SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

33,667 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + Intel Arc A370M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU. The CPU sits in the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 74th percentile, giving the overall build a 79th percentile combined standing. The data shows a system designed for balanced everyday performance rather than extreme compute, with the processor clearly outpacing the graphics component in relative terms.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is an 8000-series mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors across a 178 mm² die. It features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The 28 W TDP classifies it as a power-efficient chip for thin-and-light laptops, yet the boost clock reaches desktop-class levels.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Integrated Radeon 780M graphics are present, though this build pairs the CPU with a discrete Intel Arc A370M GPU.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance for a 28 W part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,082 points and single-core score of 1,737 points indicate solid sustained throughput. Geekbench results reinforce this picture with a multi-core score of 10,104 and single-core 1,899. PassMark scores further detail workload characteristics: multi-thread at 24,990, single-thread at 3,626, integer math at 90,382, and floating-point math at 52,582.

The average benchmark score of 33,667 places this CPU in the 84th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX scores 33,668, a 0% delta, meaning these two chips are effectively identical in average performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33,736, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 scores 33,542, only 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H scores 33,537, also 0.4% lower. This clustering indicates the 8840HS sits at a performance plateau where several competing designs converge.

Real-world implications: the 8-core/16-thread configuration handles parallel workloads like video encoding and compilation well, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response in office applications and web browsing. The 16 MB L3 cache is moderate by modern standards but adequate for the intended mobile segment. Data compression performance in PassMark reaches 292,888, indicating strong archiving and file-handling throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is evident from their percentile positions: the CPU at 84th versus the GPU at 74th. This 10-point gap suggests the processor can feed the graphics card in most gaming scenarios without being the limiting factor, but the GPU will cap frame rates in graphically intense scenes.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33,667 versus the GPU's 29,175 reflects different performance ceilings. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation (PassMark physics at 1,149) or encryption (PassMark data encryption at 17,650), the processor handles the load without GPU involvement. In GPU-bound tasks like rasterization or ray tracing, the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput defines the ceiling.

The Radeon 780M integrated graphics inside the CPU could serve as a fallback, but the discrete Intel GPU provides substantially higher performance. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the A370M, while limited by its 64-bit bus, exceeds what integrated graphics typically achieve, reducing memory bottleneck concerns in gaming.

For gaming, the balance tilts toward GPU limitation at higher resolutions, but at 1080p with lower settings, the CPU's strong single-thread score (3,626 PassMark single-thread) can keep frame times consistent. The 89.6 GB/s system memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU, which could create contention in memory-heavy scenarios, but the discrete GPU's dedicated VRAM mitigates this.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A370M's 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest playable frame rates at 1080p with medium settings for esports titles, but AAA games at high refresh rates will likely exceed the GPU's capabilities. The CPU's strong single-core performance prevents it from being the bottleneck in lighter titles.

Streaming: The 8840HS's 8 cores and 16 threads handle encoding workloads well, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 13,082 indicating sufficient headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 17,650 shows capable security processing for stream authentication and DRM.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance shines here. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10,104 and PassMark integer math at 90,382 support smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 1024 shading units accelerate effects and transitions, though 4 GB VRAM limits working with large projects.

3D rendering: CPU rendering benefits from the 16 threads, with Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,045 indicating reasonable viewport and render performance. GPU-accelerated rendering is constrained by the A370M's 74th percentile standing, making this pairing more suitable for preview renders than final output.

Software development: Compilation tasks leverage the 8-core/16-thread design, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 20,714 shows strong SIMD throughput for optimized code. The 84th CPU percentile ensures responsive IDE performance and fast builds.

Student and office work: The 28 W TDP enables long battery life, and the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 1,899, PassMark 3,626) handles document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, saving power.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8840HS compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 5 7645HX?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores: the 8840HS scores 33,667 while the 7645HX scores 33,668, a delta of 0%. They are effectively performance equals in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A370M ranks in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places it above the majority of GPUs but well below high-end discrete options.

Q: Does this laptop support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the Intel Arc A370M has an end-of-life production status, though it remains available in existing laptop designs.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Ryzen 7 8840HS has a 28 W TDP, indicating a power-efficient mobile design suitable for thin laptops.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29,175 on average versus the RX 470's 28,996, a 0.6% difference. The two GPUs perform nearly identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 74th percentile standing and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest 1080p gaming is the primary target, with playable frame rates in esports and older titles but compromises required for modern AAA games.

The Intel Arc A370M's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games exceeding 4 GB VRAM usage. The 1024 shading units process geometry and pixels at a 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate, handling 1080p resolution without difficulty. Texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s supports detailed texture filtering.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,626 PassMark single-thread) ensures game logic and physics calculations proceed without bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. However, the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically intensive scenes. At 1080p with medium settings, the system should deliver smooth gameplay in competitive shooters and MOBAs, while high-fidelity single-player titles will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and compute limitations become more apparent, making this a 1080p-focused gaming system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an Alchemist-generation mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The DG2-128 chip features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. Clock speeds range from a 1550 MHz base to 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz effective at 14 Gbps.

Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards but appropriate for the GPU's entry-level positioning. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support at reduced performance levels compared to higher-tier Arc GPUs.

Compute performance measures 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate reaches 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate 131.2 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and Vulkan score of 28,673, averaging to 29,175 overall. This places the GPU in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (1.0% lower). The proximity of these scores indicates the A370M performs in a well-populated mid-range band.

The 35 W TDP makes this an efficient GPU for laptops, though the "IGP" slot width suggests it may be integrated on the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory and compute requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU on relative scales. The Ryzen 7 8840HS achieves an average benchmark score of 33,667, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is essentially tied with the Ryzen 5 7645HX (0% delta) and within 0.4% of the Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H.

The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. It sits within 1% of its nearest rivals, with the RX Vega M GH just 0.1% higher and the RX 6800M 1% lower.

The combined percentile for this build is 79th, reflecting the balanced but not exceptional nature of the pairing. The CPU's specific benchmark scores—Cinebench R23 multi-core 13,082, Geekbench multi-core 10,104, PassMark multi-thread 24,990—indicate strong productivity capability. The GPU's scores—Geekbench OpenCL 29,676, Vulkan 28,673—show competent graphics compute for its class.

The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (84 vs 74) means the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In workloads that use both components, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor. In CPU-only workloads like compilation or office tasks, the processor performs at its 84th percentile level.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU represents the higher-performing component, ranking in the 84th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 74th percentile. The combined 79th percentile indicates a system positioned above average but not in the enthusiast tier.

The CPU's 28 W TDP and the GPU's 35 W TDP suggest a power-efficient design suitable for mainstream laptops. The 8-core/16-thread processor provides ample multi-threading for productivity, while the discrete GPU adds dedicated graphics capability beyond what integrated solutions offer. This pairing targets users who need solid all-around performance in a portable form factor.

In the laptop market, this build sits in the upper-midrange tier, offering strong CPU performance for professional work and adequate GPU performance for casual gaming and light creative tasks. The 4 GB GPU memory and 64-bit bus limit high-end gaming and professional 3D work, but the system handles everyday computing, productivity, and moderate gaming comfortably.

Who Should Build It

Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find this system adequate for most titles, with the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensuring smooth gameplay in CPU-bound scenarios. Esports players benefit from the high boost clock and responsive processor, while the GPU handles competitive titles at high frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing or photo manipulation will appreciate the 16-thread CPU, which accelerates export and rendering tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,082 indicates capable performance for 1080p video projects, though 4 GB VRAM limits GPU-accelerated effects work.

Software developers compiling large codebases benefit from the multi-threaded design and PassMark integer math score of 90,382. The 16 MB L3 cache aids frequently accessed data patterns found in compilation and testing workflows.

Students and office workers gain from the 28 W TDP enabling long battery life and the single-thread performance for responsive application use. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle display output during light tasks, preserving battery when the discrete GPU is unnecessary.

Small business workstations benefit from the balance of CPU and GPU performance, handling spreadsheets, databases, and presentation software with ease while providing discrete graphics for occasional design or video work. The 84th CPU percentile ensures the system remains responsive under multi-application loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket that does not offer user-upgradeability in most laptop designs. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation for current applications. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU allows fast NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and is marked as "IGP" slot width, indicating it is likely soldered to the motherboard rather than replaceable. The GPU's end-of-life production status means replacement availability will diminish over time. The system's 35 W GPU TDP and 28 W CPU TDP suggest the laptop's cooling and power delivery are designed for these specific components.

The CPU's multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking. The 4 nm process and 25,000 million transistor count represent current-generation manufacturing, ensuring efficient operation. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, providing balanced access for multi-threaded workloads.

Sensible upgrades for this platform are limited to memory and storage. Adding more DDR5 memory can improve multitasking and memory-intensive applications, while PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives maximize storage throughput. The CPU and GPU are not upgradeable in a typical laptop chassis, so users should consider their performance needs carefully at purchase time. The balanced nature of this build—CPU at 84th percentile, GPU at 74th—means any future system upgrade would need to address both components to avoid creating a larger performance gap.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds