SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with an Intel Arc A310 is a study in extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread powerhouse that ranks in the 91st percentile of all processors, while the GPU is a 30-watt entry-level card that sits in the 40th percentile of all graphics cards. Consequently, the combined benchmark picture is entirely dictated by the workload: any task that leverages the CPU’s immense thread count will be exceptional, while any task that depends on the GPU will be severely constrained. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation here is AMD’s mature Socket AM4, which anchors the Ryzen 9 5950X. This is a Zen 3 architecture part, codenamed Vermeer, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 8,300 million transistors spread across a dual-die design (2x 74 mm²). The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability, offering 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. For storage and expansion, the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is ample for a high-speed NVMe SSD and a primary graphics card. The 105 W TDP is modest for the core count, meaning most AM4 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it.

The GPU side of the platform introduces a different set of requirements. The Intel Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the x16 slots most desktop boards allocate for graphics. In this configuration, the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is the limiting factor for any data-heavy workload. The card draws only 30 W and requires no external power connectors, making it a single-slot, low-power add-in that any standard desktop PSU can handle. The suggested PSU for this GPU is a modest 200 W, which is trivially satisfied by any power supply capable of feeding the 5950X.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to one clear direction: replace the Arc A310. The CPU has headroom to drive a much more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its 91st percentile rank and high multi-threaded scores. A user could keep the 5950X, the AM4 motherboard, and the DDR4 memory, and simply install a higher-end graphics card. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and 105 W TDP leave substantial room for a GPU with higher power demands and bandwidth needs. The platform itself is not the bottleneck; the current GPU is. The CPU’s active production status and unlocked multiplier suggest that it remains a viable upgrade target for users on older AM4 boards, offering a drop-in path to 16 cores and 32 threads without a platform change.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a severe bottleneck imbalance in favor of the CPU. The Ryzen 9 5950X delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15233, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900F, which scores 51730 on the aggregate average benchmark with a deltaPct of 0.4, and the Intel Core i7-14700, which scores 52301 with a deltaPct of -0.7. This means the 5950X is statistically neck-and-neck with these top-tier consumer chips, differing by less than one percent in average score.

Conversely, the Intel Arc A310’s Passmark G3D score is 5433, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 250, which scores 7557 with a deltaPct of -0.1, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which scores 7472 with a deltaPct of 1. The GPU is functionally in the same performance class as decade-old entry-level cards. This creates a situation where the CPU can process game logic, physics, and AI calculations far faster than the GPU can render frames. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-object-count strategy games or software compilation, the system will perform exceptionally. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as modern 3D games at high resolutions, the system will be limited to the Arc A310’s modest capabilities.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this conclusion. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1856 and single-thread score of 944 are strong, indicating that even lightly-threaded tasks are handled well. However, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 29 is a fraction of what modern games require. The bottleneck is not the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s inability to render frames quickly enough to utilize the CPU’s headroom. Any workload that is primarily graphical will be capped by the Arc A310; any workload that is purely computational will be capped by the CPU’s 32 threads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s performance profile is top-tier. In Cinebench R23, it scores 26017 in multi-core and 1614 in single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 4324 multi-core and 266.5 single-core. Geekbench results are 15233 multi-core and 2083 single-core. The Passmark multi-thread score is 45424, with a single-thread score of 3470. In specific computational tasks, the 5950X excels: Passmark integer math scores 185520, floating-point math scores 100280, and data encryption scores 39593. Data compression hits 624347, and random string sorting reaches 65172. The extended instructions score is 40468, while physics scores 1878. The average benchmark score across all tests is 51947, placing it at the 91st percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, scores 52073 with a deltaPct of -0.2, meaning the 5950X is virtually identical in aggregate performance.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is entry-level. The Passmark G3D score is 5433, and the Passmark GPU compute score is 2157. In synthetic API tests, Passmark DirectX 9 scores 69, DirectX 10 scores 31, DirectX 11 scores 33, and DirectX 12 scores 29. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 30607, and the Vulkan score is 28964. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 7550, placing it at the 40th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R7 250, scores 7557 with a deltaPct of -0.1, indicating the Arc A310 is on par with a card from several generations ago. The combined picture is a system that is a top-10% performer for CPUs and a bottom-half performer for GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 66.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets a niche set of users who need massive CPU throughput but have minimal graphical requirements. For gamers at 1080p with esports titles or older games, the Arc A310 can deliver playable frame rates, but the 5950X is overkill for this purpose. A more sensible target is the content creator who works primarily with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, and only needs basic display output. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, as the Passmark data compression score of 624347 and integer math score of 185520 indicate strong parallel performance. Students and small business workstations that run office suites, spreadsheets, and database queries will find the CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 15233 to be more than sufficient for their needs.

The system is less suitable for gamers targeting high-refresh-rate experiences or modern AAA titles, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and low compute scores will be the limiting factor. The Arc A310’s 40th percentile rank and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest it is not designed for current-generation gaming. The intended user is someone who prioritizes parallel processing power for productivity and is willing to accept minimal graphical performance or plans to upgrade the GPU later. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank and the GPU’s 40th percentile rank create a system where the CPU is a long-term investment and the GPU is a placeholder.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Arc A310’s Passmark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 indicate that it is best suited for low-resolution, low-detail settings in older or less demanding games. At 1080p with ultra settings, modern games will likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates due to the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU, with a 3DMark 8-thread score of 6598 and a max-thread score of 11597, will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the system may achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with medium or low settings. For AAA titles released in the last few years, the expectation is that the Arc A310 will deliver low to medium settings at 1080p, with frame rates that are playable but far from high-refresh. The CPU’s single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensure that game logic and physics will be processed without issue. The bottleneck in all gaming scenarios will be the GPU’s rendering throughput, which is estimated to be comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, given the 1 percent deltaPct in average benchmark score.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-Refresh Gaming: Not recommended. The Arc A310’s estimated performance, based on its Passmark G3D score of 5433, is insufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors in modern titles. The CPU can handle the workload, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below 144 Hz in most games.
  • Streaming: The CPU is excellent for encoding. The 5950X’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and Passmark multi-thread score of 45424 allow for software x264 encoding without impacting game performance, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 29 means the game itself will run poorly.
  • Video Editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23: 26017) will accelerate rendering and export times in editors like Premiere Pro, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 30607 provides basic acceleration for effects and transitions.
  • 3D Rendering: Excellent for CPU rendering. The 5950X’s Passmark floating-point math score of 100280 and 16 cores will render scenes in Blender or similar software efficiently. GPU rendering with the Arc A310 is not viable due to its low compute score of 2157.
  • Software Development: Very strong. The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 624347 and integer math score of 185520 indicate fast compilation times and efficient parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload.
  • Student and Office Work: Overkill but functional. The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2083 handles web browsing and office applications with ease. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 625 is sufficient for 2D desktop rendering and basic video playback.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, using TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The card has 6 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The clocks are fixed at a base and boost of 1750 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores for the Arc A310 are low across the board. The Passmark G3D score of 5433 places it at the 40th percentile, and the DirectX 12 score of 29 is particularly weak, indicating poor performance in modern graphics APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 28964 is better than the DirectX scores, but still entry-level. For rendering, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for textures and scene complexity. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the low FP32 throughput suggests that ray-traced workloads will be very slow. The card’s 30 W TDP and single-slot design make it ideal for low-power or HTPC builds, but its performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon R7 250, which is a card from a much older generation.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU pair is 66, indicating that this system outperforms 66% of all desktop combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5950X compare to the Intel Core i9-13900F?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51947, while the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51730. The deltaPct is 0.4, meaning the 5950X is 0.4% faster on average.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A310?

A: The Arc A310 has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, achieved through 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A310 has 6 ray tracing cores, but its low FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS suggests that ray-traced workloads will be limited.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the Arc A310?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A310 is 200 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 30 W with no external power connectors required.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a good CPU for multi-threaded tasks?

A: The data indicates yes. It scores 26017 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 45424 in Passmark multi-thread, placing it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the socket and memory type for the Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with ECC capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture and codenamed Vermeer. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with a transistor count of 8,300 million across a dual-die design. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 105 W, and the processor has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a large 64 MB of L3 cache. The memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with ECC capability, offering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and has a launch MSRP of $799.

The benchmark results for the 5950X are exceptional. It scores 10810 in 3DMark 16-thread and 11597 in 3DMark max-thread, indicating excellent scaling with thread count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15233 are high, confirming its position at the 91st percentile. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1614 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2083. In Passmark tests, the CPU excels in data encryption (39593), integer math (185520), floating-point math (100280), and data compression (624347). The average benchmark score of 51947 places it in the same league as the Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i7-14700, with deltas of less than 1%.

For real workloads, the 5950X is a top-tier choice for any CPU-bound task. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as evidenced by the high multi-threaded scores. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with gaming and data-intensive applications. The CPU’s ECC memory support and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it suitable for workstation-class builds. The only caveat is the 105 W TDP, which is modest for the core count, meaning that sustained all-core loads may require adequate cooling to maintain boost clocks. The production status is active, and the unlocked multiplier ensures that users can extract additional performance if desired.