SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + Intel Arc A310

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the Intel Arc A310 represents a desktop build with a stark performance asymmetry: a high-end 8-core Zen 5 CPU operating at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, combined with an entry-level Alchemist GPU sitting at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 63, indicating that the CPU dominates the performance profile of this pairing. The benchmark data shows a processor capable of top-tier multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, while the graphics card provides modest 1080p-class performance with modern feature support. This is a configuration where the CPU is the clear anchor, and the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and represents the 9000 series for the desktop segment. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The socket is AMD Socket AM5, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The TDP is rated at 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results for the 9700X demonstrate its high-end positioning. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 20,485 in multi-core and 2,211 in single-core. The single-core result places it among the fastest desktop processors, as evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,280 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3,023. The multi-threaded performance scales well, with 3DMark scores of 9,824 for 16 threads and 9,771 for max threads, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration scales efficiently across workloads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 37,161 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 17,906 reinforce this position. The average benchmark score across all tests is 37,943, placing the CPU at the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the 9700X is effectively tied with the Intel Core i9-14901E, which has an average score of 37,911 and a deltaPct of 0.1. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is also within 0.1%, and the Intel Core 5 211E sits at 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is 0.4% behind. This means the 9700X sits at the top of a cluster of high-performance processors, with differences of less than half a percent separating them. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that is equally competitive for both lightly-threaded applications like gaming and heavily-threaded tasks like rendering or compilation, with no visible gap to its closest competitors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this build is defined by a massive CPU-to-GPU performance gap. The CPU operates at the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile, creating a system where the graphics card is the bottleneck for any GPU-bound workload. The combined percentile of 63 confirms that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU, and the CPU's capabilities are underutilized in graphics-intensive scenarios. In gaming, the Arc A310 will limit frame rates well below what the 9700X could otherwise support, even at lower resolutions where CPU performance typically matters more.

In CPU-bound workloads—such as data compression, encryption, or physics calculations—the 9700X will perform at its full potential. The Passmark data compression score of 437,140 and data encryption score of 21,815 are strong indicators of throughput in these tasks. However, in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or modern game engines, the Arc A310 will cap performance. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and its percentile position show that it is not designed to keep pace with the CPU. The FPS scaling data is absent for this pairing, but the benchmark scores indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor in any frame-rate-sensitive scenario. The CPU will wait for the GPU to finish rendering frames, meaning that upgrades to the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Ryzen 7 9700X are consistently strong across a range of tests. In 3DMark, the 16-thread score is 9,824, the 8-thread score is 8,184, and the 4-thread score is 4,869. The 2-thread score is 2,525, and the single-thread score is 1,280. These results show a linear scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 8 threads as the CPU approaches its multi-thread ceiling. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,485 and single-core of 2,211 further validate the CPU's high performance, with the single-core result being particularly notable for its strength in lightly-threaded applications. Geekbench scores of 17,906 multi-core and 3,023 single-core align with this picture.

The GPU benchmarks for the Intel Arc A310 show a different story. In Geekbench OpenCL, the GPU scores 30,607, and in Vulkan, it scores 28,964. Passmark DirectX tests are low, with DirectX 10 scoring 31, DirectX 11 scoring 33, and DirectX 12 scoring 29. The DirectX 9 score is 69. The Passmark G2D score is 625, and the G3D score is 5,433. The GPU compute score is 2,157. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 7,550, placing it at the 40th percentile. This is a low-end result, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (deltaPct 1.4). The GPU is essentially competitive with a GTX 1650, but the CPU is in a different class entirely.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The data indicates that the Intel Arc A310 will be the primary limiter in gaming performance. Given the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and its percentile of 40, this pairing is suitable for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in modern titles, and it will struggle with high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,211, ensures that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU's low compute throughput will cap frame rates.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the Arc A310 may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings, but the lack of measured data means these are estimates. For AAA games, the GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. The CPU's high single-core score suggests that frame pacing will be consistent, but the overall FPS will be low relative to what the CPU could support with a more powerful GPU. Users should expect this build to handle older or less demanding games comfortably, while newer titles will require significant graphical compromises.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The Ryzen 7 9700X is a high-end processor for content creation, software development, and productivity tasks, while the Arc A310 is an entry-level GPU suitable for basic display output and light gaming. The system is well-suited for software developers who need fast compilation times, as the CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,485) will handle build workloads efficiently. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, spreadsheets, and data analysis will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance, with the GPU providing adequate desktop acceleration for 2D workloads (Passmark G2D score of 625).

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU capable, but the GPU will be a bottleneck for GPU-accelerated effects or rendering. The CPU's Passmark floating-point math score of 78,999 and integer math score of 120,142 support heavy computational tasks. Gamers at 1080p with low graphical demands may find this build acceptable for esports titles, but for high-refresh-rate gaming or modern AAA games, the GPU is insufficient. This build is not recommended for users who primarily game, but it is a strong choice for CPU-bound professional workloads where the GPU is secondary.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering a modern interface for future expansion. The TDP of the CPU is 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W for the GPU. This leaves significant headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade in the future, as the CPU's power draw is low and the PSU requirement is minimal.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The Arc A310 is an entry-level card, and replacing it with a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's high percentile and strong multi-threaded scores mean it will not be a bottleneck for most mid-range or even high-end GPUs. The AM5 platform also offers a path to future CPU upgrades within the same socket, though the 9700X is already a high-end part. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives will be compatible. The system's memory support is limited to DDR5, which is the current standard, and the dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The Arc A310's low G3D score of 5,433 and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what high-refresh monitors require, even at 1080p. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 2,211 in Cinebench R23 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The multi-threaded score of 20,485 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the CPU can handle both game and encode workloads, but the GPU's low gaming performance will limit the game's quality settings.

Video editing: The CPU performs well in multi-threaded tasks, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 17,906 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 37,161. This supports timeline editing and rendering in software. The GPU's compute score of 2,157 will limit GPU-accelerated effects, but basic editing is feasible.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, given the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,485. However, GPU-based renderers will be limited by the Arc A310's low compute throughput and 4 GB VRAM, making this build better suited for CPU-rendering pipelines.

Software development: The CPU excels here, with a Passmark data compression score of 437,140 and a data encryption score of 21,815. Compilation and testing workloads will run quickly, and the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for office tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 3,023 in Geekbench ensures snappy application response. The GPU's G2D score of 625 is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration, and the low TDP of both components keeps power consumption modest.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and socket?

A: The CPU is based on Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and uses AMD Socket AM5.

Q: How much memory and what type does the system support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The CPU is at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,943.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The GPU is at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7,550.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, and the GPU itself has a TDP of 30 W.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 63.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, from the Arc 3 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, and the memory runs at 1937 MHz with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 5.376 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 30 W, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, with the release date in October 2022, and the successor is Battlemage.

Benchmark results for the Arc A310 show modest performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 30,607, and the Vulkan score is 28,964. Passmark scores are low for DirectX tests, with DirectX 10 at 31, DirectX 11 at 33, DirectX 12 at 29, and DirectX 9 at 69. The G2D score is 625, and the G3D score is 5,433. The GPU compute score is 2,157. The average benchmark score is 7,550, placing it at the 40th percentile. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (deltaPct 1.4). The GPU is competitive with a GTX 1650, which is a low-end card from several generations ago. For rendering, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit texture-heavy scenes, while the 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing support but with insufficient compute throughput for practical RT workloads. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures modern API compatibility, but the raw performance is limited.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, a high-end 8-core CPU from the Zen 5 architecture, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is a top-tier processor for its class, with an average benchmark score of 37,943 and a percentile of 86 among all CPUs. The GPU is a low-end part, with an average benchmark score of 7,550 and a percentile of 40 among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 63 reflects the system's overall tier, which is dragged down by the GPU's limited performance. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build: the processor is capable of high-end productivity tasks, while the GPU is sufficient for basic graphics output and light gaming. The system's overall tier, based on the 63rd combined percentile, places it in the mid-range for general performance, but the CPU's individual performance is in the top 14% of all CPUs. The Arc A310, with its end-of-life status and low compute scores, is the clear weak point, and users who need more graphics performance should prioritize a GPU upgrade.