SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H paired with the Intel Arc A770M is an unusual cross-vendor laptop combination: a Zen 4 mobile processor sitting in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, attached to an Alchemist-generation discrete mobile GPU in the 62nd percentile. The combined build lands at the 72nd percentile, which tells you immediately what kind of machine this is — a competent all-rounder whose processor outclasses its graphics solution. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed in-game results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The single most important structural fact about this build is the gap between its two halves. The Ryzen 7 7840H sits at the 81st percentile versus all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 29868, while the Arc A770M sits at the 62nd percentile versus all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 18383. That is a nineteen-point percentile spread, and it defines the machine's character: the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, and the GPU almost always is.

The CPU-side scaling data backs this up. In 3DMark's CPU tests, the 7840H scores 976 single-threaded, 1906 on two threads, 3638 on four threads, 6116 on eight threads, and 7461 on sixteen threads — with 7409 at maximum threads. Scaling is nearly linear from one to four threads and remains strong through eight. The sixteen-thread score of 7461 slightly exceeding the max-thread score of 7409 indicates SMT is delivering genuine additional throughput rather than just appearing on paper. For gaming, the relevant numbers are the single-thread and four-thread scores, because most game engines still lean on one to four heavily loaded threads — and both are proportionally strong relative to the chip's multi-core results.

The GPU's relative weakness means the bottleneck shifts by resolution and settings rather than by workload. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, the estimate must be derived from the scores: a passmark G3D score of 11774 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2278 place the A770M alongside parts like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (average 18159, 1.2 percent behind the A770M's 18383) — a class of GPU that is comfortable at 1080p and increasingly stressed at 1440p with Ultra settings and ray tracing enabled. Meanwhile the CPU could feed a meaningfully faster GPU: its nearest rivals — the Ryzen 7 5800XT at 29879 (delta 0 percent), the Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955 (delta -0.3 percent) and the Ryzen 5 9600X at 29713 (delta 0.5 percent) — are chips that regularly anchor much stronger gaming configurations. In short: the CPU has headroom the GPU cannot use.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh 1080p gaming. The estimated picture is favorable at 1080p. The A770M's 512 GB/s of memory bandwidth, 4096 shading units and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, benchmarked in the same tier as the RTX 3060 Mobile, should deliver high frame rates in esports titles and playable-to-high frame rates in modern AAA games at 1080p with Ultra presets. These are estimates, not measured figures — no FPS rows exist for this pairing — but the score tiers support the conclusion.

Streaming while gaming. This is where the CPU-heavy balance pays off. The 7840H's sixteen threads are barely touched by the game itself — the four-thread score of 3638 versus the sixteen-thread score of 7461 shows how much concurrent capacity remains — so encoding and compositing a stream can run alongside gameplay without starving the render thread. The A770M's Vulkan score of 74422 in Geekbench indicates a viable compute path for encode assistance as well.

Video editing. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 with 16 GB of GDDR6 on the GPU and 89.6 GB/s of system memory bandwidth makes this a workable 1080p editing machine and a serviceable 4K one. The 512 GB/s of GPU bandwidth helps timeline scrubbing and GPU-accelerated effects. It is not a workstation-class editor, but the combined 72nd percentile places it comfortably above mid-range.

3D rendering. Cinebench R20 multi-core at 9967 and R15 multi-core at 2392 confirm solid CPU rendering throughput, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494 shows the A770M can contribute meaningfully to GPU-rendered viewport work. The 16 GB of VRAM is generous for this GPU class and helps with larger scenes.

Software development. Compiling is a multi-threaded workload, and the 7840H's near-linear scaling through sixteen threads plus a strong single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3350) means fast incremental builds and responsive IDEs. ECC memory support adds a layer of correctness assurance unusual in a mobile part.

Student and office work. Overkill for documents, well-suited for coursework that touches code, media or data. Passmark single-thread of 3641 means snappy everyday responsiveness, and the integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback display path.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7840H is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process under the "Phoenix" codename. It runs a 3.80 GHz base clock with boosts to 5.10 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP — a mobile-optimized design that achieves desktop-adjacent performance per watt. The die measures 178 mm² and carries 25,000 million transistors.

The cache hierarchy is conventional and well-provisioned: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and — notably for a mobile part — ECC is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

The benchmark picture is remarkably consistent. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23731 against a single-core of 3350 gives a multi-thread ratio near 7.1x on an 8-core part — excellent SMT efficiency, corroborated by the 3DMark thread scaling. Passmark's multithread score of 27968 sits alongside a single-thread score of 3641. The specialized Passmark subscores sketch the workload profile: integer math at 96692, floating point at 58724, data compression at 341520, encryption at 20162, extended instructions at 25654, and string sorting at 38938 — balanced across the board, with no glaring weakness.

Against rivals, the 7840H is statistically indistinguishable from the Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879 average, 0 percent delta) and within a third of a percent of both the 8845HS and 7840HS (both 29955, -0.3 percent), while edging the Ryzen 5 9600X (29713, +0.5 percent). That cluster tells you this is a well-defined performance tier: strong eight-core throughput with competitive single-thread speed. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited — performance is what the scores show.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop), "building" here means selecting a machine that carries both silicon families. The data points to three buyer profiles.

First, gamers who prioritize 1080p. The GPU's score tier — neck-and-neck with the RTX 3060 Mobile — and its 16 GB VRAM buffer make 1080p the natural resolution, with 1440p viable at reduced settings. Buyers chasing 1440p Ultra or ray-traced gameplay should look upward.

Second, content creators and developers on the move. The 81st-percentile CPU, 23731-point R23 multi-core score and ECC-capable DDR5 platform make this a legitimate mobile workstation for editing, light rendering and compilation. The GPU is the junior partner here, but 16 GB of VRAM and strong OpenCL results keep GPU-accelerated workflows viable.

Third, students and small-business users who want one machine for both productivity and entertainment. The combined 72nd percentile means the system clears mainstream expectations in almost every mixed workload, with the CPU providing long-lived headroom for future software demands.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Ryzen 7 7840H + Arc A770M combination — the database contains no per-game rows for this pairing, and pairRankByFps is empty. Every frame-rate statement in this section is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measurement.

The anchor data points are the passmark G3D score of 11774, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2278, and the DirectX subscores (DX9 at 178, DX10 at 56, DX11 at 69, DX12 at 70). The overall average of 18383 places the A770M 0.1 percent ahead of the Radeon RX 460 (18373), 0.8 percent ahead of the FirePro D500 (18533 — technically the A770M trails by that margin), 1.1 percent ahead of the Radeon Pro 5700 (18189) and 1.2 percent ahead of the RTX 3060 Mobile (18159).

Working from that tier, the estimated picture is: comfortable high frame rates at 1080p in esports and older titles, playable frame rates at 1080p Ultra in current AAA releases, and a need to reduce settings at 1440p. The DX9 score of 178 stands out relative to the DX10–12 scores, suggesting legacy API performance is relatively stronger — relevant for older game libraries. Ray tracing is supported via DirectX 12 Ultimate with 32 RT cores, but the score tier implies it should be used selectively. On the CPU side, there is no indication of a processor-side frame limit at any resolution this GPU can drive; the single-thread score of 976 in 3DMark and 3641 in Passmark confirm adequate per-core speed for high-frame-rate target refresh rates.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A770M is Intel's Alchemist-generation Xe-HPG mobile flagship, built on TSMC's 6 nm process as the DG2-512 chip. It packs 21,700 million transistors into a 406 mm² die at a density of 53.4M per mm². Core counts are substantial: 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 render output units and 32 RT cores. Clocks run from a 1650 MHz base to a 2050 MHz boost.

The memory subsystem is the card's strongest asset: 16 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus at 16 Gbps effective, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that outclasses what this GPU tier usually carries and directly benefits high-resolution textures and large working sets in creative applications.

Throughput numbers are solid for the class: 16.79 TFLOPS FP32, 33.59 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 rate), 262.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 524.8 GTexel/s texture rate. API support is modern — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. The TDP is 120 W, delivered as an integrated mobile graphics solution (IGP slot class) over PCIe 4.0 x16.

What the benchmark scores mean for rendering is mixed. Geekbench OpenCL at 89494 and Vulkan at 74422 show genuine compute capability, and Passmark GPU compute at 4778 confirms usable GPGPU throughput. But the overall 62nd percentile and the rival cluster around it place gaming performance firmly in the mid-tier. The production status is listed as End-of-life, meaning this is a legacy option rather than a current retail focus.

Benchmark Performance

Pulling the numbers together. CPU: 3DMark CPU tests — 976 single-thread, 1906 two-thread, 3638 four-thread, 6116 eight-thread, 7409 max-thread, 7461 sixteen-thread. Cinebench — R15 multi 2392 / single 337; R20 multi 9967 / single 1407; R23 multi 23731 / single 3350. Passmark — multithread 27919, single-thread 3641, plus the subscores listed above. Average score: 29868, 81st percentile versus all CPUs.

GPU: 3DMark Steel Nomad 2278, Geekbench OpenCL 89494, Vulkan 74422, Passmark G3D 11774, GPU compute 4778, G2D 711, and the DirectX subscores. Average score: 18383, 62nd percentile versus all GPUs.

The combined percentile of 72 lands almost exactly between the two individual percentiles — evidence that this is a balanced composite of a strong CPU and a mid-tier GPU rather than a lopsided configuration. The nearest-rival data reinforces it: on the CPU side the 7840H is within a percent of four well-known chips; on the GPU side it is within 1.2 percent of four parts spanning older mainstream and professional mobile graphics. Neither component is an outlier; the pairing's identity comes from the CPU's clear advantage over its partner.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: The GPU. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile versus all CPUs while the GPU sits at the 62nd, and the CPU's thread scaling (7461 at sixteen threads, 976 single-thread) shows it can drive workloads well beyond what the A770M's score tier can render.

Q: Are the frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, principally the passmark G3D result of 11774 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2278.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with the Ryzen 7 5800XT (29879 average, 0 percent delta), 0.3 percent behind both the Ryzen 7 8845HS and 7840HS (29955), and 0.5 percent ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X (29713).

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and does it matter?

A: The A770M carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity is generous for the GPU's performance tier and particularly benefits texture-heavy games and GPU-accelerated creative workloads.

Q: Can this build handle streaming while gaming?

A: Yes. The eight-core, sixteen-thread CPU scales to 7461 in 3DMark's sixteen-thread test, leaving substantial concurrent capacity for encode and compositing tasks alongside the game's render load.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes. ECC support is listed for the Ryzen 7 7840H, which is notable for a mobile part and relevant for reliability-sensitive workstation use.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The Arc A770M is listed as End-of-life, so systems carrying it are legacy inventory rather than current-generation retail stock.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: laptop) pairing AMD's Ryzen 7 7840H — an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 "Phoenix" processor on a 4 nm TSMC process — with Intel's Arc A770M, an Alchemist Xe-HPG mobile GPU on a 6 nm process. It is a cross-vendor design: AMD CPU, Intel discrete graphics, with the CPU additionally carrying Radeon 780M integrated graphics as a display fallback.

In tier terms, the machine sits at the 72nd percentile combined, built from an 81st-percentile CPU and a 62nd-percentile GPU. That places it firmly in the upper-mainstream category: stronger than typical office laptops, below enthusiast gaming machines. The 35 W CPU TDP against the 120 W GPU TDP sketches the power budget priorities — this platform spends most of its thermal envelope on graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform constraints matter more than usual here. The Ryzen 7 7840H uses AMD Socket FP8 (with part numbers spanning FP7r2 and FP7 variants), a mobile BGA-class interface — in practice the CPU is soldered and not user-upgradable. The same applies to the A770M. In a laptop of this class, the realistic upgrade surface is memory and storage, not the compute silicon.

For memory, the platform supports dual-channel DDR5 delivering 89.6 GB/s of system bandwidth; populating both channels matters, since the iGPU-adjacent architecture benefits from full bandwidth. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, sufficient for a fast NVMe SSD plus the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 link. No suggested PSU figure is provided — appropriate for a laptop — and the relevant thermal figures are the 35 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP, which the chassis must be engineered to dissipate in combination.

The sensible "next upgrade" is therefore a whole-platform step. Since the CPU already matches the Ryzen 7 8845HS within 0.3 percent, staying in the same AMD mobile family yields no meaningful gain; the productive direction is a system whose GPU exceeds the A770M's 62nd-percentile tier, because the benchmark data consistently shows the processor has headroom that this graphics solution leaves unspent. The multiplier on the 7840H is locked, so there is no tuning path either — the scores as measured are the scores this configuration delivers.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds