SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A550M: A Balanced Mobile Powerhouse

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H paired with the Intel Arc A550M represents a distinctly modern laptop configuration, combining AMD's efficient Zen 4 architecture with Intel's dedicated Xe-HPG graphics. This pairing sits at an 84th combined percentile among all system configurations, placing it firmly in the upper tier of mobile computing hardware. The CPU achieves an 81st percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU reaches an 86th percentile against all GPUs, indicating that both components are above-average performers in their respective categories. This analysis examines the benchmark data to understand what this pairing delivers across computational tasks, gaming, and professional workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This is a mobile-first discrete GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, providing substantial headroom for demanding workloads.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, yielding a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. For rendering tasks, the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS is the primary metric for traditional rasterization. The FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicates strong half-precision throughput, which is increasingly relevant for AI-assisted rendering and certain compute workloads. The GPU includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the absence of tensor core data means AI acceleration relies on the Xe-HPG architecture's general compute capabilities.

Benchmark results show the Arc A550M scoring 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Vulkan. These near-identical scores suggest consistent performance across different compute APIs, which is notable for a mobile GPU. The average benchmark score of 49,737 places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Comparing to nearest rivals, the Arc A550M sits within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957) and within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001). The margin to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951) is 2.4% slower, while the Arc A550M is 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477). These deltas indicate that the Arc A550M competes in the upper echelon of GPU performance, despite being a mobile part.

For rendering workflows, the combination of 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p texture-heavy scenes, though 4K rendering with high-resolution textures may exceed capacity. The ray tracing cores enable hardware RT, but the 16-core count suggests entry-level RT performance relative to dedicated desktop RT flagships. The Arc A550M's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs and features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark profile spans multiple test suites. In 3DMark, the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 7,461 with 16 threads, 1,906 with 2 threads, 3,638 with 4 threads, 6,116 with 8 threads, 7,409 with max threads, and 976 single-thread. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads shows strong multi-threading efficiency, with the 16-thread score nearly quadrupling the 2-thread score. In Cinebench, the CPU achieves 2,392 in R15 multi-core, 337 in R15 single-core, 9,967 in R20 multi-core, 1,407 in R20 single-core, 23,731 in R23 multi-core, and 3,350 in R23 single-core. These scores indicate a well-balanced processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

PassMark results further characterize the CPU: data compression scores 341,520, data encryption 20,162, extended instructions 25,654, find prime numbers 83, floating point math 58,724, integer math 96,692, multithread 27,919, physics 1,301, random string sorting 38,938, and single-thread 3,641. The high data compression and integer math scores suggest strong general-purpose compute capabilities, while the floating point score supports scientific and engineering workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29,868, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 29,955 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 29,955 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713 (+0.5%). This clustering within 0.5% indicates that the 7840H is competitively positioned among current and recent-generation desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU, as detailed, averages 49,737 at the 86th percentile. The combined picture from the 84th combined percentile is a system where both components are above-average, with the GPU slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU. This suggests a configuration that is GPU-bound in most graphics-intensive scenarios, which is typical for gaming and rendering workloads. The CPU's 81st percentile ensures it can feed the GPU adequately in most situations, though the 0.3% gap between the 7840H and its HS variants may translate to minor CPU-bound limitations in extremely high-FPS scenarios.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and a 35 W TDP. This mobile processor uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, along with ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample connectivity for the discrete GPU and NVMe storage.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical for Zen 4, providing low-latency access to frequently used data. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provides a fallback display output and basic compute capability, though the discrete Arc A550M handles demanding graphics workloads.

Benchmark scores translate to real-world performance as follows: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,731 indicates strong productivity performance for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 3,350 supports responsive day-to-day use, including web browsing, office applications, and light coding tasks. PassMark multithread score of 27,919 corroborates the multi-core strength, while the single-thread score of 3,641 confirms competitive single-thread performance.

For specific workloads, the data compression score of 341,520 indicates fast file archiving and decompression, useful for developers and content creators handling large assets. The data encryption score of 20,162 supports secure communications and VPN throughput. The floating point math score of 58,724 and integer math score of 96,692 suggest capable scientific computing and financial modeling performance. The extended instructions score of 25,654 indicates strong SIMD performance for multimedia processing.

Comparing to rivals, the 7840H is essentially tied with the Ryzen 7 5800XT (0% delta), which is a desktop processor, highlighting the efficiency of Zen 4's mobile implementation. The 0.3% deficit to the 8845HS and 7840HS suggests these sibling parts hold a slight edge, likely due to minor clock or power differences. The 0.5% advantage over the Ryzen 5 9600X indicates the 7840H's extra cores provide a measurable multi-thread benefit.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840H compare to the Ryzen 7 8845HS in multi-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29,868, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 8845HS's average score of 29,955. This places the 7840H at the 81st percentile, with the delta being minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in real-world workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest competitive alternative based on benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A550M averages 49,737, which is 0.4% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957) and 0.5% slower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001). It is 2.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951) but 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation use cases where data integrity is critical, such as financial modeling or scientific computing.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This bandwidth is sufficient for the 8-core Zen 4 architecture, ensuring that memory-bound workloads like data compression and encryption do not starve the CPU.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. This supports the discrete Intel Arc A550M (which uses PCIe 4.0 x16) as well as fast NVMe storage devices, though the exact lane allocation depends on the laptop's design.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 976 in 3DMark single-thread and 7,461 in 3DMark 16-thread, showing a 7.6x scaling from single to 16 threads. In Cinebench R23, single-core scores 3,350 while multi-core scores 23,731, a 7.1x scaling, indicating efficient thread utilization across the 8 cores with SMT.

Q: Is the GPU's ray tracing performance competitive with its rasterization performance?

A: The GPU includes 16 ray tracing cores, but benchmark data only covers OpenCL and Vulkan compute scores (49,894 and 49,580). No dedicated ray tracing benchmark scores are available in the data, so RT performance cannot be quantified relative to rasterization; the 16-core count suggests entry-level RT capability.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 7840H and the Intel Arc A550M can be assessed through their respective percentiles and relative performance. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile, a 5-point gap favoring the GPU. This means that in most graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor, as it has relatively more headroom compared to its peers than the CPU does.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 86th percentile suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings, but the CPU's 81st percentile may become a constraint in CPU-bound titles or at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed the CPU's capability to feed the GPU. The delta to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower) indicates the Arc A550M is competitive with high-end desktop GPUs from recent generations, while the CPU's tight clustering with the Ryzen 7 5800XT and 8845HS (within 0.5%) shows it is a solid mid-range performer.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's multi-thread score of 23,731 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark multithread of 27,919 indicate that CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will be CPU-bound, with the GPU contributing only where GPU-accelerated rendering is supported. The CPU's 35 W TDP suggests thermal constraints in a laptop chassis, potentially limiting sustained multi-core performance compared to desktop parts.

The memory subsystem is a potential balancing factor: the CPU's 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, while the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for a mobile part. This asymmetry suggests that memory-bound workloads on the CPU side may bottleneck before the GPU becomes a constraint. The 8 GB GPU VRAM is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming, but may limit high-texture 4K workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 49,737 (86th percentile) and its proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower) and RX 6900 XT (2.4% slower), the Arc A550M is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p Ultra settings in most modern titles. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that 1080p Ultra with high-quality textures will be the sweet spot, with 1440p Ultra achievable but potentially requiring settings reductions in VRAM-heavy titles.

The CPU's single-thread score of 976 in 3DMark and 3,350 in Cinebench R23 multi-core indicate that it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound games, though the 81st percentile places it slightly below the GPU's relative strength. At 1080p, where CPU overhead is more significant, frame rates may be limited by the CPU in esports titles, potentially capping at lower values than the GPU alone could deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the Arc A550M's performance should scale closer to its benchmark percentile.

Estimated frame rates, assuming typical scaling from the benchmark scores: at 1080p Ultra, expect 60-100+ FPS in AAA titles and 100-150+ FPS in esports titles, depending on CPU limitations. At 1440p Ultra, expect 40-70 FPS in AAA titles and 70-110 FPS in esports titles. At 4K Ultra, expect 20-40 FPS in AAA titles, with esports titles potentially reaching 50-70 FPS. These estimates are speculative and based solely on the compute scores; actual gaming performance depends on driver optimization, game-specific engine behavior, and thermal management.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This CPU+GPU pairing targets laptop users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without compromising portability. The 84th combined percentile indicates a high-tier system suitable for enthusiasts and professionals. Gamers seeking 1080p high-refresh-rate gameplay and moderate 1440p capability will find the Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU performance adequate, while the CPU's 81st percentile ensures smooth gameplay in most titles.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, benefit from the CPU's strong multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,731) and the GPU's compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL 49,894). The 8 GB VRAM supports 1080p rendering projects, and the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS provides reasonable GPU-accelerated rendering throughput. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 16 threads and high integer math score (96,692), which accelerates compilation and testing.

Students and small business users in STEM fields can leverage the CPU's floating point math (58,724) and data encryption (20,162) for scientific computing and secure communications. The 35 W CPU TDP and mobile-class GPU (60 W TDP) suggest this configuration is intended for laptops that balance performance with battery life, making it suitable for users who need a single device for both work and play.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is not upgradable in a traditional sense; it is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs. The GPU is also a mobile component, integrated into the laptop's motherboard, so neither component can be upgraded independently. The platform supports DDR5 memory, which is an upgrade path if the laptop has SO-DIMM slots, though the dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is already optimal for this CPU.

PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides a modern I/O foundation, supporting the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and NVMe storage. The GPU's suggested PSU is not specified, but the CPU's 35 W TDP and GPU's 60 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that is modest for a laptop, likely requiring a power adapter in the 130-180 W range (this is an estimate; no exact figure is in the data). The GPU is marked as End-of-life, indicating that Intel has moved on to newer architectures, which may affect long-term driver support.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or storage, as these are the only user-serviceable components in most laptops. For users seeking higher performance, the nearest CPU rival, the Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.3% faster), represents a marginal upgrade, but the soldered nature of mobile CPUs makes this impractical. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% faster), is a desktop part and not applicable to this mobile platform.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A550M, a discrete Xe-HPG mobile GPU. It is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile combine to an 84th combined percentile, placing this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29,868 places it among peers like the Ryzen 7 5800XT (29,879) and Ryzen 7 8845HS (29,955), while the GPU's average of 49,737 competes with the RTX 5070 Ti (49,957) and RX Vega 64 (50,001). This pairing is well-matched for a laptop that aims to deliver high performance in both CPU and GPU workloads, with the GPU holding a slight relative advantage. The system is best suited for users who prioritize gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks but still need strong CPU performance for productivity.

The build's overall tier is high for a laptop, evidenced by the 84th combined percentile, making it a competitive option for mobile workstations and gaming laptops. The balance between the two components is good, with the GPU's slightly higher percentile suggesting that the system is capable of pushing graphics-heavy workloads, while the CPU ensures responsive general-purpose performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile and proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower) indicate capability for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-thread score of 976 in 3DMark supports high frame rates, though the 81st percentile may limit maximum FPS in esports titles. Estimated 1080p Ultra frame rates of 60-100+ FPS in AAA titles are plausible, with esports titles potentially exceeding 144 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and PassMark multithread score of 27,919 provide headroom for software encoding while gaming, though hardware encoding on the Arc A550M (which supports modern APIs) may offload this task. The GPU's Vulkan score of 49,580 suggests efficient compute for stream encoding, and the CPU's data encryption score of 20,162 supports secure stream delivery.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,731 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 49,894 indicate capable performance for 1080p video editing and moderate 4K editing. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for timeline previews and effects, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit multi-stream 4K workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread performance (Cinebench R20 multi-core of 9,967) supports CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's FP32 of 8.397 TFLOPS accelerates GPU renderers. The 16 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 96,692 and extended instructions score of 25,654 speed up compilation and code execution. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 3,350 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,641 in PassMark ensures snappy web browsing and office applications. The CPU's 35 W TDP supports long battery life for all-day use, while the GPU's compute capabilities handle occasional graphics tasks like presentations or light photo editing. The 16 MB L3 cache provides fast access to frequently used data, improving multitasking efficiency.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds