SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS + Intel Arc A550M

This laptop pairing combines AMD's Zen 4 mobile architecture with Intel's discrete Xe-HPG graphics silicon. The CPU sits in the 81st percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, putting the combined system in the 84th percentile of all benchmarked laptop configurations. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. The chip runs at a 3.80 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP envelope that suits thin-and-light laptops. The processor package contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, and it supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is notable for a mobile part.

Cache allocation is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor itself, and it includes the Radeon 780M integrated graphics as a fallback when the discrete GPU is not in use. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the part number covers three variants (FP7r2, FP7, and FP8). The multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is not available.

Benchmark scores tell a clear story about this chip's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the 7840HS scores 15102 points multi-core and 1761 points single-core. The multi-core figure represents strong sustained throughput for a 35 W part, while the single-core result shows the Zen 4 architecture's efficiency at moderate power levels. Geekbench results are similarly solid: 11846 multi-core and 2031 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal how the chip behaves across different thread counts: 1904 at 2 threads, 3651 at 4 threads, 6092 at 8 threads, and 7314 at 16 threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is modest (6092 to 7314, roughly 20%), indicating that the chip's SMT implementation adds useful but not transformative throughput in heavily threaded workloads.

Passmark results reinforce the picture. Multi-thread score is 28633, single-thread is 3753, integer math hits 98682, and floating-point math reaches 59921. Data compression scores 345536, encryption hits 20627, and extended instructions land at 25747. These numbers place the CPU in the 81st percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 29955. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with an identical average score (29955, 0% delta), followed by the Ryzen 7 5800XT at 29879 (0.3% behind), the Ryzen 7 7840H at 29868 (0.3% behind), and the Ryzen 5 9600X at 29713 (0.8% behind). The 7840HS essentially matches its newer 8845HS sibling, which is a strong result for a chip that is not the latest generation.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this CPU is not the limiting factor. The single-thread score of 1761 in Cinebench R23 and 2031 in Geekbench provide ample headroom for game logic and physics, while the 8-core/16-thread configuration ensures background tasks do not steal frames. The GPU's 86th percentile standing suggests the graphics card will govern frame rates in most titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 7314 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28633 indicate that encoding, capture, and game rendering can coexist without severe contention. The 16 MB of shared L3 helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency during simultaneous workloads.

Video editing workloads scale well with core count, and this chip delivers. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 15102 places it in solid territory for timeline scrubbing, export, and preview rendering. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multiple high-resolution video streams, though 8 GB of VRAM on the GPU will limit the number of effects layers or the resolution of previews before offloading to system memory becomes necessary.

3D rendering is where the 8-core/16-thread layout shines. Passmark floating-point math at 59921 and integer math at 98682 show strong compute throughput for CPU-based rendering engines. The 16-thread scaling from 3DMark (7314) is close to the max-thread score (7316), indicating the chip saturates its cores efficiently under sustained load. For CPU-only renders, this machine will be competitive with desktop parts from a generation or two ago.

Software development benefits from both single-thread responsiveness and multi-core compilation. The single-thread score of 3753 in Passmark keeps IDE interactions snappy, while the multi-thread score of 28633 accelerates builds across 8 physical cores. The 25,000 million transistors on a 4 nm node means power draw stays reasonable during long compile sessions, preserving battery life in a laptop chassis.

Student and office work is comfortably handled. The single-thread Geekbench score of 2031 and Passmark single-thread of 3753 are more than adequate for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 35 W TDP means the laptop can sustain light workloads without aggressive fan noise, and the integrated Radeon 780M can handle display output when the discrete GPU is idle to save power.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A550M's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is a high-midrange mobile part that should handle most titles at 1080p with high settings, and many games at 1440p with adjustments.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its gaming ceiling. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 (0.4% higher), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (2.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477 (2.6% lower). The A550M sits right at the boundary between these desktop-class GPUs, which means its gaming performance should land between the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT in rasterized workloads. That translates to roughly 60-100+ FPS at 1080p ultra in most modern titles, with dips below 60 in the most demanding games at 1440p.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a moderate configuration. At 1080p, 8 GB is generally sufficient for current games, though texture-heavy titles with ultra-quality packs may exceed this limit. At 1440p, 8 GB becomes a more serious constraint, and users should expect to lower texture quality in some titles. The 16 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests ray tracing performance will be modest compared to rasterization.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is reasonably balanced, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In gaming, the GPU is the primary limiter. The CPU's 81st percentile standing and strong single-thread scores (1761 Cinebench R23, 2031 Geekbench) mean it can feed the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's 86th percentile position, with an average score of 49737, will be the ceiling for frame rates at 1080p and above.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the balance flips. Productivity workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation rely on the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads. The GPU's compute capabilities (8.397 TFLOPS FP32, 16.79 TFLOPS FP16) can accelerate some tasks, but the CPU will dictate overall throughput in most non-gaming applications. The 35 W TDP of the CPU versus the 60 W TDP of the GPU also indicates where the power budget is allocated under load.

Memory bandwidth is a potential shared bottleneck. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s is typical for a dual-channel DDR5 laptop configuration, and the GPU's 224.0 GB/s is modest for its class. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming or rendering while gaming, the memory subsystem could become the limiting factor. The CPU's 16 MB L3 helps mitigate this for the processor side, but the GPU has no such cache to fall back on.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840HS compare to the Ryzen 7 8845HS?

A: The two chips have identical average benchmark scores of 29955, with a 0% delta. The 8845HS is the newer generation, but the 7840HS matches it in overall performance.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M competitive with desktop GPUs?

A: Yes, it sits between the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477 average score, 2.6% lower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951 average score, 2.4% higher). It also nearly matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% higher).

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and does it matter?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for most workloads, and the 16 MB of shared L3 cache reduces reliance on system memory for frequently accessed data.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes the Radeon 780M integrated GPU. This can handle display output and light graphics tasks when the discrete Arc A550M is not in use, which can save power in a laptop.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A550M has 16 RT cores, but its FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS suggests ray tracing performance will be modest. Expect playable ray tracing at 1080p with reduced settings in most titles.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The 7840HS scores 1761 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2031 in Geekbench single-core, and 3753 in Passmark single-thread. These are strong numbers that indicate responsive performance in everyday applications.

Q: Is the GPU's 8 GB VRAM enough for modern gaming?

A: At 1080p, 8 GB is generally sufficient for current titles. At 1440p, some games with high-resolution textures may exceed this limit, requiring lower texture settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop buyers who need a system that can handle both productivity and gaming without making major compromises. The CPU's 81st percentile rating and the GPU's 86th percentile rating place this in the upper tier of mobile configurations, suitable for users who run demanding applications on the go.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system well-suited to high-refresh displays. The GPU's performance between the RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT in the benchmark hierarchy suggests it can push high frame rates in esports titles and maintain 60+ FPS in most AAA games at 1080p. Those targeting 1440p should expect to adjust settings, particularly texture quality, to stay within the 8 GB VRAM budget.

Content creators working with video, photos, and 3D assets will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15102 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28633 provide solid export and rendering times. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance can accelerate AI-based workflows in supported applications.

Software developers get a responsive system for both interactive work and builds. The single-thread performance handles IDEs and terminal sessions without lag, while the 8-core/16-thread configuration keeps compile times reasonable. The 35 W CPU TDP means the laptop can sustain long build sessions without thermal throttling in a well-designed chassis.

Students and office workers who occasionally game or edit video will find this system overqualified for their daily tasks. The integrated Radeon 780M can handle light graphics work when the discrete GPU is disabled to save battery, and the CPU's efficiency at 35 W supports all-day productivity use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across 406 mm², with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile) and is now marked as end-of-life in production status.

The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate configuration that suits 1080p gaming but will strain at higher resolutions with large textures. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration.

Clock speeds are 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and has a TDP of 60 W, which is reasonable for a mobile discrete part. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

Benchmark scores show the A550M at 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 49737. This places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are all desktop-class parts: the RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (0.4% higher), RX Vega 64 at 50001 (0.5% higher), RX 6900 XT at 50951 (2.4% higher), and RX 6800 XT at 48477 (2.6% lower). The fact that a mobile GPU trades blows with high-end desktop parts from recent generations is remarkable, though the 60 W TDP means sustained performance may be lower than those desktop cards in practice.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS processor with the Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU is an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 mobile part with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a 60 W mobile discrete part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. Together, they occupy the 84th percentile of all benchmarked configurations, which places this system in the upper tier of laptop performance.

The pairing is unusual in that it mixes AMD's latest mobile CPU architecture with Intel's discrete GPU, a combination that is more common in pre-built laptops than in DIY builds. The CPU's 81st percentile rating and the GPU's 86th percentile rating are closely matched, meaning neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This creates a balanced system where the bottleneck shifts based on workload rather than being permanently lopsided.

The build class is explicitly laptop, so there are no upgrade paths for the CPU or GPU. Buyers should evaluate this system based on its total performance envelope rather than individual component potential. The 84th combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms the majority of laptops on the market, suitable for users who need both CPU-heavy productivity and GPU-accelerated gaming or creative work in a portable form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all processors. Its strongest results are in multi-threaded tests: Cinebench R23 multicore at 15102, Geekbench multicore at 11846, and Passmark multithread at 28633. Single-thread performance is solid but not class-leading: Cinebench R23 single-core at 1761, Geekbench single-core at 2031, and Passmark single-thread at 3753.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its two recorded benchmarks are Geekbench OpenCL at 49894 and Geekbench Vulkan at 49580. The close agreement between these two scores indicates consistent performance across different compute APIs.

The combined picture is a system where both components perform above the median of their respective categories. The CPU matches the Ryzen 7 8845HS exactly (0% delta) and edges out the Ryzen 7 5800XT (0.3% ahead) and Ryzen 7 7840H (0.3% ahead). The GPU is within 0.5% of the RTX 5070 Ti and RX Vega 64, and within 2.6% of the RX 6800 XT. This means the pairing delivers desktop-class GPU performance in a laptop form factor, with a CPU that keeps pace with the latest mobile and recent desktop parts.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means gaming performance must be inferred from these benchmark scores. The 86th percentile GPU paired with the 81st percentile CPU suggests a system that will excel at 1080p gaming with high settings and handle 1440p with moderate adjustments. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the most likely limits in future titles, while the CPU's 16 MB L3 and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure it will not starve the GPU in most scenarios.