SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

50,718 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT paired with the Intel Arc A750 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count CPU from AMD’s 5000 series with a mid-range Intel discrete GPU. The data for this exact pairing contains no measured FPS figures, so all gaming performance discussion in this analysis is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores and percentile positions of each component. The CPU holds a 90th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile, and the combined build percentile is 78. This gap in percentile rankings suggests a processor-heavy system where the GPU is likely the limiting factor for frame rate output in most gaming scenarios.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all FPS figures referenced in this gaming section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions of the CPU and GPU. The data is explicitly marked as not measured, so any numerical interpretation of frame rates is an approximation based on the underlying compute and graphics performance indicators.

The Intel Arc A750’s benchmark results provide the foundation for these estimates. The GPU scores 12,534 in Passmark G3D, which places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570, which scores 20,556 and trails by just 0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20,534 and trails by 0.2%. The A750’s average benchmark score of 20,582 is nearly identical to these competitors, indicating that its raw graphics throughput is comparable to a mobile RTX 3070. For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this level of performance typically translates to playable frame rates in most titles, though the exact FPS would vary by game.

At 1440p, the A750’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient capacity and throughput for many modern games, but the GPU’s 66th percentile rank suggests that frame rates would begin to dip below the high-refresh territory in demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is a moderate result that further supports the notion of mid-range 1440p capability. For 4K gaming, the data indicates a more significant challenge; the GPU’s compute performance of 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 is respectable, but the memory capacity and bandwidth, while solid, are not positioned for consistent ultra-settings 4K output. Estimates place 4K frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for less demanding titles and lower for graphically intensive ones.

The CPU’s gaming contribution is substantial. The Ryzen 9 5900XT’s single-thread score of 942 in 3DMark and 5,276 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates strong per-core performance that supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Its 16 cores and 32 threads ensure that background tasks and game logic do not bottleneck GPU utilization. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,607 and 16-thread score of 10,624 suggest that the CPU can feed the A750 effectively, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced. At 1080p, the CPU’s 90th percentile rank likely allows the GPU to operate at near-full utilization, making the A750 the primary frame rate limiter.

Overall, the estimated gaming experience is that of a 1080p-centric system with strong headroom for high-refresh monitors, a capable 1440p performer for medium-to-high settings, and a 4K solution that requires reduced settings. The absence of measured data means these are qualitative projections, but the benchmark scores consistently point to a CPU that exceeds the GPU’s needs in most gaming workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark performance is anchored by several key scores. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 5900XT achieves a multicore score of 37,373 and a single-core score of 5,276. The 3DMark suite shows a max-thread score of 11,040, an 8-thread score of 6,607, a 4-thread score of 3,589, a 2-thread score of 1,853, and a single-thread score of 942. Passmark results include a multithread score of 43,810, a single-thread score of 3,474, integer math at 177,566, floating point math at 99,398, and data compression at 597,862. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 50,718, and it sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU’s benchmark results are led by a Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and a Passmark GPU compute score of 5,368. Geekbench scores include 98,554 for OpenCL and 85,631 for Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612. DirectX performance in Passmark is notably lower, with scores of 65 for DirectX 10, 72 for DirectX 11, and 70 for DirectX 12, while DirectX 9 scores 181. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this build is 78, which reflects a system that is more capable than the majority of configurations but has a distinct performance ceiling set by the GPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all high-end mobile or desktop parts: the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (0.1% above), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (0.5% below), the Intel Core i9-14900T scores 51,015 (0.6% above), and the Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50,398 (0.6% below). This places the 5900XT in the upper echelon of processors, just slightly behind the fastest laptop chips but ahead of many desktop parts.

The GPU’s nearest rivals are more diverse, with the Intel Arc B570 scoring 20,556 (0.1% below), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.2% below), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20,662 (0.4% above), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20,480 (0.5% below). The A750’s average score is virtually indistinguishable from these competitors, indicating that its performance class is well-defined. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart by a significant margin in percentile terms, making this a system where the processor is the dominant component in raw compute capability.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance of this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With a 90th percentile CPU and a 66th percentile GPU, the data shows a 24-point gap in relative performance. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU is the clear bottleneck for frame rate output. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores, such as the 942 single-thread 3DMark and 5,276 Cinebench R23 scores, can handle game logic and physics without issue, but the GPU’s 12,534 Passmark G3D score limits how many frames can be rendered per second. The estimated FPS at 1080p would be constrained by the A750’s fill rate and pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s.

At higher resolutions, the bottleneck shifts further toward the GPU. The A750’s 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are fixed resources, and as resolution increases, the demand on these resources grows. The GPU’s 66th percentile rank suggests that it cannot maintain the same relative performance at 1440p or 4K as it does at 1080p, so the frame rate scaling would show diminishing returns as resolution increases. In contrast, the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for resolution-independent tasks, meaning CPU utilization would drop as resolution rises.

For non-gaming workloads, the bottleneck reverses. In compute-heavy tasks like video rendering or 3D modeling, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,373 and Passmark multithread score of 43,810 indicate that the processor is the primary driver of performance. The GPU’s compute score of 5,368 in Passmark is lower than its 3D rendering score, suggesting that the A750 contributes to acceleration but is not the limiting factor. The CPU’s data encryption score of 37,814 and extended instructions score of 39,141 further demonstrate that CPU-bound tasks will see significant throughput, while the GPU’s role is supplementary.

The evidence from percentile positions is clear: this is a CPU-first build. The 78th combined percentile is closer to the GPU’s 66th percentile than the CPU’s 90th, indicating that the GPU drags the overall system ranking down. In gaming, the GPU limits FPS; in productivity, the CPU leads but the GPU provides support. The FPS scaling, while estimated, would show a plateau at higher resolutions as the GPU saturates, while CPU-bound tasks would scale nearly linearly with core count and clock speed.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The target user for this build is a gamer focused on 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank and strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 942, ensure that frame rates are not CPU-limited, while the GPU’s 66th percentile rank is sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most titles. The estimated frame rates at 1080p would be ideal for 144Hz monitors, where the CPU can push high FPS and the GPU keeps up with the rendering load. For 1440p, the build remains viable, but users should expect to adjust settings to high rather than ultra to maintain smooth performance.

Content creators, particularly those working with video editing or 3D rendering, would benefit from the CPU’s multicore strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,373 and Passmark multithread score of 43,810 indicate that rendering times for CPU-based workloads would be short. The GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 performance provide hardware acceleration for compatible applications, making this a capable hybrid workstation. Software developers compiling large codebases would see strong performance from the 16 cores and 32 threads, with the Passmark data compression score of 597,862 suggesting fast build times.

Students and small business workstations would find this build overqualified for typical office tasks. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,853 and single-thread score of 942 handle everyday applications with ease, and the GPU’s 732 Passmark G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for data integrity in professional environments, though the build’s gaming focus means it is not optimized for maximum power efficiency. The 105W TDP of the CPU and 225W TDP of the GPU are moderate, making cooling requirements manageable for most desktop cases.

Users who require high-end 4K gaming or professional-grade GPU compute should look elsewhere, as the A750’s 66th percentile rank is not positioned for those workloads. The build is best suited to users who prioritize CPU performance for both gaming and productivity, with a GPU that is adequate but not exceptional.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 8,300 million transistors across a die size of 2x 74 mm². The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 105W. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The socket is AMD Socket AM4, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes is available from the CPU.

The benchmark scores translate directly into real workload performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,373 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded rendering performance, placing the CPU in the top 10% of all processors. For video encoding or 3D scene rendering, this means tasks that take an hour on a lower-tier CPU would complete in significantly less time. The single-core score of 5,276 in Cinebench R23 and 942 in 3DMark single-thread indicate that the Zen 3 architecture’s per-core efficiency is competitive, which is important for applications that rely on single-threaded performance, such as older games or certain productivity tools.

The Passmark scores provide a broader view. The integer math score of 177,566 and floating point math score of 99,398 show strong arithmetic throughput, which benefits scientific computing and financial modeling. The data encryption score of 37,814 suggests that the CPU can handle encryption and decryption tasks at high speed, useful for database servers or secure communications. The data compression score of 597,862 is particularly high, indicating that file compression and decompression tasks, such as those in backup software or game loading, would be exceptionally fast.

The 64 MB of L3 cache is a key feature of the Zen 3 design, as it reduces memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The 8,300 million transistor count and 7 nm process node contribute to the CPU’s efficiency, allowing it to maintain high clock speeds within a 105W TDP. The multiplier is unlocked, meaning users can overclock the processor beyond its 4.80 GHz boost clock if their cooling solution permits.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the DG2-512 chip and Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The TDP is rated at 225W, with a suggested PSU of 550W and power delivered via a 6-pin and 8-pin connector.

The GPU includes 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It has 28 ray tracing cores, though the tensor core count is not specified in the data. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores indicate that the A750 is a mid-range GPU with specific strengths. The Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and the 66th percentile rank place it below the top-tier GPUs but above the majority. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 show solid compute performance for general-purpose tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is a moderate result for DX12 gaming, suggesting that the GPU can handle modern titles at 1080p and some 1440p workloads.

For rendering, the GPU’s ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing, though the 28 RT cores are not as plentiful as in higher-end GPUs. The FP32 and FP16 performance are relevant for compute-heavy rendering tasks, with FP16 achieving double the throughput of FP32, which is beneficial for workloads that support mixed precision. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most rendering scenarios, but large scenes or high-resolution textures could exceed the memory capacity, leading to slower performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports the Ryzen 9 5900XT. The CPU uses DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 4 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 105W, and the GPU’s TDP is 225W, with a suggested PSU of 550W for the GPU alone. The combined power draw of the CPU and GPU is within the range of a mid-sized PSU, but the system’s total power consumption depends on other components.

The upgrade path on AM4 is limited, as the Ryzen 9 5900XT is one of the highest-tier processors for this socket. A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the A750 is the limiting factor in this build. Replacing the A750 with a higher-performance GPU would improve gaming FPS and compute performance, but the data does not specify which GPU would be a suitable replacement. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank means it would not bottleneck a more powerful GPU, so any upgrade would likely result in a more balanced system.

The memory support for DDR4 is a potential upgrade point, as users could increase capacity or speed, though the dual-channel bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is fixed by the memory type. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that the system is compatible with the latest NVMe SSDs and GPUs, though the A750 already uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The PSU headroom is sufficient for the current components, but a GPU upgrade might require a higher-wattage PSU, depending on the new GPU’s requirements.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3, and the GPU is an Intel Arc A750 from the Alchemist generation. The combined percentile for this build is 78, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations. The CPU alone is at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile, creating a system that is CPU-dominant.

The build is best described as a high-CPU-performance desktop with mid-range graphics. It is not a top-tier gaming machine, as the GPU’s percentile rank limits its 4K and high-refresh 1440p capabilities, but it is a strong performer for 1080p gaming and CPU-intensive productivity tasks. The pairing is unusual in that it combines AMD’s top-end consumer socket CPU with Intel’s mid-range discrete GPU, which may appeal to users who prioritize multi-threaded processing over raw graphics power.

The overall tier from the percentiles indicates that this build outperforms 78% of all systems, making it a solid choice for users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without reaching the extreme high end. The GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests that it may not be the best long-term investment, but the CPU’s active production status ensures continued support and availability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT and Intel Arc A750 build is 78, indicating it outperforms 78% of all configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 50,718, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-13850HX’s score of 50,761 and 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370’s score of 50,448.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, supported by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT supports ECC memory, which is useful for data integrity in professional workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A750 includes 28 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has a suggested PSU of 550W, and the GPU’s TDP is rated at 225W.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the primary use case for this build. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank and single-thread score of 942 in 3DMark ensure that frame rates are not CPU-limited, while the GPU’s 12,534 Passmark G3D score supports high FPS in most titles. The estimated performance is suitable for 144Hz monitors, where the CPU’s strong per-core performance and the GPU’s mid-range throughput combine for a smooth experience.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,373 allows for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay without significant frame drops, as the CPU can allocate resources to both tasks. The GPU’s compute score of 5,368 in Passmark provides additional encoding support, making this a viable single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing is accelerated by both components. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 43,810 and data compression score of 597,862 speed up timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate effects and color grading in compatible software.

3D rendering is CPU-bound in this build. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,373 is a strong indicator of rendering performance, and the 64 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency for complex scenes. The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development leverages the CPU’s multi-core architecture. The Passmark integer math score of 177,566 and extended instructions score of 39,141 indicate fast compilation times, while the 32 threads allow for parallel builds. The ECC memory support reduces the risk of memory errors during long development sessions.

Student and office work is over-served by this build. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,474 in Passmark handles everyday applications with ease, and the GPU’s 732 Passmark G2D score ensures smooth desktop rendering. The system is more powerful than necessary for these tasks, but its performance headroom means it will remain responsive for years.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds