SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

23,982 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop-class hardware pairing built around AMD’s Ryzen 7 8840U processor and Intel’s Arc A350M graphics. The data shows a configuration aimed at balanced mobile productivity, with a clear lean toward CPU-heavy workloads rather than high-end gaming. The Ryzen 7 8840U is an 8-core, 16-thread part based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Arc A350M is Intel’s entry-level discrete GPU, built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using a 6 nm process. Together, they form a system that sits in the 73rd percentile overall among all tested builds, indicating a solidly above-average mobile platform, though not a top-tier performer.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840U is a mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It belongs to AMD’s 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 microarchitecture, which is a modern, high-IPC design. The chip is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. This process advantage contributes to its efficiency, as reflected in its 28 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops without active desktop-grade cooling.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This configuration helps feed the 16 threads during multi-threaded workloads. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The memory bandwidth figure is a critical constraint for certain workloads, as it is roughly on par with mid-range desktop parts but well below high-end HEDT platforms.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. In the 3DMark tests, the chip scores 979 in single-thread, 1,863 in 2-thread, 3,289 in 4-thread, 4,896 in 8-thread, and 5,691 in 16-thread tests. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is modest (from 4,896 to 5,691, a gain of about 16%), indicating that the additional threads provide diminishing returns in lightly-threaded synthetic loads, but the 8-core baseline is strong. The max-thread score of 5,677 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, confirming that the CPU does not benefit from hyper-threading beyond 16 threads—which is expected since it has exactly 16 threads.

In Cinebench, the multi-core R23 score of 12,972 and single-core R23 score of 1,703 place this chip in a competitive position. The multi-core score is roughly 7.6 times the single-core score, demonstrating excellent scaling across all 8 cores. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 9,610 and a single-core score of 1,970. These numbers suggest a chip that can handle both bursty single-threaded tasks (like UI responsiveness and light coding) and sustained multi-threaded loads (like video encoding and compilation).

The PassMark suite adds further context. The multi-thread score is 23,346, while the single-thread score is 3,543. Integer math scores 85,740, floating-point math 48,820, and extended instructions 18,654. Data encryption scores 16,072, and data compression scores 267,525. The find-prime-numbers test scores just 78, which is a low absolute number but typical for such a specific benchmark. The physics score is 1,176. These results indicate a balanced CPU with no obvious weak point in general-purpose compute. The average benchmark score is 23,982, and the CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 76, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested processors.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 8840U sits in a tight pack. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G by 0.4%, beats the Intel Xeon 6333P by 0.7%, trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U by 0.9%, and beats the Intel Core i5-11500 by 1.1%. These deltas are all under 1.5%, indicating that the 8840U’s raw CPU performance is statistically indistinguishable from these alternatives in aggregate benchmarking. The practical differences come down to power efficiency, platform features, and integrated graphics, not raw compute speed.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is CPU-dominant. The Ryzen 7 8840U’s average benchmark score of 23,982 places it in the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350M’s average benchmark score of 24,647 places it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the entire build is 73, indicating that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers.

The CPU’s 3DMark multi-thread score of 5,691 is a key indicator for gaming and content creation. This score is about 1.7 times higher than the 2-thread score of 1,863, showing that the chip leverages multiple cores effectively. The 8-thread score of 4,896 suggests that most modern games, which typically use 6-8 threads, will see near-full utilization. The single-thread score of 979 is respectable, though not class-leading; it ensures that older games or those with poor threading will still run acceptably.

The GPU’s Geekbench scores are 24,546 for OpenCL and 24,747 for Vulkan. These two scores are very close, differing by less than 1%, which suggests that the Arc A350M performs consistently across different compute APIs. The average GPU score of 24,647 places it in the 70th percentile, meaning it outperforms 70% of all tested GPUs. This is a mid-pack position, suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings or entry-level creative work.

The combined system percentile of 73 is what a buyer should focus on. This is not a high-end gaming rig; it is a capable laptop platform that can handle everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and light content creation. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, which means the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, spreadsheet manipulation, and multi-tasking, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. This is a small, power-efficient chip designed for entry-level laptops.

The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is modest; it is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will become a bottleneck in higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1150 MHz, and the boost clock is 2200 MHz, providing a reasonable clock headroom for bursty workloads.

Compute resources are limited but present. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 raster operation units (ROPs). It also includes 6 ray tracing (RT) cores, which is notable for an entry-level part, though the raw compute power is low. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. These figures are roughly on par with an older mid-range desktop card like the GTX 1650, but with the added benefit of hardware ray tracing support.

The GPU’s percentile versus all GPUs is 70, and its average benchmark score is 24,647. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% slower). These deltas are all under 2%, meaning the Arc A350M is effectively a peer of these very different GPUs in aggregate compute. The RX 590 and GTX 1630 are older desktop cards, while the RTX A5000 Mobile is a professional laptop GPU. This positioning suggests the Arc A350M is a jack-of-all-trades entry-level GPU.

The API support is modern: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with current games and future titles that leverage DX12 Ultimate features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for this class of GPU, and the TDP is 25 W, making it efficient enough for thin laptops. The production status is end-of-life, meaning this is a mature product that has been superseded in Intel’s lineup.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a mobile professional or student who needs a laptop for CPU-intensive work with occasional light gaming. The Ryzen 7 8840U’s 76th percentile CPU standing makes it ideal for software developers, data analysts, and office workers who run multi-threaded applications like compilers, virtual machines, or large spreadsheets. The 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, handle heavy multi-tasking without stutter.

Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-low settings will find the Arc A350M acceptable, but it is not a high-refresh-rate gaming GPU. The 70th percentile GPU placement means it will run esports titles smoothly, but demanding AAA games will require reduced settings. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks like video encoding (using the 12,972 Cinebench R23 multi-core score as a reference) will appreciate the processor, but GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Premiere Pro will be limited by the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1,703 in Cinebench R23) for coding and simulation, while the integrated Radeon 780M and discrete Arc A350M provide dual GPU options for light graphics work. Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or office suites will be well-served by the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 23,346, which indicates responsive multitasking. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for dual-monitor productivity setups but not for large 3D scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so performance must be estimated from the GPU’s 70th percentile score. The Arc A350M’s 768 shading units and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can drive 1080p at 60 FPS in esports titles, but high-refresh (144 Hz) gaming will require significantly reduced settings or older games. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 979 in 3DMark ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are well-suited for x264 encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,972 indicates headroom for simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU’s 6 RT cores and modern API support (DX12 Ultimate) allow for hardware-accelerated encoding via Intel Quick Sync, though the 25 W TDP limits sustained encode quality.

Video editing: The CPU is the star here. The Geekbench multicore score of 9,610 and PassMark integer math score of 85,740 support smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export in CPU-based codecs. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing but will struggle with 4K timelines or heavy effects. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side helps with large file transfers.

3D rendering: This is not a rendering powerhouse. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is entry-level, and the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The CPU can handle CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) with its 16 threads, but render times will be longer than a desktop workstation. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with repetitive tasks.

Software development: The CPU excels here. The PassMark data compression score of 267,525 and encryption score of 16,072 indicate fast build times and secure data handling. The single-thread score of 3,543 in PassMark ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The 16 threads allow for parallel compilation, and the 28 W TDP means sustained loads are thermally manageable in a laptop.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 76th percentile ranking makes this a smooth multitasker. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,970 ensures quick application launches, while the 16 threads handle background tasks like antivirus scans and cloud syncs without noticeable lag. The GPU’s 70th percentile is overkill for office apps but supports dual 4K displays via the modern display outputs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24,647 and 70th percentile placement suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. The CPU’s 8-core strength ensures it will not be the bottleneck in typical gaming scenarios.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends, the Arc A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate should push frame rates above 100 FPS at 1080p with low-to-medium settings. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed Mirage, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will be limiting; expect 30-50 FPS at 1080p with medium settings and reduced textures. The 6 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the low compute throughput means RT effects will significantly reduce frame rates.

The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 4,896 is a strong indicator for gaming performance, as most modern games utilize 6-8 threads. The single-thread score of 979 is sufficient for maintaining minimum frame rates. The combined system percentile of 73 suggests that this build is not a gaming-first platform; users seeking high-refresh gaming should look at higher-tier GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the CPU is the stronger component. The Ryzen 7 8840U sits in the 76th percentile among CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile among GPUs. This 6-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphically intensive workloads. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1080p, as the CPU’s 8-core performance can feed the GPU more frames than it can render.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data processing, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is largely irrelevant. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 23,346 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,972 show that the processor can sustain heavy loads without issue. The GPU’s 25 W TDP and 4 GB VRAM mean it is not designed for prolonged heavy compute.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to a system where lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will yield diminishing returns because the GPU is already near its limit. Conversely, upgrading the GPU would provide a larger performance boost for gaming than upgrading the CPU. The 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth is a shared resource; in gaming, the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is separate and adequate for its class.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate features.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The CPU ranks in the 76th percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,982.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU build ranks in the 73rd percentile among all tested systems.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread part on the Zen 4 architecture, while the GPU is a 6 nm entry-level discrete part from Intel’s Arc 3 Mobile line. The combined percentile of 73 indicates this is a mid-to-upper-tier laptop configuration, outperforming the majority of tested systems but not reaching the top tier.

The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 76th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 70th percentile. This makes the system well-suited for productivity and general use, with gaming as a secondary capability. The CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and 16 MB L3 cache provide strong performance for single and multi-threaded tasks, while the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM limits its use to 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe lanes. The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, meaning the combined power draw is 53 W, which is manageable in a laptop chassis.

A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth, as the current GPU is the primary bottleneck. However, the laptop form factor limits upgradeability. The CPU is an "Active" production part, meaning it is current, and the GPU is "End-of-life," suggesting that future driver optimizations may be limited. The 4 GB VRAM is the most constraining factor for future games; a GPU with 8 GB or more would be a substantial improvement. The CPU’s 16 threads are sufficient for years to come, so the platform as a whole has a reasonable lifespan, but the GPU will age faster.