SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database. The CPU is a current-generation 8-core Zen 4 part built for Socket AM5, while the GPU is an end-of-life Ampere design from the GeForce 30-series. The combined percentile of this pairing is 66, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 3070 TiM is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, packing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. Clock speeds are modest for the architecture: a 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth for 1080p and 1440p rendering, though the 8 GB capacity is a limiting factor for high-texture workloads at 4K.

The RTX 3070 TiM carries 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features. The FP32 throughput is rated at 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. These figures place the GPU in the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database, meaning it sits exactly at the median performance level. The GPU has no benchmark scores recorded, so its percentile is derived from architectural specifications and historical data patterns.

For rendering workloads, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is strong for texture streaming and large scene data, but the 8 GB VRAM cap becomes a bottleneck in complex 3D scenes with high-resolution textures. The RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, which is useful for architectural visualization and cinematic rendering, but the modest boost clock of 1410 MHz limits raw compute throughput compared to higher-clocked Ampere variants. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern rendering APIs. The pixel and texture rates suggest it can handle high-resolution rasterization efficiently, but the 50th percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier performer in the current landscape.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop platform. It supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is adequate for a single high-bandwidth GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is low for an 8-core part and indicates efficient power delivery. The GPU has a 220 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the combination is 550 W, providing headroom for the CPU’s 65 W draw and the GPU’s 220 W draw, with room for other components.

The power connector on the GPU is a single 8-pin, which simplifies cable management. The GPU is triple-slot wide, measuring 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width, so case compatibility requires a spacious chassis. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully supported by the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-refresh monitors.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be increasing system memory to maximize the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth, as the 83.2 GB/s figure is a ceiling for CPU-bound tasks. For GPU upgrades, the RTX 3070 TiM is end-of-life, and its successor series (GeForce 40) would be the natural step, but the 550 W PSU may need to be replaced if a higher-TDP card is chosen. The CPU itself has an unlocked multiplier and is production active, so it remains a viable processor for several years. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support is not yet a bottleneck, as most current GPUs and SSDs use this interface.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.10 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU has no integrated graphics, which is noted as N/A. It was released on 2024-03-31 with a launch MSRP of $270, and it is currently production active.

Benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,646 multi-core and 3,761 single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 11,191 multi-core and 1,579 single-core, while Cinebench R15 scores are 2,685 multi-core and 378 single-core. Geekbench results are 13,523 multi-core and 2,290 single-core. 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,008 single-thread to 7,883 at 16 threads, with max threads at 7,861. PassMark tests include 30,893 multi-thread, 3,872 single-thread, 100,371 integer math, 62,629 floating point math, 378,160 data compression, and 22,117 data encryption.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all mobile or low-power parts: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30,879 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30,548 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30,468 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028 (0.9% higher). This indicates the 8700F performs similarly to these parts despite being a desktop chip, and its advantage is in its 65 W TDP and efficient 4 nm process.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 3,761 in Cinebench R23 is competitive for responsiveness in office applications and light coding. The data compression score of 378,160 is notable for file archiving and database workloads. The floating point math score of 62,629 indicates solid performance in scientific computing and simulation tasks. The encryption score of 22,117 suggests it can handle secure communications without significant overhead.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, as the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 50th percentile suggest a pairing where the GPU is the primary limiter in most gaming scenarios.

Based on the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,761) and the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, this system should handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. For 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth should provide playable frame rates in less demanding games, but ray tracing at this resolution may strain the 46 RT cores. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is likely insufficient for ultra textures in modern AAA titles, leading to potential stuttering or reduced settings. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer, so expect around 60 FPS at 1080p ultra in demanding games, with lower frame rates at higher resolutions. These are estimates, not measured results.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed by their respective percentiles. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. This 32-percentage-point gap indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming workloads. The CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, as evidenced by its high multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26,646) and single-thread scores (3,761). In contrast, the GPU’s performance is average compared to all GPUs, so it will limit frame rates before the CPU becomes a constraint.

For CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, AI inference, and data compression, the CPU’s 82nd percentile ensures it performs well above average. The PassMark physics score of 1,553 and integer math score of 100,371 show strong computational throughput. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile means GPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding will be limited by the GPU’s compute capabilities. The FP32 throughput of 16.60 TFLOPS is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs, so tasks like ray tracing or large-scale matrix operations will hit GPU limits first.

FPS scaling estimates follow this pattern: at 1080p, the CPU can sustain high frame rates in CPU-light games, but the GPU will cap performance in graphically intensive scenes. At 1440p, the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps, but the 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint in texture-heavy games. At 4K, both the VRAM and compute limits become apparent, and the system will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at ultra settings. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so no bottleneck exists there.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, meaning it outperforms approximately two-thirds of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and the suggested PSU for the system?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 220 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W for the combined system.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,746, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13600H, 0.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.9% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700TE.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates from benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this system are gamers playing at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU’s 50th percentile performance and 8 GB VRAM are adequate for most titles. Content creators working with 1080p video editing or light 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 82nd percentile multi-thread performance, as Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,646 indicates strong rendering capability. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 8-core/16-thread configuration and high integer math score of 100,371. Students running virtual machines or data analysis workloads can leverage the CPU’s 378,160 data compression score for efficient file handling. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will find the single-core score of 3,761 sufficient for responsive daily tasks. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming or professional 3D rendering at high resolutions due to the GPU’s VRAM and compute limits.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F, an 8-core Zen 4 desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, a GeForce 30-series GPU based on Ampere architecture. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a traditional tower system. The CPU is currently production active, while the GPU is end-of-life, indicating the GPU is a mature component. The combined percentile of 66 places this system in the upper-middle tier, outperforming most configurations but not reaching the top tier. The CPU’s 82nd percentile is strong, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is average, making this a CPU-favored build where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,746, with an 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, scores 30,879, which is 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30,548 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30,468 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028 (0.9% higher). These narrow deltas show the 8700F is tightly grouped with these parts, despite differences in form factor and power envelope.

The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, and its percentile is 50, indicating median performance. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a clear strength, capable of handling demanding multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU is a balanced but not exceptional performer. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this asymmetry, as the CPU’s high ranking lifts the overall score despite the GPU’s average showing. For users prioritizing CPU-intensive tasks, this pairing is favorable; for GPU-bound workloads, the RTX 3070 TiM is the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The CPU’s single-core score of 3,761 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-light games, while the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can push 144 Hz in esports titles, though demanding AAA games may fall to 60-90 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,646, can handle encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s 50th percentile may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming performance in graphically intense titles.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 378,160 and multi-thread score of 30,893 support smooth timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth aids in effects rendering, but 8 GB VRAM may limit large 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 26,646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 46 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 16.60 TFLOPS compute is average, making GPU rendering slower than higher-tier cards.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 100,371 and 16 threads speed up compilation, and the single-core performance of 3,872 in PassMark ensures fast IDE responsiveness, making this a capable development workstation.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 82nd percentile and single-core score of 3,761 handle spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing without lag, while the GPU is overkill for these tasks but provides headroom for occasional light gaming or multimedia.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds