SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

33,091 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop-class system. The combined percentile sits at 79, with the CPU reaching the 83rd percentile and the GPU the 74th. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a direct measurement.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7745HX is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile chip built on the Zen 4 architecture and the Dragon Range codename. The base clock is 3.60 GHz, the boost clock is 5.10 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W. It is manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 6,570 million transistors in a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3. The memory controller supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, and it includes an integrated Radeon 610M GPU for display output. The socket is AMD Socket FL1, and the multiplier is unlocked.

The benchmark results show a chip that is strong in both single-threaded and heavily threaded work. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 18,452.5 and the single-core score is 1,850. Geekbench reports 13,613 for multi-core and 2,366 for single-core. PassMark's multi-thread score is 32,581, with a single-thread score of 3,947. In 3DMark, the max-threads score is 7,967, the 16-thread score is 7,993, the 8-thread score is 6,604, the 4-thread score is 3,815, the 2-thread score is 1,997, and the single-thread score is 1,023. These results place the CPU at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33,091.

The nearest rivals confirm a tight cluster. The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average score of 33,089, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G also scores 33,089, also a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079, again a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33,201, which is 0.3 percent behind the 7745HX. In practical terms, this CPU is on par with those three strong desktop chips and slightly ahead of the 6950H.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 32 MB shared L3 handles parallel tasks such as code compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering without the CPU becoming the primary constraint. The single-thread scores, particularly the 3DMark single-thread result of 1,023 and the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1,850, indicate that everyday desktop responsiveness and single-threaded applications such as spreadsheets or web browsing will not strain the processor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 74th. That gap means the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads — data compression, encryption, floating-point math, or integer math — the CPU will set the pace. In GPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor.

The CPU's memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, while the GPU has 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. However, the GPU has only 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 64-bit bus. That VRAM capacity is a hard cap for texture-heavy scenes, and when the VRAM is exhausted, the GPU will need to rely on slower system memory. The CPU's 32 MB shared L3 helps with latency-sensitive tasks, but it does not compensate for the GPU's limited VRAM.

Because there is no measured FPS data, the balance can only be estimated from the percentiles. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile suggest that in gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1080p and above. At lower resolutions and settings, the CPU's single-thread strength may allow the GPU to run at full utilization, but the 4 GB VRAM will still limit texture detail and resolution in many titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33,091, placing it in the 83rd percentile. The GPU's average score is 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile. The combined build percentile is 79.

On the CPU side, the most relevant multi-core result is Cinebench R23 multi-core at 18,452.5. The single-core R23 result is 1,850. Geekbench multi-core is 13,613 and single-core is 2,366. PassMark multi-thread is 32,581 and single-thread is 3,947. The 3DMark max-threads score is 7,967, the 16-thread score is 7,993, the 8-thread score is 6,604, the 4-thread score is 3,815, the 2-thread score is 1,997, and the single-thread score is 1,023.

On the GPU side, the OpenCL score is 29,676 and the Vulkan score is 28,673. The nearest GPU rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (a delta of -0.1 percent), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (-0.1 percent), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (+0.6 percent), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (+1.0 percent). The A370M is essentially level with the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, and 0.6 percent ahead of the RX 470 and 1.0 percent ahead of the RX 6800M.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The 83rd CPU percentile and 74th GPU percentile mean the system is CPU-leaning. In workloads that depend on both, the GPU will be the first to show strain.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is suited for users who need strong CPU performance with a modest GPU. The 83rd CPU percentile makes it a good fit for content creators who rely on 8-core/16-thread workloads such as video rendering, 3D scene processing, or large batch data operations. The 16 threads and 32 MB shared L3 are well suited for software development, including compilation and running multiple virtual machines. The ECC memory support is an advantage for small business workstations where data integrity matters, and the mobile form factor makes it portable for students.

The GPU's 74th percentile means it is not a high-end gaming GPU. For light gaming at 1080p with moderate settings, the A370M can handle it, but for high-refresh or ray-traced games, the GPU will be the limiting factor. Content creators who rely on GPU-accelerated rendering will find the 4 GB VRAM limiting for large scenes, though the GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support make it capable for routine tasks. Software developers who work on CPU-bound code will be well served, but those who need large GPU compute buffers may want more VRAM.

Students and general-purpose users will benefit from the low power draw — the CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 35 W — and the integrated Radeon 610M can handle basic display tasks without engaging the discrete GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a laptop socket. The upgrade path is limited by the laptop platform, but the CPU multiplier is unlocked, so an overclocker could adjust the CPU clock if cooling allows. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel interface and ECC, so a workstation-minded user can install ECC DDR5 if the laptop board supports it. The PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU provides high bandwidth for storage and expansion, though the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life, so no future driver or hardware support is likely. The CPU is still active. The TDPs are 55 W for the CPU and 35 W for the GPU, so the total power draw is modest. There is no suggested PSU in the data, but the low TDPs mean a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. A sensible next upgrade would be adding more DDR5 memory to take advantage of the dual-channel bandwidth, or a Gen 5 NVMe drive to use the PCIe lanes. The GPU is not a candidate for replacement in a laptop, and the CPU's performance is already at a high level.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance is solid, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,023 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,850. This gives enough headroom for high frame rates in less demanding games, but the GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will cap the frame rate at 1080p with reduced detail. No measured FPS data exists, so this is an estimate.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU can handle encoding and gameplay simultaneously, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,452.5. The GPU's limited VRAM may force lower game settings to keep both workloads stable.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance is strong, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 32,581 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 13,613. The GPU can assist with effects and previews via its OpenCL score of 29,676, but the 4 GB VRAM is a limit for 4K timelines with many effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are the primary engine, and the 3DMark max-threads score of 7,967 confirms the CPU is capable. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest, so CPU-based renderers will work well, while GPU-based renderers will be constrained by the 4 GB VRAM.

Software development: The 16 threads, 32 MB L3, and ECC support make this a solid development machine. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 105,773 and data encryption score of 22,967 show strong compute for compilation and secure workloads.

Student and office work: The mobile form factor, 55 W CPU TDP, and integrated Radeon 610M make it a practical laptop for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,850 ensures responsive everyday use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the Alchemist generation. It uses the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. There are 8 RT cores for ray tracing. The base clock is 1550 MHz, the boost clock is 2050 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz with a 14 Gbps effective rate. The memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS and the FP16 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's benchmark results are an OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673, averaging 29,175. That places it at the 74th percentile. The nearest rivals show a narrow spread: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is 0.1 percent behind, the AMD FirePro W8000 is 0.1 percent behind, the AMD Radeon RX 470 is 0.6 percent ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M is 1.0 percent ahead. This means the A370M is a mid-tier mobile GPU that sits slightly above the RX 470 and RX 6800M in synthetic scores, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are real limitations for modern game assets.

For rendering, the 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support hardware ray tracing, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is enough for small to medium 3D scenes, but high-resolution textures or large models will exceed the VRAM.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 112 GB/s of bandwidth and a 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: The CPU has an average score of 33,091, while the i7-13650HX has an average score of 33,089, a delta of 0 percent.

Q: Is the GPU faster than the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: Yes, the A370M has an average score of 29,175, which is 0.6 percent higher than the RX 470's 28,996.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile is 79, with the CPU at 83 and the GPU at 74.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All frame-rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The CPU's single-thread strength, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,023 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,850, suggests that the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most games. The GPU, with a 74th percentile ranking and only 4 GB of VRAM, will be the primary constraint. At 1080p with moderate settings, the GPU may produce playable frame rates in many titles, but the 64-bit memory bus and 112 GB/s of bandwidth will require texture detail to be lowered. At 1440p or higher, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, and frame rates will drop as the VRAM is exhausted. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU provides enough headroom for background tasks, but the GPU's limited VRAM and bandwidth define the gaming ceiling.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build. The CPU is an AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor, and the GPU is an Intel Arc A370M, an Alchemist mobile GPU. The combined percentile is 79, placing the system in the upper mid-range but not the top tier. The CPU is at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 74th, so the CPU is the stronger component. The build is best suited for CPU-heavy workloads, light to moderate gaming, and content creation where the CPU carries the load. The absence of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds