SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

46,971 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 pairs a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 3 processor with the Intel Arc A310E, a 4 GB entry-level discrete GPU, in a desktop build that lands at the 70th combined percentile. The CPU is a strong multi-threaded performer with an 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a clear imbalance: the processor can drive far more graphics horsepower than this card can feed. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints an unambiguous picture: the Ryzen 9 5900 is the dominant component in this pairing, and the Arc A310E is the bottleneck in virtually every graphics-bound workload. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46,971 places it within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13700K, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no benchmarks recorded. This asymmetry means the CPU’s 89th percentile standing is entirely wasted in gaming scenarios where the GPU’s 50th percentile position caps output.

The bottleneck manifests differently across workload types. In single-threaded tasks, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,070 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,439 indicate responsiveness that the GPU cannot match in frame generation. Multi-threaded workloads like rendering or compilation will see the CPU run at high utilization while the GPU idles, as the Arc A310E’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest. The GPU’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth further limits texture-heavy scenes, making the CPU’s 51.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth irrelevant to the graphics pipeline.

In gaming, the bottleneck is severe and consistent. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1,697 and integer math score of 128,641 suggest it can handle game logic and AI calculations with ease, but the GPU’s 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs constrain fill-rate and texture throughput. For high-refresh monitors, the data indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor at any resolution above 1080p, and even at lower resolutions, the GPU’s pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s will plateau well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The 70th combined percentile reflects this compromise: the build is better than average overall, but it is a CPU-centric system with a GPU that cannot exploit the processor’s headroom.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5900 a good match for the Arc A310E?

A: No, the data shows a significant mismatch. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and average score of 46,971 vastly exceed the GPU’s 50th percentile and empty benchmark slate. In gaming, the GPU will be the hard limit, while in productivity, the CPU will dominate.

Q: What is the CPU’s strongest benchmark result?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 excels in multi-threaded tests, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,834 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 33,969. Its Passmark data compression score of 411,453 is particularly high, indicating strong throughput for compression workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900’s average score of 46,971 is 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022), 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13700K (46,881), 0.4% below the Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176), and 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46,654). These are essentially performance ties.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics features?

A: Yes, the Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It also has 6 ray tracing cores, though its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits practical RT performance.

Q: What memory does the GPU use, and is it sufficient?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for light 1080p gaming but will bottleneck in high-texture or high-resolution scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 uses AMD Socket AM4, supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. It also offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Is there any measured gaming data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussed here is estimated from benchmark scores, not direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, using TSMC’s 7 nm process node. It packs 8,300 million transistors across a dual-die design measuring 2x 74 mm². The base clock runs at 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the 65 W TDP makes it a power-efficient option for a high-core-count desktop chip. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support, which is valuable for workstation reliability. Its PCIe Gen 4 capability, with 20 lanes from the CPU, provides ample bandwidth for modern SSDs and expansion cards.

Benchmark results show a processor that is exceptional in multi-threaded workloads but merely strong in single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,834 places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs, while the single-core score of 4,070 is competitive but not class-leading. Passmark results reinforce this: multi-thread score of 33,969, integer math at 128,641, floating-point math at 69,124, and extended instructions at 26,859. The data compression score of 411,453 is notable, suggesting the CPU excels in file archiving and data-heavy tasks. Random string sorting at 43,386 and find prime numbers at 213 indicate solid but not outstanding performance in those specific algorithms.

The 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms the Ryzen 9 5900 is a top-tier processor. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Intel Core i7-13700K, Intel Core i9-12900F, and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, with all deltas within ±0.7%, meaning the 5900 is effectively on par with these modern alternatives. For real workloads, this translates to fast video editing, rapid 3D rendering, and snappy software compilation, but the GPU pairing will limit any graphics-accelerated output. The CPU’s 64 MB L3 cache (with 512 KB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core) also helps in cache-sensitive workloads, though the GPU cannot leverage this directly.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes CPU throughput over gaming graphics. The Ryzen 9 5900’s multi-core strength makes it ideal for content creators who render video or 3D scenes in software, where the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,834 and Passmark multi-thread score of 33,969 will shine. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads, as will data analysts running multi-threaded scripts or simulations. Students in engineering or computer science fields can use the CPU’s performance for academic workloads, though the GPU is insufficient for GPU-accelerated research tasks.

Small business workstations handling office productivity, database operations, or financial modeling will find the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 411,453 and integer math score of 128,641 useful for daily tasks. However, gamers should only consider this build if they play at lower resolutions and settings, as the Arc A310E’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will struggle with modern titles. High-refresh gaming at 1080p is possible for esports titles, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it is a mid-pack performer at best. The build is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for any GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning work, where the GPU’s modest 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 6 RT cores are insufficient.

The desktop form factor and AM4 socket mean upgrades are possible, though the GPU is the obvious weak point. Users who need CPU-heavy workloads with occasional light gaming will find this build adequate, but anyone expecting balanced performance should look elsewhere or upgrade the GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all figures here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The Ryzen 9 5900’s Passmark single-thread score of 3,439 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,070 indicate the CPU can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecks, but the Arc A310E’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus will constrain frame rates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates in older or lighter titles, but modern AAA games will see significant drops due to the 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 ROPs. The GPU’s texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s suggest it can output roughly 32 million pixels per second at peak, which translates to around 30 FPS at 1080p (1,920 × 1,080 = 2,073,600 pixels) under ideal fill-rate conditions, but real-world performance will be lower due to shading and memory latency. Ray tracing is supported via 6 RT cores, but the low FP32 throughput means RT effects will severely hamper performance.

At 1440p or higher, the GPU will be overwhelmed, with estimated frame rates dropping below playable thresholds in most titles. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1,697 ensures no CPU-side bottleneck, so the GPU is the sole limiter. For esports games with lower graphical demands, the Arc A310E might achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p with reduced settings, but this is an estimate, not a measured result. The data clearly shows this is not a gaming-first build; it is a CPU-centric workstation with incidental gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit frame rates well below what high-refresh monitors require, even at 1080p. The CPU can handle the load, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames.

Streaming: Possible but limited. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads can handle encoding via software with a Passmark multi-thread score of 33,969, but the GPU’s lack of tensor cores (listed as null in the data) means no dedicated encoding acceleration from the Arc A310E. Streaming at high quality would tax the CPU, which is capable but not ideal.

Video editing: Excellent for CPU-based editing and rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,834 and Passmark floating-point math score of 69,124 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in software renderers. GPU acceleration is limited, so effects that rely on the GPU will be slow.

3D rendering: Strong for CPU rendering. The Ryzen 9 5900’s multi-core performance rivals the Intel Core i7-13700K, with a 0.2% higher average score, making it suitable for Blender or similar CPU-based render engines. GPU rendering is not viable due to the Arc A310E’s modest specs.

Software development: Excellent. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Passmark integer math score of 128,641, speed up compilation and testing. The data encryption score of 26,247 also helps with secure development workflows.

Student and office work: Overkill but effective. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,439 ensures responsive office applications, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output, but any graphical workload will be slow.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3) using the DG2-128 chip on TSMC’s 6 nm node. It packs 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are fixed at 2000 MHz for base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is low by modern standards.

Compute throughput is modest: 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, plus 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a 75 W TDP, drawing power from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, and the card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as the successor.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and empty benchmark list (avgBenchmarkScore of 0) make it difficult to compare directly, but the specs indicate it is suitable for light gaming, basic video playback, and office display output. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for modern games at higher settings, and the 64-bit bus will cause performance drops in memory-intensive scenes. Ray tracing is technically supported but impractical given the low compute throughput. For rendering, the GPU can accelerate some effects, but the CPU will handle most heavy lifting.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining an AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (12-core, 24-thread Zen 3 CPU) with an Intel Arc A310E (4 GB discrete GPU). The CPU is a high-end desktop processor released in January 2021, on the AM4 socket, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an end-of-life entry-level card released in March 2024. The combined percentile is 70, indicating the build outperforms 70% of all systems in the database, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU.

The class is desktop, and the tier is mid-to-high overall thanks to the CPU, but the GPU pulls down the gaming and graphics potential. The CPU’s 89th percentile vs. the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a lopsided system: it is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level GPU. For CPU-bound tasks, this build rivals systems with Intel Core i7-13700K or AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, but for gaming, it will underperform even modest integrated graphics solutions in some cases. The build is best described as a high-performance CPU with token graphics capability, suitable for productivity but not for GPU-accelerated workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 5900’s benchmark scores are extensive and impressive. In Cinebench, it scores 2,906 in R15 multi-core, 410 in R15 single-core, 12,110 in R20 multi-core, 1,709 in R20 single-core, 28,834 in R23 multi-core, and 4,070 in R23 single-core. Passmark results include data compression at 411,453, data encryption at 26,247, extended instructions at 26,859, find prime numbers at 213, floating-point math at 69,124, integer math at 128,641, multi-thread at 33,969, physics at 1,697, random string sorting at 43,386, and single-thread at 3,439. The average benchmark score is 46,971, with an 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022, -0.1%), Intel Core i7-13700K (46,881, +0.2%), Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176, -0.4%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46,654, +0.7%).

The Arc A310E has no recorded benchmarks, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. There are no nearest rivals listed for the GPU. The combined picture is a CPU that is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i7-13700K in average score, but a GPU that is unmeasured and mid-pack. The CPU’s multi-core dominance is clear from the Cinebench R23 score of 28,834, which is a strong result for a 65 W part. The GPU’s lack of data means its 50th percentile is speculative, but its specs suggest it will not exceed mid-range expectations. In summary, this build’s benchmark performance is defined by the CPU, with the GPU contributing little to the overall 70th combined percentile.