SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and Intel Arc A570M form a potent mobile pairing that targets the upper mid-range of laptop performance. The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. This combination places in the 85th percentile for all system pairings, indicating a build that handles demanding productivity tasks and high-refresh gaming with authority. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for its class, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance in games must be inferred from synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay testing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a Phoenix-series chip with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor count of 25,000 million on a 178 mm² die. The cache layout is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback iGPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU shows strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3DMark results show a score of 979 in single-thread, 1904 in 2-threads, 3651 in 4-threads, 6092 in 8-threads, and 7314 in 16-threads. This scaling is nearly linear up to 8 threads, with only a marginal gain from 8 to 16 threads, indicating that the 8-core design is efficiently utilized. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and single-core score of 1761 place it comfortably in the upper tier of mobile processors.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29955, which places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, which scores identically at 29955 with a 0% deltaPct. The Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879 (0.3% slower), the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 (0.3% slower), and the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713 (0.8% slower). In practical terms, this CPU is essentially on par with the best 8-core mobile chips from AMD's current lineup.

For real workloads, the Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 and single-core score of 2031 suggest strong performance in everything from office productivity to software compilation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and single-thread score of 3753 reinforce this. Specific compute tasks show the chip's versatility: floating point math scores 59921, integer math scores 98682, and extended instructions score 25747. Data compression scores 345536 and data encryption scores 20627, indicating capable handling of archival and security workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 16 threads and high boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide the headroom needed to feed a discrete GPU in demanding titles. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6092 indicates that the processor can maintain high frame pacing in games that utilize multiple cores, though the lack of measured FPS data means actual frame rates must be estimated from the GPU's synthetic performance.

Streaming: The combination of a powerful 8-core CPU and the Arc A570M's dedicated encoding hardware makes this a viable streaming platform. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 suggests there is enough CPU overhead to encode video while maintaining game performance, though the exact quality settings would depend on the specific encoding implementation.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102, combined with the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM, positions this system for 1080p and some 1440p video editing. The PassMark float point math score of 59921 indicates strong raw compute for effects, though rendering times will be longer than workstation-class parts.

3D rendering: The 16-thread CPU and the GPU's 16 ray tracing cores make this a competent entry-level rendering rig. The Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 is sufficient for CPU-based renders, and the Arc A570M's RT cores provide acceleration for compatible renderers, though the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and 16 MB of L3 cache are well-suited for compiling code. The PassMark integer math score of 98682 and data compression score of 345536 show strong performance in the types of operations common in build systems, while the 81st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking between editors, terminals, and virtual machines.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity. The single-thread score of 979 in 3DMark and 3753 in PassMark guarantee snappy response in web browsers and office suites. The 35 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU mean the laptop will have reasonable battery life for light workloads, though the 8 GB VRAM GPU is more than needed for spreadsheet and document tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU has 16 ray tracing cores, though tensor core specifications are not listed. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz.

Compute performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58392 (0.3% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which scores 58085 (0.3% slower). The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% faster). These comparisons place the Arc A570M in a strange position: it performs like a desktop-class GPU from a previous generation, but in a mobile form factor.

The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming with high textures and for moderate 1440p workloads. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for high-resolution textures, but the 16 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of mobile GPUs, but the lack of tensor core data leaves uncertainty about its AI acceleration capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is designed for gamers who want high-refresh 1080p performance in a laptop form factor. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the CPU's 81st percentile ranking combine for a system that can handle esports titles and most AAA games at high settings, though the absence of measured FPS data means exact settings cannot be guaranteed.

Content creators working with video and photo editing will find the 8-core CPU and 8 GB GPU sufficient for 1080p workflows. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 power can handle rendering and effects, but large 4K projects will strain the VRAM and compute resources.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 threads and high boost clock. The PassMark data compression score of 345536 and integer math score of 98682 indicate fast builds and responsive test suites. The 16 MB of L3 cache helps with branch-heavy workloads.

Students and small business users who need a single machine for coursework, presentations, and light gaming will find this configuration more than capable. The single-thread performance is sufficient for all office tasks, and the discrete GPU adds flexibility for design software or casual gaming without being a power hog.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system ranks in the 85th percentile of all pairings, meaning it outperforms 85% of all measured configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 29955 on average, which is exactly equal to the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0% deltaPct) and 0.3% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800XT.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile part and useful for workstation-style tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A570M includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a desktop GPU?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58239, which is 0.3% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, indicating desktop-class performance in a mobile package.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is generally good, but the data reveals specific workload-dependent bottlenecks. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and the GPU's 88th percentile ranking suggest the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. In CPU-bound scenarios, the 8-core/16-thread design with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz will drive high frame rates in games that rely on single-thread performance, as shown by the 3DMark single-thread score of 979.

In GPU-bound workloads, the Arc A570M's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p, but demanding 1440p or 4K workloads will be constrained by the memory bus width. The 128-bit memory interface is the primary bottleneck for texture-heavy scenes, while the 16 RT cores may struggle with complex ray-traced lighting.

For productivity tasks, the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capability complement each other. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28633 and the GPU's float point performance allow for parallel workloads, but the 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP mean sustained performance will be limited by laptop cooling solutions. In mixed workloads, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU, but the GPU's memory bandwidth will cap performance in tasks that require large data transfers.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a consideration for professional users.

The 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest a combined power draw of 110 W, which is modest for a laptop with discrete graphics. This leaves headroom for a higher-power GPU in the same chassis, provided the laptop's cooling and power delivery can support it. The socket is specific to the FP8 package, so CPU upgrades are limited to other FP8 parts from the same generation.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a GPU with more VRAM or higher bandwidth, as the 8 GB GDDR6 at 224.0 GB/s is the most likely bottleneck. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking leaves room for future titles to leverage more cores, but the 8-core/16-thread configuration is a solid baseline for the next few years.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a mobile 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a mobile Arc 5 chip with 8 GB VRAM and a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile ranking is 85, placing this system in the upper tier of all configurations.

The CPU's 81st percentile ranking means it outperforms 81% of all CPUs, and the GPU's 88th percentile ranking means it outperforms 88% of all GPUs. This is a high-performance mobile workstation and gaming system, suitable for users who need substantial compute power on the go.

The data indicates this is a mid-to-high-end laptop configuration, not an entry-level or budget system. The 4 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process highlight the modern design, while the 16 GB of combined cache (16 MB L3 on CPU) and 8 GB of GPU VRAM provide ample resources for demanding applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and single-core score of 1761, a Geekbench multi-core score of 11846 and single-core score of 2031, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 28633.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The only available benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 58239.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking is 7 points higher than the CPU's 81st percentile, indicating that the GPU is the more capable component relative to its peers. The combined 85th percentile ranking suggests that when paired, the system performs at a level that is 15% below the top-tier configurations, but well above the majority of laptops.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from the synthetic scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (979 in 3DMark single-thread) and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings is achievable, but exact frame rates cannot be stated from the available data.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds