SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

28,350 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + Intel Arc A350M: A Mobile Powerhouse or a Compromise?

This laptop-class pairing combines an 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 7735U processor with a dedicated Intel Arc A350M GPU, targeting the thin-and-light gaming segment. The CPU, built on TSMC's 6 nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded performance that places it in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M GPU, also on 6 nm, secures a 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Together, this system achieves a combined 75th percentile score, indicating a balanced configuration where neither component drastically outclasses the other. The data shows a pairing designed for mainstream productivity and 1080p gaming, though the absence of measured FPS results means all gaming expectations must be derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, which allows it to handle both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained multi-threaded workloads. The chip is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm², and it carries a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that prioritize efficiency. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache, providing sufficient data locality for most applications.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that is competitive with much larger desktop parts. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10085 in multi-core and 1490 in single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it achieves 1698 multi-core and 234 single-core. Geekbench results show 7216 multi-core and 1442 single-core. The PassMark suite provides a broader view: multi-thread score of 20723, single-thread score of 3236, floating-point math at 42966, integer math at 79580, and extended instructions at 16349. Data compression scores 250457, while data encryption reaches 15825. The find prime numbers test yields a notably low 57, which may reflect the test's sensitivity to the chip's architecture. The average benchmark score across all tests is 28350, placing the CPU at the 80th percentile of all CPUs.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 7735U sits in a tight cluster. It is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6337P and Intel Core i9-11950H, both showing a deltaPct of 0.1 percent. It also matches the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U with a -0.1 percent difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is 0.4 percent faster. These small deltas indicate that the 7735U performs within a narrow band of high-end laptop and entry-level server chips, making it a very capable workhorse for its power envelope. For real-world workloads, the data suggests that video editing, software compilation, and 3D rendering tasks will execute smoothly, while the single-core score of 1490 in Cinebench R23 indicates competent responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded games.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U uses the AMD Socket FP7, a BGA-style package that is soldered onto the motherboard, meaning it is not user-upgradable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile chip and could appeal to users running error-sensitive workloads. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connections. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback display output, though this pairing relies primarily on the dedicated Arc A350M.

The GPU's TDP is 25 W, while the CPU runs at 28 W TDP, totaling 53 W. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data, and since this is a laptop build class, the power delivery is handled by the system's internal power adapter and battery. Given the absence of a suggested PSU, the headroom analysis is qualitative: the combined 53 W TDP is modest, indicating that an adequately sized laptop power brick will suffice without thermal throttling concerns. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides ample bandwidth for its 4 GB GDDR6 memory.

Because the CPU is soldered and the GPU is an integrated mobile part, a sensible next upgrade for a user seeking more performance would be a completely new laptop platform. The data does not indicate any socket or interface compatibility with other components. However, the presence of DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 suggests that the platform is modern, and users upgrading from older DDR4 laptops will notice a significant bandwidth improvement. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that may benefit users running long-duration compute tasks where data integrity is paramount.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U and Intel Arc A350M is 75, indicating it outperforms 75 percent of all laptop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7735U compare to the Intel Core i9-11950H?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735U has an average benchmark score of 28350, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Intel Core i9-11950H's 28332, making them effectively equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 7 7735U platform?

A: The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is shared between the CPU and the integrated Radeon 680M graphics.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A350M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M features 6 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan score is 24747.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop configuration?

A: This is a laptop configuration, as indicated by the build class field. The CPU is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is a mobile part with a 25 W TDP.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U was released on 2023-01-03, while the Intel Arc A350M was released on 2022-03-29. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is still active in production.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who need a balance of CPU throughput and GPU acceleration in a portable form factor. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and strong multi-core scores (10085 in Cinebench R23, 20723 in PassMark multi-thread) make it ideal for data analysts running complex simulations, software developers compiling large codebases, and content creators who edit 4K video or render 3D scenes. The GPU's 70th percentile and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 indicate it can handle hardware-accelerated graphics workloads, such as CAD visualization or basic GPU-accelerated machine learning inference.

For gamers, this configuration targets 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, given the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's single-core score of 1490 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound titles will be stable. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the DDR5 memory bandwidth for compiling and running virtual machines, while small business workstations handling spreadsheet-heavy workloads will find the PassMark integer math score of 79580 more than sufficient. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for scientific computing users who require data integrity over extended compute runs.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in esports titles, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in modern AAA games at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 20723, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU's 6 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated encoding features, though the 25 W TDP may limit sustained encoding performance under heavy load.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10085 and Geekbench multi-core of 7216 indicate that the CPU can handle timeline scrubbing and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate accelerates effects and transitions in editing software.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 42966 and the GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance suggest that both components can contribute to rendering tasks. The CPU will handle geometry processing, while the GPU accelerates ray tracing in supported renderers.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 250457 and integer math score of 79580 show strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in iterative build processes.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3236 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches, while the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multitasking across numerous browser tabs and office documents. The integrated Radeon 680M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled to save battery.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation of Arc 3 mobile GPUs. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The shading units number 768, with 48 texture mapping units and 24 raster operation units, and 6 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 6.758 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, with an average of 24647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is 0.4 percent faster, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 0.5 percent faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, which is 0.8 percent slower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is 1.5 percent slower. These comparisons indicate that the Arc A350M performs at the level of a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago, making it suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings. For rendering, the 6 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern rendering APIs. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system's combined percentile of 75 sits between the CPU's 80th and GPU's 70th percentiles, indicating a slight GPU bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 28350 is significantly higher than the GPU's 24647, suggesting that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. In CPU-bound tasks such as physics simulations (PassMark physics score of 996) or data encryption (15825), the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will sit idle. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the Arc A350M's 70th percentile will limit performance, with the CPU having spare capacity.

The deltaPct between the CPU and its rivals is minimal (0.1 to -0.4 percent), while the GPU's rivals show a wider spread (1.5 percent to -0.5 percent), indicating that the GPU has more variability in performance. This suggests that in games optimized for Intel GPUs, the Arc A350M may perform closer to its 70th percentile, while in less optimized titles, it could drop below. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact bottleneck, but the percentile gap of 10 points (80 vs 70) implies that upgrading the GPU would yield a larger performance gain than upgrading the CPU in gaming scenarios. For productivity workloads that are multi-threaded, the CPU's 16 threads provide a clear advantage, and the GPU's role is secondary.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete mobile GPU. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3+, is designed for efficient multi-threaded performance in a 28 W TDP envelope. The GPU, with 768 shading units and 6 RT cores, is an entry-level discrete part targeting 1080p gaming and light creative work. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper quartile of laptop configurations, meaning it will outperform a majority of mainstream laptops while remaining below enthusiast-tier gaming rigs.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking indicates it is a high-performing mobile processor, while the GPU's 70th percentile shows it is slightly above average. This pairing is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video editing, software development, and 3D modeling, but who also want the benefit of a discrete GPU for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated applications. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus of the GPU are its main limitations, but the overall system is a balanced mid-range laptop configuration.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735U achieves an average benchmark score of 28350, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core of 10085 and single-core of 1490, Geekbench multi-core of 7216 and single-core of 1442, and PassMark multi-thread of 20723 with single-thread of 3236. The Intel Arc A350M achieves an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan score is 24747.

Combined, these scores produce a system percentile of 75, indicating that this configuration outperforms three-quarters of all laptop builds in the database. The CPU's scores are comparable to the Intel Core i9-11950H (28332, 0.1 percent slower) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (28379, 0.1 percent faster). The GPU's scores are comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4 percent faster) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5 percent faster). This combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component, and the GPU is adequate for mainstream gaming and creative tasks.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking, its 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance, and its 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest that this system is capable of running most modern games at 1080p resolution with medium to high settings. The 4 GB VRAM will be a limiting factor for games that require more than 4 GB of texture memory, potentially requiring lower texture quality settings.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the CPU's single-core score of 1490 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1080p. For AAA titles, the GPU's 6 RT cores enable ray tracing effects, but the modest FP32 throughput means that ray tracing will likely require reduced resolutions or upscaling techniques to maintain playable frame rates. The absence of measured FPS data means these expectations are qualitative, based on the synthetic benchmark scores and the system's percentile rankings. Users should treat these estimates with caution and consult real-world reviews for specific game performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds