SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7736U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7736U

30,364 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7736U + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Ultraportable Powerhouse

The AMD Ryzen 7 7736U and Intel Arc A350M combination represents an interesting pairing of a high-efficiency Zen 3+ mobile processor with Intel's entry-level discrete Arc graphics. This laptop-class build sits at the 76th percentile overall, placing it comfortably above the median for combined CPU and GPU performance. The CPU, an 8-core/16-thread Rembrandt-R part built on TSMC's 6nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded results that rival desktop-class processors from a few generations ago. The Arc A350M, meanwhile, brings Xe-HPG architecture with hardware ray tracing support, positioning this as a capable all-rounder for both productivity and light gaming. With no measured FPS data available for this exact pairing, all gaming performance analysis must be framed as estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7736U is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process with a 208 mm² die size. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads running at a 2.70 GHz base clock and boosting up to 4.70 GHz, all within a remarkably low 15W TDP. This efficiency envelope makes it well-suited for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited, yet the performance ceiling remains high enough for demanding workloads.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory subsystem supports dual-channel DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, plus ECC memory support for reliability-sensitive tasks. PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 20 lanes (CPU only) ensures fast access to storage and discrete GPUs.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that punches well above its power class. In Cinebench R23, the 7736U scores 12,768 points multi-core and 1,548 points single-core. The R15 run shows 2,019 multi-core and 246 single-core. Geekbench results show 7,453 multi-core and 1,721 single-core. These numbers place the chip at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,364.

The nearest rival comparisons show remarkable parity. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 30,390, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i9-11980HK is 0.2% ahead at 30,422, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T leads by 0.3% at 30,468. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U trails by 0.4% at 30,254. This clustering indicates the 7736U sits in a sweet spot where an 8-core/16-thread configuration with high boost clocks competes directly with both newer and more power-hungry designs.

PassMark sub-tests reveal workload-specific strengths. Integer math scores 78,821, floating point math hits 44,499, and extended instructions reach 19,384. Data encryption processes at 15,635, while data compression achieves a massive 274,440 — indicating strong performance for archiving and database tasks. Find prime numbers scores 56, physics hits 1,007, random string sorting reaches 28,172, and multithread performance totals 21,725. Single-thread performance sits at 3,350.

For real workloads, this means the 7736U excels at parallel tasks like code compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering where all 16 threads can be utilized. The single-core performance of 1,548 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for snappy application responsiveness and light gaming. The compression score of 274,440 suggests file archiving and backup operations will be exceedingly fast.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. This is Intel's entry-level Arc 3 mobile discrete GPU, featuring 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. Clock speeds run from a 1,150 MHz base to a 2,200 MHz boost, with memory operating at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While the VRAM capacity is modest by modern standards, the bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings. The GPU includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, bringing hardware-accelerated ray tracing to the entry-level segment. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute reaches 3.379 TFLOPS with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The Arc A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully modern in API support. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and is designated as an IGP form factor, meaning it is soldered onto the motherboard. The GPU carries a 25W TDP and is now end-of-life in production status, having been released in March 2022.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747, with an average benchmark score of 24,647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Rival comparisons show tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX 590 leads by 0.4% at 24,744, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile leads by 0.5% at 24,763, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT trails by 0.8% at 24,442, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 trails by 1.5% at 24,277.

For rendering workloads, the Arc A350M's ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated RT effects in supported games and applications. The FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS indicates reasonable compute capability for GPU-accelerated effects in video editors. The 4 GB VRAM may limit texture-heavy workloads, but for 1080p rendering and light 3D work it should prove sufficient. The dual compute scores suggest strong Vulkan performance, which bodes well for modern game engines.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's benchmark scores suggest it can push 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, with estimated frame rates in the range of 60+ FPS for esports titles and 30-60 FPS for AAA games. The CPU's single-core score of 1,548 in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck for physics and AI calculations. Hardware ray tracing is available but likely best reserved for lighter scenes given the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread configuration handles encoding offload well, with x264 encoding using multiple threads without crippling the gaming experience. The CPU's 12,768 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The 15W TDP keeps thermals manageable during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: The combination of strong multi-core CPU performance and GPU compute acceleration makes this suitable for 1080p editing timelines. The PassMark data compression score of 274,440 speeds up project file handling, while the GPU's 24,546 OpenCL score accelerates effects and transitions. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with preview performance.

3D rendering: CPU rendering benefits from the 16 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12,768 providing solid performance for single-frame renders. GPU rendering via OpenCL or Vulkan can accelerate specific workloads, though the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate helps with texture-heavy scenes.

Software development: The 7,453 Geekbench multi-core score accelerates compilation of large codebases, while the 1,721 single-core score ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. PassMark integer math of 78,821 indicates strong general computation throughput.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the efficiency ensures long battery life from the 15W CPU TDP. The 3,350 PassMark single-thread score handles web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work with ease. The GPU's 24,747 Vulkan score accelerates browser rendering and any GPU-accelerated productivity applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 81st percentile while the GPU rests at the 70th percentile, indicating the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the 7736U will be the primary driver with the GPU playing a supporting role. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A350M will likely become the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality settings, with the CPU having sufficient headroom to feed the GPU.

The 0.1-0.3% differences between the 7736U and its nearest CPU rivals suggest that any of these processors would perform nearly identically in this system, meaning GPU choice has more impact on overall system capability. The GPU's 0.4-1.5% delta from its rivals similarly indicates that the Arc A350M sits in a performance class where small differences separate competitors.

The combined 76th percentile places this system above average but not in the enthusiast tier. The CPU's 15W TDP versus the GPU's 25W TDP creates a thermal profile where the processor can sustain its boost clocks without overwhelming the cooling solution, while the GPU has enough power budget for reasonable sustained performance. Memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s from the CPU side and 112.0 GB/s on the GPU side means neither component should starve the other.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 30,364, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its most impressive results include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,768, Geekbench multi-core at 7,453, and PassMark multithread at 21,725. The PassMark data compression score of 274,440 is exceptional and indicates the CPU excels at bandwidth-intensive operations. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, scores 30,390, a negligible 0.1% difference.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 24,647, at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench Vulkan performance of 24,747 slightly edges out OpenCL at 24,546. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24,744, just 0.4% ahead. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead at 24,763, while the RX 6600 XT trails by 0.8% at 24,442.

Combined, these scores place the system at the 76th percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming expectations must be derived from the individual component scores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12,768 suggests strong game physics and simulation performance, while the GPU's 24,647 average score indicates 1080p gaming capability at medium settings for most titles. The tight clustering of both components' rivals suggests this system performs predictably within its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is specific to mobile platforms and does not offer user-upgradeability in the traditional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, so upgrading RAM capacity or speed is the most straightforward memory improvement. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for faster NVMe storage.

The GPU is designated as IGP (integrated graphics package) with a 25W TDP and no suggested PSU, meaning it is soldered and not replaceable. The CPU's 15W TDP combined with the GPU's 25W TDP creates a modest total power envelope that any laptop power delivery system can handle. The Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its 4 GB VRAM.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on memory capacity and storage speed, as DDR5 support allows for faster data access. The CPU's 208 mm² die size and 6nm process indicate a mature design that should remain competitive for several years. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests it is the component most likely to become the system's limiting factor over time, but its 70th percentile standing means it remains viable for current games.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U good for gaming?

A: The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and 12,768 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicate strong gaming performance, with single-core of 1,548 ensuring solid frame pacing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle modern game engines well, though the integrated Radeon 680M graphics are not designed for gaming — the discrete Arc A350M handles that role.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A350M handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture. With 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance, ray tracing works but may require lower resolutions or settings to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A350M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings, though texture-heavy mods or high-resolution texture packs may exceed this capacity.

Q: What is the TDP of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The CPU has a 15W TDP while the GPU has a 25W TDP, totaling 40W for the core processing components. This modest power draw enables thin-and-light laptop designs with efficient cooling.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7736U supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in professional workloads like software development and scientific computing. It supports dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the 7736U compare to the Ryzen 5 7640HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS has an average benchmark score of 30,390, which is 0.1% higher than the 7736U's 30,364. This difference is negligible in real-world usage, and the 7736U's 8 cores and 16 threads match the 7640HS in thread count.

Q: Is the Arc A350M better than the GTX 1630?

A: The Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24,647 is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630's 24,277. The Arc also offers hardware ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which the GTX 1630 lacks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, an 8-core/16-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU leads with an 81st percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile. The combined 76th percentile places this system above average for overall performance.

The CPU's Zen 3+ architecture on a 6nm process delivers exceptional efficiency with a 15W TDP, making it ideal for portable systems. The GPU's Xe-HPG architecture brings modern features like hardware ray tracing to the entry-level segment. Both components are manufactured by TSMC on the same 6nm node, suggesting consistent thermal characteristics.

The 8-core/16-thread processor with 4.70 GHz boost clock handles demanding multi-threaded workloads, while the 4 GB GDDR6 GPU with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth provides discrete graphics capability beyond what integrated solutions offer. The system supports DDR5 memory with ECC, PCIe Gen 4 storage, and modern graphics APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance in a portable package. Software developers will appreciate the 7,453 Geekbench multi-core score and ECC memory support for reliable compilation. Video editors working with 1080p footage benefit from the 12,768 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and GPU acceleration via 24,546 OpenCL score.

Students and office workers get more than enough performance for productivity tasks, with the 3,350 PassMark single-thread score ensuring snappy application response. Small business workstations handling data compression workloads will see excellent throughput from the 274,440 PassMark data compression score.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU performance sufficient for most titles, with the CPU's single-core strength preventing bottlenecks. Content creators working on 3D rendering benefit from the 16 threads and hardware ray tracing support, though the 4 GB VRAM requires scene optimization. This is a balanced system for users who prioritize CPU performance while still wanting discrete graphics capability in a power-efficient laptop form factor.