SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 form a desktop pairing that ranks in the 91st percentile overall, combining a 94th-percentile CPU with an 87th-percentile GPU. This is a high-tier configuration aimed at 1440p and 4K gaming, with the data showing a strong lean toward GPU-bound performance at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits in the 91st combined percentile, placing it well above the majority of systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF's score of 70163.

Q: What is the RTX 5080's standing relative to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE in average benchmark score, with 56083 versus 57367.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 5080?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance score?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4691 in both Passmark single-thread tests, a strong figure that supports high-refresh gaming.

Q: Is the game performance data measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured, with an average of 211.5 FPS across the game test suite, ranking 151st out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has a 65 W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, a position that signals top-tier processing capability. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69875, just 0.2% behind, while the Intel Core i7-14700K trails by 0.9% with a score of 69355. This clustering indicates that the 9700F is squarely in the upper echelon of desktop processors, with differences of less than one percent separating it from its closest competitors. The single-thread score of 4691 is particularly notable, as it drives responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080 posts an average benchmark score of 56083, landing in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 reflects modern API efficiency, while the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 235901 and 255450 respectively show strong compute and graphics API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 36565 further corroborates its position, though it trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2% in average score, a margin that is noticeable but not dramatic. The GPU also delivers a Passmark GPU compute score of 21789, indicating solid non-graphics compute throughput.

The combined picture is one of a balanced high-end system. The CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile together yield a 91st combined percentile, meaning the pairing is slightly more CPU-dominant in relative terms. The average FPS across the measured game suite is 211.5, which is exceptionally high and confirms that this build is capable of driving very high frame rates in most titles. The pair ranks 151st out of 3732 pairs by FPS, putting it in the top 4% of all tested combinations, a strong indicator of elite gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear resolution-dependent balance shift. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength is fully utilized, with titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 744 FPS and Valorant reaching 590 FPS. These numbers suggest that the CPU is feeding the GPU effectively at lower resolutions, where frame rates are less constrained by rendering load. However, as resolution increases to 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. For instance, Valorant drops from 590 FPS at 1080p to 519 FPS at 4K, a relatively small decline, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls from 99 FPS at 1080p to 49 FPS at 4K, a 50% reduction that points squarely at GPU rendering limits.

The FPS scaling between 1440p and 4K is particularly telling. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate goes from 163 FPS at 1440p to 138 FPS at 4K, a modest drop that indicates the GPU still has headroom. Conversely, Ark: Survival Ascended drops from 31 FPS at 1440p to 16 FPS at 4K, showing that extremely demanding titles can overwhelm the RTX 5080 at higher resolutions. The CPU's multi-thread score of 36470 and floating-point math score of 77955 are strong enough to avoid bottlenecking in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's 87th percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive workloads.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is notably low for its performance class, which suggests that power draw and thermal output are not likely to be system constraints. This leaves the GPU's 360 W TDP as the dominant power consideration, and the suggested 750 W PSU reflects that requirement. The balance is thus: at 1080p and 1440p, the system is well-matched, but at 4K in demanding titles, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, which is expected given its percentile position relative to the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this system is exceptional, with Counter-Strike 2 delivering 337 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hitting 400 FPS. Even at 1440p, esports titles remain well above 200 FPS, with Valorant at 559 FPS and CS:GO at 512 FPS, making this a top choice for competitive players who need maximum frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a multi-thread score of 36470, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, implied by its 336 tensor cores and modern Blackwell architecture, can offload streaming tasks, though the data focuses on raw compute and rendering scores rather than dedicated encoding benchmarks.

Video editing: The CPU's data encryption score of 21488 and extended instructions score of 33688 indicate strong processing for codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS and 16 GB of VRAM support timeline rendering and effects, making this a capable system for 4K video projects, though the GPU's 87th percentile suggests it is not the absolute fastest for compute-heavy effects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 10752 shading units and 84 RT cores deliver a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637, which is solid for real-time rendering. For offline rendering, the CPU's floating-point math score of 77955 and integer math score of 120788 provide strong multi-threaded performance, though the 8-core design is less competitive than higher-core-count rivals in pure render times.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 4691 ensures fast compilation of individual files, while the multi-thread score of 36470 handles parallel builds efficiently. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth reduce latency in code-heavy workflows, making this a responsive development machine.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and 4 nm process node make this an efficient system for daily tasks. The single-thread performance excels in office applications, and the GPU's compute power is overkill for typical productivity but ensures no lag in browser-based or document-heavy workloads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, where the data shows exceptional performance. The 337 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 400 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p are ideal for competitive players with 240 Hz or higher monitors. At 1440p, the system maintains over 100 FPS in most titles, including 163 FPS in Warzone and 106 FPS in Control, making it suitable for high-refresh 1440p panels.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 16 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for large projects, while the CPU's multi-thread score of 36470 handles encoding and export tasks. The system is also viable for developers who need fast compilation times and the ability to run multiple virtual machines, given the 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache.

Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's efficiency, with its 65 W TDP reducing heat and power costs, while the single-thread score of 4691 ensures snappy application launches. However, the GPU is overkill for office tasks, so this build is best suited for users who also game or do creative work. The 91st combined percentile confirms that this is a high-tier system, not a budget or mid-range option, and it is best matched with a high-resolution, high-refresh display to fully utilize its capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a chip size of 378 mm² and 45,600 million transistors. It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The base clock runs at 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, while memory operates at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU packs 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. This hardware configuration produces a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both at 56.28 TFLOPS. These numbers translate to strong rasterization and compute performance, though the Passmark DirectX scores of 151 for DX12 and 324 for DX11 suggest that raw API-specific benchmarks vary, likely due to driver optimization or test methodology.

In rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 indicates solid performance in modern APIs, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 255450 shows good cross-platform compatibility. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking places it below the top tier, with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE outperforming it by 2.2% in average score. The 360 W TDP and dual-slot design require robust cooling and a 750 W PSU, as indicated by the suggested power supply. The 16-pin power connector and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface are modern standards, ensuring compatibility with current high-end motherboards.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and lighter titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 744 FPS, Valorant at 590 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 400 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 manage 99 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 90 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly playable. Valorant stays at 559 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 223 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 163 FPS. Single-player games see a dip but stay above 60 FPS in most cases, with Control at 106 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 74 FPS. The Medium drops to 59 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 31 FPS, indicating that the most demanding titles can stress the GPU at 1440p.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Valorant still delivers 519 FPS, but most titles see significant drops. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 138 FPS, Control at 72 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 72 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 49 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 45 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is barely playable at 16 FPS, and The Medium is at 47 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 211.5, but this is skewed by the high performance in esports titles, as 4K gaming in AAA games typically requires upscaling or reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, ranking in the 91st combined percentile. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, based on Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process, while the GPU is a GeForce 50-series card with Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process. Together, they represent a high-tier system that excels in gaming and handles creative workloads with authority.

The pair ranks 151st out of 3732 pairs by FPS, placing it in the top 4% of all tested combinations. The CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile create a slight imbalance, with the CPU being relatively stronger than the GPU. This means the system is well-suited for CPU-bound tasks like esports gaming and productivity, while GPU-bound workloads at 4K will see the GPU as the limiting factor. The 65 W CPU TDP is notably efficient, while the 360 W GPU TDP requires adequate cooling and power delivery.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The TDP is rated at 65 W, which is low for its performance class, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. ECC memory support is available, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. It has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the launch MSRP is $289.

In benchmarks, the CPU scores 4691 in single-thread tests, which is strong for gaming and everyday tasks. The multi-thread score of 36470 reflects its 8-core design, which is competitive but not class-leading against higher-core-count rivals. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 show solid computational throughput, while the data compression score of 421988 and random string sorting score of 45890 indicate good performance in data-heavy workloads. The extended instructions score of 33688 and data encryption score of 21488 round out its capabilities.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which scores 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.9%. This tight clustering means that the 9700F performs within 1% of these alternatives, making it a highly competitive choice for multi-threaded workloads. The 94th percentile ranking confirms that it sits in the upper tier of all CPUs, though it is not at the absolute top, which would require more cores or higher clocks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds