SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A570M

This mobile pairing combines AMD's Zen 4 Phoenix CPU with Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc 5 GPU in a laptop-class build. The Ryzen 7 7840H delivers 8 cores and 16 threads on TSMC's 4 nm process, boosting to 5.10 GHz, while the Arc A570M brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2048 shading units. The combined benchmark percentile sits at 85, placing this configuration above the vast majority of systems in the database. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, representing the 7000 series for mobile platforms. The processor packs 8 physical cores with simultaneous multithreading for 16 threads, a configuration that scales well across both lightly-threaded and heavily-parallel workloads. Base clock sits at 3.80 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.10 GHz, giving the chip a wide operating range between efficiency and peak performance. The 35 W TDP classifies this as a low-power mobile part, yet the benchmark results punch well above what that power envelope might suggest.

The cache hierarchy follows a per-core design: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that matters for workstation-adjacent tasks. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A570M handles the heavy lifting in this build. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes offers adequate connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage.

Single-thread performance is strong. The 3DMark single-thread score of 976 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3350 indicate excellent per-core efficiency from the 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Cinebench R20 single-core result of 1407 and R15 single-core of 337 follow the same pattern, showing consistent scaling across benchmark generations. PassMark single-thread at 3641 reinforces this picture. For everyday tasks — web browsing, office documents, light code compilation — the 7840H responds quickly without needing to engage all cores.

Multi-threaded performance scales effectively with the 8-core/16-thread design. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 represents a roughly 7x improvement over the single-core result, indicating near-linear scaling with thread count. The 3DMark max-threads score of 7409 closely tracks the 16-thread score of 7461, suggesting the CPU saturates its thread count efficiently. The 4-thread score of 3638 and 8-thread score of 6116 show progressive gains as more cores engage. PassMark multithread at 27919 and floating-point math at 58724 indicate strong throughput for numerically intensive workloads.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 81 places it ahead of roughly four-fifths of all processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, scores 29879 on average versus the 7840H's 29868 — a delta of 0%, meaning the two perform essentially identically in aggregate. The Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, putting them 0.3% ahead, while the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, 0.5% behind. This places the 7840H in a tightly contested band where generation and platform differences matter less than workload-specific behavior.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29868 combines results from 3DMark, Cinebench, and PassMark suites. The 3DMark scores show a clear progression: 976 single-thread, 1906 dual-thread, 3638 quad-thread, 6116 eight-thread, 7409 max-threads, and 7461 sixteen-thread. The near-identical max-threads and sixteen-thread scores confirm that 16 threads fully utilize the processor's capabilities. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23731 is particularly notable for rendering workloads, while the R20 multi-core score of 9967 and R15 multi-core of 2392 track the expected generational scaling.

PassMark results cover specialized workloads. Data compression scores 341520, indicating fast archiving and file compression. Data encryption at 20162 shows solid cryptographic throughput. Extended instructions at 25654 and random string sorting at 38938 handle mixed integer and string operations effectively. Prime number finding at 83 and physics at 1301 are lower absolute numbers but represent different workload characteristics. Integer math at 96692 and floating-point math at 58724 provide the headline arithmetic throughput numbers.

The GPU's benchmark showing comes from a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals bracket this result closely: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.3% behind), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% ahead). The Arc A570M thus sits in a performance band that includes both desktop-class cards and professional workstation GPUs, which is remarkable for a mobile part.

The combined percentile of 85 reflects the synergy between the 81st-percentile CPU and 88th-percentile GPU. The pair is balanced enough that neither component dramatically outstrips the other, though the GPU holds a slight edge in relative standing. This combined picture suggests a system that can handle both CPU-intensive productivity and GPU-accelerated graphics workloads without a glaring bottleneck in either direction.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840H compare to the Ryzen 7 5800XT in average benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 on average, while the Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29879, a delta of 0%. The two processors are statistically tied in aggregate performance, despite belonging to different generations and platforms.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does that mean?

A: The Intel Arc A570M sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 88% of graphics cards in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and 0.5% of the NVIDIA P102-100.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7840H supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which combined with ECC support makes it suitable for data-integrity-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3350, while the multi-core score is 23731 — a ratio of roughly 7:1. This indicates strong per-core performance from the 5.10 GHz boost clock and effective scaling across all 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A570M have and what memory type does it use?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. This is a dense, modern process that contributes to the CPU's strong performance-per-watt.

Q: What socket does the 7840H use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket. The part numbers include FP7r2, FP7, and FP8 variants, indicating compatibility across multiple mobile platform revisions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming depends on the GPU's ability to push frames quickly. With the Arc A570M at the 88th GPU percentile and the CPU at the 81st percentile, this laptop can plausibly target 1080p high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles, though the 1300 MHz boost clock and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput set expectations at medium-to-high settings rather than maximum detail at very high frame rates.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which can handle game encoding alongside the GPU's rendering load. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 indicates enough headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units tackle the graphics side. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports simultaneous game and encoder traffic.

Video editing combines CPU and GPU acceleration. The 7840H's PassMark floating-point math score of 58724 handles format conversions and effects processing, while the Arc A570M's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate preview rendering and GPU-accelerated effects. The 8 GB VRAM provides sufficient capacity for 4K timelines with moderate effect stacks.

3D rendering leans heavily on multi-threaded CPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23731 places this CPU in a strong position for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU can supplement with OpenCL-based rendering, though its 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest compared to dedicated desktop render cards.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced single and multi-thread performance. The single-thread score of 3350 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation of individual files, while the multi-core score of 23731 accelerates full builds across 16 threads. Data encryption at 20162 and compression at 341520 in PassMark indicate solid throughput for build artifact packaging and secure communications.

Student and office work rarely stresses either component fully. The CPU's single-thread performance handles document editing and web browsing with ease, while the integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery savings. The 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable power draw for a laptop chassis.

Who Should Build It

Mobile gamers seeking 1080p performance will find this pairing capable of running modern titles at medium-to-high settings, with the GPU's 88th percentile ranking ensuring smoother frame rates than integrated graphics alone. The 8 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy games at 1080p, though 1440p gaming would require more conservative settings.

Content creators working on location — video editors, 3D artists, and graphic designers — benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores and the GPU's OpenCL capabilities. The 23731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates export times, while the 224.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth handles texture streaming in creative applications.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the 16-thread throughput and single-thread responsiveness. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking ensures snappy builds, and the ECC memory support provides data integrity for long-running compilation sessions.

Students need a machine that handles everything from research to media consumption. The 7840H's balanced performance and the Arc A570M's graphics capability cover both productivity and entertainment, while the mobile form factor suits dorm-room and lecture-hall use.

Small business workstations that occasionally need graphics acceleration — for presentations, light CAD, or data visualization — will find this pairing adequate. The GPU's near-parity with workstation-class cards like the Radeon PRO V710 (0.7% difference) and the CPU's ECC support offer workstation-adjacent reliability without a desktop footprint.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, representing the Alchemist generation of Arc 5 Mobile GPUs. TSMC's 6 nm process packs 11,500 million transistors into a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a 900 MHz base clock and 1300 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem comprises 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, though the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth compared to wider desktop designs. The 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units provide the raw pixel-pushing hardware. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing hardware includes 16 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in supported games. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full modern graphics API stack. FP32 throughput is 5.325 TFLOPS with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating the hardware is weighted toward standard precision rendering rather than compute-heavy AI workloads.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places the GPU at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, a strong showing for a mobile part. The nearest rivals include the desktop-class RX 6950 XT (0.3% ahead), RX 5600 OEM (0.3% behind), P102-100 (0.5% ahead), and Radeon PRO V710 (0.7% ahead). This clustering suggests the Arc A570M delivers desktop-equivalent compute performance in a laptop package, though gaming performance may vary based on driver optimization and power delivery.

The 75 W TDP is modest for the performance on offer, and the IGP slot width indicates the GPU is soldered to the motherboard rather than socketed. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the 8 GB VRAM, and display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the laptop's specific ports determine external display options.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Ryzen 7 7840H and Arc A570M pairing. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and 58239 Geekbench OpenCL score suggest 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is realistic for most modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM handles current game textures at 1080p without overflow, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports typical game streaming requirements. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, with the 5.10 GHz boost clock providing strong per-core performance for game logic.

Esports titles — competitive shooters, MOBAs, and battle arenas — should run at high frame rates given the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's compute throughput. The 1300 MHz boost clock may limit peak frame rates in less demanding titles where the GPU becomes the constraint, but the 2048 shading units provide enough fill rate for 1080p high-refresh displays in optimized games.

AAA single-player titles at 1080p will likely require medium settings for smooth 60 FPS gameplay, with high settings possible in less demanding titles. The 16 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at reduced resolutions or with lower quality presets, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits heavy ray-tracing workloads. At 1440p, expect to lower settings to medium or rely on upscaling technologies to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's 23731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score prevents CPU-bound frame rate drops in games that scale beyond 8 threads, while the single-thread score of 3350 handles older game engines that rely on fewer threads. This combination should provide consistent frame pacing without stutter from CPU limitations in most gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H CPU with the Intel Arc A570M GPU. The CPU brings Zen 4 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads on a 4 nm process, while the GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture with 2048 shading units on a 6 nm process. Both components are currently in active production, indicating ongoing availability.

The combined percentile of 85 places this pairing in the upper tier of systems in the database. The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are closely matched, with the GPU holding a slight advantage in relative standing. This balance suggests a well-rounded system that avoids severe bottlenecking in either direction.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29868 and the GPU's 58239 OpenCL score combine to create a system that excels at both productivity and graphics workloads. The CPU's nearest rivals — the 5800XT, 8845HS, 7840HS, and 9600X — all score within 0.5% of the 7840H, indicating the processor is competitive with both previous and next-generation parts. The GPU's rivals span desktop gaming cards and workstation GPUs, showing unusual versatility for a mobile component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well matched in percentile terms, with the GPU at 88 and the CPU at 81. This 7-point gap means the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers, but the difference is modest enough that neither component consistently limits the other in mixed workloads.

In CPU-heavy tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the Ryzen 7 7840H is the primary actor. The GPU can assist via OpenCL, but its 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is secondary to the CPU's 23731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Conversely, in gaming and GPU-accelerated graphics tasks, the Arc A570M takes the lead, with the CPU providing adequate support rather than becoming the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling picture — though estimated, since no measured data exists — suggests that at 1080p, the GPU is likely the primary constraint in demanding titles, while at lower resolutions or in esports titles, the CPU's single-thread performance may become the ceiling. The 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth and 224.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth are both adequate for their respective roles, reducing the chance of memory-bound bottlenecks.

Power delivery is another balancing factor. The CPU's 35 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP total 110 W of sustained draw, which is manageable for a laptop chassis. Systems with insufficient cooling or power delivery may throttle either component, but the benchmark scores suggest the reference configuration sustains performance adequately.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket that limits upgrade potential to other FP8-compatible processors within the same platform generation. The 7840H itself is a high-end member of the 7000 series, so upgrades within the same socket would likely yield marginal gains. The socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and ECC capability, and the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared across all memory operations.

PCIe connectivity comes from Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, providing adequate bandwidth for the discrete GPU (which uses PCIe 4.0 x8) and high-speed NVMe storage. The GPU's bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8 is sufficient for the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, with no bottleneck expected from the interface.

The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the CPU's 35 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP indicate a combined 110 W of component power draw. A laptop power adapter in the 130-180 W range would provide headroom for the rest of the system, though the exact figure is not specified in the data. The GPU's slot width of IGP confirms it is soldered and not replaceable.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the platform, since the dual-channel DDR5 configuration benefits both CPU and GPU workloads. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives would improve load times and data throughput. However, the CPU and GPU are both active production parts near the top of their respective mobile lineups, so a full platform replacement would be the more meaningful upgrade path when the next generation of mobile hardware becomes available.