SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

25,432 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a specific type of mobile computing configuration: a high-efficiency, 8-core Zen 4 processor coupled with a discrete entry-level Arc graphics solution. The benchmark data shows a system with a combined percentile of 76, placing it above the majority of tested configurations, yet the performance profile is distinctly split. The CPU is a clear powerhouse for its class, while the GPU anchors the system's capabilities, creating a balance that favors productivity and multitasking over high-end gaming. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark and specification data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the CPU holds a significant advantage over the GPU in terms of raw compute potential and overall percentile ranking. The processor's percentileVsAllCpus of 77 is notably higher than the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 74, indicating that the Ryzen 7 7840U is a more capable component relative to its respective market than the Arc A370M is in its own. This discrepancy suggests that in many workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially in tasks that are graphically intensive.

The multi-threaded performance of the CPU is robust, with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 5402 and an 8-thread score of 4583, demonstrating that the processor can feed data to the GPU efficiently. However, the GPU's modest specifications, including 1024 shading units and a 64-bit memory bus providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, will likely cap frame rates in modern games before the CPU's potential is fully utilized. This is a classic CPU-balanced or CPU-favored configuration, where the processor can handle complex simulation and physics calculations without breaking a sweat, but the graphics card may struggle to keep up at higher resolutions and detail settings.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means we must infer the bottleneck from the component scores. The CPU's passmark_physics score of 1256 and the GPU's fp32 compute of 4.198 TFLOPS indicate that in a gaming scenario, the Arc A370M's rendering throughput will be the primary constraint. For productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that leverage the CPU's 16 threads, the Ryzen 7 7840U will be the dominant force, and the GPU will play a lesser, though still important, role. The system's balance is therefore workload-dependent: it is a CPU-first platform where the GPU serves as a capable but secondary accelerator.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25432, which places it at the 77th percentile of all tested CPUs. This score is virtually identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11700KF, which has an average score of 25423 and a deltaPct of 0. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, both with a deltaPct of -0.1 and -0.2 respectively, and slightly trails the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, which has a deltaPct of 0.3. This positions the 7840U as a top-tier mobile processor, performing on par with a previous-generation desktop i7 in aggregate benchmarks.

In specific tests, the processor shows a strong single-core showing with a geekbench_singlecore score of 2077 and a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1677.5. Its multi-core capabilities are equally impressive, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 12719 and a geekbench_multicore score of 8766. The GPU, meanwhile, posts an average benchmark score of 29175, landing at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, with a deltaPct of -0.1, and it is less than 1% slower than the AMD FirePro W8000. The data shows a 1% advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, a significantly more powerful part in theory, highlighting that benchmark scores can sometimes mask real-world performance differences in specific tasks.

The combined picture is of a laptop that excels in processor-heavy tasks, offering performance that rivals desktop parts from a few generations ago, while the graphics solution provides solid, but not exceptional, 1080p-class performance. The CPU's high passmark_multithread score of 24782 and data encryption score of 17691 suggest it is well-suited for content creation and security-sensitive workloads, while the GPU's geekbench_opencl score of 29676 indicates competent compute capability for accelerated tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It houses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This high boost clock is reflected in its strong single-threaded performance, with a passmark_single_thread score of 3565 and a 3dmark_single_thread score of 932. The processor includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache.

The CPU's memory support for DDR5 on a dual-channel bus yields a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is ample for feeding both the CPU cores and the integrated Radeon 780M graphics. The 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die are a signal of the density of the 4 nm process. The benchmark results indicate that the 7840U is a versatile processor. Its cinebench_r15_multicore score of 1990 and passmark_integer_math score of 90852 show it can handle demanding computational tasks, such as video editing and software compilation, with ease.

The data also shows strong performance in specialized tasks, like the passmark_data_compression score of 288604, which is beneficial for file archiving and database applications. The processor's ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation-class stability. When compared to its nearest rivals, the 7840U's performance is remarkably close to the Intel Core i7-11700KF, a desktop chip with a much higher TDP, underscoring the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. This makes it an exceptional choice for thin-and-light laptops where power and thermal headroom are at a premium.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is tailored for users who prioritize processor performance in a mobile form factor. The 77th percentile CPU ranking makes it an ideal choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or large datasets, as the 16 threads and high multi-core scores (cinebench_r23_multicore: 12719) will significantly reduce render times and export durations. The strong single-core performance also benefits software developers, who rely on fast compilation times and responsive integrated development environments, with the passmark_single_thread score of 3565 ensuring snappy code builds.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those playing at 1080p with medium to high settings, or those who prioritize high frame rates in less demanding esports titles. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking suggests it can handle these scenarios, but it is not built for 1440p or 4K ultra settings in AAA games. The CPU's power, however, ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in these lighter gaming loads. Students and professionals in fields like finance or engineering will benefit from the processor's efficiency and performance, which can handle complex spreadsheets, data analysis (passmark_data_compression: 288604), and virtualization without issue.

The build is less suitable for small business workstations that require specialized GPU acceleration for CAD or machine learning, as the Arc A370M's 4 GB of VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS of fp32 performance may be limiting. However, for a general-purpose workstation handling office productivity, web development, and light graphic design, this pairing offers a powerful and efficient foundation. The CPU's 28 W TDP is remarkably low for the performance on offer, making it a prime candidate for ultraportable laptops that need to last through a workday.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the upgrade path is limited to the laptop itself, as the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in nearly all cases. The memory support for DDR5 and the PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU provide a modern foundation. The GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x8, which offers sufficient bandwidth for its capabilities.

The CPU's TDP is 28 W, and the GPU's TDP is 35 W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope of around 63 W. The data shows no suggestedPsu for the GPU, indicating it is designed for a mobile platform where power is provided by an external power brick. The lack of a suggested PSU means we cannot quantify headroom, but the low TDP figures imply that a laptop with a 100 W or higher power adapter would have sufficient power for the components. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a component swap but rather ensuring the system has sufficient RAM and fast NVMe storage to complement the CPU's capabilities.

The CPU's support for ECC memory is a professional-grade feature, though it is rarely implemented in consumer laptops. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback and can be used to save power when the discrete GPU is not needed. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life," which means it is no longer being manufactured, but the CPU is "Active," suggesting a longer support lifecycle for the platform. This configuration is best seen as a complete, balanced package rather than a starting point for future upgrades.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840U compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11700KF?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Intel Core i7-11700KF scoring 25423 and the Ryzen 7 7840U scoring 25432, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. This indicates they offer similar aggregate performance despite the AMD chip being a mobile part.

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU is at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests the CPU is a relatively stronger component, and in many tasks, the GPU will likely be the performance limiting factor.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M a good GPU for gaming?

A: The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and a geekbench_vulkan score of 28673 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings. However, it is not positioned for high-end gaming, and the 4 GB of memory may be a limitation in some newer titles.

Q: What kind of memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in professional workstations.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W. This low combined power draw is typical for a thin-and-light laptop and contributes to better battery life.

Q: Can this system handle content creation workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU's 16 threads and high multi-core scores, such as a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 12719, make it well-suited for video editing and 3D rendering tasks. The GPU can also assist with compute via its OpenCL score of 29676.

Q: Is there room for upgrades in this build?

A: The CPU is on the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile socket, which typically means the CPU is not upgradeable. The GPU is also a fixed component of the laptop. Upgrades would be limited to storage and memory.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 74 and an avgBenchmarkScore of 29175 suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming solution. The CPU's 3dmark_2_threads score of 1729 and 3dmark_4_threads score of 3029 indicate that it can handle the single and multi-threaded demands of modern game engines without bottlenecking the GPU.

Based on these scores, gamers can expect playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most titles. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor in texture-heavy games, and users may need to lower settings or resolution to maintain smooth performance. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the system should be capable of high refresh rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS on lower settings, given the strong single-core CPU performance. For AAA titles, the system is better suited for 60 FPS gaming at medium settings. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and hardware ray tracing via 8 RT cores is a bonus, but the 4.198 TFLOPS of fp32 compute will limit ray tracing to lighter effects. Overall, this is an "entry-level" gaming laptop pairing, best for 1080p esports and older or less demanding AAA games.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop class configuration that pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, a high-performance mobile CPU, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 76 places it in the upper quartile of all tested systems, indicating a strong overall performer. The CPU is a flagship-level part, scoring in the 77th percentile, while the GPU is a solid mid-tier offering in the 74th percentile.

The pairing is defined by its CPU-centric nature. The Ryzen 7 7840U is the star of the show, offering desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 28 W package. The Intel Arc A370M is a competent companion that handles graphics duties, but it is not in the same performance tier as the CPU. This is a system for users who need maximum processing power for productivity and creation, with gaming as a secondary but still viable use case. It represents a modern, efficient platform that leverages the latest DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 technology.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is feasible for esports titles. The CPU's 3dmark_single_thread score of 932 and 2-thread score of 1729 are high enough to drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in games like Fortnite or Rocket League at 1080p with competitive settings, assuming the Arc A370M can keep up with the rendering load.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. The 16 threads and a passmark_multithread score of 24782 allow for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcasting without a significant performance hit. The GPU can handle the rendering, while the CPU's headroom manages the encoding workload.

Video editing: This is a sweet spot for this build. The CPU's cinebench_r23_multicore score of 12719 and passmark_integer_math score of 90852 will handle 4K video timelines and effects processing efficiently, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 can accelerate rendering and export tasks in software like Premiere Pro.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are the primary workhorses here, with a cinebench_r15_multicore score of 1990 indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The Arc A370M can assist with viewport performance and GPU-based rendering, but its 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for complex scenes.

Software development: The processor's high single-thread performance (geekbench_singlecore: 2077) and multi-core capabilities make it ideal for code compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The fast data compression score of 288604 is also beneficial for handling large codebases and build artifacts.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic tasks but offers a future-proof platform. The CPU's efficiency ensures long battery life, while the performance headroom means it can handle any demanding academic software, data analysis tools, or multitasking scenarios a student might encounter, without any slowdowns.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds