SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The chip houses 25,000 million transistors across a 178 mm² die, with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The 65 W TDP places it firmly in the efficient mainstream desktop segment, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for users who want to extract additional performance. The cache hierarchy comprises 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest compared to some competing desktop parts but adequate for the 8000 series positioning.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a well-rounded multi-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 is the standout figure, indicating strong sustained all-core throughput for rendering and encoding workloads. The single-core score of 3761 in the same test shows competitive per-thread performance, which matters for lightly threaded applications and gaming. Geekbench multicore and singlecore scores of 13523 and 2290 respectively corroborate the Cinebench findings, with the multicore advantage of roughly 5.9x over single-core confirming good scaling across the 8 cores.

The 3DMark thread scaling results are particularly informative. The 2-thread score of 1989 scales to 3839 at 4 threads, then 6559 at 8 threads, and reaches 7861 at max threads. This shows near-linear scaling from 2 to 4 threads, then diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, which is typical for an 8-core part where the operating system and background tasks consume the remaining threads. The 16-thread score of 7883 is nearly identical to the max-thread result, confirming that all 16 threads are being utilized effectively without significant hyperthreading penalties.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The multithread score of 30893 places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, while the single-thread score of 3872 shows healthy per-core performance. The integer math score of 100371 and floating point math score of 62629 indicate strong computational throughput, while data compression at 378160 and random string sorting at 45425 show solid memory subsystem performance. The data encryption score of 22117 and extended instructions score of 28474 suggest capable AES and AVX-512 throughput, which benefits security and scientific workloads. The prime number finding score of 98 is notable for its low absolute value, but this is a specialized test that measures a specific algorithm rather than general performance.

The average benchmark score of 30746 places the 8700F at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered within a narrow band: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 (0.6% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 (0.9% lower), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028 (0.9% higher). This places the 8700F in a highly competitive performance tier where the differences between these processors are effectively within measurement noise, though the 8700F's desktop-class power envelope may allow more sustained performance than the mobile-oriented rivals in that list.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3761 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 provide strong per-core performance for game logic and physics. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration at the 82nd CPU percentile ensures that modern games that scale beyond 4 threads will not be CPU-limited in most titles. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 1989 shows solid light-threaded performance essential for maintaining high frame rates in esports titles.

Streaming: With 16 threads available, the 8700F can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates that x264 or x265 encoding at reasonable presets will have minimal impact on gaming performance, as the CPU has ample headroom beyond what games typically require.

Video Editing: The multicore throughput demonstrated by the 26646 Cinebench R23 score translates directly to faster timeline rendering, export, and effect processing in non-linear editors. The PassMark data compression score of 378160 supports fast file operations during media management, while the floating point math score of 62629 helps with color grading and effect computations.

3D Rendering: The 3DMark max threads score of 7861 and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2685 show that the 8700F can handle CPU-based rendering workloads competently. The 82nd CPU percentile means it outperforms the majority of installed CPUs, making it suitable for hobbyist or semi-professional rendering tasks where render times are proportional to multicore performance.

Software Development: The PassMark integer math score of 100371 and extended instructions score of 28474 support fast compilation of C++ and Rust codebases. The 16 threads allow parallel builds to scale effectively, and the single-thread performance ensures that incremental builds and IDE operations remain responsive. The data encryption score of 22117 supports secure development workflows with encrypted source repositories.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W TDP means the 8700F will not require exceptional cooling, and the 82nd CPU percentile ensures that spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing feel instant. The single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures that the majority of office applications, which are often single-threaded, run without perceptible delays.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this desktop pairing places it at the 74th percentile overall. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs establishes a strong foundation, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 20556 at the 65th percentile among all GPUs creates a configuration that is CPU-favorable in terms of relative performance tier.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks in detail, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 indicates modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, though the absolute value suggests it is not a top-tier card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 and Vulkan score of 96844 show strong compute capability, with Vulkan being notably higher, which is typical for Intel architectures. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281 place the Arc B570 in the mid-range GPU tier, with the G2D score of 661 indicating adequate 2D desktop performance.

The legacy DirectX scores from PassMark are informative: DirectX 9 at 164, DirectX 11 at 118, DirectX 12 at 72, and DirectX 10 at 65. The higher DirectX 9 score suggests that older games and APIs may actually perform relatively better, while the lower DirectX 12 score in PassMark's synthetic test does not necessarily reflect real-world DirectX 12 gaming, as the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 is a more modern and relevant benchmark.

The combined picture is a CPU that significantly outperforms its GPU counterpart in percentile terms. This creates a system where the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, with the GPU typically being the constraint at higher resolutions. For productivity workloads, the CPU's 82nd percentile ensures strong performance across multi-threaded applications, while the GPU's 65th percentile provides adequate but not exceptional compute acceleration for GPU-accelerated tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear upgrade path within the current AMD desktop ecosystem. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The platform uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a modern graphics card and one or two NVMe drives.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 150 W TDP of the GPU, combined with a suggested PSU of 450 W, indicate that a modest power supply is adequate for this configuration. The 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU is a standard connection that most power supplies support. The dual-slot GPU design measuring 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height requires a reasonably spacious case, but the dimensions are within the range of typical mid-tower ATX cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the AM5 socket supports newer Ryzen processors within the same platform, allowing users to drop in a higher-core-count CPU without changing the motherboard. The DDR5 memory support means that the memory purchased for this system will carry forward to a future CPU upgrade. The PCIe Gen 4 support, while not the latest standard, is sufficient for current graphics cards and storage devices.

The GPU side shows a slightly more constrained path. The Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the x16 interface that many gaming motherboards provide, but this is less impactful for gaming performance and more relevant for compute workloads that heavily access VRAM over the bus. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but users targeting 4K may find the memory capacity and bandwidth limiting.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors across a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2500 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz resulting in 19 Gbps effective bandwidth across a 160-bit bus, producing 380.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The 10 GB GDDR6 memory capacity is notable for the price segment, providing more VRAM than many competing cards with 8 GB. The 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines deliver a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 23.04 TFLOPS (at 2:1 ratio) indicate capable compute throughput for accelerated workloads.

The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games, though the RT performance is modest compared to higher-tier cards. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with the latest DirectX 12 features, while OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 support cover legacy and modern cross-platform APIs respectively.

The benchmark scores place the Arc B570 at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rivals are clustered very tightly: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (0.1% lower), the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 (0.5% higher). This places the Arc B570 in a performance tier where it trades blows with the previous-generation RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, making it a competitive mid-range option.

For rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 indicates that the GPU can handle modern DX12 games at reasonable settings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 and Vulkan score of 96844 show that the GPU has strong compute capability for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, with Vulkan being notably stronger than OpenCL. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 confirms solid compute throughput for a mid-range card.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU achieves a single-thread score of 3761 in Cinebench R23 and a multicore score of 26646, giving a multicore-to-single-core ratio of approximately 7.1x across 8 cores. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and max-thread score of 7861 show a similar scaling pattern.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitor in the benchmark database?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 is 0.1% higher than the Intel Arc A750's score of 20582, meaning the two are effectively performance peers. It is also 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU provide, and how does that affect gaming?

A: The GPU provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 160-bit bus with GDDR6 memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions with demanding textures.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration and how does it impact performance?

A: The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The 16 MB L3 is modest by desktop standards, but the benchmark scores indicate that the memory subsystem performance is sufficient to achieve the 82nd CPU percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported on the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores on the Xe2-HPG architecture, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with ray-traced games, though the absolute RT performance is modest given the card's 65th GPU percentile.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30746, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879, making the 8700F 0.4% slower in the aggregate. This difference is within measurement tolerance and effectively negligible.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and Intel Arc B570 is characterized by a significant CPU advantage in percentile terms. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This 17-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is substantially stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers, creating a configuration where the GPU is the primary performance limiter in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, this imbalance means that at 1080p resolution, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1008, Cinebench R23 single-core of 3761) will allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame output without CPU-induced frame pacing issues. However, the GPU's 65th percentile performance will ultimately cap frame rates at whatever level the Arc B570 can sustain. At higher resolutions such as 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes even more of a limiting factor, as the increased pixel count demands more from the GPU's 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

For productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the application. CPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 82nd percentile performance, and the GPU's compute capability (OpenCL score of 83514, Vulkan score of 96844) provides acceleration but may not match the CPU's relative strength. GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference or GPU rendering will be limited by the GPU's 65th percentile and its 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 versus the max-thread score of 7861 shows that the CPU is not oversubscribed at 16 threads, meaning that gaming at high frame rates while streaming or running background tasks will not cause CPU thrashing. The 8-core configuration is well-suited to modern game consoles' 8-core design, which means games optimized for consoles will utilize the 8700F's cores effectively without overloading the CPU.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F desktop processor with the Intel Arc B570 graphics card in a desktop-class configuration. The CPU represents AMD's 8000 series with the Zen 4 Phoenix architecture on the AM5 socket, while the GPU represents Intel's Battlemage generation with the Xe2-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop configurations tracked in the database.

The CPU at the 82nd percentile positions this build favorably for CPU-intensive workloads, outperforming the majority of installed desktop processors. The GPU at the 65th percentile places it in the mid-range of graphics performance, capable of smooth 1080p gaming and competent 1440p gaming at moderate settings. The imbalance between the two components suggests that the system is optimized for productivity and multitasking scenarios where the CPU's superior relative performance can be fully utilized, while gaming performance is adequate but not exceptional.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 150 W TDP of the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 450 W, make this a power-efficient desktop configuration. The 4 nm CPU process and 5 nm GPU process contribute to the efficiency profile. The AM5 socket and DDR5 memory support provide a modern platform foundation, while the PCIe Gen 4 support from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU ensure compatibility with current storage and peripheral hardware.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while maintaining reasonable gaming capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 82nd percentile performance, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 indicating strong throughput. The GPU's compute capability with an OpenCL score of 83514 provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming in less demanding titles, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring that games are not CPU-bound. The GPU's 65th percentile and 10 GB VRAM provide enough headroom for modern games at medium to high settings, though users targeting maximum settings at 1440p or above may find the GPU limiting.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 threads for parallel compilation and the PassMark integer math score of 100371 for compute-intensive build tasks. The data encryption score of 22117 supports secure development workflows. Students and office users will benefit from the responsive single-thread performance and power efficiency of the 65 W TDP, making this a quiet and cool-running system for academic or professional work.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for data processing, spreadsheet analysis, or database operations will find the CPU's 82nd percentile and the system's overall 74th percentile sufficient for demanding business applications. The 10 GB GPU memory provides capacity for large datasets in GPU-accelerated analytics, though the 380.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance on very large data transfers.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the benchmark database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with the Intel Arc B570, and the dataIsMeasured field confirms this is not a measured configuration. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649, this system should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution with high settings in most modern titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance and 8-core configuration ensure that games will not be CPU-limited at this resolution, allowing the GPU to operate at its full capability. The GPU's 65th percentile suggests that it will perform in line with mid-range GPUs, with the nearest rival comparison to the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750 providing a reference point for expected performance.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU's 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate become more significant factors. The 10 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for most games at this resolution, but bandwidth constraints may cause performance dips in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's performance headroom means that frame rates will scale with GPU capability, and users can expect playable performance at medium to high settings depending on the title.

For competitive esports titles that favor high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread score of 3761 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's DirectX 9 PassMark score of 164 suggest that lighter games can achieve high frame rates, though the GPU's 65th percentile may cap performance in less optimized titles. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, with 1440p gaming possible at reduced settings, and 4K gaming likely requiring significant compromises in quality settings due to the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel throughput limitations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds