SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc A310: A Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's latest Zen 5 desktop processor with Intel's entry-level Arc discrete GPU, producing a system that sits at the 67th percentile overall among all desktop combinations. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at only the 40th percentile among all GPUs — an extreme imbalance that defines every workload outcome discussed below.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD's 9000 series processors. This is a desktop-class build, and the platform supports DDR5 memory exclusively, running on a dual-channel memory bus with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The memory controller also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for users who prioritize data integrity in workstation or server-adjacent workloads.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself. This means the primary GPU slot and at least one NVMe storage slot can run at Gen 5 speeds, assuming the motherboard and peripherals support the standard. The GPU in this build, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it will operate within the Gen 5 slot but will only utilize eight lanes of Gen 4 bandwidth — a limitation that does not bottleneck this particular GPU given its modest performance envelope.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 watts. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 watts, which indicates that even a modest power supply can handle this pairing comfortably. The GPU draws no additional power connectors, taking all its power from the PCIe slot, which simplifies cabling and makes this an easy drop-in for pre-existing systems with limited PSU headroom. A sensible next upgrade path would involve keeping the AM5 motherboard and DDR5 memory while replacing the GPU with a higher-tier model, since the CPU has substantial headroom that the current GPU leaves completely untapped.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU include integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has no integrated graphics (listed as "N/A"), so the discrete Intel Arc A310 is mandatory for any display output.

Q: What is the release timeline for these components?

A: The CPU was released on September 15, 2025, while the GPU was released on October 11, 2022, and is now marked as end-of-life production status.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores an average of 69,996, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875), 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515), 0.9% above the Intel Core i7-14700K (69,355), and 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163).

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to the GTX 1650?

A: The Intel Arc A310 scores 5,433 in PassMark G3D, which places it 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472 average score, but with a 1% delta meaning the A310 is slightly behind in average score comparisons — the deltaPct of 1 indicates the A310 is 1% lower than the GTX 1650's average of 7,472).

Q: Can this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU's memory controller supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop processors and may appeal to users running error-sensitive computations.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern graphics APIs despite its low raw performance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is not suitable. The GPU sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs, and its PassMark G3D score of 5,433 places it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon R7 250 and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — both entry-level parts. High-refresh gaming (144 Hz or above) requires far more GPU throughput than this card can deliver at any modern resolution with quality settings.

Streaming and content creation workloads present a mixed picture. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36,470 is exceptional, ranking at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, which means software encoding and general productivity tasks will fly. However, the GPU's compute performance is weak — its PassMark GPU compute score is 2,157 — so any GPU-accelerated encoding or rendering will be severely limited.

Video editing depends heavily on which engine is used. CPU-based editing in software like HandBrake or Premiere's software encoder will benefit from the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong integer math score of 120,788 and floating-point math score of 77,955. But GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, or export via hardware encoders will drag the system down to the GPU's low level.

3D rendering follows the same pattern. CPU rendering in Blender or similar tools will be fast, given the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads with a multithread score of 36,470. GPU rendering, however, will be nearly unusable for complex scenes, as the Arc A310's FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS is a fraction of what dedicated rendering GPUs offer.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,691 and data compression score of 421,988 indicate rapid compilation, fast code indexing, and responsive IDE performance. The GPU is adequate for basic 2D desktop rendering, as its PassMark G2D score of 625 shows it can handle standard office and development interfaces without issue.

Student and office work is entirely feasible. The CPU's 65-watt TDP and the GPU's 30-watt TDP together create a low-power system that runs quietly and economically. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 69 and DirectX 11 score of 33 are low, but for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures snappy response.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a narrow audience. Gamers at 1080p with very low settings and older titles might find the GPU acceptable, but the data shows the GPU is at the 40th percentile — below the median — so even esports titles at competitive settings may struggle. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications, such as software developers compiling large codebases or researchers running data analysis, will get excellent value from the CPU's 94th-percentile standing.

Small business workstations that run office suites, web applications, and light database work will perform admirably with this pairing. The CPU's data encryption score of 21,488 and random string sorting score of 45,890 indicate strong throughput for typical business workloads. Students building a budget desktop for coursework, programming assignments, and general productivity will find the CPU far exceeds their needs while the GPU handles basic display output.

The build is not suitable for 3D artists, video editors working with GPU acceleration, or gamers targeting modern AAA titles at medium or higher settings. The GPU's percentile ranking and its nearest rivals (all from the entry-level or older generation) make this clear. This is a CPU-centric system where the GPU serves as a display adapter with modest 3D capability rather than a gaming or rendering workhorse.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F achieves an average benchmark score of 69,996, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70,163 (0.2% higher), followed by the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69,875 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69,355 (0.9% lower). The CPU's sub-scores show particular strength in data compression (421,988), integer math (120,788), and floating-point math (77,955), with a multithread score of 36,470 and a single-thread score of 4,691.

The Intel Arc A310 achieves an average benchmark score of 7,550, placing it at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7,557 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7,580 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 at 7,472 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M at 7,447 (1.4% lower). The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 5,433, with a GPU compute score of 2,157. Its OpenCL score is 30,607 and Vulkan score is 28,964.

The combined picture is a system at the 67th percentile overall, driven almost entirely by the CPU's dominance. The GPU's 40th-percentile ranking pulls the combined score down from what the CPU alone would achieve, making this a lopsided pairing where the processor outperforms the graphics card by a wide margin in their respective percentile standings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame rate expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions of the two components.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and its 40th-percentile ranking, frame rates in modern 3D games will be low. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 indicate that even API-level performance is weak. At 1080p with ultra settings, most modern titles will struggle to maintain playable frame rates. At 720p or with significantly reduced settings, some older or less demanding games may run acceptably.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,691 ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations will not be the bottleneck in most games, but the GPU will cap frame rates far below what the CPU could support. For competitive esports titles with very low graphics settings, the system may achieve playable frame rates, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution scaling. The data strongly suggests this is not a gaming-oriented build.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing exhibits one of the most extreme CPU-to-GPU imbalances in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile — a 54-percentage-point gap. In any gaming workload, the GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck; the CPU could easily feed a GPU several tiers higher without breaking a sweat.

In CPU-bound workloads, the GPU becomes nearly irrelevant. The CPU's multithread score of 36,470 and single-thread score of 4,691 mean that software compilation, data processing, and office productivity will run at speeds dictated entirely by the processor. The GPU's compute score of 2,157 shows it can handle basic 2D acceleration but offers little for compute-heavy tasks.

The FPS scaling analysis — had measured data existed — would show frame rates that remain nearly constant regardless of CPU settings, because the GPU saturates first. Conversely, CPU benchmark scores would show no variation based on GPU choice, because the GPU is not involved in those tests. The bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU limits all graphics-related tasks, while the CPU limits only those tasks that require no GPU involvement beyond display output.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F — an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor on the AM5 socket — with the Intel Arc A310, a 4 GB entry-level GPU from Intel's Alchemist generation. The system's combined percentile ranking is 67th among all desktop combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier overall, but this figure masks the extreme component-level disparity.

The CPU is a modern, high-performance part with a 94th-percentile ranking, while the GPU is an end-of-life entry-level part at the 40th percentile. The overall tier is therefore misleading: in CPU-heavy tasks, this system performs like a top-tier machine; in GPU-heavy tasks, it performs like a budget machine from several years ago. The build class is desktop, with a 65-watt CPU and a 30-watt GPU requiring only a 200-watt suggested PSU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, containing 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the TDP is 65 watts. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores demonstrate strong all-around performance. The PassMark multithread score of 36,470 places this CPU at the 94th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163 average, 0.2% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515 average, 0.7% lower). The single-thread score of 4,691 is excellent for responsiveness. The data compression score of 421,988 indicates outstanding throughput for archiving and file operations, while the integer math score of 120,788 and floating-point math score of 77,955 show strong computational capability for both business and scientific workloads. The extended instructions score of 33,688 and encryption score of 21,488 round out a well-balanced CPU profile.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level GPU from the Alchemist generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip. It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The card is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a TDP of 30 watts with a suggested PSU of 200 watts. Display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connectors, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is competitive only with older entry-level parts. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 places it at the 40th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557 average, 0.1% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472 average, 1% lower). The DirectX scores are notably low — DirectX 9 at 69, DirectX 11 at 33, and DirectX 12 at 29 — indicating weak legacy and modern API performance. The G2D score of 625 is adequate for basic desktop tasks, while the compute score of 2,157 shows limited GPU compute capability. The OpenCL score of 30,607 and Vulkan score of 28,964 suggest that compute workloads through those APIs perform relatively better than DirectX-based tasks, but still far below what modern mid-range GPUs achieve.