SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7840H

29,868 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7840H + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Mobile Pairing Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H pairs a high-end 8-core Zen 4 CPU with Intel's entry-level Arc A350M GPU in a laptop configuration. This combination sits at the 76th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tracked laptop builds. The CPU is the clear strength here, ranking in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 70th percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7840H compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H's average benchmark score of 29,868 is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT (29,879, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29,955, -0.3% delta). It sits slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29,713, +0.5% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A350M ranks in the 70th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 24,647. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4% delta), meaning the Arc A350M performs nearly identically to that desktop-class card.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H supports ECC memory. It also features dual-channel DDR5 memory support with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Ryzen 7 7840H has 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename), manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the Arc A350M have?

A: The Intel Arc A350M comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is currently listed as Active in production, while the GPU is marked as End-of-life. The GPU was released on 2022-03-29, and the CPU has no recorded release date in the data.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core testing, the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 3,350 points. Its 3DMark single-thread score is 976, and its Passmark single-thread score is 3,641, indicating strong per-core performance for a mobile processor.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in relative terms. The Ryzen 7 7840H achieves an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,868. Its multi-threaded performance is particularly impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 23,731 points, while 3DMark max-threads reaches 7,409 and 3DMark 16-threads hits 7,461. The scaling from 2 threads (1,906) to 4 threads (3,638) to 8 threads (6,116) shows near-linear improvement, indicating excellent multi-core efficiency.

The Intel Arc A350M, by contrast, ranks in the 70th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 24,647. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24,546, and its Vulkan score is 24,747. This places it in direct competition with desktop graphics cards from previous generations; the data shows it performing within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile.

The combined percentile of 76 reflects this pairing's overall position in the laptop market. The CPU's strength in multi-threaded tasks is evident from the Passmark scores: multithread performance reaches 27,919, integer math hits 96,692, and floating-point math scores 58,724. The CPU also demonstrates strong data handling capabilities with a data compression score of 341,520 and random string sorting at 38,938.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, though the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus may limit texture-heavy modern games. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,350 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck frame generation in most scenarios.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 27,919 indicates strong parallel processing capability, while the CPU's 81st percentile ranking suggests it can handle encoding tasks without compromising game performance.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's 23,731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 24,546 OpenCL score creates a capable editing platform. The CPU handles timeline processing and export encoding efficiently, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading. The 4 GB VRAM may limit complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be the primary strength here, with the Ryzen 7 7840H's 16 threads delivering strong performance in applications that utilize multi-threading. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide some hardware acceleration for RT-enabled renderers, though the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits its contribution relative to the CPU.

Software development: The 16 threads and 5.10 GHz boost clock handle compilation tasks efficiently. The Passmark data encryption score of 20,162 and extended instructions score of 25,654 indicate solid performance for cryptographic operations and modern instruction set workloads common in development environments.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 3,641 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a power-efficient fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is unnecessary.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to mobile platforms. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, which is typical for mobile processors.

The Intel Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and is marked as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) package, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. This makes GPU upgrades impractical or impossible in most laptop chassis. The GPU's TDP is 25 W, and the CPU's TDP is 35 W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope of approximately 60 W for the core compute components.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on maximizing the existing hardware: increasing system memory to take full advantage of the dual-channel DDR5 support would benefit both CPU and GPU performance, as the iGPU (Radeon 780M) shares system memory. The CPU's production status remains Active, but the GPU is End-of-life, indicating that the graphics component is the more likely candidate for replacement in a future system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, delivering 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at 2:1 ratio).

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is the most significant limitation for modern gaming, as many titles at high settings require more than 4 GB of VRAM even at 1080p. The 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT capabilities, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark results place the Arc A350M at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with performance nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (-0.4% delta) and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (+1.5% delta). The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s indicate reasonable fill rates for its class, though the 64-bit memory bus constrains bandwidth-intensive workloads.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance in a mobile form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M sufficient for most titles, particularly esports and older games where the 4 GB VRAM is less restrictive. The 70th percentile GPU ranking means it outperforms a majority of integrated graphics solutions while remaining below dedicated gaming GPUs.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-bound tasks—such as software development, data analysis, or CPU-based rendering—will benefit most from the Ryzen 7 7840H's 81st percentile CPU ranking. The 16 threads and high boost clock handle compilation, scripting, and parallel workloads efficiently. Video editors can leverage the CPU for export encoding while using the GPU for real-time preview acceleration.

Students and professionals needing a versatile workstation will appreciate the balance of strong CPU performance with capable graphics. The system handles office productivity, programming, and light creative work without strain. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support will find the CPU's compatibility valuable, though they should verify motherboard support for this feature.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H represents the mainstream mobile tier of AMD's 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W.

Cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 4 connectivity provides 20 CPU lanes. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics offer a fallback display solution.

Benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 23,731, while 3DMark max-threads reaches 7,409. Single-thread performance is equally impressive with a 3,350 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 976 in 3DMark single-thread. The Passmark suite shows balanced capabilities across workloads: integer math at 96,692, floating-point at 58,724, and data encryption at 20,162.

The CPU's nearest rivals—the Ryzen 7 5800XT, Ryzen 7 8845HS, and Ryzen 5 9600X—all perform within 0.5% of this chip, indicating that the 7840H sits at a performance plateau where architectural differences yield minimal practical impact. The 81st percentile ranking confirms this is a high-end mobile processor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") featuring an AMD Ryzen 7 7840H CPU paired with an Intel Arc A350M GPU. The combination ranks at the 76th percentile overall, placing it above three-quarters of tracked systems. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile reveals the processor as the dominant component.

The system represents a practical mid-range mobile configuration: the CPU delivers desktop-class multi-threading in a 35 W envelope, while the GPU provides entry-level discrete graphics performance that exceeds integrated solutions. The Arc A350M's 25 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light chassis designs. This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower without the thermal and power requirements of high-end gaming GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a CPU-bound system where the processor significantly outpaces the GPU. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will constrain frame rates and texture quality before the CPU becomes a bottleneck.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive applications like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the Ryzen 7 7840H's 16 threads and 23,731 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will dominate system performance. The GPU's contribution in these workloads is secondary, making the CPU the primary driver of productivity performance.

The balance shifts depending on workload type. Gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks will be GPU-limited, while productivity and multi-threaded compute tasks will be CPU-limited. The 76th combined percentile reflects this equilibrium: the system performs well in most scenarios but does not excel in either extreme. Users seeking higher gaming performance would need a stronger GPU, while those needing more compute throughput would benefit from a higher-tier CPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination, so the following are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and performance parity with the AMD Radeon RX 590 suggest 1080p gaming at medium settings is the realistic target for modern titles.

The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 compute indicate that esports titles—such as competitive shooters and MOBAs—should achieve high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 60 FPS even at high settings. The 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level RT capability, but enabling ray tracing will significantly impact performance given the GPU's modest compute resources.

The 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for modern AAA games. Titles requiring more than 4 GB of video memory at 1080p high settings will experience texture pop-in or forced quality reductions. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,350 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more significant.

For 1440p gaming, the Arc A350M will struggle with demanding titles, likely requiring low settings or reduced resolution scaling. The 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth scalability at higher resolutions. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking provides reassurance that frame pacing and minimum frame times will remain stable, even when the GPU is pushed to its limits.