SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

33,091 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + Intel Arc A350M

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 4 mobile flagship with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, yielding a combined percentile of 77. The data shows a substantial performance gap between the two components — the processor is clearly the dominant half of this equation, with the GPU trailing in relative standing. This analysis draws exclusively from the benchmark data in the fact pack, and it is important to note upfront that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which anchors it to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This is a laptop-class socket, meaning the upgrade path is fundamentally different from desktop systems — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and users cannot swap processors independently. The platform supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which adds a layer of reliability for workstation tasks that demand data integrity.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the processor itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion devices. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 610M, which serves as a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is idle or unavailable. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and while the fact pack does not list a suggested PSU for the system, the combined power envelope of a 55 W processor and a 25 W GPU is modest by gaming laptop standards. This leaves headroom for the rest of the system components, but users should note that the GPU is end-of-life and the CPU is still in active production — a mismatch in lifecycle status.

A sensible next upgrade for a system built around this platform would involve increasing memory capacity beyond the dual-channel baseline, since DDR5 supports higher densities, and adding Gen 5 NVMe storage to exploit the PCIe lanes. The GPU, being end-of-life, offers no forward upgrade path within this chassis; users would need to consider a new laptop for better graphics performance. The CPU itself, however, is near the top of its mobile generation, so the platform's ceiling is largely determined by the GPU rather than the processor.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 7745HX delivers an average benchmark score of 33091, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089 with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089 with 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079 with 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H trails by 0.3% with a score of 33201 (note: the negative deltaPct indicates the rival scores higher). This means the 7745HX is effectively performance-parity with three of its closest competitors, and within a rounding error of the fourth — the differences are statistically negligible.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 7993 in 3DMark's 16-thread test and 7967 in the max-thread test, showing near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18452.5 reinforces this strong multi-core showing. Single-thread performance is equally robust: 3DMark single-thread scores 1023, Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1850, and Geekbench single-core scores 2366. The Geekbench multicore score of 13613 represents a 5.75x multiplier over the single-core score, indicating excellent thread scaling across the 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Intel Arc A350M, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 24647, sitting at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan score is 24747. The nearest rivals show a wider spread: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 with -0.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 with 0.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 with 1.5%. The GPU is within 1.5% of all four rivals, meaning it trades blows with desktop-class cards from several generations ago and a mobile workstation card.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its peer group by a negligible margin, while the GPU slightly underperforms its closest rivals. The 13-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build — it is a processor-first system with a graphics component that does not match the CPU's tier.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. It uses the DG2-128 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a modest figure that will constrain performance in texture-heavy workloads. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

The shader array consists of 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. Clock speeds range from a base of 1150 MHz to a boost of 2200 MHz, yielding a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering workloads, the benchmark scores indicate a GPU that is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744 score, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5%). The RTX A5000 Mobile comparison is notable because that card typically carries far more VRAM and a wider memory bus, yet the A350M matches its compute scores in Geekbench OpenCL. This suggests the A350M's raw compute is adequate for entry-level rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will be limiting factors for large scenes or high-resolution textures. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but with only 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 power, complex ray-traced scenes will likely struggle.

The GPU's TDP is 25 W, which is exceptionally low for a discrete card, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The slot width is listed as IGP, indicating it is designed for integrated form factors in laptops. Display outputs are portable-device dependent, so connectivity varies by laptop model. This is an end-of-life product, released on 2022-03-29, so driver maturity is presumably established but no further hardware revisions are planned.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-intensive tasks. The 83rd-percentile CPU makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, students running data analysis scripts, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity. The PassMark integer math score of 105773 and data compression score of 383322 indicate strong performance in non-graphics compute tasks.

Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings could use this system for esports titles, where the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1850) will drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 70th percentile ranking means AAA games at high settings will be limited. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages CPU encoding (the 8 cores and 16 threads will handle multi-track timelines) may find the system adequate, but GPU-accelerated effects will be constrained by the A350M's modest compute.

The CPU's 32 MB shared L3 cache and 5.10 GHz boost clock make it responsive for interactive workloads, while the 55 W TDP keeps thermals manageable in a laptop chassis. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics provides a backup display option, which is useful for troubleshooting or power-saving modes. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities in simulation and compilation tasks, though the GPU may limit any machine learning coursework that relies on CUDA — the A350M is not an NVIDIA product, so CUDA is unavailable.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is a Dragon Range mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The TDP is 55 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in supported laptops.

Benchmark results show strong scaling across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 1023 (single-thread) to 1997 (2-thread), 3815 (4-thread), 6604 (8-thread), and 7993 (16-thread). The jump from 8 to 16 threads is 21% (6604 to 7993), which is less than the theoretical 100% from doubling threads — this indicates that the additional threads provide diminishing returns in this workload due to shared resources or memory bandwidth limits. The max-thread score of 7967 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, confirming that all 16 threads are fully utilized.

Cinebench R23 results reinforce the multi-core story: 18452.5 multicore versus 1850 single-core, a 9.97x ratio. The single-core score of 1850 is competitive with desktop Zen 4 parts, indicating high IPC and boost clock efficiency. Geekbench scores of 13613 multicore and 2366 single-core yield a 5.75x scaling factor, which is lower than Cinebench's ratio, reflecting different workload characteristics — Geekbench includes memory-latency-sensitive tests that don't scale as well.

PassMark tests show specific strengths: integer math at 105773, floating-point math at 64297, and extended instructions at 28966. The data encryption score of 22967 and random string sorting of 44474 indicate solid cryptography and data-manipulation performance. The prime number finding score of 156 is low in absolute terms but reflects the test's single-threaded nature. The multithread score of 32581 and physics score of 1697 round out the profile, with the physics score suggesting adequate performance for physics simulation in games. The average benchmark score of 33091 places it at the 83rd percentile, with the nearest rivals all within 0.3%, meaning this CPU is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-13650HX, AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D in overall performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile socket designed for laptop platforms.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Ryzen 7 7745HX have?

A: The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A350M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7745HX compare to the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: In average benchmark scores, the Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091 while the Core i7-13650HX scores 33089, a delta of 0% — they are effectively identical.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Ryzen 7 7745HX has a TDP of 55 W, which is moderate for a mobile 8-core processor.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is still in active production.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 1023 in 3DMark and 1850 in Cinebench R23 will drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM will cap settings. Estimated 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings is achievable, but high-refresh 1440p is unlikely given the GPU's 70th percentile ranking.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can handle encoding workloads while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 18452.5 indicating ample headroom for x264 encoding. The GPU's 25 W TDP leaves power budget for the CPU, but the A350M's limited encode capabilities may push more load onto the CPU.

Video editing: Multi-core scores of 7993 (3DMark 16-thread) and 18452.5 (Cinebench R23) support smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering in CPU-accelerated editors. GPU effects will rely on the A350M's 768 shading units and 6 RT cores, which are adequate for basic effects but may struggle with heavy color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 64297 provides solid compute for CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) offer acceleration in compatible renderers, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The RX 590 rival (24744 score) suggests this GPU is roughly on par with a 2018 desktop card.

Software development: The 16 threads and high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2366) excel at compilation, with PassMark integer math of 105773 handling build pipelines efficiently. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequent code recompilation.

Student and office work: The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites, with the Radeon 610M integrated graphics providing a low-power display mode. The GPU's 70th percentile is more than sufficient for document rendering and spreadsheet acceleration.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, a high-end mobile CPU from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU has 768 shading units and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 77 places this system above the majority of laptops, but the CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile creates an imbalance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33091 puts it in the top echelon of mobile processors, tied with the Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G. The GPU's average score of 24647 places it in the upper-middle tier, competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile. This pairing is best described as a productivity-first laptop with modest gaming capability — the CPU can handle demanding compute tasks, but the GPU limits graphics-intensive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear bottleneck dynamic: the CPU is the stronger component by a significant margin. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile represents a 13-point gap, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 383322), or encryption (22967), the system will perform at a high level, leveraging the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or GPU rendering, the A350M's 70th percentile will cap performance. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24744 with a -0.4% delta, indicating the A350M is slightly slower than this 2018 desktop card. The FPS scaling implications are clear: frame rates will be limited by the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, not the CPU's compute headroom.

The 3DMark scores illustrate the CPU's scaling efficiency: from 2 threads (1997) to 16 threads (7993), the CPU shows a 4x improvement, indicating good multi-core utilization. However, the GPU's single benchmark pair (OpenCL 24546, Vulkan 24747) shows no such scaling insight, and the 4 GB VRAM will cause texture thrashing in modern games that demand more memory. In balanced workloads — such as gaming with background streaming — the CPU can handle the encode while the GPU renders, but the GPU's 25 W TDP limits its peak performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% delta), suggests performance comparable to these cards.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM would likely deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games would require settings reductions to medium or low. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints — high-resolution textures will exceed the 4 GB VRAM budget, causing stutter. At 1440p, the GPU would struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most titles, given its 70th percentile ranking and the fact that the RX 590 rival (24744 score) was a 1080p-oriented card.

Esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, which are CPU-bound, would benefit from the Ryzen 7 7745HX's 1023 single-thread 3DMark score and 1850 Cinebench R23 single-core score. Frame rates in these titles could exceed 100 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, as the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock drives physics and game logic. The 32 MB L3 cache also reduces latency in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's 24 ROPs and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap fill-rate-limited scenarios, so extreme high-refresh (240Hz+) gaming is not realistic. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades if the laptop chassis allows — though the GPU's end-of-life status and the laptop's fixed nature make such upgrades unlikely.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds