SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

46,971 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with an Intel Arc A310 creates a unique desktop configuration where a high-end 12-core CPU is matched with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination results in a system whose overall performance is heavily skewed toward processor-centric workloads, with the graphics component acting as a limiting factor for gaming and 3D rendering. The data indicates a desktop build with a combined percentile of 65, placing it above the median for all systems, but the specific strengths and weaknesses require a detailed breakdown of each component's benchmark results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 1750 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to an effective 15.5 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration, reflected in its pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). It includes 6 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc A310 achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and a Vulkan score of 28964. Its Passmark G3D score is 5433, with a GPU compute score of 2157. The percentile rank for this GPU is 40, indicating it performs better than 40% of all GPUs in the database. Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Arc A310 is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Radeon R7 250, trailing by a mere 0.1% in average benchmark score. It also sits 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. This places it in a performance tier where it can handle light gaming and basic graphical tasks, but it is not designed for high-fidelity or high-refresh-rate experiences. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are significant constraints for modern titles at higher resolutions and detail settings.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A310’s capabilities are limited by its raw compute throughput and memory bandwidth. The 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for entry-level video encoding and decoding, but the low ROP count of 16 will bottleneck fill-rate-dependent operations. The presence of 6 RT cores is notable for a card in this class, but the overall shader performance will severely limit ray-traced effects. Benchmark results indicate that for any serious 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated compute, this component will be the primary bottleneck, as its Passmark G3D score of 5433 is over 30 times lower than what a high-end card would achieve, though such comparisons are not directly in the data.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 65, meaning it outperforms 65% of all recorded systems in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 has an average benchmark score of 46971, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700K's average score of 46881.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier based on its benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a Passmark G3D score of 5433 and sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. It performs within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon R7 250.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 achieves a multi-core score of 28834 in Cinebench R23, and a single-core score of 4070.

Q: What are the memory specifications for the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU and the suggested PSU for the system?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W, and the suggested PSU for a system with this GPU is 200 W.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, containing 8,300 million transistors across two 74 mm² dies. The CPU has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. It features a total of 64 MB of L3 cache, with 512 KB of L2 and 64 KB of L1 per core. Memory support is DDR4 with a dual-channel bus, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and its multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28834 in multi-core and 4070 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 scores are 12110 multi-core and 1709 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2906 multi-core and 410 single-core. Passmark results are equally robust: a multi-thread score of 33969, single-thread score of 3439, integer math at 128641, floating point math at 69124, and data compression at 411453. The average benchmark score is 46971, placing the CPU at the 89th percentile among all CPUs.

This places the Ryzen 9 5900 in a competitive position against modern rivals. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700K, 0.4% behind the Intel Core i9-12900F, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX. The high multi-core scores indicate excellent performance for demanding workloads like video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 4070, is also strong for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 12-core part, indicating high efficiency. In real workloads, this CPU will excel at rendering, compression, and any task that can utilize its 24 threads, though its performance in gaming will be contingent on the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and require a discrete GPU for basic display output and light acceleration. The Ryzen 9 5900, at the 89th percentile for CPUs, is a powerful processor ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, data analysts running multi-threaded computations, and students in engineering or scientific fields. The Passmark integer math score of 128641 and data compression score of 411453 indicate strong performance in database operations and file archiving.

For content creators, the CPU handles video editing and 3D rendering in software that leverages multiple cores, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28834. However, the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow. This system is not for gamers seeking high-refresh or high-resolution experiences, as the Arc A310 is a bottleneck. Instead, it is for small business workstations where the processor is the primary workhorse, and the GPU is sufficient for 2D productivity applications, office suites, and web browsing. The 4 GB VRAM is adequate for dual-monitor setups and basic video playback but will struggle with large textures in 3D applications. The low TDP of the GPU (30 W) and CPU (65 W) makes this an energy-efficient combination for long-running compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is an established socket, meaning future CPU upgrades are limited to other AM4 parts, but the platform itself is mature and stable. The system’s memory bandwidth is capped at 51.2 GB/s, which is a potential bottleneck for the 12-core CPU in memory-intensive tasks, but it is a known limitation of the platform.

The Intel Arc A310 connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 30 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, indicating that the power supply headroom is minimal. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model, as the CPU has significant headroom to drive a faster card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is sufficient for its current performance, but a newer GPU would also be compatible with the motherboard's PCIe slots. The AM4 platform does not support DDR5 or PCIe Gen 5, so any upgrade path for the CPU is limited to the Ryzen 5000 series or older. For memory, users are confined to DDR4, which has a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s in this dual-channel setup. Given the CPU’s high performance, the most impactful upgrade would be a new GPU, which would shift the system’s balance toward better gaming and rendering performance. The 200 W PSU would need to be upgraded for any GPU with a higher TDP.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A310’s Passmark G3D score of 5433 and its position at the 40th percentile among all GPUs suggest it is an entry-level part. Its performance is within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is a known 1080p entry-level card.

Based on this, the system is estimated to be capable of running esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings. For modern AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will likely necessitate low settings and 720p or 1080p resolutions to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4070 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU will limit overall frame rates. At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A310 will struggle significantly, and the 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will be a limiting factor. Ray tracing is technically supported via the 6 RT cores, but the low shader performance means enabling it will result in very poor frame rates. Users should treat this as a light gaming or media consumption machine, not a dedicated gaming rig.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 achieves an average benchmark score of 46971, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, scores 47022, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Ryzen 9 is essentially tied. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654), but 0.4% behind the Intel Core i9-12900F (47176). This places the 5900 in a high-end tier for multi-threaded desktop performance.

The Intel Arc A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550, sitting at the 40th percentile. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7557) and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7580), but 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472) and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447). This indicates that the GPU is in the lower mid-range tier, suitable for basic tasks.

The combined percentile for the build is 65, reflecting a system that is more powerful than the average desktop, but the disparity between the CPU’s high ranking (89th) and GPU’s lower ranking (40th) means the overall score is pulled down by the GPU. The CPU’s dominance in benchmarks like Cinebench R23 (28834 multi-core) and Passmark multi-thread (33969) is not matched by the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 5433. This combined picture shows a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is constrained in GPU-bound workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Intel Arc A310. The build class is "desktop," and its combined percentile is 65, indicating it performs better than 65% of all systems in the database. The CPU is a high-end 12-core processor from the 5000 series, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete card from Intel's Arc 3 series.

The pairing is unusual, as the CPU is a top-tier part (89th percentile) while the GPU is a low-tier part (40th percentile). The system is designed for users who need massive CPU processing power for professional or creative workloads but only require a basic GPU for display output and light acceleration. It is not a balanced gaming build, as the GPU will bottleneck any gaming or GPU-compute task. The overall tier of the system, based on the 65th percentile, is above average, but this is almost entirely due to the CPU’s strength. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and 4 GB VRAM further underscore its role as a placeholder or a component for non-gaming uses.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46971 is at the 89th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 7550 is at the 40th percentile. This suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck in any workload that relies on graphics processing or GPU compute.

In gaming, the CPU’s high single-thread score (4070 in Cinebench R23) would allow it to feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s low Passmark G3D score of 5433 will cap the frame rate. The GPU is also limited by its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, which will cause stuttering and texture pop-in in modern games. For rendering and video editing, the CPU will handle the heavy lifting of encoding and physics, but the GPU will slow down effects and final frame rendering. The Passmark physics score of 1697 for the CPU and the GPU’s compute score of 2157 indicate that the GPU is not a capable compute accelerator compared to the CPU.

Conversely, the CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU in any scenario. The 12-core processor’s multi-thread performance (33969 Passmark multi-thread) is far beyond what the Arc A310 requires, meaning the CPU will remain underutilized in GPU-bound tasks. The bottleneck is consistent: the GPU limits all graphics and compute-intensive workloads, while the CPU excels at general-purpose and multi-threaded processing. For users to balance this system, they would need to upgrade the GPU to a model with a higher percentile ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The Arc A310’s performance is within 1% of the GTX 1650, and its low pixel rate (28.00 GPixel/s) will prevent high refresh rates at 1080p in most titles. Users should expect 60 FPS only in esports titles at low settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads (Passmark multi-thread score of 33969) can easily handle software encoding at high bitrates, making it suitable for streaming. However, the GPU’s low G3D score (5433) will limit the game’s performance, potentially forcing lower in-game settings.

Video editing: The Ryzen 9 5900 excels here, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28834 accelerating timeline rendering and exports. The GPU will provide limited acceleration for effects, but the CPU will dominate the workflow.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is a strength, with a Passmark floating point math score of 69124. GPU rendering will be slow due to the Arc A310’s 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance, making this system more suited to CPU-based renderers.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 128641 and data compression score of 411453 make it ideal for compiling large codebases and running parallel builds. The GPU is irrelevant for this task.

Student and office work: Overkill for the CPU, but the low TDP of both components (65 W CPU, 30 W GPU) makes it efficient. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for multiple monitors and office applications, and the CPU will handle any demanding academic software with ease.