SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

39,768 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D with an Intel Arc A310 presents one of the most pronounced CPU-to-GPU performance asymmetries in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 40th percentile among all graphics cards. This 47-point percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this build, and it shapes every workload outcome.

The data indicates that the GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck in gaming and graphics-accelerated tasks. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10081 and max-thread score of 10067 demonstrate massive parallel headroom that the Arc A310 simply cannot utilize. In any game or 3D application, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 becomes the limiting factor, capping frame delivery well below what the CPU could otherwise support.

For CPU-bound workloads, the picture inverts completely. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230 and a single-core score of 2080, meaning productivity applications that rely on processor throughput will run at near-flagship levels. The Arc A310's contribution in these scenarios is minimal, which is appropriate for tasks like compilation, data processing, or spreadsheet manipulation where GPU acceleration is secondary.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the measured data — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, benchmark results indicate that in gaming, the Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will saturate long before the CPU's eight Zen 5 cores break a sweat. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 controller is actually in the same order of magnitude as the GPU's memory bandwidth, which is unusual and highlights the extreme imbalance.

This bottleneck profile means that users upgrading from a weaker CPU while keeping the Arc A310 will see virtually no gaming improvement, but will experience dramatic gains in multi-threaded productivity. Conversely, swapping the GPU for something stronger while keeping the 9800X3D would unlock the CPU's full potential, though the data suggests the current GPU holds back nearly every graphics-oriented task.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D posts an average benchmark score of 39768, placing it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, scores 40081, putting the 9800X3D 0.8% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 comes in at 40048, a 0.7% advantage, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS trails by just 0.4% at 39603, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, which the 9800X3D beats by 0.7%. These margin-of-error differences suggest the 9800X3D sits in a tightly contested performance band despite its higher percentile rank.

Delving into individual scores, the CPU's single-thread performance is exceptional: Geekbench single-core scores 2964, PassMark single-thread scores 4430, and Cinebench R23 single-core scores 2080. Multi-threaded results are equally strong, with Geekbench multi-core at 18696 and PassMark multi-thread at 40009. The 3DMark thread scaling shows efficiency: 2 threads score 2394, 4 threads score 4669, 8 threads score 8252, and 16 threads score 10081, nearly matching the max-thread score of 10067. This indicates excellent thread scaling with negligible overhead.

The Intel Arc A310, by contrast, averages 7550 across its benchmark suite, sitting at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R7 250, scores 7557 (0.1% ahead), while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 scores 7580 (0.4% ahead). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7472, meaning the A310 leads by 1%, and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 7447, a 1.4% advantage for the A310. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 reveal its modest compute capabilities.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 64, which reflects the CPU's strength dragging up an otherwise low-tier GPU. The combined picture is a system that excels at processor-bound tasks but falls into the lower half for graphics-intensive workloads. The data shows a 0.4% CPU advantage over one rival and a 1.4% GPU advantage over another, yet the experience in practice will be defined by the GPU's 40th percentile ceiling.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, ensuring ample bandwidth for modern expansion cards and NVMe storage. ECC memory support is included, making this platform suitable for workstation-class reliability.

The Intel Arc A310's power requirements are minimal — its TDP is just 30 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. This leaves extraordinary headroom with any reasonable power supply, as the CPU's 120 W TDP combined with the GPU's 30 W TDP totals a modest draw. The GPU requires no power connectors and occupies a single slot, making it an easy addition to compact builds.

A sensible next upgrade path would prioritize replacing the GPU before any CPU consideration. The 9800X3D's 87th percentile performance can drive far more capable graphics cards, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure no bandwidth bottleneck. The platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability also future-proof the memory subsystem. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and its 4 nm TSMC process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die indicates efficiency headroom.

The Arc A310's end-of-life production status and its successor Battlemage being listed in the data suggest that GPU upgrades are imminent in the product cycle. The A310's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while adequate for its 4 GB memory, would limit a more powerful GPU — but the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means any new GPU can run at full bandwidth. For users seeking balance, upgrading the GPU to a mid-range card would transform this system from a CPU-monster/GPU-dwarf into a well-rounded performer.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who need only basic graphics capability. Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering that leverages CPU cores will benefit from the 9800X3D's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230 and PassMark floating-point math score of 79456. The data shows that tasks like data compression (PassMark score 468017), encryption (22158), and integer math (116709) will run at high speed, making this suitable for developers compiling large codebases or researchers processing datasets.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with modest graphical demands could use this system for esports titles that favor CPU speed, though the GPU's 40th percentile will limit visual fidelity. Students and office workers running productivity suites, spreadsheets, and web applications will find the single-thread performance of 2964 Geekbench single-core more than sufficient, while the low GPU power draw keeps system noise and heat minimal.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, database queries, or scientific computing will see strong CPU-bound throughput, particularly with the PassMark multi-thread score of 40009. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running computations. However, anyone needing serious graphics performance — 3D artists, video editors using GPU acceleration, or gamers wanting high settings — should look elsewhere, as the Arc A310's capabilities are firmly in the entry-level segment.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and its DirectX 12 score of 29 place it in the entry-level gaming tier, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 which it leads by 1% in average benchmark score.

At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, esports titles and older games should run acceptably, given the GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM will be sufficient for these titles but will limit texture quality in newer games. At 1440p, expect significant frame rate drops as the 64-bit memory bus and 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate become strained. 4K gaming is not viable with this GPU.

The CPU's gaming potential is irrelevant here because the GPU caps frame delivery. The 9800X3D's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2394 and single-thread score of 1212 show excellent low-thread performance that would excel in CPU-bound gaming scenarios, but the Arc A310 cannot translate that into high FPS. The PassMark physics score of 4083 suggests good game physics simulation, but again, the GPU limits overall output.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 64, reflecting the CPU's 87th percentile dragging up the GPU's 40th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7700?

A: The 9800X3D averages 39768 in benchmarks, which is 0.8% behind the Ryzen 7 7700's 40081 average score.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A310's nearest rival in performance?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 250 scores 7557, just 0.1% ahead of the Arc A310's 7550 average benchmark score.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, given the CPU's 120 W TDP and the GPU's 30 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Geekbench?

A: The Geekbench single-core score is 2964, indicating strong per-core performance.

Q: Is the Arc A310 still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310 is listed as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, and memory clocks run at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed.

Ray tracing hardware includes 6 RT cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz.

Benchmark results reveal the GPU's positioning: Geekbench OpenCL scores 30607, Vulkan scores 28964, but PassMark DirectX scores are low — DirectX 9 at 69, DirectX 11 at 33, DirectX 10 at 31, and DirectX 12 at 29. The PassMark G3D score of 5433 and GPU compute score of 2157 confirm entry-level performance. For rendering, the 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles basic 3D workloads, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus severely constrain complex scenes and high-resolution textures. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the raw compute power will make RT workloads challenging.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, a Zen 5 architecture processor from the 9000 series, with the Intel Arc A310, an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 GPU. The CPU is a 4 nm TSMC part with 8 cores and 16 threads, base clock of 4.70 GHz, boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and 120 W TDP. The GPU is a 6 nm TSMC part with a 30 W TDP and single-slot design.

The overall tier from the percentiles is 64th combined, which masks the extreme divergence: the CPU at the 87th percentile is a high-end performer, while the GPU at the 40th percentile is firmly entry-level. This is a workstation-oriented build where CPU compute dominates, with GPU capability as an afterthought. The CPU's 96 MB shared L3 cache and 80 KB L1 cache per core, along with 1 MB L2 per core, provide substantial on-chip storage for data-intensive workloads.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 120 W, and the socket is AMD Socket AM5.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 96 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics. The multiplier is unlocked, and the launch MSRP is $479. The release date is 2024-11-06.

Benchmark scores demonstrate strong all-round performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 23230, single-core 2080; Geekbench multi-core 18696, single-core 2964; PassMark multi-thread 40009, single-thread 4430. Data-centric workloads shine: PassMark data compression scores 468017, encryption 22158, integer math 116709, floating-point math 79456, extended instructions 38808, and random string sorting 48526. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2 threads (2394) to 16 threads (10081) shows efficient parallelization. The average benchmark score of 39768 at the 87th percentile places it among high-end desktop CPUs, with rival scores within 0.8% indicating a competitive segment.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread strength (Geekbench single-core 2964) supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the Arc A310's 40th percentile GPU performance caps FPS well below what the CPU can drive. Expect playable 1080p esports at modest settings, not high-refresh AAA gaming.

Streaming: The 9800X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230 can handle software encoding while maintaining game performance, but the GPU's limited output means stream quality will be constrained by the capture source's frame rate.

Video editing: CPU-based encoding and effects processing will be fast, given the PassMark multi-thread score of 40009, but GPU-accelerated rendering will bottleneck on the Arc A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM, making 4K timeline previews difficult.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will leverage the 9800X3D's multi-thread power (Cinebench R23 23230), but GPU renderers will be severely limited by the A310's compute and memory constraints.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 116709 and data compression score of 468017, making this a strong development workstation. The GPU's basic acceleration suffices for UI rendering.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance (PassMark 4430, Geekbench 2964) handles document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing effortlessly. The low GPU power draw (30 W TDP) and no power connectors make for a quiet, efficient system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds