SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
74%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

3,924 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS + Intel Arc A370M

This pairing combines an 8-core/16-thread AMD mobile processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with a dedicated Intel Arc discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation, targeting thin-and-light laptops. The CPU holds a 56th percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, producing a combined system percentile of 65. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores; no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on component-level benchmarks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A370M, with its 74th GPU percentile and an average benchmark score of 29,175, is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings rather than high-refresh competitive play. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for esports titles, but the 64-bit memory bus limits headroom for newer AAA games. Frame rates at 144 Hz are unlikely to be sustained in demanding titles; the GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS suggests playable but not exceptional performance.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 5900HS's 16 threads provide ample parallel capacity for encoding workloads alongside gaming. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 12,745.5 points, which indicates strong multi-threaded headroom for software encoding. The Intel Arc GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, enabling hardware-accelerated encoding paths. However, the 35 W TDP envelope shared between CPU and GPU in a laptop chassis may limit sustained streaming-plus-gaming loads.

Video Editing: The combination of 8 Zen 3 cores and the Arc A370M's 1024 shading units handles 1080p video editing comfortably. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth support timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores and 32 ROPs provide acceleration for effects and color grading in compatible software. The 4 GB VRAM may constrain 4K editing timelines, but 1080p projects should proceed without major bottlenecks.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance, scoring 5,992 in 3DMark max threads and 6,011 in 16-thread tests, makes it a competent render engine for CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) offer GPU-accelerated rendering support in applications that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan. The 7,200 million transistors on a 6 nm TSMC process provide efficient compute for its class, though the 4 GB memory cap will limit scene complexity.

Software Development: The 16-thread CPU with a single-thread score of 871 in 3DMark and 1,475.5 in Cinebench R23 delivers responsive compilation times for moderate-sized codebases. The dual-channel DDR4 memory support at 68.3 GB/s bandwidth handles multi-process development environments well. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support benefits graphics programming and compute workloads. The 56th CPU percentile indicates solid but not top-tier performance for large-scale builds.

Student and Office Work: This system excels at productivity tasks, with the CPU's 8 cores handling spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads effortlessly. The 35 W TDP enables long battery life in a laptop form factor, and the integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback for light GPU tasks when the discrete Arc GPU is idle. The 74th GPU percentile ensures smooth UI rendering and hardware acceleration in office applications. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data in typical office workflows.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score across all tests is 3,924, placing it at the 56th percentile of all CPUs. This positions it near the Intel Xeon E-2278GE (average score 3,939, 0.4% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE (average score 3,906, 0.5% lower). The Ryzen 9 5900HS sits slightly below the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U (3,958, 0.9% higher) and the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (3,959, 0.9% higher). These close margins indicate that the 5900HS competes with desktop-class chips despite its mobile 35 W TDP.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates strong scaling: 3DMark scores progress from 1,690 (2 threads) to 3,133 (4 threads), 5,049 (8 threads), and 5,992 (max threads). The 16-thread score of 6,011 nearly matches the max-thread result, indicating excellent thread utilization. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,745.5 points confirms this capability, while the single-core score of 1,475.5 shows competitive per-core performance. The R15 multi-core score of 2,041 and single-core of 236.5 further corroborate this balanced profile.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197 (0.1% higher), while the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211 (0.1% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 470 trails at 28,996 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1% lower at 28,874 — a surprising result given the RX 6800M's higher-tier positioning. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 29,676 in OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan, showing consistent performance across compute APIs.

The combined system percentile of 65 reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU slightly outpaces the CPU in relative standing. The CPU's 56th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile create a configuration where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, though neither is top-tier. Benchmark results indicate a system optimized for 1080p gaming and productivity rather than high-end compute or 4K rendering.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that constrains performance in memory-intensive workloads.

Compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, providing adequate fill rates for 1080p rendering. FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The 8 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature rare in this GPU class. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results place the A370M at the 74th GPU percentile, with Geekbench OpenCL scoring 29,676 and Vulkan scoring 28,673. These scores indicate the GPU performs slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 470 in compute workloads, which is notable given the RX 470's desktop-class memory bandwidth. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM limitation is the primary constraint — complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed this capacity, forcing fallback to system memory. The 64-bit memory bus compounds this issue, as 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is roughly half of what desktop mid-range GPUs offer. The 35 W TDP reflects the mobile design, trading raw performance for thermal efficiency.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame rates are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise figures. The GPU's 74th percentile and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 suggest 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is achievable in most titles, with esports games like CS:GO and Valorant likely hitting 60-100 FPS at high settings. Older AAA titles from 2015-2019 should run at 60+ FPS on medium settings, while newer releases may require low settings to maintain playable frame rates.

The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are the primary limiting factors. Games with large texture packs or open-world environments that exceed 4 GB of video memory will experience stuttering or texture pop-in as data streams from system memory. Titles optimized for DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan can leverage the GPU's modern feature set, including ray tracing at reduced resolutions for playable performance. The CPU's 16 threads ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, avoiding CPU-bound drops in most scenarios.

At 1440p, the A370M's bandwidth and compute limitations become apparent — frame rates would drop by roughly 30-40% compared to 1080p, making high settings impractical. At 4K, only very light or older titles would remain playable. The combined 65th system percentile reinforces that this is a 1080p-focused gaming platform rather than a high-resolution performer. For competitive gamers prioritizing frame rates over visual fidelity, reducing settings to low or medium at 1080p could yield 100+ FPS in lighter esports titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a GPU-favorable balance: the GPU at the 74th percentile outperforms the CPU at the 56th percentile, meaning the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. However, the CPU's 16 threads provide substantial headroom for non-gaming workloads, so the bottleneck only manifests in CPU-intensive titles or at very high frame rates where per-core performance matters. The single-thread score of 871 in 3DMark and 1,475.5 in Cinebench R23 indicates the CPU can drive the GPU effectively in most games.

In multi-threaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 56th percentile is the ceiling, with the GPU's compute capabilities potentially sitting idle. The 3DMark scores show near-linear scaling from 2 to 16 threads (1,690 to 6,011), confirming that the CPU fully utilizes its cores. FPS scaling in games would follow the GPU's performance curve: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck; as frame rates rise at lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread performance limits maximum FPS. The 68.3 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU, which can create contention in memory-heavy workloads.

The 35 W TDP envelope for both CPU and GPU in a laptop means thermal throttling is a practical concern. Sustained loads on both components simultaneously may reduce clocks, with the CPU's boost clock of 4.60 GHz unlikely to be maintained during extended gaming sessions. The GPU's boost clock of 2050 MHz faces similar constraints. This thermal balance favors bursty workloads over sustained high-intensity tasks.

Who Should Build It

This system targets mobile users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the GPU adequate for mainstream titles, while the CPU ensures smooth streaming and background tasks. Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the 16-thread CPU for encoding and the GPU's hardware acceleration for effects. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the CPU's multi-core throughput, and the Vulkan 1.4 support aids graphics programming.

Students in engineering or computer science programs gain from the CPU's 8 cores for simulations and the GPU for visualization tasks. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or light CAD work will perform comfortably within the system's capabilities. The 74th GPU percentile indicates the Arc A370M is a step above integrated graphics, making this suitable for users who occasionally game but primarily need a productive workhorse. The 56th CPU percentile places it above typical ultrabooks, providing desktop-like responsiveness in a portable package.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a high-end mobile processor from the 5000 series, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne). It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, within a 35 W TDP. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. Cache structure includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3. It uses AMD Socket FP6 and includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 56th percentile with an average score of 3,924. In Cinebench R23, multi-core scores 12,745.5 and single-core 1,475.5, indicating strong multi-threaded performance for a 35 W part. The 3DMark scores (single-thread 871, 2-thread 1,690, 4-thread 3,133, 8-thread 5,049, 16-thread 6,011, max-thread 5,992) demonstrate excellent thread scaling efficiency. The CPU closely matches desktop processors like the Xeon E-2278GE (0.4% difference) and Ryzen 5 4600GE (0.5% difference), despite the mobile design. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation, smooth multitasking, and capable content creation performance. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the 7 nm process ensures power efficiency. The CPU's production status is active, with a release date of January 2021.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop class system. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor from AMD's 5000 series, while the GPU is Intel's entry-level Arc 3 mobile offering from the Alchemist generation. The combined system percentile of 65 places this configuration above the median of all tested systems. The CPU's 56th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile create a system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU, which is unusual in mobile configurations where CPUs often dominate.

The build targets 1080p gaming and productivity, with the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for medium-settings gaming. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide solid multi-tasking and content creation capabilities. The 35 W TDP for both components enables a thin-and-light laptop design with good battery life. This is not a high-performance desktop replacement, but rather a balanced mobile solution for mainstream users. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests this is a mature platform, while the CPU remains active. Overall, the build sits in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for users who want dedicated graphics without sacrificing portability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 65, placing it above the median of all tested configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900HS has an average benchmark score of 3,924, sitting 0.4% below the Intel Xeon E-2278GE (3,939), 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE (3,906), and 0.9% below both the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U (3,958) and Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (3,959).

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to other GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is at the 74th percentile with an average score of 29,175. It is 0.1% below both the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197) and AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211), 0.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996), and 1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded benchmark score?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 12,745.5 points, and in 3DMark 16-thread tests it scores 6,011 points, with a max-thread score of 5,992.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-only socket with no upgrade path to different processors — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in laptop designs. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth, and the platform uses PCIe Gen 3 for expansion. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, providing adequate bandwidth for its 4 GB VRAM. The 35 W TDP for the CPU and 35 W TDP for the GPU indicate a low-power platform; the suggested PSU field is null, meaning no external power supply recommendation exists for this mobile configuration.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop platform would be increasing system RAM, as the CPU's memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s can be fully utilized with dual-channel DDR4 modules. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 3 NVMe drives would improve load times and system responsiveness. The GPU is end-of-life with no successor listed, so users seeking better gaming performance would need to consider a different laptop entirely. The CPU remains active in production, but its FP6 socket confines it to the original motherboard. For users hitting the 4 GB VRAM limit, external GPU enclosures are not supported by this platform's bus interface. The PCIe Gen 3 CPU connection limits expansion bandwidth, though this is unlikely to affect typical laptop peripherals. The 35 W TDP cap means the system is designed for efficient operation rather than headroom for overclocking, and the CPU's multiplier is locked. Overall, this platform offers limited upgrade potential beyond memory and storage, making it a fixed-performance purchase.