SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

46,971 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Intel Arc A770 form a high-end desktop pairing, with the combined percentile ranking at 90. The CPU holds an 89th percentile position among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of each component, interpolated against their respective nearest rivals.

Gaming Performance

Because no frame-rate data was captured for this specific configuration, gaming performance must be inferred from the synthetic scores and relative standings. The Intel Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting strong 1440p and capable 4K performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 further indicates robust API-level efficiency, which is critical for titles that leverage Vulkan’s low-overhead path.

For 1080p high-refresh gaming, the Arc A770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should provide ample headroom for frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, though the exact figures depend on the game’s engine and API. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus is a substantial asset for texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions, reducing the likelihood of VRAM-related stuttering.

At 1440p, the pairing is expected to excel, given the CPU’s 89th percentile rank and the GPU’s 90th percentile rank. The Ryzen 9 5900’s single-thread score of 4070 in Cinebench R23 suggests that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be solid, while the A770’s pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s supports high fill-rate demands. For 4K, the estimates indicate playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 90th percentile position relative to rivals like the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (deltaPct -1.7) implies it trails the absolute top-tier cards in raw rasterization.

It is critical to note that these are estimates. The absence of measured FPS data means the interaction between the CPU’s cache hierarchy (64 MB L3) and the GPU’s driver overhead cannot be precisely quantified. However, the benchmark scores align with a system that targets high-refresh 1080p and smooth 1440p gaming, with 4K as a secondary option for less demanding esports or older titles.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 5900 delivers an average benchmark score of 46971, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, scores 47022, a negligible delta of -0.1%, meaning the two are statistically tied. Against the Intel Core i7-13700K, the Ryzen 9 5900 is 0.2% ahead (46881 vs 46971), while it trails the Intel Core i9-12900F by 0.4% (47176 vs 46971). The widest gap is against the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, where the desktop chip leads by 0.7% (46654 vs 46971). These margins are tight, indicating that the Ryzen 9 5900 sits firmly in a competitive performance band.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28834 is a strong indicator of 12-core/24-thread efficiency. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12110 and R15 multicore score of 2906 corroborate this trend, showing consistent scaling across benchmark versions. Single-thread performance is equally respectable, with R23 single-core at 4070 and R20 single-core at 1709, positioning the CPU for responsive everyday tasks.

The Arc A770’s average benchmark score of 68809 places it at the 90th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000, a delta of -0.3%, showing near-parity. The AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% behind at 68562, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 leads by 1.5% (69870), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 leads by 1.7% (69986). This grouping suggests the A770 is a high-end performer that competes with workstation-class GPUs from the previous generation.

Combining the two, the CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 90th percentile yield a system-level 90th percentile ranking. The PassMark multithread score of 33969 for the CPU and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 for the GPU paint a picture of a balanced pairing where neither component drastically outclasses the other, minimizing the risk of severe bottlenecking in most applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a large, power-hungry chip, with a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, requiring a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

Memory is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K textures and large datasets, and it aligns with the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer rate. The GPU’s core clocks are set at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost.

Compute resources include 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The 32 ray tracing cores are present, though tensor cores are not listed in the FACT PACK, indicating a reliance on standard shader-based AI acceleration. The FP32 throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1), which supports heavy compute workloads. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 reflects strong DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 suggests efficient use of Vulkan 1.4. For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 figures indicate capable compute for viewport manipulation, though the lack of tensor cores means machine learning-based features like DLSS equivalents may rely on alternative methods. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring adequate bandwidth to the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, placing the system in the top 10% of all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5900 compare to the Intel Core i7-13700K in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700K’s 46881.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A770?

A: The GPU has 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, derived from 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 5900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is listed in its specifications.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 9 5900?

A: The boost clock is 4.70 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Q: What API versions does the Arc A770 support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the Arc A770 compare to the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 in average score?

A: The Arc A770 scores 68809, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P6000’s 69986.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 8,300 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 74 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, which is notably efficient for the core count.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. The L3 capacity is critical for gaming and productivity, reducing memory latency and improving multi-threaded throughput. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is standard for the AM4 platform. ECC memory support is included, a feature beneficial for workstation stability.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent across Cinebench versions. The R23 multicore score of 28834 and single-core score of 4070 indicate strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. PassMark results show high integer math performance (128641), floating-point math (69124), and data compression (411453). The multithread score of 33969 and single-thread score of 3439 reinforce its balance.

Compared to rivals, the Ryzen 9 5900’s deltaPct values are tight—never exceeding 0.7%. This means it performs within a narrow band of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Intel Core i7-13700K, Intel Core i9-12900F, and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX. For real workloads, this translates to near-parity in multi-core rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks, with the 12-core count ensuring smooth parallel processing. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 65 W TDP limits headroom without adequate cooling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This is a mature ecosystem, and the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the Arc A770’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s suggested PSU of 550 W aligns with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade for this pairing would focus on the GPU, as the CPU’s 89th percentile rank provides a solid foundation. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM is future-proof for resolution increases, but its 90th percentile position means there are faster options available. Replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model would require a PSU check, as the current 225 W TDP plus 65 W CPU draw is well within the 550 W suggested PSU, leaving room for a GPU with a higher TDP.

On the platform side, the AM4 socket is at the end of its lifecycle, so a CPU upgrade would necessitate a motherboard and memory change to a newer platform. However, the Ryzen 9 5900’s performance is competitive with newer chips, as evidenced by its near-tie with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe SSDs, and the 20-lane allocation (CPU only) ensures the GPU and one or two M.2 drives can operate at full speed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing with a slight edge toward the GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 90th percentile are nearly aligned, meaning neither component is drastically more powerful than the other in synthetic terms. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance (R23 single-core 4070) and the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 suggest that at 1080p, the CPU may occasionally become the limiting factor in high-refresh scenarios, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will dominate the workload.

For multi-threaded applications, the CPU’s 12-core/24-thread configuration and 64 MB L3 cache provide ample compute, but the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4096 shading units are more than sufficient for rendering tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 411453 for the CPU indicates strong I/O processing, which complements the GPU’s texture throughput. In productivity, the balance is nearly perfect, with the CPU leading in physics (PassMark physics 1697) and the GPU leading in raw pixel pushing.

The FPS scaling estimates show that at 1080p, the CPU’s 0.2% deltaPct over the Intel Core i7-13700K means frame rates will be similar to that rival, while the GPU’s -1.7% deltaPct against the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 suggests the A770 will trail in GPU-bound scenarios. Overall, the system is unlikely to exhibit severe bottlenecks in either direction, provided the memory is configured in dual-channel mode to achieve the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (Zen 3, 12 cores, 24 threads) with the Intel Arc A770 (Xe-HPG, 16 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a 5000-series part with a 65 W TDP, unlocked multiplier, and ECC support, targeting enthusiast and workstation users. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part with a 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, and 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the upper echelon of desktop PCs. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46971 and the GPU’s 68809 yield a system that is competitive with high-end configurations from the same era. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, is a mobile chip, indicating the desktop Ryzen 9 5900 holds its own against newer, power-efficient parts. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, is a mining card, suggesting the A770’s performance is comparable to specialized compute hardware.

This pairing is best described as a high-refresh gaming and content creation workstation. The CPU’s 12 cores handle rendering and compilation, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth support large textures and high resolutions. The system is not entry-level; it targets users who require serious compute without stepping into HEDT or workstation-class pricing.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p will find this pairing ideal, as the GPU’s 90th percentile rank and the CPU’s 89th percentile ensure high frame rates in most titles. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly suited for texture-heavy mods and future game releases. For 4K gaming, the system is viable but will require settings adjustments in demanding titles, given the GPU’s -1.7% deltaPct against the NVIDIA Quadro P6000.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28834 and the GPU’s 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 performance. The PassMark floating-point math score of 69124 supports complex simulations, while the GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores enable accelerated ray-traced rendering in compatible software. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 12 cores and 24 threads, as the PassMark integer math score of 128641 indicates strong parallel compilation throughput.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the CPU’s ECC memory support for data integrity and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM for scientific visualization or machine learning inference. The system’s 90th percentile combined rank means it handles office productivity effortlessly, but it is over-provisioned for basic tasks. This build is for users who need a single machine for both work and play, with the Arc A770’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and the Ryzen 9 5900’s 64 MB L3 cache providing a responsive experience across varied workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4070 (R23) paired with the GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 should sustain frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles, though the lack of measured data means this is an estimate.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU can handle encoding via x264 while gaming, with the PassMark multithread score of 33969 providing ample headroom. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM prevents memory pressure when running a game and streaming software simultaneously.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28834 accelerates export times, while the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K timeline scrubbing and effects processing. The FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS is beneficial for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 cores deliver strong CPU-based rendering, as indicated by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12110. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 provide a hybrid rendering path, though the lack of tensor cores means AI denoising may be less efficient.

Software development: Compilation tasks scale well with the CPU’s 24 threads, and the PassMark data compression score of 411453 speeds up build artifact handling. The GPU is largely idle in this scenario, leaving headroom for multiple displays.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the 89th percentile CPU and 90th percentile GPU ensure zero lag in multitasking. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running data analysis tasks, and the 16 GB VRAM can handle large datasets in visualization tools.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds