SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing represents a balanced desktop configuration where the CPU’s high single-thread performance complements the GPU’s solid rasterization capabilities, though the data reveals that the graphics card becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 94th percentile standing among all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 59th percentile, indicating that the processor has considerable headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The combined percentile of 77 and an average FPS of 123.9 across 51 games place this build in the upper-middle tier of all tested pairs, ranking 1853rd out of 3732 combinations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution across resolutions shows a clear pattern of GPU limitation intensifying as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are high enough to suggest the CPU is doing substantial work, but the drop-off at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 in most titles points directly at the RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth as the limiting factor. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 56 FPS at 1080p to 42 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K, a 50% reduction from 1080p to 4K that cannot be attributed to CPU limitations given the Ryzen 7 9700F’s 4691 single-thread score.

In CPU-light but GPU-heavy titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the frame rates remain surprisingly stable across resolutions (69 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, 41 FPS at 4K), suggesting that the GPU is the bottleneck even at 1080p in such demanding simulations. Conversely, esports titles like Valorant show massive scaling from 438 FPS at 1080p to 299 FPS at 4K, indicating that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately but the graphics card’s fill rate limits output at higher pixel counts. The PassMark physics score of 2122 and integer math score of 120788 confirm that the CPU handles game logic and physics calculations without issue, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20349 places it in a position where it will consistently be the limiting component in modern AAA titles.

The benchmark data indicates that the 9700F’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a 5.50 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient for current gaming workloads, as evidenced by the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 59th percentile. The deltaPct values against rivals show the CPU is effectively on par with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% faster) and Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% slower), meaning the processor is not holding back the RTX 3060 Ti in any meaningful way. For users planning to upgrade the GPU later, the CPU will support a significantly faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck, but the current pairing is GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios above 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile of all processors, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 36470 and single-thread score of 4691. The single-thread performance is particularly strong, as evidenced by the PassMark single-thread score ranking, and this translates directly to gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The data compression score of 421988 and floating-point math score of 77955 indicate strong computational throughput for productivity tasks. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875 average, 0.2% slower), Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163 average, 0.2% faster), and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515 average, 0.7% slower), showing that this 8-core part competes with higher-core-count processors in aggregate benchmarks.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 16129 places it in the 59th percentile of all graphics cards, with a PassMark G3D score of 20349 and GPU compute score of 10006. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 provides a modern gaming metric, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 show compute versatility. The RTX 3060 Ti’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014 average, 0.7% slower), AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351 average, 1.4% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361 average, 1.4% faster), indicating that the GPU sits in a competitive mid-range segment.

The combined picture shows a pairing where the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU, which means that the RTX 3060 Ti is the performance ceiling for gaming. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 123.9, but this figure is inflated by esports titles like Valorant (438 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (422 FPS at 1080p). Realistic expectations for modern AAA titles at 1440p are in the 40-60 FPS range, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 (42 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (38 FPS), and Microsoft Flight Simulator (56 FPS). The GPU’s 8 GB memory capacity is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but will require texture quality compromises at 4K in many titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts to 5.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it highly power-efficient for a desktop processor. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3, which provides ample fast memory for gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4691 is exceptional and explains why the CPU performs well in games that rely on high clock speeds and strong IPC. The multi-thread score of 36470 demonstrates that the 8 cores scale well under parallel workloads, though it trails higher-core-count processors in heavily threaded applications. The extended instructions score of 33688 and AES encryption score of 21488 indicate strong performance in cryptography and vectorized workloads, while the prime number finding score of 183 and random string sorting score of 45890 show balanced integer performance.

The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking means it outperforms 94% of all processors in the database, which is remarkable for an 8-core part. The nearest rival comparisons show that the 9700F trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (a mobile 16-core processor) and Intel Core i7-14700KF (a desktop 20-core processor), highlighting the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture. The 65 W TDP means this processor can be cooled with modest aftermarket coolers, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking to extract additional performance if thermal headroom permits. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fast compilation times, and smooth multitasking without the power draw and heat of higher-TDP processors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor, ensuring compatibility with the fastest current SSDs and graphics cards. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, which means users coming from older platforms will need new RAM as part of any upgrade. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for users building workstations or servers that require error-correcting memory. The platform’s 4 nm process and 65 W TDP mean that the CPU runs cool and efficiently, allowing for smaller power supplies and more compact cooling solutions.

The RTX 3060 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the AM5 platform’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a 200 W TDP and the suggested power supply is 550 W, which provides a baseline for system builders. The CPU’s 65 W TDP combined with the GPU’s 200 W TDP means a 550 W PSU leaves headroom for other components, but users planning future GPU upgrades should consider a higher-capacity power supply. The GPU uses a 12-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height, which should fit in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the RTX 3060 Ti with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom with its 94th percentile ranking. The CPU’s performance is on par with the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, so it will not bottleneck any current graphics card. The AM5 platform supports future AMD processors in the same socket, so users can also upgrade the CPU without changing the motherboard. The 8 GB GPU memory is the most limiting factor for longevity, as modern games increasingly require more VRAM for high-resolution textures, so users targeting 4K gaming should prioritize a GPU upgrade over a CPU upgrade.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this pairing delivers excellent frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant hitting 438 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 191 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS. These scores easily exceed 144 Hz refresh rate targets for esports gaming, making this a capable setup for competitive play.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a multi-thread score of 36470 provide enough processing power to handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 152 tensor cores and 38 RT cores support hardware-accelerated encoding and ray tracing, though the 59th GPU percentile suggests using NVENC for streaming rather than stressing the CPU.

Video Editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77955 and integer math score of 120788 indicate strong performance for video encoding and effects processing. The GPU’s compute score of 10006 accelerates rendering in supported applications, though the 8 GB VRAM limits working with very high-resolution or long-form projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 36470 and the GPU’s compute capabilities make this a viable entry-level rendering workstation, but the 59th GPU percentile means render times will be longer than with higher-end cards. The CPU’s 94th percentile and ECC memory support make it more suited for CPU-based rendering tasks.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 ensures fast compilation of single files and responsive IDE performance, while the multi-thread score handles parallel builds efficiently. The data encryption score of 21488 aids in secure development workflows.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 94th percentile and 65 W TDP mean this system handles productivity suites, web browsing, and document creation with ease while remaining energy-efficient. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the system’s overall responsiveness is excellent for multitasking across multiple applications.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS at ultra settings across 51 games reveals a clear resolution hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate of 123.9 FPS is respectable, but the distribution is wide. Esports titles dominate: Valorant runs at 438 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 422 FPS, and Roblox at 247 FPS. Modern AAA titles are more demanding, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 56 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 51 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 69 FPS. The most demanding title tested is Ark: Survival Ascended at 28 FPS, which is borderline playable.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the average FPS dropping significantly across most titles. Valorant still achieves 374 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 42 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 38 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is an outlier at 163 FPS, suggesting it scales well with the RTX 3060 Ti’s architecture. Many games fall into the 50-70 FPS range at 1440p, which is playable but requires reducing settings from ultra for smoother gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and bandwidth limitations become severe. Valorant still manages 299 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 138 FPS, but most games drop below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 25 FPS. The Medium is particularly demanding at 26 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 41 FPS is borderline. For 4K gaming, users will need to significantly lower settings or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF’s 70163. The two processors are effectively tied in aggregate performance, making them comparable for most workloads.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti a bottleneck for the Ryzen 7 9700F?

A: Yes, in most gaming scenarios the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU ranks in the 94th percentile while the GPU ranks in the 59th percentile, and the average FPS across games drops significantly as resolution increases, indicating GPU limitation.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory for error-correcting workloads.

Q: Does the RTX 3060 Ti support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Ti has 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based upscaling technologies. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3060 Ti is 550 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 550 W power supply provides adequate headroom for the CPU and GPU under load, though future GPU upgrades may require more.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is possible but not ideal. At 3840x2160, most games run below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 28 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 25 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant achieve 299 FPS, but AAA games will require reduced settings.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this system?

A: The CPU uses the AM5 socket, which supports future AMD processors. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking means it can handle significantly faster GPUs, so upgrading the RTX 3060 Ti to a higher-end card is the most sensible next step.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 5 architecture) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB GDDR6, Ampere architecture). The CPU is a high-end processor in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range card in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 77 places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of all tested combinations, ranking 1853rd out of 3732 pairs.

The Ryzen 7 9700F is part of AMD’s 9000 series, released in September 2025 with a launch MSRP of $289. It features a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 32 MB L3 cache, and a 65 W TDP. The RTX 3060 Ti was released in November 2020 with a launch MSRP of $399 USD and is now end-of-life. The GPU has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply. The pairing represents a sensible balance where the CPU provides substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades, while the current GPU handles 1080p and 1440p gaming effectively.

The measured FPS data shows this build averages 123.9 FPS across all tested games at 1080p, but this drops significantly at higher resolutions due to GPU limitations. The system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming and competent 1440p gaming, with the CPU’s strong performance ensuring that no processor-related bottlenecks occur in most titles. The 8 GB GPU memory is the primary constraint for longevity, particularly for 4K gaming or future game releases with higher VRAM requirements.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming and are willing to accept medium settings at 1440p for demanding titles. The CPU’s 94th percentile and single-thread score of 4691 make it excellent for esports games like Valorant (438 FPS at 1080p), Counter-Strike 2 (191 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (227 FPS). Users with 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitors will find this system delivers smooth competitive gameplay without compromise.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread score of 36470 and floating-point performance of 77955, though the GPU’s 59th percentile limits GPU-accelerated workloads. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the 5.50 GHz boost clock and 8-core design, while the ECC memory support makes this viable for data-intensive workstations. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks but excellent for multitasking and future-proofing.

Gamers targeting 4K should look elsewhere or be prepared to significantly lower settings, as the measured data shows most AAA titles running below 30 FPS at 3840x2160. Small business users needing a reliable workstation with strong single-thread performance and ECC memory support will find the Ryzen 7 9700F particularly attractive, while the RTX 3060 Ti provides adequate graphics for professional applications that use GPU acceleration. Overall, this build is best suited for users who want a strong CPU foundation with room to grow, and who prioritize 1080p or 1440p gaming over 4K performance.