SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific configuration for a laptop platform, built around a high-efficiency, high-performance CPU and a modest, entry-level discrete GPU. The data available for this combination is derived entirely from individual component benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are estimated from these synthetic scores, providing a reliable but non-experiential picture of the system's capabilities. This analysis will break down the platform, usage scenarios, and component balance based strictly on the provided facts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this system is the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, a mobile processor utilizing the AMD Socket FP8. This socket is specific to AMD's mobile platform, meaning the upgrade path is generally tied to the laptop chassis itself rather than a traditional desktop motherboard. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is a critical resource for both the CPU's integrated Radeon 780M graphics and the discrete Intel Arc A350M. The platform’s PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the primary GPU and an NVMe SSD. The system is not designed for user-driven CPU upgrades in the same manner as a desktop; the "upgrade path" here is more about the configuration options available at the time of purchase, such as RAM and storage capacity.

The power envelope is defined by the CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP. This combined 70 W thermal budget is a key characteristic of a thin-and-light or compact laptop design. The suggestedPsu field is null, but the total power draw is low enough to be handled by a standard laptop power adapter without requiring a high-wattage external supply. The data indicates that the platform is built for efficiency, with the CPU's 4 nm process node and the GPU's 6 nm process node contributing to a balanced power profile. A sensible upgrade from this configuration would involve moving to a system with a higher-tier GPU within the same chassis family, should the manufacturer offer such a variant, as the CPU has sufficient headroom in its benchmark scores to support a stronger graphics solution without becoming the primary bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the Intel Arc A350M is positioned as an entry-level GPU, with an average benchmark score of 24647 and a percentile ranking of 70. The CPU's single-thread performance, as indicated by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 990 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2081, is strong enough to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will likely limit the system to medium or high settings in esports titles rather than achieving maximum refresh rates in demanding AAA games. The system is better suited for 60 FPS gaming than for pushing 144 Hz in graphically intensive titles.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming due to its high multi-threaded performance. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16192 and a Passmark multithread score of 28498 provide ample headroom for encoding video while a game is running. The x264 encoding workload would be handled comfortably by the 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor, leaving the dedicated GPU free to render frames. The integrated Radeon 780M can also serve as a secondary encoder if needed, although the discrete GPU's capabilities are the primary focus for gaming. This makes the pairing viable for a single-PC streaming setup for less demanding games.

Video Editing: The combination is workable for 1080p video editing. The CPU's strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 16192) will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export processes, particularly with software that can utilize all 16 threads. The GPU's 4 GB of VRAM is a limitation for complex effects or 4K timelines, but the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 768 shading units are sufficient for basic color correction and transitions in standard definition and 1080p projects. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance can accelerate some compute tasks in supported applications, but it is not a primary workstation GPU.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. For CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles with CPU), the Ryzen 7 8845HS is a strong performer, with a Passmark floating point math score of 59254 indicating solid compute throughput. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS is a significant bottleneck, and its 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity and texture sizes. The data suggests that users would need to rely primarily on the CPU for final renders, which is feasible but slower than a dedicated high-end GPU. The 6 RT cores provide some ray-tracing acceleration but are entry-level in capability.

Software Development: The CPU excels in this scenario. The 16 threads and high cache hierarchy (16 MB L3) provide excellent performance for code compilation, running virtual machines, and executing test suites. The Passmark data compression score of 344439 and integer math score of 97747 are strong indicators of responsiveness in build tools and database operations. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, meaning the system's overall performance is dictated by the CPU and RAM, which are both high-quality components. This makes it a very capable and efficient laptop for developers.

Student and Office Work: This is the system's sweet spot. The high single-thread performance (Geekbench 2081) ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets. The multi-core performance handles multitasking with dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication apps without breaking a sweat. The efficiency of the 45 W TDP CPU, combined with the 25 W TDP GPU, contributes to excellent battery life for all-day use. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle all office graphics tasks, allowing the discrete GPU to remain idle and conserve power.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a top-tier mobile processor, sitting in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350M is a lower-mid-range GPU in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a system where the CPU is almost always the component with more headroom, making the GPU the primary limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 1347), the CPU will be the star performer, and the GPU will have little to no impact.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In gaming, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will likely cause stutters and texture pop-in at higher resolutions or with high-quality textures, making it the clear bottleneck. Conversely, in productivity tasks like 3D model manipulation or heavy multitasking, the CPU's performance is so high that it will not be the limiting factor; instead, the RAM speed and storage I/O might become more relevant. The benchmark scores for the GPU show a high average (24647), but this is relative to its peers, and its raw compute power is far lower than what the CPU can command in terms of data throughput. The system is best described as a "CPU-first" laptop with a discrete GPU as an add-on for light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, rather than a balanced gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is not for a high-end gamer or a professional 3D artist. Instead, it is tailored for the following users:

Students and Office Professionals: The combination of a powerful, efficient CPU and a low-power GPU is ideal for students who need a laptop for research, writing, coding, and light photo editing, with the occasional ability to play less demanding games like League of Legends or CS:GO. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking ensures a smooth, responsive experience for daily tasks.
Mobile Software Developers: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a Passmark multithread score of 28498 is a powerhouse for compiling code and running containers. The presence of a discrete GPU is a bonus for testing graphics applications or running local machine learning inference with the GPU's tensor-like capabilities (though not officially listed).
Content Creators on a Budget: For creators working primarily with 1080p footage and light effects, this system offers a solid balance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 will handle exports quickly, and the GPU can accelerate effects and render previews in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro, provided the user is mindful of the 4 GB VRAM limitation.
Small Business Workstations: For tasks such as accounting, data entry, and customer relationship management, this system is overqualified on the CPU side, ensuring longevity and smooth operation for years. The discrete GPU is not strictly necessary but offers headroom for connecting multiple 4K displays or accelerating certain business visualization tools.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for competitive gaming?

A: The CPU is excellent, but the GPU is the limiting factor. The Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647 and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is sufficient for 1080p esports titles at high frame rates, but it may not sustain maximum refresh rates in more demanding games. The CPU's high single-thread score of 990 in 3dmark ensures input responsiveness.

Q: How much RAM can I use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The maximum capacity is not specified in the data, but the architecture supports standard laptop SODIMM modules. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, which is shared between the CPU and the integrated graphics.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: It can handle 4K editing, but with compromises. The CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 16192) is strong enough for decoding and encoding, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle with complex 4K timelines, multiple layers, and heavy effects. It is best suited for 1080p workflows.

Q: What is the launch date of these components?

A: The CPU, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, was released on 2023-12-05. The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, was released earlier on 2022-03-29. The GPU is noted as "End-of-life" production status, while the CPU is "Active".

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). This allows for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the GPU's overall low compute power (3.379 TFLOPS) means that ray tracing will be very demanding and may result in low frame rates in modern titles.

Q: Is the CPU faster than the Ryzen 7 7840HS?

A: According to the nearestRivals data, the Ryzen 7 8845HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS have the exact same average benchmark score of 29955, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. They are effectively tied in performance based on the available aggregate data.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is the entry point into Intel's Arc Alchemist mobile lineup. It is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using a 6 nm TSMC process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU is configured with 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, paired with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. Its memory subsystem is a notable limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a low bandwidth figure, which will throttle performance in memory-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

Clock speeds are a bright spot, with a base of 1150 MHz and a boost of 2200 MHz. This high boost clock helps the GPU achieve a peak FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU's benchmark scores in Geekbench (OpenCL 24546, Vulkan 24747) are consistent, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, with a performance delta of less than 1%, indicating it is a solid entry-level performer. For rendering, the GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance can be used in some compute workloads, but the 4 GB VRAM is the hardest limit; large 3D scenes will not fit, and the 64-bit bus will cause significant performance drops when memory is swapped. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a system with a strong CPU and a modest GPU. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS achieves an average benchmark score of 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, which is tied at 0% delta, and it is only 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X. Key CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore of 16192, a Geekbench multicore of 12212, and a Passmark multithread of 28498. The Intel Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. The combined percentile for this build is 76, reflecting the CPU's high standing. Since no measured FPS data exists, these scores are the primary indicators of performance, suggesting that the CPU will never be the bottleneck in most applications, while the GPU will limit high-end gaming.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration that pairs a high-end mobile CPU with a low-end discrete GPU. The buildClass is explicitly "laptop". The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a premium 8-core processor, while the Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level graphics solution. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that this system is better than the majority of other laptop builds in the database, primarily thanks to the CPU's exceptional 81st percentile ranking. However, the GPU's 70th percentile ranking pulls the overall score down. This is a system for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like programming, productivity, and content creation, but who also need some discrete graphics capability for gaming or GPU-accelerated apps. It is not a top-tier gaming laptop, but it is a well-rounded mobile workstation.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a member of the Ryzen 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. This is a mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It has a 45 W TDP, which is typical for a high-performance mobile chip. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB of L3 cache.

The CPU's performance is outstanding across the board. Its 3dmark_16_threads score is 7404, and its max_threads score is 7413, showing excellent scaling with all cores active. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2081 and a Passmark single thread score of 3738. In real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 is a robust result for a 45 W mobile chip, making it suitable for heavy compilation and rendering tasks. The Passmark integer math score of 97747 and floating point math score of 59254 demonstrate its arithmetic capabilities. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics is also present and is a capable iGPU for office work and light gaming, though the discrete GPU is meant to handle more intensive tasks. This CPU is a top-tier choice for a laptop, delivering desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds