SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A570M

This mobile pairing combines an 8-core/16-thread AMD processor built on TSMC's 6 nm process with Intel's Arc A570M discrete GPU, also fabricated on 6 nm. The CPU holds the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, placing this combination in the 83rd percentile overall for laptop builds. The data indicates a system capable of strong 1080p gaming and productive multi-threaded workloads, though no measured FPS figures exist for this exact pairing, so all frame rate expectations are derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific socket that does not support user-level CPU upgrades. This is a soldered or BGA-style platform, meaning the processor is permanently attached to the motherboard. Consequently, the upgrade path for the CPU is essentially closed; users cannot swap in a newer or higher-tier Ryzen processor without replacing the entire laptop or motherboard assembly. The platform's memory support is DDR5 only, running dual-channel with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. With ECC memory support listed as true, this platform offers error-correcting capability, which is unusual for mobile consumer systems and could appeal to users running long-duration compute tasks where data integrity matters.

The GPU is equally non-upgradeable in a laptop context. The Intel Arc A570M is an IGP-class component, meaning it is integrated into the system board rather than being a replaceable MXM module. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for its 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool, but again, this is fixed at the factory. The CPU contributes 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which would be allocated to the GPU, storage, and other peripherals. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be expanding storage with a Gen 4 NVMe SSD, since the CPU supports 20 PCIe lanes and DDR5 memory is already in place. Memory capacity could be increased if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots, though many thin-and-light designs solder the RAM. The CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP suggest a combined thermal envelope near 110 W, which typical laptop power adapters in the 130-180 W range handle without issue, but no PSU suggestion is provided in the data pack.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile position suggest this pairing can drive high-refresh 1080p panels in many titles. The Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is substantial for a mobile part, and the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer at 224 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern game assets at 1080p. However, the lack of measured FPS data means users should expect estimates rather than guarantees; the GPU scores within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic benchmarks, which is a desktop-class card, so 1080p high-refresh is plausible for esports titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads, evidenced by a 3DMark max-thread score of 6872 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106, provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The PassMark multithread score of 23166 reinforces that this processor can handle encoding workloads without choking the game thread. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which include modern encode and decode features, though the data pack does not specify dedicated encoder hardware.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 13106 and Geekbench multi-core of 8114 indicate strong rendering capability for 1080p and 1440p video timelines. The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) accelerates effects and color grading in applications that leverage half-precision compute. The 16 GB shared L3 cache (16 MB total) on the CPU helps with timeline scrubbing and preview generation, while the 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is adequate for 4K previews in most editors.

3D rendering: The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units make it a capable entry-level renderer for DXR and Vulkan ray tracing workloads. The FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS places it in a range where Blender or similar CPU-based renders would benefit more from the CPU's 16 threads than from GPU acceleration in many scenes. The CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 47865 indicates solid compute throughput for physics simulation and particle systems.

Software development: The 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark data compression score of 293278, make this platform well-suited for compilation, testing, and virtualization. The single-thread PassMark score of 3296 and Geekbench single-core of 1699 show acceptable responsiveness for IDE interactions, though not top-tier. The DDR5 memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s helps with large codebase indexing and container startup times.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 912 and PassMark single-thread score of 3296 are modest but adequate for document editing, spreadsheet computation, and web browsing. The Radeon 680M integrated graphics in the CPU provide a fallback display output, and the Arc A570M's 8 GB VRAM ensures smooth multi-monitor setups. The 35 W CPU TDP contributes to longer battery life in light workloads, making this a reasonable all-day productivity laptop.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 4.75 GHz, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². The cache hierarchy comprises 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, which is a modest amount by modern desktop standards but typical for mobile APUs. The 35 W TDP classifies this as a high-performance mobile processor designed for thin-and-light gaming and creator laptops.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25147. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 (0.6% lower). This places the 7735HS in a performance band where the differences are negligible — within 0.6% of four very different processors, including a server EPYC part and a desktop Ryzen 5. The implication is that this mobile chip delivers desktop-equivalent multi-threading in a 35 W envelope, which is a significant efficiency achievement.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106 is strong for a 35 W part, and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6870 nearly matches the max-thread score of 6872, indicating that the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads and does not exhibit diminishing returns beyond that point. The PassMark multithread score of 23166 corroborates this. Single-thread performance is comparatively weaker: the 3DMark single-thread score of 912 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1546 are below many desktop parts, which is expected given the 35 W thermal limit. The PassMark single-thread score of 3296 is adequate for daily tasks but not exceptional.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group, holding the 88th percentile versus the CPU's 77th percentile. This imbalance suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios — such as high-detail gaming at 1440p — the Arc A570M will be the limiting factor, while in CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics simulation or heavy multitasking — the Ryzen 7 will cap performance. The combined percentile of 83 sits between the two individual scores, indicating that the pairing is well-matched overall, with neither component dramatically overshadowing the other.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 2048 shading units should maintain a healthy balance at 1080p. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 5697 suggests it can feed the GPU in modern titles that use 6-8 cores, while the GPU's 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate can handle geometry and rasterization at high settings. However, at 1440p or with ray tracing enabled, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 RT cores will become the bottleneck, as the CPU has headroom to spare. In productivity, the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 18237 and extended instructions score of 20050 indicate that encryption and SIMD-heavy workloads are CPU-limited, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 shows it can accelerate compute tasks significantly.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's nearest rivals include the RX 6950 XT (0.3% higher), RX 5600 OEM (0.3% lower), NVIDIA P102-100 (0.5% higher), and Radeon PRO V710 (0.7% higher), which suggests the Arc A570M performs in a range that can comfortably handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles, but may struggle with 4K or path-traced workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, meaning the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Consequently, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates extrapolated from the synthetic benchmark scores, not observed results. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL benchmarks suggest that this system will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles, with 1440p requiring some settings reductions for demanding games.

At 1080p, the combination of the CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 6870 and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 should push frame rates above 60 FPS in competitive shooters and esports titles, potentially reaching 100+ FPS in well-optimized games. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory at 224 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p texture sets, and the 64 ROPs can handle 1080p pixel fill rates without bottlenecking. At 1440p, the GPU's 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate will be stretched, and users should expect 40-60 FPS in AAA titles on high settings, with ray tracing likely halving performance due to the modest 16 RT cores. The CPU's single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark is a potential limiter for very high frame rate scenarios (240 Hz panels), where game logic and draw call submission can bottleneck below the GPU's capability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who need a balanced system for 1080p gaming and productivity without sacrificing portability. The laptop-class build with a 35 W CPU and 75 W GPU suits gamers who prioritize 1080p resolution and are willing to accept medium-high settings in the most demanding titles. The 77th percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU mean that users upgrading from a 6-core/12-thread laptop with integrated graphics will see dramatic improvements in both gaming and rendering tasks.

Content creators who work with 1080p video timelines or 3D scenes that fit within 8 GB VRAM will find this system capable; the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106 and the GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerate exports and previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 threads and the PassMark data compression score of 293278, which indicates fast build times. Students and office workers get a system that exceeds their needs, with the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3296 handling spreadsheets and documents effortlessly, while the GPU ensures smooth external display support. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or moderate CAD workloads will appreciate the 16 threads and ECC memory support, which is rare in this class.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS achieves an average benchmark score of 25147, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival comparisons show a tightly packed field: the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005 (0.6% lower). This clustering indicates that the 7735HS delivers performance indistinguishable from a server EPYC or a desktop Ryzen 5 in aggregate, which is remarkable for a 35 W mobile part. The CPU's strongest results are in PassMark multithread (23166) and integer math (85309), while its weakest are in PassMark find prime numbers (59) and 3DMark single-thread (912), the latter reflecting the thermal constraints of a mobile chassis.

The Intel Arc A570M achieves an average benchmark score of 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, 0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 0.7% higher). This places the Arc A570M in an elite band of GPUs that includes high-end desktop cards, which is exceptional for a mobile IGP-class component. The combined percentile of 83 for this pairing reflects a system where the GPU is the stronger performer, but the CPU does not drag it down significantly.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a 7000-series mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on Zen 3+ architecture, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip based on Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 83 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, outperforming roughly 83% of all benchmarked builds. The pairing is balanced: the CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile create a system where neither component is a glaring weakness, though the GPU has more headroom relative to its peers.

The platform's 6 nm process technology for both CPU and GPU contributes to an efficient thermal profile, with the CPU at 35 W TDP and the GPU at 75 W TDP. This makes the system suitable for medium-sized laptops with adequate cooling, not ultra-thin designs. The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 2048 shading units provide a cohesive compute package that handles gaming, rendering, and productivity tasks without a dominant bottleneck. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM is future-proof for 1080p gaming over the next few years, though 1440p high-refresh gaming will require settings tuning.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H?

A: The data shows they are effectively tied. The Ryzen 7 7735HS has an average benchmark score of 25147, while the Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25201, a difference of 0.2% in favor of the 6800H. This is within measurement noise.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A570M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DXR ray tracing. Its FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS suggests entry-level ray tracing performance, suitable for 1080p with DLSS-style upscaling.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Ryzen 7 7735HS have?

A: The processor has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core. This is a moderate cache size for a mobile processor, sufficient for gaming and productivity workloads.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13106 and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM suggest it can handle 4K timelines with proxy workflows, but native 4K multi-stream editing may strain the system. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 threads are adequate for 1080p and light 4K editing.

Q: What is the memory type for this platform?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is also listed as true, which is unusual for mobile systems.

Q: How does the Arc A570M compare to the Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the RX 6950 XT scores 58392, a difference of 0.3%. This places them in the same performance band in synthetic compute, though gaming performance may vary based on driver optimization.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable in this platform?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The processor is not user-upgradeable, as it is soldered to the motherboard. The GPU is likewise fixed, as it is an IGP-class component.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The transistor density of 42.8M per mm² is high but not exceptional for 6 nm. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth — this is adequate for 1080p gaming but will be a limiting factor at 1440p with high-resolution textures.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s are strong for a 75 W mobile part. The FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provide solid compute for both gaming and content creation. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest RT core count means performance will be lower than desktop RTX-class parts. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58239. Its nearest rivals are all significantly different in class: the RX 6950 XT (0.3% higher), RX 5600 OEM (0.3% lower), NVIDIA P102-100 (0.5% higher), and Radeon PRO V710 (0.7% lower). This indicates the Arc A570M performs at a level that competes with desktop GPUs from the previous generation, which is notable for a mobile IGP. The 75 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it is designed for laptops, not desktop replacement systems, but its performance ceiling is high enough for 1080p ultra gaming and 1440p medium-high gaming in most titles.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds