SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7736U

30,364 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U paired with the Intel Arc A550M presents an unusual balance of compute and graphics muscle. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, posts an average benchmark score of 30364, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, meanwhile, reaches an average benchmark score of 49737, sitting in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 84, indicating that neither component dramatically outclasses the other in overall compute terms.

However, workload distribution tells a more nuanced story. In multi-threaded CPU tasks, the Ryzen 7 7736U delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12768, which is competitive with its nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS trails by just 0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-11980HK is 0.2% ahead. This suggests the CPU can sustain heavy parallel workloads without becoming the primary constraint in GPU-bound scenarios. Single-core performance, at 1548 in Cinebench R23 and 1721 in Geekbench, is adequate for responsive daily use but is not the platform's headline feature.

The bottleneck profile shifts depending on the application. For gaming, the Arc A550M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and 64 ROPs suggest it can push pixels, but the 128-bit memory interface constrains texture-heavy scenes. Conversely, in CPU-intensive productivity tasks like data compression—where the Ryzen 7 scores 274440 in PassMark—the processor demonstrates it can feed the GPU without stalling.

The 15 W TDP of the CPU is notably low for an 8-core part, indicating that thermal and power constraints shape sustained performance. The GPU's 60 W TDP, set against this, means the graphics solution draws four times the power of the processor. In a laptop chassis, this imbalance suggests that battery-constrained scenarios will throttle GPU performance first, while plugged-in use allows the Arc A550M to stretch its legs. Benchmark data confirms the GPU's headroom: its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, showing consistent compute performance across APIs.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD's Socket FP7, a mobile-specific package that dictates the upgrade trajectory. The Ryzen 7 7736U uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². Memory support is DDR5, running dual-channel with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported—a feature that appeals to workstation users who prioritize data integrity.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. The Arc A550M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which means the GPU has full access to the CPU's lane budget without contention. This is a clean configuration for a laptop: the CPU's 20 lanes can accommodate the GPU's 16 lanes plus additional devices like NVMe storage. For upgrades, the socket is not user-replaceable in the traditional sense—this is a soldered mobile part—so the practical upgrade path is limited to memory and storage.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, which signals that Intel has moved on from the Alchemist architecture. This does not diminish its current performance, but it does mean driver optimization and future game support will taper off. The CPU, in contrast, is marked as active in production, suggesting a longer software support window. For a user considering this build, the sensible next upgrade would be to a newer GPU generation with higher memory bandwidth, as the 224.0 GB/s figure is modest by current standards.

Power supply requirements are not explicitly listed, but the CPU's 15 W TDP and GPU's 60 W TDP sum to a modest 75 W for the core components. This is a low-power pairing that fits ultraportable and thin-and-light laptop designs. The lack of a suggested PSU figure in the data indicates that this is not a desktop build with swappable power supplies; instead, the laptop's internal power delivery is fixed. Users should expect that the system's thermal solution, not the PSU, will be the limiting factor for sustained load.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The 6 nm process node from TSMC keeps power efficiency high, reflected in the 15 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache—a configuration that balances latency and capacity for mixed workloads.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12768 places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-11980HK, a high-end desktop-class mobile chip, and just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS. This is a remarkable showing for a 15 W part, indicating that Zen 3+ delivers strong performance-per-watt. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7453 reinforces this, though the single-core score of 1721 is more modest, suggesting that the boost clock of 4.70 GHz is not enough to top leaderboards in lightly-threaded tasks.

PassMark results reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 274440 is exceptional, indicating the CPU handles archival and compression workloads with ease. Integer math scores 78821 and floating-point math scores 44499, showing balanced arithmetic capability. The extended instructions score of 19384 confirms that AVX and similar instruction sets are well-supported, which benefits scientific and engineering applications. The find prime numbers score of 56 is low in absolute terms but typical for a mobile chip—this is a synthetic test that heavily taxes memory latency.

The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback for basic display output, though in this build, the discrete Arc A550M handles rendering duties. The CPU's memory controller supports DDR5, and the dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient to feed both the CPU cores and the discrete GPU without creating a data starvation bottleneck. For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU is best suited to parallel tasks like code compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering, where its 16 threads can be fully utilized.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 64 ROPs can drive high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, where the CPU's single-core score of 1548 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to keep frame pacing smooth. At higher resolutions, the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes a constraint, and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it will hold up in demanding titles but not at maximum settings for 1440p or above.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 21725 indicates that simultaneous game and encode workloads will not cause stutter, especially since the GPU's Vulkan score of 49580 shows it can handle rendering tasks without offloading to the CPU. The 15 W TDP, however, means sustained streaming sessions may cause thermal throttling in thin chassis.

Video editing: The data compression score of 274440 and integer math score of 78821 are directly relevant to video codecs, which rely on these operations. The CPU can handle 4K timeline scrubbing, though export times will be moderate given the 12768 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p effects work but may spill over for complex 4K composites.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 2048 shading units work in tandem for render tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 shows the GPU can accelerate render engines that support OpenCL, while the CPU's floating-point math score of 44499 handles physics and simulation tasks. The combined percentile of 84 indicates this pairing is competitive for hobbyist and small-studio rendering.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded throughput, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12768 indicating solid parallel build times. The ECC memory support is a unique advantage for developers who need data integrity during long builds, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that large codebases load quickly.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 3350 in PassMark single-thread ensures snappy spreadsheet and document performance. The integrated Radeon 680M provides a low-power fallback for battery-conscious tasks, while the discrete GPU remains idle. The 15 W TDP means long battery life for note-taking and web browsing, making this a versatile academic laptop.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The Arc A550M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 are nearly identical, suggesting consistent performance across graphics APIs. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% in average benchmark score, though this is a synthetic comparison and does not translate directly to gaming frame rates. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, is 0.4% ahead, indicating that the Arc A550M is in the upper tier of mobile GPUs.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 64 ROPs should deliver playable frame rates in most titles. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for current games, though texture-heavy titles may exceed this capacity at ultra settings. At 1440p, the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor; frame rates are expected to drop by a significant margin, and users may need to lower settings to medium for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the GPU is not recommended, as the 128-bit memory bus cannot sustain the bandwidth required for modern titles at high detail.

The CPU's role in gaming is supportive but not constraining. The single-core score of 1548 in Cinebench R23 indicates that the Ryzen 7 7736U can drive high frame rates without bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The 16 MB of L3 cache helps with game data locality, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that assets stream from system memory to the GPU without stutter. For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the CPU's responsiveness is more than adequate.

Given the absence of measured FPS data, these estimates should be validated through hands-on testing. The benchmark scores suggest a pairing that is well-suited to 1080p gaming, with headroom for 1440p at reduced settings, but the lack of per-game measurements means users should approach specific title expectations with caution.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 30364 is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U, 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, and 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-11980HK.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature not commonly found in mobile processors and is beneficial for workstation tasks that require data integrity.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 84, indicating it outperforms most laptops in overall compute and graphics capability.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is end-of-life, meaning Intel has discontinued production. The CPU, in contrast, is marked as active in production.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully supported by the CPU's 20 Gen 4 lanes.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need balanced performance in a laptop form factor without sacrificing portability. The CPU's 15 W TDP and the GPU's 60 W TDP make this a low-power combination that fits thin-and-light designs, appealing to professionals who travel frequently.

Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU ranking sufficient for modern titles at high settings. The 8 GB VRAM handles current game requirements, and the CPU's 16 threads ensure smooth performance in game streaming scenarios. For 1440p gaming, users should be prepared to adjust settings, as the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor.

Content creators working with video and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 274440 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 49894. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for professionals who cannot afford data corruption during long renders. Software developers will appreciate the multi-threaded compile performance, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12768 indicating solid build times.

Students and office workers gain from the CPU's single-thread score of 3350 in PassMark, which ensures responsive productivity applications. The integrated Radeon 680M provides a low-power graphics fallback for battery-conserving tasks, while the discrete GPU handles heavier workloads when plugged in. Small business workstations that require occasional GPU acceleration without a dedicated desktop setup will find this pairing adequate.

The build is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy AI workloads, given the GPU's memory bandwidth and the absence of tensor cores. Users with those needs should look elsewhere. For the target audience of mobile professionals and students who game moderately, this CPU+GPU combination offers a compelling balance of compute and graphics capability within a low power envelope.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M mobile GPU. The CPU, from the 7000 series based on Zen 3+ architecture, is a 15 W part designed for efficient multi-threaded performance. The GPU, from Intel's Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile), is a 60 W part with 2048 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The build's combined percentile of 84 places it in the top tier of laptop configurations, outperforming 84% of all systems in benchmark databases. The CPU's individual percentile of 81 and the GPU's percentile of 86 show that both components are strong performers in their respective categories. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30364 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, which trails by just 0.1%. The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 is within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, a high-end desktop GPU.

This is not a desktop replacement; the low TDPs indicate a focus on efficiency over raw performance. The build is best understood as a premium ultraportable that can handle demanding tasks when needed, but is optimized for battery life and thermal comfort. The GPU's end-of-life status means this is a mature platform, and the CPU's active production status ensures ongoing software support.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that punches above its power class. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score of 2019 and single-core score of 246 establish a baseline for legacy comparisons. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12768 and single-core of 1548 are more modern metrics, with the multi-core score placing the CPU in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Geekbench scores of 7453 multi-core and 1721 single-core confirm the multi-threaded strength.

PassMark results are extensive: multi-thread score of 21725, single-thread of 3350, integer math of 78821, floating-point math of 44499, extended instructions of 19384, data compression of 274440, data encryption of 15635, physics of 1007, and random string sorting of 28172. The find prime numbers score of 56 is a weak point, indicating memory latency sensitivity, but this is a minor concern for real-world workloads. The average benchmark score of 30364, with a percentile of 81, shows the CPU is a solid mid-range performer.

The GPU's benchmark data is more limited, with only two metrics: Geekbench OpenCL of 49894 and Geekbench Vulkan of 49580. These scores are remarkably close, showing consistent performance across compute and graphics APIs. The average benchmark score of 49737, with a percentile of 86, places the GPU in the upper tier. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (2.6% behind).

The combined picture is of a balanced system: the CPU is slightly below the GPU in percentile ranking, but both are strong enough to avoid a significant bottleneck in most workloads. The CPU's 81st percentile and GPU's 86th percentile combine to an overall 84th percentile, indicating that the system is greater than the sum of its parts in terms of real-world responsiveness. The absence of measured FPS data means these benchmarks are the primary evidence of performance, and they suggest a capable laptop for 1080p gaming and productivity tasks.