SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc A310E form a desktop pairing that targets a specific, efficiency-focused niche rather than raw high-end performance. The CPU is a modern 8-core Zen 5 part with strong single-threaded capability, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc Alchemist chip with 4 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile rank of 72 indicates a system that sits above the median of all tracked configurations, though the data shows a significant imbalance between the processing power of the CPU and the graphical capabilities of the GPU.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and is produced on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU operates with a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, and its memory runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration by modern standards, placing the A310E in the entry-level segment of the graphics market.

In terms of compute resources, the A310E has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It also includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, though the absence of tensor core data suggests that AI-accelerated features are not a primary focus for this chip. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 3.072 TFLOPS and FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS. These figures point to a GPU that can handle light to moderate graphical workloads but will struggle with demanding 3D rendering tasks or high-resolution texture work.

The graphics card has a TDP of 75 W, making it a low-power solution that requires no external power connectors and only a 250 W suggested PSU. Its single-slot design and compact dimensions of 168 mm in length make it suitable for small form factor builds. The display outputs include four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections, which is a notable feature for multi-monitor setups. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The A310E holds a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, meaning it performs at the median level of the tracked database. However, its benchmark score is listed as zero, and it has no nearest rivals, which indicates a lack of comparative data for this specific model. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, suggesting that this is a transitional product in Intel's lineup. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors, particularly for large scenes or high-resolution textures where memory capacity and speed are critical.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F are comprehensive and show a strong performance profile. The multi-threaded score is 36470, the single-thread score is 4691, and the average benchmark score is 69996. The CPU's percentile rank against all CPUs is 94, placing it in the top 6% of all processors tracked. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with an average score of 69875, which is 0.2% behind, and the Intel Core i7-14700KF with a score of 70163, which is 0.2% ahead. This indicates that the 9700F is tightly clustered with some of the most powerful desktop and mobile chips available.

The GPU benchmarks are notably absent, with no scores provided for the Intel Arc A310E. The average benchmark score is listed as zero, and the percentile rank is 50, which is the median position. This lack of data means that the GPU's performance cannot be directly compared to rivals, and any analysis must rely on its architectural specifications and the CPU's performance as a reference point. The combined percentile for the entire build is 72, which reflects a system that is above average overall but is clearly constrained by the GPU's entry-level positioning.

The combined picture is one of a high-performing CPU paired with a low-performing GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile rank indicates that it is a top-tier processor, while the GPU's 50th percentile rank suggests it is exactly average. This creates a significant mismatch where the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphical workloads. The data shows that the system's overall percentile of 72 is pulled down considerably by the GPU, and the full potential of the CPU would only be realized with a more capable graphics card.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, which is a standard configuration for a mid-to-high-end consumer CPU. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 W, making it an efficient part. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after in workstation builds.

The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a die size of 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes, which provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics are N/A, meaning a discrete GPU is required, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $289, and the release date is September 2025.

The benchmark scores reveal a CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The single-thread score of 4691 is high, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits gaming and lightly threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 36470 is also impressive, reflecting the efficiency of the 8-core, 16-thread design. Specific workloads show a data compression score of 421988, data encryption of 21488, extended instructions of 33688, and floating-point math of 77955. Integer math scores 120788, physics 2122, and random string sorting 45890. These numbers suggest that the CPU is well-suited for a variety of tasks, from content creation to software development, where both single-thread and multi-thread performance are valued. The 65 W TDP is a key advantage, allowing for lower power consumption and easier cooling compared to higher-TDP rivals.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 4691 and multi-thread score of 36470 provide a strong foundation, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 50th percentile rank are the limiting factors. The system is likely to achieve playable frame rates at 1080p in less demanding titles, but high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will be beyond the GPU's capabilities. The 94th percentile CPU ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-bound in most scenarios, but the GPU will prevent the system from reaching its full potential.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously. The multi-thread score of 36470 indicates that the CPU can manage streaming overhead without significant performance degradation. However, the GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder and its low compute performance may require a software encoding approach, which places additional load on the CPU. The overall experience will be acceptable for 1080p streaming but will not be ideal for higher resolutions.

Video editing relies on both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's floating-point score of 77955 and integer score of 120788 support smooth timeline editing and effect processing. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for basic effects and color grading, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit the use of large 4K projects or complex compositing. The system is capable of 1080p editing with ease, but 4K workflows will be constrained by the GPU's memory and compute limits.

3D rendering is heavily dependent on the CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-thread score of 36470 ensures fast CPU-based rendering, which is common in applications like Blender's Cycles engine. The GPU's ray tracing cores are present, but the low FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM make GPU rendering impractical for complex scenes. The system will handle simple renders but will be significantly slower than a configuration with a higher-end GPU.

Software development benefits from the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. The data compression score of 421988 and random string sorting score of 45890 indicate fast compilation and code processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during long compile sessions. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this pairing is a solid choice for coders.

Student and office work is well-served by this system. The CPU's 94th percentile rank ensures snappy application launches and multitasking, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is more than enough for productivity applications. The low TDP of the CPU and GPU combined means the system runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for a shared space. The single-slot GPU and compact dimensions also allow for a small form factor build that takes up minimal desk space.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers at 1080p with older or less demanding titles will find this system adequate, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4691 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games, and the GPU's 50th percentile rank can handle medium settings. However, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K, or those who play modern AAA titles with high graphics presets, will need a more powerful GPU to avoid being the bottleneck.

Content creators working with 1080p video or light 3D rendering can benefit from the CPU's multi-thread score of 36470 and floating-point score of 77955. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic effects and rendering, but creators who work with 4K footage or complex 3D scenes will find the GPU limiting and should consider a different graphics card.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's data compression score of 421988 and integer math score of 120788, which speed up compilation and code analysis. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow for efficient parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. The GPU is not a factor for most development work, making this an efficient and cost-effective choice.

Students and office workers will find this system more than capable, as the CPU's 94th percentile rank ensures smooth multitasking across applications. The low TDP of 65 W for the CPU and 75 W for the GPU keeps the system quiet and cool, which is ideal for dorm rooms or small offices. The compact GPU size also enables a small form factor build that saves desk space.

Small business workstations that handle data processing, accounting, or light content creation can leverage the CPU's encryption score of 21488 and extended instructions score of 33688 for secure and efficient operations. The system's overall 72nd percentile rank indicates it is above average for general business tasks, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of data integrity that is valuable in professional environments.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the CPU's and GPU's benchmark scores and architectural specifications. The CPU's single-thread score of 4691 suggests that it will not be a limiting factor in most games, as it ranks in the 94th percentile overall. The GPU, however, with its 4 GB VRAM and 50th percentile rank, will be the primary constraint on gaming performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the system is estimated to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance can push high FPS. For more demanding AAA titles, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will likely result in medium-to-low settings to maintain 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's limited memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s and 4 GB VRAM will cause significant frame rate drops, and ultra settings will be unattainable in most modern games. The lack of measured FPS data makes these estimates uncertain, but the architectural evidence points to a system that is best suited for 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F holds a 94th percentile rank among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 69996 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355).

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E have any benchmark scores listed?

A: No, the GPU's benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile rank is 50, which is the median position, but there are no specific test scores to reference.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310E features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which is 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect the build?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has a TDP of 65 W, which is relatively low for an 8-core processor. This allows for efficient cooling and lower power consumption, making it suitable for compact builds.

Q: Can the system be overclocked?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," indicating it draws power solely from the motherboard, which may limit its overclocking headroom.

Q: What is the combined percentile for the entire build?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc A310E build is 72, which places it above the average of all tracked configurations.

Q: What is the GPU's API support?

A: The Intel Arc A310E supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and rendering APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, an 8-core Zen 5 processor with a 94th percentile CPU rank, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level Xe-HPG GPU with a 50th percentile GPU rank. The CPU is designed for the AM5 platform with DDR5 memory support, while the GPU is a compact, single-slot, low-power card requiring no external power. The combined percentile of 72 indicates that the system performs above the median of all tracked builds, but the performance is heavily skewed toward the CPU side. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it best suited for light gaming and productivity, while the CPU's strong multi-thread score of 36470 and single-thread score of 4691 provide a robust foundation for more demanding tasks. This pairing is a budget-conscious desktop solution that prioritizes CPU performance and energy efficiency over graphical fidelity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear bottleneck in this system, with the GPU being the limiting factor in graphical workloads. The CPU's 94th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 69996 are far superior to the GPU's 50th percentile rank and zero benchmark score. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 4691 ensures that frame rates will rarely be CPU-bound, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance at 1080p with medium settings. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a fraction of what high-end cards offer, creating a significant imbalance where the CPU is underutilized in graphics-intensive tasks.

Conversely, in CPU-heavy workloads like software development or data processing, the system is well-balanced, as the GPU is not a factor. The CPU's data compression score of 421988 and integer math score of 120788 indicate strong performance for these tasks, and the GPU's low power draw does not interfere. The lack of measured FPS data makes precise bottleneck quantification difficult, but the architectural evidence points to a system where the GPU will bottleneck gaming performance, while the CPU will be the dominant component in all other scenarios. The overall combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance, as the system's potential is constrained by the entry-level GPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds