SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

25,432 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and Intel Arc A350M represent a specific tier of laptop hardware, one that prioritizes efficiency and a balanced feature set over raw flagship performance. The CPU, built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Phoenix, is a mobile-first processor designed to deliver strong multi-threaded performance within a 28 W TDP envelope. The GPU, part of Intel’s Alchemist generation, offers entry-level discrete graphics capabilities with modern feature support. Together, they form a pairing that sits at the 74th percentile for all combined CPU+GPU configurations, according to the benchmark database. This analysis will dissect their individual strengths, examine their suitability for various workloads, and assess the overall system balance using the available benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the TSMC 4 nm process node. This particular node, combined with the Zen 4 architecture, allows for a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. This configuration is typical for a high-end mobile part, and the benchmark results indicate it handles a wide range of tasks with aplomb. The data shows a significant scaling in multi-threaded workloads; for instance, the 3dmark_16_threads score of 5427 is nearly three times the single-thread score of 932, demonstrating that the 16 threads are effectively utilized for parallel processing.

The 7840U’s performance profile is best understood through its synthetic benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves a multicore score of 12719 and a single-core score of 1677.5. The multicore score represents a strong result for a 28 W part, indicating that sustained workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will perform well. The single-core score is equally important for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 8766 multicore and 2077 single-core, which aligns with the Cinebench results. The PassMark suite provides more granular insights; the integer math score of 90852 and floating-point math score of 51767 suggest robust computational power, while the data encryption score of 17691 and compression score of 288604 highlight efficiency in those specific tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25432 places it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals provide context for its tier. It is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-11700KF, with a delta of 0%, and nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, which trails by only 0.1%. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D by 0.3%. This indicates that the 7840U offers performance comparable to a previous-generation desktop i7, a substantial feat for a mobile processor. The data suggests that for real-world workloads, this CPU will not be the bottleneck in most productivity tasks, and its 16 threads ensure it can handle multi-tasking and parallel processing demands efficiently. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics also provide a fallback for basic display output and light GPU-accelerated tasks, though the discrete Arc A350M will handle more demanding graphics workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A350M, with its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, is positioned as an entry-level discrete GPU. Its benchmark scores indicate it is roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590, trailing by just 0.4%. This suggests it can handle eSports titles like CS:GO or Valorant at high frame rates, but for more demanding AAA titles, it will likely require lower settings to maintain playable frame rates. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, these expectations are estimated from the GPU’s benchmark scores and its 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads are a significant asset for streaming. Encoding video with x264 or x265 can be demanding, but the 7840U’s strong Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12719 indicates it has enough headroom to handle the encoding load while gaming. The GPU also supports modern hardware encoding features common to the Alchemist architecture, which can offload the encoding work entirely. The combination of a strong multi-threaded CPU and a modern GPU makes this a capable laptop for a single-PC streaming setup, provided the game's graphics settings are tuned to the GPU’s capabilities.

Video Editing: For video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, the 7840U provides solid performance. The multi-core scores (Cinebench R23: 12719, Geekbench multicore: 8766) are strong indicators of good export and rendering times. The Arc A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) mean it can accelerate effects and timeline playback. However, the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for working with large 4K timelines or complex effects, as it may run out of memory. The data suggests this is a good pair for 1080p editing or light 4K work, but not for heavy, professional-grade projects.

3D Rendering: This workload heavily favors the CPU. The 7840U’s 16 threads and high PassMark multithread score of 24782 will produce respectable render times in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM place it at the entry level. The data shows that for complex scenes, the CPU will be the primary workhorse, and the GPU will provide a moderate boost for viewport performance and simpler renders.

Software Development: The CPU is the star here. Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the 7840U’s 16 threads, coupled with its high integer math score of 90852, will handle code builds efficiently. The 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness for IDE interactions and single-threaded scripting tasks. The memory support for DDR5 and ECC memory (as listed in the spec pack) also makes this a stable and reliable platform for development work, where data integrity is paramount.

Student and Office Work: For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, this system is overkill. The single-core Geekbench score of 2077 and PassMark single-thread score of 3565 guarantee a fluid experience in any office application. The efficiency of the 4 nm process and 28 W TDP means long battery life is likely, making it an excellent choice for a student who needs all-day portability. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics also mean the discrete GPU can be idled to save power when not needed.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This inherently limits the upgrade path, as the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard. The data shows the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is the expected standard for this generation. For PCIe, the CPU provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU itself is connected via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The TDP figures provide a clear picture of the power envelope. The CPU has a 28 W TDP, and the GPU has a 25 W TDP. This combined 53 W draw is very manageable for a laptop cooling solution. The GPU has an end-of-life production status, and its specifications do not list a suggested PSU, which is typical for a mobile IGP-class component. For a user looking to maximize performance within this platform, the data suggests that the CPU is the stronger component. The most sensible "upgrade" would not be a component swap, but rather ensuring the system has sufficient RAM (dual-channel DDR5) and fast NVMe storage to feed the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s performance, being on par with a desktop Core i7-11700KF, is likely to be the component that remains relevant for the longest period.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is not for a desktop builder; it is a laptop configuration identified by the build class. The target user is someone who needs a mobile workstation or a powerful ultraportable. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work with video and photos on the go. The strong multi-threaded scores mean that a software developer can compile large projects without waiting, and the efficient 28 W TDP means they can do so away from a power outlet. For students, the combination offers the performance to handle any academic software, from CAD to statistical analysis, while the efficient design is conducive to all-day battery life. In a small business context, this laptop can serve as a primary workstation for office productivity, and the CPU’s ECC memory support adds a layer of data reliability for financial or database work. For gamers, this is a system for 1080p gaming at medium settings; the GPU’s performance, similar to an RX 590, is not designed for high-refresh, high-detail 1440p or 4K gaming. The data clearly indicates a machine built for productivity first, with gaming as a secondary capability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is the entry point for Intel’s discrete Alchemist mobile GPUs. It is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Its memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration, and the data indicates it is a direct competitor to older mainstream desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 590.

The compute capabilities are defined by 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 render output units (ROPs). The GPU also includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is a notable feature for this class. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The raw FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.758 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These numbers suggest a GPU capable of 1080p gaming with modern features like ray tracing enabled, albeit at lower settings and frame rates.

In benchmark results, the Arc A350M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747. This gives it an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24744, putting the Intel GPU just 0.4% behind. It also compares closely to the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% behind) and is 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. This data reveals that the A350M offers performance in the range of a mid-range desktop GPU from a few generations ago. For rendering, this means it can handle 1080p content creation and light 3D work, but its 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U?

A: The CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25432. It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-11700KF (0% delta) and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (0.3% delta).

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840U supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, which provides a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the gaming performance of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24647 places it at the 70th percentile. It is comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, being just 0.4% slower, which suggests it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M architecture includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Arc A350M is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: What are the TDPs for this CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. The combined power draw of 53 W is efficient for a laptop platform.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All performance expectations for gaming are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a clear picture of a system where the CPU is the dominant component. The Ryzen 7 7840U, with a percentile of 77, is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the Arc A350M, which is at the 70th percentile. In CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the workhorse, and the GPU will have limited impact. The CPU’s 16 threads and high Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12719 ensure that these tasks are handled efficiently.

Conversely, in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the Arc A350M will be the primary limiting factor. Its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are restrictive for modern games at higher resolutions. The GPU’s performance, being on par with an RX 590, will likely bottleneck the CPU in most gaming scenarios, meaning frame rates will be limited by the GPU’s rendering capabilities rather than the CPU’s processing power. The FPS scaling in games will be dictated by the GPU’s 70th percentile performance.

The balance is therefore workload-dependent. For productivity, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU providing ample power. For gaming, it is GPU-bound, and the CPU will often be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames. The 74th combined percentile reflects this, showing a system that is more capable than its individual GPU percentile might suggest, thanks to the strong CPU. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck, but the benchmark scores strongly suggest the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration, as indicated by the build class. It pairs a high-end, efficient mobile CPU (AMD Ryzen 7 7840U) with an entry-level discrete mobile GPU (Intel Arc A350M). The CPU is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) part with 768 shading units. This is a pairing that prioritizes CPU performance and power efficiency over raw graphics power. The combined percentile of 74 indicates that this system outperforms 74% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database. It is a tier above basic integrated graphics laptops, but it is not a high-end gaming machine. The overall tier is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop with light gaming capabilities, suitable for professionals, developers, and students who need strong computational power on the go.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing is clear and distinct. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U achieves an average benchmark score of 25432, placing it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, with key results including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12719 and a single-core score of 1677.5. The Geekbench scores of 8766 (multicore) and 2077 (single-core) corroborate this performance level. In contrast, the Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 24546 and 24747, respectively. The delta between the GPU and its nearest rival, the RX 590, is minimal at -0.4%.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU provides the majority of the performance headroom. The CPU’s 77th percentile rank is significantly higher than the GPU’s 70th percentile, suggesting that the CPU is the more capable component. This is reflected in the combined percentile of 74, which is pulled down by the GPU’s relatively lower standing. For users, this means the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and multitasking, while its performance in GPU-bound tasks like high-detail gaming will be more modest. The data confirms that this is a CPU-centric build, and its overall performance tier is defined by the processor’s strength.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds