SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and Intel Arc A310E pairing represents a distinct desktop configuration where a high-end, modern CPU is matched with an entry-level dedicated GPU. The data shows a system with a combined percentile of 66, indicating it outperforms the majority of recorded builds, but the performance profile is sharply divided. The Ryzen 7 8700F is a powerful 8-core processor that sits in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A310E is a 75 W graphics card that lands exactly in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a fundamental imbalance where the processor's capabilities vastly outstrip the graphics subsystem's ability to render frames, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload. The following analysis details the specific architecture, benchmark scores, and platform characteristics that define this configuration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a severe bottleneck scenario, with the Intel Arc A310E acting as the primary constraint in nearly all real-world applications. The Ryzen 7 8700F achieves a multi-threaded score of 26,646 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Arc A310E has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The disparity in processing power is extreme; the CPU is capable of feeding frames at a rate the GPU cannot physically render.

The CPU's benchmark scores confirm its ability to handle massive workloads. Its 3DMark max-threads score of 7,861 and Geekbench multicore score of 13,523 indicate ample headroom for complex physics, AI calculations, and data processing. In contrast, the GPU's specifications reveal its limitations. With 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and only 16 ROPs, the Arc A310E is designed for basic display output and light acceleration, not high-fidelity gaming or rendering. Its FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS is minuscule compared to the CPU's computational throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, or spreadsheet calculations, the CPU will operate near its full potential. The Passmark data compression score of 378,160 and integer math score of 100,371 demonstrate exceptional processing capability. However, in any workload that relies on GPU acceleration—gaming, 3D rendering, video encoding—the system's performance will be capped by the GPU's 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus width. The bottleneck is so pronounced that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would result in almost no observable difference in graphics-limited tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 66, which means it performs better than 66% of all recorded system configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30,746, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30,879), 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13600H (30,548), and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30,468).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU, and what type of memory does it use?

A: The Intel Arc A310E uses 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F does not support ECC memory, despite being a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: What is the boost clock of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has a constant clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is specified as "desktop," featuring the AMD Socket AM5 CPU and a single-slot Intel Arc A310E GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. Built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, it integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The CPU has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it power-efficient for its performance class. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from 2 to 8 cores. The 3DMark scores progress from 1,989 (2 threads) to 3,839 (4 threads), 6,559 (8 threads), and peak at 7,883 (16 threads) and 7,861 (max threads). This near-linear scaling up to 8 threads and marginal gains beyond indicates that the CPU efficiently utilizes its 16 threads but sees diminishing returns past 8 cores in this workload. The single-thread score of 1,008 in 3DMark and 3,761 in Cinebench R23 single-core demonstrate excellent per-core performance, typical of the Zen 4 architecture.

In real-world terms, the CPU excels in multi-threaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,646 positions it as a high-end consumer processor, rivaling previous-generation H-series mobile chips and desktop parts with similar core counts. The Geekbench multicore score of 13,523 reinforces this, indicating strong performance in tasks like video encoding, 3D modeling, and software compilation. Passmark tests show exceptional data compression (378,160) and integer math (100,371) scores, while the floating-point math score of 62,629 highlights its capability in scientific and engineering calculations. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide adequate cache for its workload demands.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The platform provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for an 8-core part, meaning most AM5 motherboards with adequate VRM cooling will handle it without issue.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A310E, is a 75 W single-slot card that requires no external power connectors. Intel suggests a 250 W power supply, which is quite low, making this an easy system to power with almost any standard desktop PSU. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, so the upgrade path for the GPU is straightforward: replace it with a more powerful modern card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is compatible with all AM5 motherboards, and a higher-tier GPU can be installed without changing the platform.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A310E with a more powerful GPU that can match the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's 82nd percentile performance suggests it can handle a mid-range or even high-end graphics card without becoming a bottleneck itself. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 4 lanes future-proof the system for several years. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance if the user has adequate cooling. With a launch MSRP of $270, the CPU represents a solid foundation for a workstation or gaming system that can be upgraded over time.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (30,879, 0.4% higher), Intel Core i5-13600H (30,548, 0.6% lower), Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30,468, 0.9% lower), and Intel Core i7-13700TE (31,028, 0.9% higher). The CPU sits comfortably among these mobile and low-power desktop parts, showing it is competitive with a wide range of processors.

The GPU has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that while it is exactly average among all recorded GPUs, it has no recorded benchmark scores in the data, making its performance difficult to quantify directly. The combined percentile of 66 suggests that the system as a whole outperforms 66% of builds, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU's high percentile. The GPU's 50th percentile means half of all GPUs are faster, which is a poor match for a CPU in the 82nd percentile.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R20 scores of 11,191 (multicore) and 1,579 (single-core) show a strong ratio, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. Passmark single-thread score of 3,872 and multithread score of 30,893 further confirm the CPU's balanced performance. The data suggests that in a system with a more capable GPU, this CPU would deliver top-tier gaming and rendering performance. With the current GPU, the CPU's potential is largely unrealized in graphics-intensive tasks, as the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a constant 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute resources include 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. It delivers a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These specifications are modest, placing the card in the entry-level segment. For comparison, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is average among all GPUs, but this is misleading as the dataset includes many integrated and low-end parts.

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs. It includes 6 RT cores, enabling basic ray tracing, though the low compute throughput will limit ray tracing performance to very low resolutions and settings. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games, which often require 6-8 GB at 1080p with high textures. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also constrain performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The card is single-slot, 168 mm long, and requires no external power connectors, making it ideal for small form factor systems.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is suitable for users who require substantial CPU processing power but have minimal GPU demands. The Ryzen 7 8700F's 82nd percentile performance makes it an excellent choice for developers, data analysts, and engineers who compile code, run simulations, or process large datasets. The Passmark data compression score of 378,160 and integer math score of 100,371 indicate exceptional throughput for such tasks.

For content creators, the CPU can handle 4K video editing and rendering in software, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited. The Arc A310E can provide basic display output for multiple monitors (4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0) and hardware acceleration for video decoding, but its 4 GB VRAM and low bandwidth make it unsuitable for high-resolution texture work. Students and office workers who run office suites, browse the web, and use virtual machines will find the CPU's 16 threads useful for multitasking, while the GPU handles desktop rendering adequately.

Gamers at 720p or low 1080p settings with esports titles may find the system playable, but the GPU's 50th percentile performance will limit frame rates. The system is not recommended for high-refresh gaming or modern AAA titles at medium or high settings. Small business workstations that run accounting software, database management, or point-of-sale systems will benefit from the CPU's reliability and the GPU's low power draw. The combination is best viewed as a CPU-centric workstation with a basic display adapter, not a balanced gaming rig.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F (8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 4 architecture) paired with the Intel Arc A310E (Xe-HPG architecture, 4 GB GDDR6). The CPU is an 8000 series part for Socket AM5, launched on 2024-03-31 with a launch MSRP of $270. The GPU is an end-of-life Alchemist (Arc 3) generation card, also released on 2024-03-31, with no launch MSRP listed.

The build's combined percentile is 66, meaning it outperforms 66% of recorded configurations. However, this figure is heavily skewed by the CPU, which ranks in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 50th. The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,746, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Intel Core i5-13600H, with performance deltas of -0.4% and +0.6%, respectively. The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores or nearest rivals, making its performance position based solely on its percentile ranking. This is a fundamentally unbalanced pairing, where the CPU is a high-end performer and the GPU is an entry-level component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a viable scenario. The Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will produce low frame rates even at 1080p. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,008 is strong, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, preventing high-refresh gameplay in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU can handle encoding via software with its 16 threads, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,646. However, the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth will struggle to run games while streaming simultaneously. The system can stream low-demand games or use CPU-based encoding, but the experience will be suboptimal.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario. The Geekbench multicore score of 13,523 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11,191 indicate fast rendering in software-based editors. The GPU can accelerate effects and previews, but its 4 GB VRAM will limit 4K timeline performance. The system is good for 1080p editing, adequate for 4K with the right software.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is a strong suit, with the Passmark floating-point math score of 62,629 showing solid FPU performance. GPU rendering will be slow due to the Arc A310E's low compute throughput. The system can handle CPU-based renders in Blender or similar software, but GPU rendering with OptiX or similar will be disappointing.

Software development: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 3DMark max-threads score of 7,861, allow for fast compilation and parallel builds. The Passmark data encryption score of 22,117 indicates good security-related performance. The GPU is sufficient for multiple monitors and basic desktop acceleration.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 3,872) ensures responsive application usage. The system handles spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's low power draw (75 W) and no external power connectors make it ideal for a quiet, efficient workstation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications. The Intel Arc A310E has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which suggests it performs at the level of a typical entry-level card.

Based on the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, estimated frame rates for esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at 1080p low settings would be in the range of 60-80 FPS, assuming CPU headroom. The Ryzen 7 8700F's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,008) ensures the CPU will not be a limiting factor in these scenarios. For more demanding AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will be severe constraints, with estimated performance dropping to 20-30 FPS at 1080p low settings. At 720p, some titles may achieve playable frame rates above 30 FPS, but the experience will be inconsistent.

The 6 RT cores on the GPU may enable basic ray tracing, but the low shading unit count and bandwidth will make ray-traced performance very poor. The GPU's pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are low, further capping fill-rate intensive scenes. These estimates assume the GPU is the bottleneck, which it is in all gaming scenarios given the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking. Users seeking playable modern gaming should consider a more powerful GPU, as the current pairing is best suited for non-gaming or very light gaming workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds