SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

50,718 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and Intel Arc B770 form a desktop pairing that targets high-core-count productivity without sacrificing modern GPU features. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is Intel’s Battlemage architecture with 16 GB of VRAM. The data shows a strong CPU-side performer with a 90th percentile ranking, paired with a GPU that sits at the 50th percentile overall. This is a combination where the processor clearly outclasses the graphics card in raw compute, making workload balance the central consideration for any builder.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900XT is built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, using TSMC’s 7 nm process with 8,300 million transistors across two 74 mm² dies. It offers 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache layout is generous: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. This is a desktop-class processor with a 105 W TDP, supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 942 in single-thread to 1,853 in 2-thread, 3,589 in 4-thread, 6,607 in 8-thread, and peak at 11,040 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates the 16-core design is efficiently utilized, with minimal overhead when moving from 8 to 16 cores. In Cinebench, the multi-core scores are particularly telling: 3,767 in R15, 15,696 in R20, and 37,373 in R23, against single-core scores of 531, 2,215, and 5,276 respectively. The R23 multi-core figure is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which is near-ideal for a 16-core part.

PassMark results reinforce this multi-threaded strength. The multithread score is 43,810, while single-thread is 3,474. Integer math hits 177,566 and floating-point math reaches 99,398, showing balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data compression scores 597,862, suggesting strong throughput for archiving and file management tasks. The extended instructions score of 39,141 indicates solid AVX2/AVX-512-class workload performance. For real-world use, this CPU excels in rendering, compilation, and scientific computing where all 32 threads can be engaged. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for snappy desktop response and gaming, but the CPU’s identity is clearly that of a workstation-grade multi-core processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 368 mm². It features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The GPU has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, though tensor core counts are not listed in the data. Clock speeds are a base of 2100 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. Memory is a 16 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed. Pixel fill rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, has a 225 W TDP, and requires both a 6-pin and 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU’s benchmark data is empty, and its percentile ranking is 50, meaning it sits at the median of all GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are notable for 1440p and 4K texture-heavy workloads, but the lack of measured benchmark scores means performance claims must be inferred from the hardware specifications alone. The 32 RT cores suggest capable ray tracing, though the absence of tensor cores may limit AI-accelerated workloads. For rendering, the FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS positions it as a mid-range compute device, adequate for real-time engines but not for heavy offline rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a pronounced imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile means the processor is far more capable than the graphics card in most workloads. This is a CPU-bound configuration in almost every scenario. For gaming, the Arc B770 will likely be the limiting factor at high resolutions, as the CPU’s 16 cores can easily feed frames to the GPU. At lower resolutions and settings, the CPU may become the bottleneck if the GPU cannot keep up with the processor’s frame generation potential. However, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth mean that memory capacity is unlikely to be a constraint in modern titles.

In productivity, the bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU. CPU-heavy tasks like data compression, integer math, and multithreaded rendering will run at full speed, while GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or 3D viewport rendering will be limited by the Arc B770’s mid-range compute output. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is roughly half of what a high-end GPU would offer, so any workload that relies on GPU compute will see the CPU waiting on the graphics card. The absence of tensor cores also means AI inference or machine learning tasks that depend on dedicated tensor hardware will be slower or fall back to shader-based compute.

For balanced use, the pairing works best when the workload is CPU-primary with occasional GPU acceleration. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide ample bandwidth for the GPU’s x16 interface, so data transfer is not a bottleneck. The 105 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP mean a 550 W PSU is sufficient, leaving headroom for other components. The real bottleneck is the GPU’s raw compute ceiling; users expecting high-end ray tracing or 4K gaming will find the Arc B770 lacking, while those focused on multi-threaded CPU tasks will rarely notice the GPU’s limitations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 942 in 3DMark and 5,276 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for 1080p high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it will hold back frame rates in demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM helps with texture quality, but the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 output is modest for 1440p ultra settings. Estimated FPS will be playable at 1080p high, but 1440p will require medium settings to maintain 60+ FPS.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU has ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with a multithread score of 43,810 in PassMark. The GPU’s lack of tensor cores means it will rely on fixed-function encoders, which are present but not detailed in the data. The CPU can easily handle 1080p60 encoding without impacting game performance.

Video editing: The CPU’s 37,373 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates timeline rendering and export in CPU-based workflows. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth assist with real-time previews and GPU-accelerated effects, but the 19.66 TFLOPS compute limit will slow down heavy effects stacks. This is a solid pairing for 4K editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, where the CPU handles the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, the 16-core processor excels, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 11,040. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower due to the Arc B770’s mid-range FP32 throughput, but the 16 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes than 8 GB GPUs. The 32 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but performance will be below dedicated high-end GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s 177,566 PassMark integer math score accelerates compilation, and the 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, except for shader compilation testing. The 32 threads allow parallel builds and multiple VMs without slowdown.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for basic tasks, but the single-thread score of 3,474 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and browser performance. The GPU’s 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x HDMI 2.1a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The 105 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP mean a modest power draw for a workstation-class system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 50,718, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (0.5% lower), the Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51,015 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50,398 (0.6% lower). These deltas are within 1%, meaning the 5900XT is effectively tied with these mobile and low-power desktop parts in overall CPU performance. The GPU has no benchmark scores or rivals listed, and its average score is 0. The combined percentile for the pairing is 70, reflecting the CPU’s strength pulling up the GPU’s mediocrity.

The CPU’s individual benchmark scores are definitive: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 37,373, PassMark multithread at 43,810, and 3DMark max threads at 11,040. These all point to a top-tier multi-threaded processor. The single-thread scores are more modest, with 3DMark single-thread at 942 and PassMark single-thread at 3,474, but these are still competitive for the platform. The GPU’s lack of data means no direct comparison is possible, but its 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the pack, likely comparable to mid-range cards from the previous generation.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT have?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc B770?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 5900XT supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU boosts up to 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has a suggested PSU of 550 W, with a 225 W TDP.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc B770 has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900XT is at the 90th percentile, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket with broad motherboard availability. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is a plus for stability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single GPU at x16 plus an NVMe drive. The 105 W TDP means most AM4 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it without issue. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking can extract additional performance if the cooling and motherboard allow.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes. The 225 W TDP and dual power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) require a PSU with those connectors; the suggested 550 W PSU provides headroom for the CPU and GPU combined. The GPU’s dual-slot design fits most cases, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1) support modern monitors. For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU is the stronger component, so replacing the GPU with a higher-tier card (with better FP32 throughput and potentially more VRAM) would balance the system. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking means it can drive a more powerful GPU without becoming the bottleneck. Alternatively, adding a second GPU for compute tasks is possible with the 20 PCIe lanes, though the CPU’s 16-core design is the primary compute resource.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (16 cores, 32 threads, Zen 3) with the Intel Arc B770 (16 GB GDDR6, Xe2-HPG architecture). The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 90th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 70, indicating a system that is stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones. The CPU’s 50,718 average benchmark score places it among high-end desktop and mobile processors, with rivals within 1% in either direction. The GPU’s lack of benchmark data makes direct comparison impossible, but its hardware specs suggest mid-range capability. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-first workstation with a competent but not exceptional graphics card.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who prioritize multi-threaded CPU performance over GPU compute. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores, though the GPU may limit frame rates in demanding titles. Content creators doing video editing or 3D rendering in CPU-based workflows will see excellent performance, with the GPU providing 16 GB VRAM for large textures. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and 177,566 PassMark integer math score. Students and office workers will find the system overkill but responsive, with the CPU’s 3,474 PassMark single-thread score ensuring smooth everyday use. Small business workstations handling data compression or encryption will leverage the 597,862 PassMark data compression score. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking makes it suitable for light rendering or GPU-accelerated effects, but not for high-end ray tracing or AI workloads. This build is for users who need a powerful CPU and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds