SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the Intel Arc A310E is a study in contrasts. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread powerhouse that ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This combination targets users whose workloads are heavily CPU-bound.

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is not ideal. The Ryzen 9's single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1,614 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, but the Arc A310E's modest 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB of VRAM will bottleneck frame rates at high refresh rates. Gamers seeking 240 Hz or even 144 Hz experiences would need a more capable GPU.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 32 threads. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a Passmark multithread score of 45,424 can handle encoding, scene compositing, and game capture simultaneously. The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache helps maintain smooth streaming performance even with multiple background tasks.

Video editing is where this pairing shines. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 and Geekbench multicore score of 15,233 indicate excellent rendering capability. Timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export tasks will be CPU-bound, and the 32 threads handle these efficiently.

3D rendering workloads are strongly favored. The Passmark integer math score of 185,520 and floating-point math score of 100,280 demonstrate substantial computational throughput. The CPU's 16 cores directly translate to faster ray tracing and physics simulation in CPU-based render engines.

Software development benefits from the high core count and the Passmark data compression score of 624,347, which speeds up compilation and code analysis tasks. The 32 threads allow parallel builds to complete faster, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases.

Student and office work is overkill for this CPU, but the Arc A310E's 50th percentile GPU standing means everyday tasks like document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet processing are handled without issue. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p office displays, and the 75 W GPU TDP keeps power consumption low for campus environments.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 5950X posts an average benchmark score of 51,947, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, scores 52,073, which is a mere 0.2% difference — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121, 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-13900F trails at 51,730, 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i7-14700 leads this group slightly at 52,301, 0.7% above the Ryzen 9.

In specific CPU tests, the 3DMark suite shows scalability: 1,856 for 2 threads, 3,595 for 4 threads, 6,598 for 8 threads, 10,810 for 16 threads, and 11,597 for max threads. This progression demonstrates strong multi-threading efficiency, though the gap between 16 and 32 threads suggests diminishing returns beyond 16 cores in some workloads.

Cinebench R23 scores are 26,017 multicore and 1,614 single-core. The single-core result is respectable but not class-leading, indicating the 4.90 GHz boost clock delivers solid per-thread performance. Geekbench results are 15,233 multicore and 2,083 single-core, reinforcing the CPU's balanced performance profile.

The Passmark suite reveals workload-specific strengths. Data encryption scores 39,593, extended instructions 40,468, and prime number finding 228. Integer math at 185,520 and floating-point math at 100,280 are strong, while the single-thread score of 3,470 shows the architecture's efficiency.

The Intel Arc A310E has no benchmark scores in the data, but its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates mid-pack performance. The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting the CPU's dominance pulling the average upward despite the GPU's middling standing.

# CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It uses a 7 nm process at TSMC with 8,300 million transistors across a dual-chip design measuring 2x 74 mm². The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Cache configuration is generous: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. This large L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, which is critical for gaming and database workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported for reliability-sensitive applications.

The 105 W TDP is moderate for a 16-core part, indicating good power efficiency from the 7 nm process. The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's scaling characteristics. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,856 doubles to 3,595 at 4 threads, a 93.7% scaling efficiency. From 8 threads (6,598) to 16 threads (10,810), scaling is 63.8%, and from 16 to 32 threads, it's just 7.3%. This suggests that workloads using up to 16 threads benefit nearly linearly, but the second CCD (chiplet) provides diminishing returns beyond that point.

The Passmark multithread score of 45,424 is strong, but the single-thread score of 3,470 reveals that per-core performance is not exceptional compared to newer architectures. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,614 confirms this — it's capable, but not a leader. The CPU's strength clearly lies in multi-threaded throughput.

For real workloads, this means video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing tasks that can utilize 16 or more threads will see excellent performance. Tasks that rely on single-thread speed, such as some gaming physics and legacy applications, will perform adequately but not at the level of the latest competition.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this pairing is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 9 5950X, at the 91st CPU percentile, vastly outperforms the Arc A310E at the 50th GPU percentile. This creates a clear CPU-dominant system where the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck is unambiguous. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can feed. The CPU's strong single-thread scores — 944 in 3DMark single-thread and 3,470 in Passmark single-thread — can handle game logic and draw calls, but the GPU cannot translate that into high FPS.

For productivity workloads, the balance is more favorable. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means compute tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing will run at near-top-tier speeds. The GPU's 50th percentile standing is sufficient for display output and basic acceleration, but not for GPU-accelerated rendering or heavy compute.

The combined system percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance — it's above average but not exceptional, dragged down by the GPU's mediocrity. The 32 GPU threads and 6 RT cores provide some acceleration capability, but the 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit GPU compute performance.

PSU requirements reveal the system's modest power appetite. The CPU's 105 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, indicate a low-power build. This means the bottleneck is not power-related; the GPU simply has limited silicon resources.

Users should be aware that upgrading the GPU would dramatically improve gaming performance, but the CPU would remain the system's backbone. Conversely, pushing the CPU with heavy multi-threaded workloads will not be hindered by the GPU, as most render tasks are CPU-bound.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for users who prioritize CPU performance and only need basic GPU capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from the Ryzen 9's 16 cores and 32 threads.

Video editors using CPU-based encoding will see Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 26,017 translate into faster export times. The 64 MB L3 cache and 32 threads handle 4K timeline scrubbing and effects processing smoothly, even while other applications run in the background.

3D artists and architects using CPU-based render engines will appreciate the Passmark floating-point math score of 100,280. The 16 physical cores accelerate ray tracing and physics simulations, while the GPU provides adequate OpenGL 4.6 support for viewport display.

Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the Passmark data compression score of 624,347, which speeds up build systems and version control operations. The 32 threads allow parallel compilation, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Students and small business workstations will find this system more than adequate for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web-based applications. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking handles dual-monitor productivity setups with ease, and the 75 W GPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool.

Gamers should avoid this pairing unless they plan to upgrade the GPU. At 1080p with low settings, the Arc A310E can manage some titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus severely limit modern games. The CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient for gaming, but the GPU is the constraint.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Ryzen 9 5950X's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5950X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores 51,947 on average benchmark, which is 0.2% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, 0.3% below the AMD EPYC 8124P, 0.4% above the Intel Core i9-13900F, and 0.7% below the Intel Core i7-14700.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, along with DDR4 in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the system's combined performance percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting the CPU's 91st percentile standing and the GPU's 50th percentile standing.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, suitable for fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310E is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3), using a 6 nm process at TSMC. The DG2-128 chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm².

The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 6 RT cores for hardware ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, and memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is modest by any standard, and the small VRAM capacity will limit texture detail and resolution in modern games. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it's average — not a gaming GPU but not entirely incapable.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is unusual for a low-power card and suggests professional multi-display use.

The TDP is 75 W with no power connectors required, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. It's a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its 50th percentile ranking is based on aggregate hardware characteristics. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is sufficient for basic GPU acceleration in applications like Blender or Premiere Pro, but the 4 GB VRAM will struggle with large textures or high-resolution renders. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but performance will be limited.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X CPU with the Intel Arc A310E GPU. The CPU is a 5000-series processor on the AM4 platform, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc product. The system's combined percentile is 71, indicating above-average overall performance.

The CPU is the clear star, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 51,947. It's competitive with top-tier processors like the Intel Core i9-13900F, which it beats by 0.4%, and the Intel Core i7-14700, which beats it by 0.7%. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is average.

This pairing creates a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is limited in graphics performance. It's a workstation-oriented build where the GPU serves primarily for display output and light acceleration rather than gaming or GPU compute.

The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads make it suitable for professional workloads, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level specs. The system's total power draw is low — 105 W CPU TDP plus 75 W GPU TDP — making it efficient and easy to cool.

The build class is desktop, meaning it's designed for stationary use. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and the GPU is single-slot with no power connectors, making installation straightforward. The overall tier, based on the 71st combined percentile, is mid-to-high range, with the CPU pulling the system above average.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 5950X uses AMD Socket AM4, which is a mature platform with a wide range of compatible motherboards. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is available for error-checking workloads.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The Arc A310E uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it won't saturate the CPU's lanes, leaving room for additional expansion.

Memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, which is adequate for most workloads but not exceptional. The 64 MB L3 cache helps compensate for memory latency, but users with memory-intensive applications might consider higher-speed DDR4 kits.

The system's power headroom is substantial. The CPU's 105 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, mean there's ample room for a GPU upgrade. Swapping the Arc A310E for a more powerful GPU — one with higher percentile standing — would dramatically improve gaming and GPU compute performance without changing the platform.

The CPU itself is near the top of its platform. The AM4 socket's flagship processors are all Zen 3 parts, and the 5950X is among the best. A CPU upgrade would require moving to a new platform, but the current CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck for most workloads.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, given the CPU's 91st percentile standing and the GPU's 50th percentile. This would balance the system and unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. Alternatively, adding more or faster DDR4 memory could benefit memory-sensitive workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates based on benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The CPU's single-thread performance — 944 in 3DMark single-thread and 3,470 in Passmark single-thread — is sufficient for gaming. Modern games typically require strong per-core performance for game logic, and the Ryzen 9 delivers that.

However, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM will be the limiting factor. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the Arc A310E might achieve playable frame rates in esports titles and older games. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance in memory-intensive scenes.

At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle significantly. The 4 GB VRAM will be exceeded by many modern titles, causing texture streaming issues and frame rate drops. The 32.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 64.00 GTexel/s texture rate are insufficient for high-resolution rendering.

The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads won't help in most games, which typically use fewer than 8 threads. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,598 indicates strong multi-threaded performance, but games rarely scale beyond 8 threads.

For high-refresh gaming (144 Hz or above), this pairing is not suitable. The GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can supply. Users seeking competitive gaming performance should consider a different GPU, while those playing less demanding titles at 1080p may find acceptable performance with lowered settings.

The system's 250 W suggested PSU indicates low power draw, which is beneficial for compact builds but also confirms the GPU's modest performance envelope. Overall, gaming on this system is possible but not recommended for serious gamers.