SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

39,768 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The chip integrates 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, which reflects the density of the 4 nm process. Cache configuration is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. That L3 pool is the defining feature of this processor, providing a large high-speed buffer that benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, particularly gaming.

Benchmark results place this CPU in a strong position. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23,230, while single-core reaches 2,080. Geekbench results show 18,696 multi-core and 2,964 single-core. In 3DMark threaded tests, the chip scores 10,081 with 16 threads, 8,252 with 8 threads, 4,669 with 4 threads, and 2,394 with 2 threads; the single-thread score is 1,212. The max-thread score of 10,067 is nearly identical to the 16-thread result, indicating that the processor reaches its scaling limit at 16 threads. The Passmark suite reinforces this: multi-thread score is 40,009, single-thread is 4,430, integer math scores 116,709, floating-point math scores 79,456, and extended instructions score 38,808. Data compression hits 468,017, data encryption 22,158, random string sorting 48,526, find prime numbers 423, and physics 4,083.

The percentile versus all CPUs is 87, meaning this processor outperforms 87% of all tested CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 39,768. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is at this level: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS averages 39,603, a delta of 0.4% (this CPU is 0.4% ahead); the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 averages 40,048, a delta of -0.7% (this CPU is 0.7% behind); the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 averages 39,485, a delta of 0.7% (ahead by 0.7%); and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 averages 40,081, a delta of -0.8% (behind by 0.8%). The 9800X3D sits within a 1.5% band of these rivals, which indicates that raw multi-thread performance is comparable to mid-range laptop and desktop parts, but the X3D's advantage lies in its 96 MB L3 cache and high clock speeds, which the synthetic benchmarks do not fully capture.

For real workloads, the single-thread score of 4,430 in Passmark and 2,080 in Cinebench R23 indicate strong responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The multi-core scores show that heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will execute efficiently. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,081 versus the 2-thread score of 2,394 shows a scaling efficiency of roughly 4.2x when moving from 2 to 16 threads, which is good but not perfect linear scaling; the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and the dual-channel DDR5 interface are the likely constraints. The Passmark physics score of 4,083 suggests that game physics simulations will run smoothly, as this test is sensitive to both clock speed and cache behavior.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket from AMD. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is relevant for workstation builds that require data integrity. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe storage and graphics cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to extract additional performance, though the X3D's cache design typically benefits more from memory tuning than from core clock increases.

The TDP is 120 W, and the suggested PSU for this CPU is 250 W, which appears in the GPU's power requirements rather than the CPU's; the CPU's own power draw is modest relative to its performance class. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or for systems without a discrete GPU. The production status is Active, and the release date is 2024-11-06. The launch MSRP is $479.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would involve adding a more powerful discrete GPU than the Intel Arc A380, because the CPU's 87th percentile performance can drive high-end graphics cards without bottlenecking at high resolutions. The motherboard should support PCIe Gen 5 for the primary slot to take full advantage of the CPU's 24 lanes, and DDR5 memory should be run in dual-channel mode to maximize the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The 96 MB L3 cache means that memory latency is less critical than on other CPUs, but memory bandwidth still matters for multi-threaded workloads. For storage, PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives will saturate the direct CPU lanes, while a second drive can use the chipset lanes. The platform is current and active, so AM5 motherboards will continue to receive BIOS updates for future Ryzen 9000-series processors, though the 9800X3D itself is already one of the highest-performing parts in the lineup based on its 87th percentile rank.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D?

A: The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the 9800X3D compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The 9800X3D averages 39,768, which is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (39,603), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (39,485), 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048), and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (40,081).

Q: What memory and PCIe support does this CPU offer?

A: It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the L3 cache size and why does it matter?

A: The L3 cache is 96 MB shared, which is unusually large. This benefits workloads with repeated data access, such as gaming and database operations, by reducing the need to fetch data from main memory.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust core clocks. The TDP is 120 W, and the launch MSRP is $479.

Q: What is the GPU pairing's performance percentile?

A: The CPU sits at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A380 sits at the 44th percentile versus all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 66.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data does not include measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU holds the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,768. The GPU holds the 44th percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8,558. The gap is enormous: the CPU is nearly five times higher in percentile rank, and the average benchmark scores differ by a factor of roughly 4.6x. This means the Intel Arc A380 will be the limiting component in virtually every workload that uses the GPU.

For CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data compression, and spreadsheet calculations, the 9800X3D will perform at its full potential. The Passmark multi-thread score of 40,009 and single-thread score of 4,430 indicate that these tasks will run quickly, and the GPU will not interfere because they do not rely on graphics processing. However, for gaming, the Arc A380's 44th percentile and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could otherwise support. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6,252 and DirectX 12 score of 35 show that it is a low-end part, and its nearest rivals are mobile or integrated GPUs: the AMD FirePro W5170M averages 8,595 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M averages 8,462 (1.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 averages 8,458 (1.2% behind), and the AMD Radeon 880M averages 8,436 (1.4% behind). These are not desktop gaming GPUs; they are laptop and integrated parts, which confirms that the Arc A380 is entry-level.

The bottleneck pattern is clear: the GPU limits gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads, while the CPU limits only the most heavily threaded tasks that exceed 16 threads, of which there are few. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10,081 versus the max-thread score of 10,067 shows that the CPU does not gain from more than 16 threads, so applications that scale beyond that will not benefit. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is the other constraint; the Passmark data compression score of 468,017 and random string sorting score of 48,526 are high but not top-tier, which reflects the dual-channel DDR5 limit. For a balanced system, the GPU should be upgraded to a part that at least matches the CPU's percentile, but as configured, the CPU is vastly over-provisioned relative to the GPU.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 87th percentile and high single-thread scores (4,430 Passmark, 2,080 Cinebench R23) are ideal for high-refresh gaming, but the Arc A380's 44th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 will limit frame rates to entry-level levels. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the pairing can manage playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will be the bottleneck in any modern game. The 96 MB L3 cache helps with CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames to exploit it.

Streaming: The CPU has enough multi-thread headroom (Cinebench R23 multi-core 23,230, Passmark multi-thread 40,009) to encode video and run a game simultaneously, but the Arc A380's lack of tensor cores and weak compute performance (Passmark GPU compute 2,762) means that GPU-based encoding will be low quality. Software encoding on the CPU is feasible, but the GPU will still bottleneck game frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core scores (Geekbench multi-core 18,696, 3DMark 16-thread 10,081) are strong for timeline editing and export tasks, which are CPU-intensive. The GPU's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle basic effects and color grading, but the 44th percentile indicates that GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. For simple cuts and transitions, this works; for heavy effects, it will struggle.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,230 is respectable for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray, and the 4 nm process keeps power draw at 120 W TDP. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and 8 RT cores are too weak for GPU rendering; the Arc A380's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 confirms this. CPU rendering is the only viable path.

Software development: The CPU shines here. Passmark integer math scores 116,709, extended instructions 38,808, and data encryption 22,158, which are strong for compilation, code analysis, and cryptographic workloads. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds well, and the single-thread score of 4,430 ensures fast interactive response in IDEs. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but that is not a negative. The single-thread performance ensures snappy UI, and the 96 MB L3 cache accelerates repeated operations like document rendering and browser tab caching. The GPU handles 2D output with a Passmark G2D score of 610. The system is more capable than needed for these tasks, but it will not feel slow.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need maximum CPU performance but are constrained to a low-end GPU, either for budget reasons or because their workloads are CPU-centric. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will find the Arc A380 adequate at low settings, and the CPU's 87th percentile ensures that frame rates will be CPU-limited only in the most CPU-heavy scenes, which the 96 MB L3 cache mitigates. Content creators who focus on CPU rendering, video encoding, or software compilation will benefit from the 8-core, 16-thread configuration and the 23,230 Cinebench R23 multi-core score; the GPU is secondary for these workflows. Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 116,709 and the 16-thread scaling, which reduces build times. Students and office workers will get a system that is far more powerful than needed for their tasks, but the low GPU means they should not expect to play modern AAA games at high settings. Small business workstations that run databases, financial models, or virtualization can use the ECC memory support and the CPU's data compression score of 468,017 for server-like workloads. The build is not balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated work, but for CPU-bound productivity, it is a strong choice.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D achieves an average benchmark score of 39,768, placing it at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 23,230 multi-core and 2,080 single-core. Geekbench scores are 18,696 multi-core and 2,964 single-core. Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 40,009, single-thread of 4,430, integer math of 116,709, floating-point math of 79,456, data compression of 468,017, data encryption of 22,158, extended instructions of 38,808, random string sorting of 48,526, find prime numbers of 423, and physics of 4,083. The 3DMark suite shows 10,081 for 16 threads, 10,067 for max threads, 8,252 for 8 threads, 4,669 for 4 threads, 2,394 for 2 threads, and 1,212 for single-thread.

The Intel Arc A380 achieves an average benchmark score of 8,558, placing it at the 44th percentile versus all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808. Geekbench results are 38,224 for OpenCL and 36,736 for Vulkan. Passmark scores are 6,252 for G3D, 610 for G2D, 2,762 for GPU compute, 37 for DirectX 10, 38 for DirectX 11, 35 for DirectX 12, and 73 for DirectX 9.

The combined percentile for this build is 66. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data, so all FPS estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 44th percentile indicate that the combined system will perform at roughly the GPU's level in graphics-bound tasks and at the CPU's level in CPU-bound tasks, with the combined percentile of 66 reflecting the average of these two disparate components.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor on the AM5 socket, with the Intel Arc A380, a 6 GB GDDR6 graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU is a high-end part at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level part at the 44th percentile versus all GPUs. The combined percentile is 66, which places the overall system in the upper-middle range of all tested builds. The CPU was released on 2024-11-06 with a launch MSRP of $479, and the GPU was released on 2022-06-13 with a launch MSRP of $149 USD. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is active. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build, where the processor is the star and the GPU is a placeholder for basic display output and light gaming. The substantial performance gap between the two components means that any upgrade to the GPU will yield a significant improvement in graphics-bound workloads, while the CPU will remain relevant for years due to its high single-thread and multi-thread performance.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-128, and is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It includes 8 RT cores for ray tracing, though the absence of tensor cores means that AI-accelerated workloads are not supported in hardware. The base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 75 W with a suggested PSU of 250 W, and the card requires a single 8-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card measuring 222 mm in length, 114 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Benchmark results show the A380 at the 44th percentile versus all GPUs, with an average score of 8,558. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, indicating that modern DirectX 12 games will run at modest frame rates. Geekbench OpenCL score is 38,224 and Vulkan is 36,736, which are moderate for compute workloads. Passmark G3D score of 6,252 and G2D of 610 show that 2D output is fine but 3D performance is entry-level. The DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 37, 38, and 35 respectively are very low, reflecting the GPU's weakness in legacy API performance, while the DirectX 9 score of 73 is higher, indicating that older games may run better. The GPU compute score of 2,762 confirms that compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning are not this card's strength. The nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5170M (average 8,595, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8,462, 1.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8,458, 1.2% behind), and AMD Radeon 880M (8,436, 1.4% behind). These are all mobile or integrated GPUs, which reinforces that the A380 performs like a laptop-class part. For rendering, the 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are enough for 1080p textures, but the low FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS will bottleneck any GPU-accelerated renderer. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall performance means ray-traced effects will be limited to low resolutions and settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds