SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop build that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming with a strong CPU foundation. The processor sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card is more modest at the 57th percentile, creating a system where the GPU is typically the limiting factor in demanding titles. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, reflecting a capable mid-range configuration that excels in CPU-heavy tasks and esports titles.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build is exceptionally strong. Measured frame rates in competitive titles are outstanding, with Valorant reaching 357 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hitting 344 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege delivering 185 FPS at 1920x1080. Even the more demanding Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 183 FPS at the same resolution, meaning a 144Hz or even 240Hz monitor can be fully utilized in these genres. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 supports this, as these titles are heavily dependent on fast core performance.

Streaming and content creation are well-served by the eight-core, sixteen-thread Ryzen 7 9700F. The PassMark multithread score of 36470 places it in the top 6% of all CPUs, and its performance is within 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-14700K. This headroom allows for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast without the CPU becoming a bottleneck, although the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit the visual quality of the streamed game.

Video editing workflows benefit significantly from the CPU’s integer and floating-point performance. The PassMark integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 indicate strong throughput for codec operations and effects processing. The 89.6 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth ensures that large media files move efficiently, making 1080p and 1440p editing timelines responsive, though 4K multi-layer projects may strain the GPU’s compute capabilities during rendering.

3D rendering and CAD work are viable on this system, driven primarily by the CPU’s multi-core might. The PassMark physics score of 2122 and the multithread score of 36470 show that CPU-based rendering engines will perform admirably. The GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute also assists in GPU-accelerated renderers, but its 57th percentile standing means complex scenes with heavy lighting and geometry will be slower than with higher-tier cards.

Software development is a natural workload for this configuration. Compilation tasks leverage the 8 cores and 16 threads, with the CPU’s data compression score of 421988 and extended instructions score of 33688 indicating fast code building and script execution. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache reduces latency when accessing frequently used code segments, and the 94th CPU percentile ensures that IDE responsiveness and build times are never a productivity barrier.

For student and office work, this build is overwhelmingly overpowered. The single-thread score of 4691 handles spreadsheet calculations and document processing instantly, while the 65W TDP keeps power consumption low during light loads. The integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so the discrete GPU is mandatory, but for typical productivity tasks the system will idle efficiently, making it a responsive yet power-conscious workstation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69996, placing it at the 94th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69875, a delta of just 0.2%, meaning the 9700F effectively matches a high-end mobile HX chip. Against the Intel Core i7-14700KF, the 9700F trails by only 0.2%, and it leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.7% and the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.9%. This clustering shows that the 9700F sits at the very top of desktop CPU performance, despite being a 65W part.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15171, which lands at the 57th percentile of all graphics cards. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with a score of 15199, a negative delta of 0.2%, meaning the RX 7600 is marginally slower. The AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics score 15270, which is 0.7% higher, indicating that the discrete card’s advantage is minimal in synthetic tests. The PassMark G3D score of 16634 and GPU compute score of 8790 reflect a mid-range part that is adequate for 1080p but not exceptional.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer and the GPU is a solid mid-range component. The combined percentile of 76 highlights this imbalance: the processor is in the top 6% while the graphics card is only in the upper half. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming or productivity, but the GPU will limit maximum frame rates in graphically intensive titles. The measured average FPS across games is 101.4, with this pairing ranking 2686 out of 3732 pairs, showing that while the CPU is elite, the overall system performance is typical of a mid-range gaming PC.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 on average, which is 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K’s average score of 69355. This places the two processors in the same performance tier, with the AMD chip holding a slight edge.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The Radeon RX 7600 is at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15171. This indicates it performs better than roughly 57% of graphics cards, but it is not a high-end part.

Q: Does this build support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, but the GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the graphics card operates on the older standard, though this does not significantly impact gaming performance.

Q: What is the maximum measured FPS in Valorant at 1080p?

A: Valorant achieves 357 FPS at 1920x1080 with ultra settings. This is the highest measured frame rate in the dataset, indicating exceptional performance for competitive esports.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, measured frame rates drop below 60 FPS in most demanding titles. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, and Control at 33 FPS. 4K gaming is not recommended with this GPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7600 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may limit texture quality in future titles.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W, while the GPU has a TDP of 165W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which is adequate for the entire system given the CPU’s low power draw.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation use. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, but the RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning the GPU is not fully utilizing the available bandwidth.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, which is a requirement for AM5. The 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is standard for dual-channel DDR5-5600, and faster kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, though the 65W TDP suggests a focus on efficiency. The production status is active, and the CPU has a launch MSRP of $289.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which provides ample headroom for the entire system. The CPU’s 65W TDP and GPU’s 165W TDP total only 230W, so a 450W supply is more than sufficient. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 94th CPU percentile means the 9700F can support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU in the 90th percentile or higher would balance the system, while the current RX 7600 at the 57th percentile leaves performance on the table.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an eight-core, sixteen-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, containing 8,315 million transistors on a die size of 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and it has a TDP of 65W, which is remarkably low for this level of performance.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation helps reduce latency in multi-threaded applications. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC, making it suitable for data integrity-sensitive workloads. It does not have integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multithread tasks. The single-thread score of 4691 is elite, and the multithread score of 36470 places it in the top 6% of all CPUs. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 show balanced performance across arithmetic operations. The data compression score of 421988 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in archiving and file management tasks. The extended instructions score of 33688 supports modern SIMD workloads, while the random string sorting score of 45890 shows quick data manipulation.

The CPU’s performance is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, demonstrating that it matches or beats these high-end parts despite its lower TDP. Its average benchmark score of 69996 is remarkably close to these rivals, and it leads the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.7%. The PassMark physics score of 2122 indicates strong performance in physics simulations, which is relevant for gaming and scientific computing. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while its low TDP makes it efficient for always-on workstations.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh rates will find this build almost ideal. Measured FPS in Valorant (357), Counter-Strike 2 (156), and Call of Duty: Warzone (183) at 1920x1080 shows that esports titles run far above 144Hz. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077, the 46 FPS at 1080p is playable but not high-refresh, so users should be prepared to lower settings for competitive play. At 1440p, the frame rates drop to 34 FPS in Cyberpunk and 31 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, making this resolution suitable for less demanding titles but not for maxed-out AAA games.

Content creators who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks will appreciate the 94th percentile processor. Video editors using the PassMark multithread score of 36470 will see fast export times, and the 421988 data compression score speeds up file transfers and backups. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will find the eight-core, sixteen-thread design capable of handling complex scenes, though GPU rendering will be limited by the RX 7600’s 57th percentile performance.

Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the high single-thread score of 4691 for IDE responsiveness and the multicore throughput for build times. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions. Students and office workers will find the system overwhelmingly fast for their needs, with the 65W TDP keeping electricity costs low during light use. Small business workstations that run database queries or financial modeling will leverage the integer math score of 120788 and the 94th percentile ranking, ensuring smooth operation under load.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. It does not have dedicated tensor cores, relying on standard compute units for AI workloads.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU clock speeds are 1720 MHz base, 2250 MHz game, and 2655 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating that the card does not have dedicated tensor acceleration.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a mid-range part. The PassMark G3D score is 16634, and the GPU compute score is 8790. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 88051, while the Vulkan score is 34401. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2310, which is a modern benchmark for DirectX 12 gaming. The DirectX 11 score of 172 and DirectX 12 score of 58 in PassMark show that the card performs better in older APIs, which is typical for this class.

For rendering, the 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for real-time graphics at 1080p. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 57th percentile ranking suggests that ray-traced scenes will run at lower frame rates than rasterized ones. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 8 GB of VRAM, but high-resolution textures at 1440p may exceed this capacity. The GPU’s performance is within 0.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, making it a direct competitor at the entry-level, though it is slower than the integrated AMD Radeon 680M by 0.7% in average score, which is surprising for a discrete card. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern monitors.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor, ranking at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range card at the 57th percentile. The combined percentile for the pairing is 76, indicating that the system performs better than 76% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69996 is near the top of the charts, rivaling high-end chips like the Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core i7-14700K. The GPU’s average score of 15171 is respectable but not exceptional, placing it just above average. The pair ranks 2686 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS across games of 101.4. This ranking suggests that while the CPU is elite, the GPU holds the system back from the top echelons of gaming performance.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range to upper-mid-range, depending on the workload. For CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and streaming, this system performs at a high level. For GPU-intensive gaming, it is a solid 1080p machine. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $289, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 269 USD, making this a cost-effective pairing for the performance offered, though pricing is not a factor in the benchmark analysis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The primary bottleneck in this system is the GPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking vastly outpaces the GPU’s 57th percentile, meaning that in most gaming scenarios, the RX 7600 will be the limiting factor. This is evident in the measured FPS: at 1080p, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (46 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (42 FPS) are GPU-bound, while esports titles like Valorant (357 FPS) are still limited by the GPU’s maximum output, not the CPU.

In CPU-heavy workloads, the balance shifts. Applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be limited by the CPU, but the 9700F’s high scores mean it can handle these tasks faster than almost any other processor. The GPU’s compute score of 8790 may become a bottleneck in GPU-accelerated rendering, but for most productivity tasks, the CPU dominates.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms the GPU bottleneck. As resolution increases from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, frame rates drop significantly. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone goes from 183 FPS at 1080p to 163 FPS at 1440p to 138 FPS at 4K, showing that the GPU is still capable at higher resolutions but cannot maintain high frame rates. In Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is from 46 FPS at 1080p to 34 FPS at 1440p to 23 FPS at 4K, indicating that the GPU is overwhelmed at higher resolutions.

The CPU’s performance is so strong that it will not bottleneck any current GPU. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would immediately improve gaming performance, as the CPU has ample headroom. The current GPU limits the system to 1080p gaming at high settings, while the CPU could easily support 1440p or even 4K with a more powerful graphics card. For users who prioritize gaming, the GPU is the clear upgrade target; for productivity, the system is well-balanced with a strong CPU and adequate GPU.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, shows that this build excels in esports titles and struggles with the most demanding AAA games at high resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent frame rates in competitive games: Valorant runs at 357 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 344 FPS, and Roblox at 201 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 183 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 185 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 156 FPS. These results make the build ideal for high-refresh 1080p gaming.

For single-player titles at 1080p, performance is mixed. Assetto Corsa runs at 92 FPS, Doom at 116 FPS, and Minecraft at 153 FPS, all smooth experiences. However, more demanding games show the GPU’s limitations. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 42 FPS, and The Medium at 33 FPS. These are playable but below 60 FPS, requiring settings adjustments for smoother gameplay.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop further. Valorant still runs at 305 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 163 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 103 FPS, making 1440p viable for esports. However, AAA titles suffer: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 31 FPS, and Control to 49 FPS. The Medium runs at 27 FPS, which is borderline unplayable. For 1440p gaming, this build is best suited for less demanding or competitive titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly out of its depth. Most games fall below 60 FPS, with only Valorant (243 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (140 FPS) remaining playable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 138 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 23 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 21 FPS, and The Medium to 22 FPS. These results indicate that 4K gaming is not a realistic use case for this GPU, as even mid-range titles like Fortnite (25 FPS) and Grand Theft Auto V (28 FPS) struggle. The data confirms that this build is optimized for 1080p and, to a lesser extent, 1440p gaming.