SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

28,350 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop-class processor/graphics pairing that sits at the 83rd combined percentile. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part with a 2.70 GHz base clock, a 4.75 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP; the GPU is an Arc 5 Mobile part with 8 GB GDDR6 and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate language below is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not a measured result.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7735U belongs to AMD’s 7000 series, uses the Zen 3+ architecture codenamed Rembrandt-R, and is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die. It supplies 8 cores and 16 threads, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock of 2.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.75 GHz are paired with a 28 W TDP, which identifies it as a power-conscious mobile processor. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel interface, with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory enabled.

Benchmark results place the CPU at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28,350. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 10,085 and single-core is 1,490; Geekbench multi-core is 7,216 and single-core is 1,442; PassMark multi-thread is 20,723 and PassMark single-thread is 3,236. The PassMark suite also provides granular workload data: integer math scores 79,580, floating-point math scores 42,966, data encryption scores 15,825, data compression scores 250,457, extended instructions score 16,349, physics scores 996, random string sorting scores 26,365, and prime-number search scores 57.

For real workloads, these numbers describe a CPU that can handle sustained multi-threaded work at a modest power envelope while still offering responsive single-thread performance. The nearest-rival comparison reinforces that reading. The 7735U is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon 6337P and the Intel Core i9-11950H, sitting 0.1% ahead of both, while it is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. In other words, the 7735U’s average score is statistically inseparable from a small cluster of mobile and server-class rivals.

FAQ

Q: What kind of processor is the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U?

A: It is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile CPU based on Zen 3+ with a 2.70 GHz base clock, 4.75 GHz boost clock, 28 W TDP, 16 MB of shared L3 cache, DDR5 dual-channel memory support, and a Radeon 680M integrated GPU. It sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 28,350. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6337P and the Intel Core i9-11950H, 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

Q: What GPU is paired with this CPU?

A: The build uses the Intel Arc A550M, a DG2-512 part with 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray-tracing cores.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49,737. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is not unlocked, so the locked multiplier prevents direct overclocking.

Q: What memory and expansion interfaces does the platform provide?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. It also provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS available for this exact combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame data is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and no pairRankByFps is listed. Any game performance estimate must therefore be treated as an estimate, not as measured data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data set contains no FPS scaling measurements, so bottleneck conclusions must be read as inferences from benchmark positions rather than from frame-rate deltas. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with the combined platform at the 83rd percentile. That arrangement indicates the GPU is the relatively stronger half of the pairing.

In workloads that are primarily GPU-bound, the Arc A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate, and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will set the performance ceiling. In CPU-bound work, the 7735U’s 8 cores, 16 threads, and 28 W TDP are the binding resources; PassMark integer math of 79,580 and encryption throughput of 15,825 show a capable CPU, but its lower percentile standing relative to the GPU suggests that, in balanced CPU-plus-GPU tasks, the CPU is the more likely limiting partner.

Frame-rate scaling, which would normally show how the balance shifts across different loads, is not present in the FACT PACK. Without it, the percentile gap is the only scaling evidence: 6 percentage points between the CPU’s 80th position and the GPU’s 86th position. The CPU also contains a Radeon 680M integrated GPU, providing a fallback graphics path, but the Arc A550M with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 is clearly the primary rendering device.

Who Should Build It

This platform suits buyers who need an 80th-percentile CPU and an 86th-percentile GPU in the same laptop chassis. For content creators, the combination of a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,085 and a GPU with 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 covers both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated workflows. For developers, the PassMark integer math score of 79,580 and random string sorting score of 26,365 indicate strong parallel build and data-processing capability, while the data compression score of 250,457 helps with asset and archive workloads.

Students and office users can rely on the single-thread performance: Cinebench R23 single-core 1,490, Geekbench single-core 1,442, and PassMark single-thread 3,236. The 28 W TDP also makes the platform appropriate for battery-conscious mobile work. Small business workstations benefit from ECC memory support and the CPU’s active production status, although the GPU is listed as end-of-life, so long-term replacement planning should be considered. Specific gaming resolutions cannot be assigned from this data because no measured FPS rows exist for the exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The Arc A550M posts Geekbench OpenCL 49,894 and Geekbench Vulkan 49,580, with an 86th GPU percentile. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3,236 and 80th CPU percentile keep it from appearing as an obvious weak link. No measured FPS exists for this pairing, so this is an estimate, but the compute scores indicate enough headroom for high-refresh play with quality settings.

Streaming. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, PassMark multi-thread score of 20,723, and encryption score of 15,825 give it room to run streaming and encoding background work alongside a game. No measured FPS data accompanies this scenario, so the assessment is qualitative.

Video editing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,085 and PassMark floating-point math score of 42,966 describe a processor capable of handling timeline edits and exports. The GPU adds 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 for effects and accelerated preview workloads.

3D rendering. CPU rendering tasks can use the R23 multi-core score of 10,085 and PassMark multi-thread score of 20,723. GPU rendering tasks can use the Arc A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16, giving the platform flexibility across both rendering paths.

Software development. Compilation and build tasks benefit from the integer math score of 79,580 and random string sorting score of 26,365. Data compression of 250,457 supports source and asset pipelines, and the 16 threads allow parallel compilation headroom.

Student and office work. Single-thread results of 1,490 in Cinebench R23 and 3,236 in PassMark, combined with a 28 W TDP, make the platform responsive and efficient for document, browser, and communication workloads.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, dataIsMeasured is false, and no pairRankByFps is provided. Therefore, this section cannot report frames per second for specific games or resolutions.

The estimated frame-rate posture comes from the benchmark scores. The GPU sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL 49,894 and Geekbench Vulkan 49,580. It has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile with 16 threads and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,236. Based on that data, the platform should be capable of smooth high-refresh gaming in many titles at settings that respect the 8 GB memory capacity. Exact fps figures are estimates and should not be treated as measured results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7 and is an active production part. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel interface, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not a supported upgrade path.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life, so future GPU replacement would depend on platform support and availability. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data; the only power figures are the CPU’s 28 W TDP and the GPU’s 60 W TDP, so PSU headroom cannot be quantified beyond those values. A sensible next step within the existing platform is ensuring both DDR5 channels are populated in order to reach the listed 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, since the memory controller is dual-channel.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U with the Intel Arc A550M. The platform sits at the 83rd combined percentile, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile. The CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. The overall tier is that of a balanced mobile platform with a slightly stronger GPU side, supported by DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28,350, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49,737, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined platform percentile is 83.

The CPU’s nearest rivals form a tight cluster: the Intel Xeon 6337P averages 28,333 and trails by 0.1%, the Intel Core i9-11950H averages 28,332 and trails by 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U averages 28,379 and leads by 0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS averages 28,478 and leads by 0.4%. The 7735U is therefore within roughly half a percent of all four rivals.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a wider spread. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti averages 49,957 and leads by 0.4%; the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 averages 50,001 and leads by 0.5%; the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT averages 50,951 and leads by 2.4%; and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48,477 and trails by 2.6%. Combined, the two components produce an 83rd-percentile laptop platform whose graphics half is the stronger contributor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture in the Alchemist generation, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, for a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The base clock is 900 MHz, the boost clock is 2,050 MHz, and the memory clock is 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray-tracing cores. Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. No tensor core count is listed in the data, so AI-oriented tensor performance is not quantified.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and display outputs are listed as portable-device dependent. In rendering workloads, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 indicate strong compute performance across different graphics APIs, matching the GPU’s 86th overall percentile. The nearest-rival results reinforce the position: the A550M is less than 2.5% away from the Radeon RX 6900 XT and ahead of the Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%, a strong standing for a mobile Arc 5 part.