SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7736U

30,364 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U pairs with an Intel Arc A370M in a laptop-class build that lands at the 78th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part with a 4.70 GHz boost clock and a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is an Intel Arc A370M with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 74th percentile standing among all GPUs. This combination targets thin-and-light mobility with a strong CPU-to-GPU balance, though the absence of measured FPS data means all gaming expectations must be derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th GPU percentile, with an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in the nearestRivals list. That rival comparison suggests the GPU can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in many titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus (112.0 GB/s bandwidth) will limit texture-heavy scenarios. The CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 1721 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1548 indicate adequate headroom for 60+ FPS in most esports titles, though high-refresh 144 Hz gaming would likely require lowered settings due to the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

Streaming — The Ryzen 7 7736U’s 16 threads and 12768 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide solid encoding headroom for software x264 streaming at 1080p60. The PassMark multithread score of 21725 and integer math score of 78821 support this, as those workloads parallelize well across the 8 cores. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics could handle Quick Sync-style offloading in a pinch, but the discrete Arc A370M’s lack of dedicated NVENC-class hardware means CPU-based encoding is the primary path — and the 15 W TDP suggests thermal limits may cap sustained encoding loads.

Video editing — The combination of a 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth (DDR5 dual-channel) and the CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 44499 makes this build suitable for 1080p timeline editing in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro. The Arc A370M’s 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores provide GPU acceleration for effects and transcoding, though the 4 GB VRAM will constrain 4K multi-layer projects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 shows the GPU can offload compute tasks effectively, but the 64-bit memory bus will bottleneck large data transfers.

3D rendering — The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12768 places it in the 81st CPU percentile, just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-11980HK in nearestRivals. For CPU-based rendering in Blender or KeyShot, the 16 threads will deliver reasonable times for medium-complexity scenes. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and Vulkan score of 28673 make it a marginal contributor for GPU-accelerated rendering — expect CPU-primary workflows to dominate, with the GPU handling viewport navigation rather than final frame output.

Software development — The PassMark data compression score of 274440 and random string sorting score of 28172 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and code indexing. The 16 MB shared L3 cache and 512 KB per-core L2 cache help with frequent small reads typical of build tools. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking and the 0.4% lead over the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U in nearestRivals suggest this build can handle multi-project IDEs, container builds, and test suites without feeling sluggish, though the 15 W TDP means sustained all-core loads will throttle below the 4.70 GHz boost.

Student and office work — With a Geekbench single-core score of 1721 and PassMark single-thread score of 3350, the CPU excels at bursty tasks like spreadsheet recalculations, document rendering, and web browsing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle background tasks (antivirus, cloud sync, video calls) without stealing resources from foreground applications. The laptop-class form factor and 15 W TDP make this an all-day battery-friendly option for campus use, and the integrated Radeon 680M provides a fallback for light graphics work when the discrete GPU is idle.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not verified results.

The Arc A370M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676, combined with its 74th GPU percentile, position it as a 1080p-class GPU. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU’s 1548 Cinebench R23 single-core score and the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest 90–120 FPS at 1080p low settings, dropping to 60–80 FPS at medium. The 4 GB VRAM will not be a limiting factor at these settings, but the 64-bit bus width (112.0 GB/s) creates a bandwidth ceiling that prevents high-texture presets from scaling linearly.

For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the GPU’s 0.6% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 470 in nearestRivals (deltaPct 0.6) locates it in the same performance class as a mid-range desktop card from several generations ago. Expect 30–45 FPS at 1080p medium settings with upscaling enabled, and 25–35 FPS at high settings. The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but at this performance tier, enabling RT will likely drop frame rates below 30 FPS in most RT-heavy titles; the 4 GB VRAM also struggles with RT workloads that require larger geometry buffers.

The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The Ryzen 7 7736U’s single-core performance (Geekbench 1721) exceeds what the Arc A370M can feed in frame generation, meaning the GPU is the primary gaming limiter. For 1440p gaming, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM become severe constraints — expect sub-30 FPS in most modern titles, making 1080p the practical ceiling for this pairing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30364, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, scores 30390 (deltaPct -0.1%), meaning the 7736U trails by only 0.1% — a statistical tie. The Intel Core i9-11980HK scores 30422 (deltaPct -0.2%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 (deltaPct -0.3%), both within a fraction of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U scores 30254 (deltaPct 0.4%), showing the 7736U leads that part by 0.4%. These near-identical scores confirm the CPU is a solid mid-range mobile performer, with the 8-core/16-thread configuration delivering balanced throughput across synthetic workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197 (deltaPct -0.1%), a 0.1% gap. The AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211 (deltaPct -0.1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996 (deltaPct 0.6%), meaning the Arc A370M leads that card by 0.6%. The AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874 (deltaPct 1%), with the A370M ahead by 1%. These margins are all within noise, placing the GPU in a tightly clustered mid-range band.

The combined percentile of 78 indicates the pairing sits comfortably in the upper-middle range of laptop builds. The CPU’s 81st percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 74th, suggesting the processor has more relative headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-heavy workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (12768), the build punches above its class, while GPU-bound tasks like Vulkan rendering (28673) show the Arc A370M’s mid-tier positioning. The PassMark physics score of 1007 and find prime numbers score of 56 are the CPU’s weakest results, indicating integer-heavy single-thread workloads are not its forte, but floating-point and multithread scores (44499 and 21725 respectively) compensate.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits gamers who prioritize 1080p resolution and esports titles over 1440p or 4K fidelity. The Arc A370M’s 74th GPU percentile and 4 GB VRAM make it a capable entry-level discrete GPU, and the CPU’s 81st percentile ensures smooth frame pacing in CPU-light titles. Users who play League of Legends, Dota 2, or Rocket League at medium-to-high settings will find this build sufficient, but those targeting AAA single-player experiences should look to higher-tier GPUs.

Content creators working with 1080p video or photo editing will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and 12768 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The PassMark data encryption score of 15635 and extended instructions score of 19384 indicate strong performance for compression and codec-heavy tasks. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 accelerates effects and color grading, though 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of GPU-accelerated node graphs in tools like DaVinci Resolve.

Software developers who compile large codebases or run multiple VMs will appreciate the 16 MB L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread layout. The 81st CPU percentile and 0.4% lead over the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U suggest this build handles parallel builds better than most thin-and-light laptops. Students working on engineering or data science projects with moderate computational needs will find the balance adequate, while small business workstations handling spreadsheet-heavy workflows, light CAD, or database queries will see the CPU’s strong integer math score (78821) shine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The Arc A370M’s 74th percentile trails the CPU’s 81st percentile by 7 points, and the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the hard limits for modern games. The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 1721 and PassMark single-thread score of 3350 are sufficient to feed the GPU’s frame output in most titles, so frame rate drops will predominantly stem from the GPU’s rendering capacity rather than CPU stalls.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation, the CPU becomes the limiting component — but not because it is weak. The 15 W TDP constrains sustained all-core boost, so long-running renders will throttle below the 4.70 GHz peak. The GPU’s 35 W TDP is also modest, but the arc's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is enough for light compute offload; however, the 64-bit memory bus means memory-bound tasks like large matrix operations will underperform relative to the shading unit count.

The 0.6% lead over the RX 470 in nearestRivals indicates the GPU sits at a performance plateau where small architectural differences (cache, memory latency) matter more than raw compute. For gaming at 1080p, the estimated FPS scaling from the Vulkan score of 28673 suggests the GPU delivers roughly 30–50% of the performance of a high-end mobile GPU, meaning CPU headroom remains unused in GPU-bound scenarios. Conversely, in PassMark data compression (274440), the CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by margins under 0.5%, showing the processor is well-balanced for its class.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7736U faster than the Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: The data shows they are statistically tied. The 7736U has an average benchmark score of 30364, while the 7640HS scores 30390, a difference of -0.1%. In practice, this means virtually identical multi-threaded performance, with the 7736U’s 8 cores/16 threads matching the 7640HS in most workloads.

Q: Can the Arc A370M handle 1440p gaming?

A: Based on its 74th GPU percentile and 4 GB VRAM, 1440p gaming is not recommended. The GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 64-bit bus limit texture throughput, and the 4 GB VRAM will exceed in modern titles at that resolution. The estimated frame rates at 1440p would be below 30 FPS in most AAA games, making 1080p the practical ceiling.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7736U supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This is independent of the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth, which is dedicated to the Arc A370M’s 4 GB frame buffer.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory (eccMemory: true). This makes the platform suitable for workstation-style tasks that require data integrity, though the laptop-class form factor may limit available ECC SODIMM options.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A370M has 8 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), meaning it can run hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, given the GPU’s 74th percentile and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, enabling RT in modern games will likely result in sub-30 FPS performance, making it usable only for light RT effects or in older titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The 7736U scores 30364 on average, while the i9-11980HK scores 30422, a delta of -0.2%. This puts the two within 0.2% of each other, meaning the 8-core mobile Ryzen matches the older 8-core Intel H-series part in synthetic benchmarks, despite the i9’s higher boost clocks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R codename) using TSMC’s 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 15 W TDP that makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, providing a total of 16 MB L3 for the full 8-core cluster.

The CPU’s memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory — a rarity in mobile parts. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback display output and light compute capabilities, though the discrete Arc A370M handles demanding graphics workloads. The processor uses AMD Socket FP7 and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the Arc A370M’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface plus NVMe storage.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multithreaded tasks: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 12768, Geekbench multi-core scores 7453, and PassMark integer math scores 78821. Single-thread performance is adequate but not class-leading — Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1548 and Geekbench single-core scores 1721, placing it in the 81st CPU percentile. The PassMark physics score of 1007 and find prime numbers score of 56 are the low points, indicating that heavy integer loops with poor cache locality will underperform, but floating-point math (44499) and data compression (274440) are strong. The nearest rivals — Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i9-11980HK, Core Ultra 5 225T, and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U — all score within 0.4% of the 7736U, confirming this is a well-balanced mid-range mobile CPU with no significant weak spot.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7736U uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a soldered mobile socket — meaning the CPU is not user-replaceable in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode (76.8 GB/s bandwidth) and ECC memory, though upgrading RAM capacity may be possible depending on the laptop’s SO-DIMM slots. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, leaving additional lanes for one or two NVMe SSDs.

The GPU is classified as end-of-life (productionStatus: "End-of-life") with a release date of March 2022, so no direct upgrade path exists within the Arc Alchemist lineup for this form factor. The GPU’s 35 W TDP and IGP slot width (integrated graphics package) mean it is likely soldered to the motherboard in a laptop chassis, preventing discrete GPU swaps. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but given the CPU’s 15 W TDP and GPU’s 35 W TDP, the total system power draw is modest — a typical laptop power adapter of 65–100 W would suffice, though the exact adapter is dependent on the laptop vendor’s design.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider a laptop with a higher-tier GPU (e.g., Arc A550M or above) if gaming performance is the priority, or a CPU with more cores (e.g., Ryzen 9 series) for heavy rendering workloads. The platform’s DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 4 mean storage upgrades (faster NVMe drives) are viable, and adding more RAM can improve multitasking. However, the soldered nature of both CPU and GPU in this laptop-class build means the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage, not the core silicon.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop-class configuration, targeting the 78th combined percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU, with its 81st percentile ranking and 30364 average benchmark score, is the stronger half of the duo, providing 8 cores/16 threads of Zen 3+ performance at a 15 W TDP. The GPU, at the 74th percentile with a 29175 average score, offers entry-level discrete graphics with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 8 RT cores, but its 64-bit bus limits bandwidth to 112.0 GB/s.

The overall tier is upper-mid-range for laptops: the CPU outperforms the average mobile processor by a wide margin, while the GPU sits in a cluster with the RX Vega M GH and RX 470, all within 1% of each other. This pairing is best suited for users who need strong CPU throughput for productivity, light content creation, and esports gaming at 1080p, but who do not require high-end GPU performance for AAA titles at high settings. The build’s laptop form factor and modest TDPs (15 W + 35 W) make it a portable option with decent battery life, though the absence of measured FPS data means the gaming estimates should be validated with real-world testing before purchase.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7736U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds