GPU production status a concern?

A: The Intel Arc A750 is marked as end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage. However, the GPU remains supported with DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 APIs, ensuring ongoing software compatibility.

Q: What is the combined system's performance percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU pairing ranks at the 79th percentile of all desktop configurations, indicating a system that outperforms roughly four-fifths of all build combinations.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads while maintaining solid gaming capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 5950X's 32 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,017. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 185,520 and the 64 MB L3 cache. Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find the multi-threaded performance useful for simulations and data processing, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for research work.

Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A750's 66th percentile standing sufficient for most titles at high settings, particularly in esports and less demanding games. Those targeting 1440p should consider the 8 GB VRAM limitation carefully, as texture-heavy titles may require reduced settings. Small business workstations handling databases, virtual machines, or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the PassMark data encryption score of 39,593. However, users whose primary focus is high-resolution gaming at maximum settings may find the GPU the limiting factor, and should consider whether the A750's mid-range standing meets their expectations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this build is clear from the percentile data: the CPU at the 91st percentile versus the GPU at the 66th percentile creates a system where the processor is never the limiting factor in gaming workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, the 5950X's strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2,083, 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,856) ensures frames are delivered to the GPU without delay. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU in graphically intensive titles, where the A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 8 GB VRAM determine the ceiling for frame rates and texture quality.

In productivity workloads, the balance inverts. The GPU's compute capabilities — evidenced by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and PassMark GPU compute score of 5,368 — provide acceleration for certain tasks, but the CPU's 32 threads dominate in heavily parallel workloads. The 3DMark scaling from 8 threads (6,598) to 16 threads (10,810) to max threads (11,597) shows diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, suggesting the CPU has headroom that many applications cannot fully utilize. For gaming, the FPS scaling would show the GPU as the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strength would manifest in minimum frame rates and frame-time consistency.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD's Ryzen 9 5950X — a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 5000 series based on Zen 3 architecture — with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card based on Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU, released on November 4, 2020, carries a launch MSRP of $799. The GPU, released on October 11, 2022, carries a launch MSRP of 289 USD. The combined system ranks at the 79th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations. The CPU's 91st percentile standing makes it a high-end processor even by current standards, while the GPU's 66th percentile places it in the mid-range segment. This pairing creates a workstation-class CPU with a mainstream gaming GPU, resulting in a system that excels at productivity and handles gaming competently but not at the highest levels.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 5950X uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which represents the final generation of that socket. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support. The GPU requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a 225 W TDP. The CPU's 105 W TDP means the total system power draw is moderate, leaving headroom in most quality power supplies.

The upgrade path for this platform is limited because AM4 is a mature socket with no new processors expected. The 5950X already represents the top of the AM4 CPU lineup, so a CPU upgrade would require moving to a new platform (e.g., AM5) with DDR5 memory and a new motherboard. For the GPU, the Arc A750's end-of-life status with Battlemage as the successor suggests a future GPU upgrade would involve either Intel's next-generation cards or competing offerings. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU to better match the CPU's 91st percentile performance, as the current 66th percentile GPU leaves performance on the table in gaming scenarios. Alternatively, adding a second GPU for compute workloads could leverage the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, though driver support for multi-GPU configurations would need verification. The 550 W PSU recommendation provides adequate headroom for the current configuration, but a GPU upgrade to a more powerful card would likely require a larger power supply.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds